Varun's response effectively describes a situation involving conflicting requirements and outlines his approach to managing these conflicts. He mentions the importance of stakeholder meetings and the need for a decision-maker when consensus cannot be reached, which is a positive aspect. However, the response could benefit from more clarity and structure, as it feels somewhat disjointed. The benchmark response is well-organized and clearly articulates the steps taken to navigate the conflict, emphasizing collaboration and the importance of stakeholder engagement. To improve, Varun should aim for a more concise and structured response that highlights the outcomes of his approach and the value it brought to the project. For example, he could say, "In a project for a brand operating across multiple geographies, I managed conflicting requirements by organizing stakeholder meetings to discuss the pros and cons of their needs. This collaborative approach allowed us to find solutions that minimized costs and maximized value for the client."