-- https://www.phpmyadmin.net/
--

START TRANSACTION;



--
-- Database: `admin_intrvuz_dev`
--

-- --------------------------------------------------------

--
-- Table structure for table `admin_companies`
--

CREATE TABLE `admin_companies` (
  `id` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `adminId` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `companyName` varchar(150) NOT NULL,
  `isAdminCompany` tinyint(4) NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
  `createdBy` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `updatedBy` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `created` datetime NOT NULL DEFAULT current_timestamp(),
  `modified` datetime NOT NULL DEFAULT current_timestamp() ON UPDATE current_timestamp()
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4 COLLATE=utf8mb4_general_ci;

--
-- Dumping data for table `admin_companies`
--

INSERT INTO `admin_companies` (`id`, `adminId`, `companyName`, `isAdminCompany`, `createdBy`, `updatedBy`, `created`, `modified`) VALUES
(1, 1, 'Adzip Technologies', 1, 1, 0, '2023-08-14 03:53:24', '2023-08-14 03:53:24'),
(3, 2, 'Adzip', 1, 2, 0, '2023-08-14 08:14:58', '2023-08-14 08:14:58'),
(7, 3, 'Vision Beyond', 1, 3, 0, '2023-08-15 08:11:07', '2023-08-15 08:11:07'),
(10, 4, 'VBeyond Corporation', 1, 4, 0, '2023-08-16 05:41:05', '2023-08-16 05:41:05'),
(13, 5, 'Artech Infosystems', 1, 5, 0, '2023-08-22 07:25:35', '2023-08-22 07:25:35'),
(14, 12, 'HCL Technologies', 1, 12, 0, '2023-08-23 02:05:32', '2023-08-23 02:05:32'),
(19, 13, 'First Call HR', 1, 13, 0, '2023-08-23 06:58:09', '2023-08-23 06:58:09'),
(21, 14, 'Fialetechnology', 1, 14, 0, '2023-08-24 12:10:10', '2023-08-24 12:10:10'),
(23, 15, 'Adzip', 1, 15, 0, '2023-09-26 03:31:18', '2023-09-26 03:31:18'),
(24, 1, 'Genpact', 0, 0, 0, '2023-10-25 23:46:53', '2023-10-25 23:46:53'),
(25, 1, 'Oracle', 0, 0, 0, '2023-10-27 04:54:37', '2023-10-27 04:54:37'),
(26, 1, 'Accenture', 0, 0, 0, '2023-11-08 02:16:07', '2023-11-08 02:16:07'),
(27, 1, 'GoKloud', 0, 0, 0, '2023-11-08 06:28:00', '2023-11-08 06:28:00'),
(28, 1, 'Yes it labs', 0, 0, 0, '2023-11-09 07:16:06', '2023-11-09 07:16:06'),
(29, 1, 'test', 0, 0, 0, '2023-11-09 11:21:38', '2023-11-09 11:21:38'),
(30, 16, 'GoKloud', 1, 16, 0, '2023-11-09 11:41:14', '2023-11-09 11:41:14'),
(31, 1, 'Google', 0, 0, 0, '2023-11-23 05:50:42', '2023-11-23 05:50:42'),
(32, 17, 'ECS India', 1, 17, 0, '2023-11-23 06:54:40', '2023-11-23 06:54:40'),
(33, 17, 'PHARMACOVIGILANCE', 0, 0, 0, '2023-11-23 16:30:20', '2023-11-23 16:30:20'),
(34, 18, 'Gradient M', 1, 18, 0, '2023-11-24 03:49:46', '2023-11-24 03:49:46'),
(35, 19, 'Gradient M', 1, 19, 0, '2023-11-24 04:05:10', '2023-11-24 04:05:10'),
(36, 20, 'VBeyond Corporation', 1, 20, 0, '2023-11-24 23:59:52', '2023-11-24 23:59:52'),
(37, 21, 'Co-Workers Technologies', 1, 21, 0, '2023-11-25 01:10:23', '2023-11-25 01:10:23'),
(38, 22, 'Gradient M', 1, 22, 0, '2023-12-12 23:04:55', '2023-12-12 23:04:55'),
(39, 33, 'test', 1, 33, 0, '2023-12-13 06:14:18', '2023-12-13 06:14:18'),
(40, 34, 'Milesweb', 1, 34, 0, '2023-12-13 07:02:43', '2023-12-13 07:02:43'),
(41, 18, 'GradientM', 0, 0, 0, '2023-12-14 04:12:23', '2023-12-14 04:12:23'),
(42, 18, 'Merkle', 0, 0, 0, '2024-01-17 10:25:17', '2024-01-17 10:25:17'),
(43, 35, 'Meraqui', 1, 35, 0, '2024-02-09 05:39:32', '2024-02-09 05:39:32'),
(44, 36, 'First Mile', 1, 36, 0, '2024-02-09 06:23:18', '2024-02-09 06:23:18'),
(45, 1, 'Wipro', 0, 0, 0, '2024-02-09 06:37:57', '2024-02-09 06:37:57'),
