Yes, there are many situations where we face this kind of scenario situation where your approach is different and your team members approach is different. So I also faced many scenarios. In that case, what I am doing, what I do always is like we judge the solution like in software industry for one problem there can be multiple solutions. So in that context, what we can do is which solution is better and how we can judge is there are particular scenarios like if it is a DSA problem like data structure problem then we judge based on the time complexity and space complexity. So similarly in our project or in normal real life projects, if there are multiple approach then we need to check its feasibility, its maintainability, how it is resolving the issue like performance of that solution. So based on these factors, we do discussions with that team member like I do discussion with that team member. My solution is taking this much time and this is the code, this is the solution. Similarly he also comes with the approach, he also comes with the solution and based on this, we have just reviewed our solutions and codes. If his approach is better than me then it will be absolutely like okay for me to go with his solution. Similarly if my approach is good in some areas then in that case he should also accept that we should go with this solution or else what we can do is we can do a third review like from our team leader or from client only. So in that context we can provide two POCs like proof of concept of both solutions and based on these factors like optimization or performance or how it is implemented, is it a complex code or easy code, is it a complex to maintain or to scale. So on these factors the person can judge that which solution we should go for.
