okay so let me share a situation where I applied knowledge of software development lifecycle to ensure the success of our projects in the automotive industry so I was working on a project involving the developments and the customizations of of Android based in bike and infotainment system. This project required the integrated Android footing on the system on chip platform using the Ubuntu YAR2 with the Hyper-V system. This Hyper-V system needed to support multiple display, USB configurations and other automotive specific functionality ensuring the timely and successful delivery of this project was critical as it was for the major automotive clients with the stringent quality and the performance requirement. So the action was taken. So the first requirement in analysis so client meeting health or details meeting with the client to gather understand their requirements include the multi-display supports custom HMI and integration with the existing automotive system. Documentation created the comprehensive requirement documentation that outlined the functionality and the non-functional requirements along with the clear acceptance criteria. Then we did planning. So in planning we used the SDLC model selection to design development model to allow the flexibility in the iterative progress which was crucial in the evolving nature of the requirements task. Then the task breakdown broke down the project into smaller manageable tasks and get a detailed pipeline milestone deadlines and resource allocations. Then there was a design system architecture design the system architecture ensuring the hypervisor setup and the multi-display capability were aligned with the deadlines. Then the technical specifications prepared the technical specifications for the hardware abstraction layer modifications, hypervisor configuration and custom patches needed for the platform. Then we came up with the implementations, coding integration, work on the coding integration and the changes focusing on the fixed input application, customizing the ASP setting up the hypervisor for display USB and the debug configurations. Then collaborations closely with the cross-function team and doing hardware engineering which are the seamless integration of software data components and different teams are working on different modules. Then testing, unit testing and the unit test for individual components to ensure they meet the defined requirements and perform as expected. System testing performance system wide testing includes stress test to verify the overall performance, stability and reliability of the IPE system. Then work on the issue resolutions, debugging and resolve the issue related to HMI timestamp inaccuracy in the audit track. Then you just need to work on resolving issues related to HMI or if there are any on-the-layers. Deployment pilot, deployment deploy all the IPE system in the control environment for initial testing and feedback. Failed development, rolled out the final solution to combine the automated platform ensuring that all the deployment procedures are followed meticulously to avoid any disruptions. Then maintenance for post-deployment supports provide the ongoing support to address any issues that arose after deployment. Ensuring that the system continues to function optimally. Update and enhancement, work on the periodic updates and enhancements based on the user feedback involve requirements, maintenance system, reliableness and performance.