(46, 37, 'IBS Gurgaon', 1, 37, 0, '2024-02-16 15:11:49', '2024-02-16 15:11:49'),
(47, 38, 'IBS Gurgaon', 1, 38, 0, '2024-02-17 04:33:26', '2024-02-17 04:33:26'),
(48, 39, 'boho baubles', 1, 39, 0, '2024-02-18 10:04:02', '2024-02-18 10:04:02'),
(49, 40, 'IBS Gurgaon', 1, 40, 0, '2024-02-19 12:58:06', '2024-02-19 12:58:06'),
(50, 40, 'Apple', 0, 0, 0, '2024-02-19 13:09:27', '2024-02-19 13:09:27'),
(51, 41, 'UpGrad', 1, 41, 0, '2024-02-22 06:49:18', '2024-02-22 06:49:18'),
(52, 42, 'Shevalues', 1, 42, 0, '2024-02-28 12:27:33', '2024-02-28 12:27:33'),
(53, 43, 'Vega', 1, 43, 0, '2024-03-05 08:58:52', '2024-03-05 08:58:52'),
(54, 44, 'Inmentus Solution', 1, 44, 0, '2024-03-09 06:36:22', '2024-03-09 06:36:22'),
(55, 45, 'Logic Overdrive', 1, 45, 0, '2024-03-18 11:38:57', '2024-03-18 11:38:57'),
(56, 45, 'Logic Overdrive INC', 0, 0, 0, '2024-03-18 13:34:41', '2024-03-18 13:34:41'),
(57, 46, 'ABCDE', 1, 46, 0, '2024-03-19 10:13:42', '2024-03-19 10:13:42'),
(58, 47, 'xyz', 1, 47, 0, '2024-03-20 06:26:25', '2024-03-20 06:26:25'),
(59, 48, 'ABCDE', 1, 48, 0, '2024-03-22 08:35:08', '2024-03-22 08:35:08'),
(60, 49, 'Sunlife', 1, 49, 0, '2024-03-28 02:50:44', '2024-03-28 02:50:44'),
(61, 50, 'Sunlife', 1, 50, 0, '2024-03-28 03:02:14', '2024-03-28 03:02:14'),
(62, 51, 'Noah Healthcare', 1, 51, 0, '2024-03-28 11:53:25', '2024-03-28 11:53:25'),
(63, 52, 'Hyperleap AI', 1, 52, 0, '2024-04-01 11:00:04', '2024-04-01 11:00:04'),
(64, 53, 'Intrvuz', 1, 53, 0, '2024-04-01 15:30:48', '2024-04-01 15:30:48'),
(65, 54, 'Intellinez', 1, 54, 0, '2024-04-03 05:07:15', '2024-04-03 05:07:15'),
(66, 57, 'Cosmospumps', 1, 57, 0, '2024-04-09 10:54:20', '2024-04-09 10:54:20'),
(67, 60, 'Hire Pedia', 1, 60, 0, '2024-04-10 05:24:49', '2024-04-10 05:24:49'),
(68, 62, 'Private', 1, 62, 0, '2024-04-20 04:35:45', '2024-04-20 04:35:45'),
(69, 63, 'Element Technologies', 1, 63, 0, '2024-04-23 06:59:37', '2024-04-23 06:59:37'),
(70, 67, 'Kynthr', 1, 67, 0, '2024-05-06 15:53:01', '2024-05-06 15:53:01'),
(71, 68, 'testing', 1, 68, 0, '2024-05-15 13:38:06', '2024-05-15 13:38:06'),
(72, 69, 'Kingson Tech', 1, 69, 0, '2024-05-23 12:32:32', '2024-05-23 12:32:32'),
(73, 70, 'shree mahadev photoshop', 1, 70, 0, '2024-05-24 20:22:11', '2024-05-24 20:22:11'),
(74, 71, 'TechDilation', 1, 71, 0, '2024-05-25 04:59:36', '2024-05-25 04:59:36'),
(75, 73, 'Royal Enfield', 1, 73, 0, '2024-06-03 10:26:38', '2024-06-03 10:26:38'),
(76, 74, 'Adzip', 1, 74, 0, '2024-07-18 17:32:53', '2024-07-18 17:32:53'),
(77, 75, 'IIBA', 1, 75, 0, '2024-07-20 17:21:17', '2024-07-20 17:21:17'),
(78, 76, 'Adzip Technologies', 1, 76, 0, '2024-07-21 02:57:07', '2024-07-21 02:57:07'),
(79, 76, 'LTI Mindtree', 0, 0, 0, '2024-07-21 03:16:45', '2024-07-21 03:16:45'),
(80, 1, 'Lingaya\'s University', 0, 0, 0, '2024-07-22 06:53:10', '2024-07-22 06:53:10'),
(81, 1, 'Tech Mahindra', 0, 0, 0, '2024-07-29 02:52:16', '2024-07-29 02:52:16'),
(82, 1, 'Infosys', 0, 0, 0, '2024-07-29 03:00:30', '2024-07-29 03:00:30'),
(83, 1, 'HCL', 0, 0, 0, '2024-07-29 03:05:14', '2024-07-29 03:05:14'),
(84, 1, 'IIBA', 0, 0, 0, '2024-07-30 15:45:35', '2024-07-30 15:45:35'),
(85, 75, 'UST', 0, 0, 0, '2024-07-31 04:37:20', '2024-07-31 04:37:20'),
(86, 75, 'Gyanahamsaa Consulting Services', 0, 0, 0, '2024-08-06 12:00:02', '2024-08-06 12:00:02'),
(87, 1, 'Royal Enfield', 0, 0, 0, '2024-08-10 16:14:06', '2024-08-10 16:14:06'),
(88, 1, 'MindSprint', 0, 0, 0, '2024-12-12 08:27:20', '2024-12-12 08:27:20');

