16. Product management:
Score: 4
Qualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement
Description: Varun mentioned his background in product management but failed to effectively link his experience with the specific needs of the role at Adzip Technologies, particularly in the life sciences domain. He should focus on detailing relevant experiences that directly relate to the job description.

17. Business analysis:
Score: 5
Qualitative Assessment: Average
Description: Varun discussed aspects of business analysis; however, his explanations lacked depth and did not fully convey his expertise in the field. Enhancing his descriptions with specific examples and outcomes from his past roles would provide a clearer picture of his capabilities.

18. Market research:
Score: 4
Qualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement
Description: While Varun mentioned market research, he did not provide detailed insights into his methods or how his research has impacted previous projects. Expanding on how he conducts market research and uses this information to drive product decisions would improve his response.

19. Agile methodologies:
Score: 5
Qualitative Assessment: Average
Description: Varun claimed experience with Agile methodologies but did not effectively describe how he has implemented these practices in a way that aligns with the strategic goals of his projects. Providing more detailed examples of his Agile practices could clarify his proficiency.

20. User experience design principles:
Score: 4
Qualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement
Description: Varun's understanding of user experience design principles was not evident in his responses. He could improve by discussing specific UX strategies he has employed and how these have enhanced product usability and customer satisfaction.