-- --------------------------------------------------------

--
-- Table structure for table `basta_psycho`
--

CREATE TABLE `basta_psycho` (
  `id` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `name` varchar(100) NOT NULL,
  `screeningId` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `resumeId` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `candidateId` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `isCompleted` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT 0 COMMENT 'if ful assesments completed ',
  `isVal` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT 0 COMMENT 'if 1 means can not use other attempt',
  `languageApt` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT 0 COMMENT 'if 1 means language aptitude completed',
  `abstractApt` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT 0 COMMENT 'if 1 means abstract reasoning completed',
  `verbalApt` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT 0 COMMENT 'if 1 means verbal reasoning completed',
  `mechanicalApt` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT 0 COMMENT 'if 1 means mechanical reasoning completed',
  `numericalApt` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT 0 COMMENT 'if 1 means numerical Aptitude completed	',
  `spatialApt` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT 0 COMMENT 'if 1 means spatial completed	',
  `perceptualApt` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT 0 COMMENT 'if 1 means Perceptual Aptitude completed	',
  `created` datetime DEFAULT NULL
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4 COLLATE=utf8mb4_general_ci;

--
-- Dumping data for table `basta_psycho`
--

INSERT INTO `basta_psycho` (`id`, `name`, `screeningId`, `resumeId`, `candidateId`, `isCompleted`, `isVal`, `languageApt`, `abstractApt`, `verbalApt`, `mechanicalApt`, `numericalApt`, `spatialApt`, `perceptualApt`, `created`) VALUES
(1, 'Varun_4_967_146_2030462929', 146, 967, 4, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, NULL),
(2, 'Varun_4_969_148_795106854', 148, 969, 4, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, NULL),
(3, 'Varun_4_971_156_1150089899', 156, 971, 4, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, NULL);

-- --------------------------------------------------------

--
-- Table structure for table `bot_interview`
--

CREATE TABLE `bot_interview` (
  `id` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `screeningId` int(11) DEFAULT NULL,
  `candidateId` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `resumeId` int(11) DEFAULT NULL,
  `ref` varchar(100) DEFAULT NULL,
  `status` enum('START','IN_PROGRESS','END') DEFAULT 'START',
  `isCron` tinyint(1) DEFAULT NULL,
  `isVal` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT 1,
  `created` datetime NOT NULL,
  `modified` datetime DEFAULT NULL
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4 COLLATE=utf8mb4_general_ci;

--
-- Dumping data for table `bot_interview`
--

INSERT INTO `bot_interview` (`id`, `screeningId`, `candidateId`, `resumeId`, `ref`, `status`, `isCron`, `isVal`, `created`, `modified`) VALUES
(1, 48, 6, 227, 'SID_6_48_20240209_151919', NULL, 1, 1, '2024-02-09 15:19:28', NULL),
(2, 48, 6, 227, 'VID_6_48_20240209_151919', NULL, 1, 1, '2024-02-09 15:19:28', NULL),
(3, 48, 6, 227, 'VIDEO_6_48_20240209_151919', NULL, 1, 1, '2024-02-09 15:19:28', NULL),
(4, 48, 6, 227, 'REPORT_6_48_20240209_151919', NULL, 1, 1, '2024-02-09 15:19:28', NULL),
(6, 57, 11, 256, 'SID_11_57_20240319_121311', NULL, 1, 1, '2024-03-19 12:23:16', NULL),
(8, 59, 7, 265, 'SID_7_59_20240328_034311', NULL, 1, 1, '2024-03-28 03:46:43', NULL),
(9, 60, 4, 259, 'SID_4_60_20240328_034731', NULL, 1, 1, '2024-03-28 03:52:09', NULL),
(10, 61, 15, 266, 'SID_15_61_20240403_120344', NULL, 1, 1, '2024-04-03 12:10:58', NULL),
(11, 61, 15, 266, 'SID_15_61_20240404_075458', NULL, 1, 1, '2024-04-04 07:57:13', NULL),
(12, 61, 15, 266, 'SID_15_61_20240404_075458', NULL, 1, 1, '2024-04-04 07:58:38', NULL),
(13, 61, 15, 266, 'SID_15_61_20240404_075458', NULL, 1, 1, '2024-04-04 07:58:45', NULL),
(18, 71, 12, 304, 'SID_12_71_20240410_071510', 'IN_PROGRESS', 1, 1, '2024-04-10 07:25:55', NULL),
(19, 60, 4, 258, 'SID_4_60_20240410_102043', 'IN_PROGRESS', 1, 1, '2024-04-10 10:21:00', NULL),
(22, 71, 12, 304, 'SID_12_71_20240412_055527', 'IN_PROGRESS', 1, 1, '2024-04-12 06:01:14', NULL),
(23, 60, 4, 258, 'SID_4_60_20240412_072303', 'IN_PROGRESS', 1, 1, '2024-04-12 07:36:05', NULL),
(24, 60, 4, 258, 'SID_4_60_20240412_081316', 'IN_PROGRESS', 1, 1, '2024-04-12 08:21:35', NULL),
(25, 60, 4, 258, 'SID_4_60_20240412_081316', 'IN_PROGRESS', 1, 1, '2024-04-12 08:37:39', NULL),
(26, 71, 12, 304, 'SID_12_71_20240412_113211', 'IN_PROGRESS', 1, 1, '2024-04-12 11:34:27', NULL),
(27, 65, 26, 285, 'SID_26_65_20240414_073142', 'IN_PROGRESS', 1, 1, '2024-04-14 07:55:36', NULL),
(28, 77, 31, 339, 'SID_31_77_20240426_070709', 'IN_PROGRESS', 1, 1, '2024-04-26 07:42:16', NULL),
(29, 79, 4, 341, 'SID_4_79_20240508_040842', 'IN_PROGRESS', 1, 1, '2024-05-08 04:26:04', NULL),
(31, 81, 4, 357, 'SID_4_81_20240526_062354', 'START', 1, 1, '2024-05-26 06:32:22', NULL),
(32, 80, 4, 344, 'SID_4_80_20240526_083102', 'START', 1, 0, '2024-05-26 08:35:16', NULL),
(33, 80, 4, 342, 'SID_4_80_20240606_163951', 'START', 1, 0, '2024-06-06 16:40:33', NULL),
(34, 87, 4, 371, 'SID_4_371_87_20240717_031712', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-17 03:17:12', '2024-07-17 03:25:15'),
(35, 88, 4, 372, 'SID_4_372_88_20240717_054229', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-17 05:42:29', '2024-07-17 05:55:24'),
(36, 80, 4, 342, 'SID_4_342_80_20240717_111340', 'END', 1, 0, '2024-07-17 11:13:40', '2024-07-17 11:23:09'),
(40, 80, 4, 344, 'SID_4_344_80_20240718_041640', 'START', NULL, 0, '2024-07-18 04:16:40', NULL),
(42, 80, 4, 342, 'SID_4_342_80_20240718_073911', 'START', NULL, 0, '2024-07-18 07:39:11', NULL),
(43, 80, 4, 344, 'SID_4_344_80_20240718_113835', 'IN_PROGRESS', NULL, 0, '2024-07-18 11:38:35', '2024-07-18 11:44:43'),
(45, 91, 40, 377, 'SID_40_377_91_20240718_141115', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-18 14:11:15', '2024-07-18 14:26:45'),
(46, 91, 33, 378, 'SID_33_378_91_20240718_142632', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-18 14:26:32', '2024-07-18 15:07:13'),
(47, 90, 35, 374, 'SID_35_374_90_20240718_160642', 'END', 1, 0, '2024-07-18 16:06:42', '2024-07-18 16:37:57'),
(48, 93, 4, 398, 'SID_4_398_93_20240718_173102', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-18 17:31:02', '2024-07-18 17:42:49'),
(49, 94, 4, 401, 'SID_4_401_94_20240718_174531', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-18 17:45:31', '2024-07-18 18:05:35'),
(50, 94, 4, 405, 'SID_4_405_94_20240718_181220', 'IN_PROGRESS', NULL, 1, '2024-07-18 18:12:20', '2024-07-18 18:12:40'),
(51, 94, 4, 404, 'SID_4_404_94_20240718_181736', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-18 18:17:36', '2024-07-18 18:31:39'),
(52, 92, 33, 388, 'SID_33_388_92_20240719_035404', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-19 03:54:04', '2024-07-19 04:26:56'),
(53, 97, 35, 410, 'SID_35_410_97_20240719_045504', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-19 04:55:04', '2024-07-19 05:21:21'),
(55, 89, 34, 373, 'SID_34_373_89_20240719_053514', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-19 05:35:14', '2024-07-19 06:13:22'),
(56, 98, 4, 411, 'SID_4_411_98_20240719_054149', 'END', 1, 0, '2024-07-19 05:41:49', '2024-07-19 06:00:30'),
(57, 98, 4, 411, 'SID_4_411_98_20240719_064136', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-19 06:41:36', '2024-07-19 07:23:20'),
(58, 80, 4, 342, 'SID_4_342_80_20240719_065101', 'END', 1, 0, '2024-07-19 06:51:01', '2024-07-19 06:56:44'),
(59, 80, 4, 342, 'SID_4_342_80_20240719_070106', 'END', 1, 0, '2024-07-19 07:01:06', '2024-07-19 07:02:19'),
(61, 92, 40, 387, 'SID_40_387_92_20240719_091012', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-19 09:10:12', '2024-07-19 09:38:48'),
(63, 99, 45, 412, 'SID_45_412_99_20240719_105451', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-19 10:54:51', '2024-07-19 11:48:04'),
(65, 96, 44, 409, 'SID_44_409_96_20240719_153137', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-19 15:31:37', '2024-07-19 16:49:22'),
(66, 91, 46, 383, 'SID_46_383_91_20240719_170627', 'END', 1, 0, '2024-07-19 17:06:27', '2024-07-19 17:36:28'),
(67, 91, 42, 375, 'SID_42_375_91_20240719_235726', 'START', NULL, 0, '2024-07-19 23:57:26', NULL),
(68, 91, 42, 375, 'SID_42_375_91_20240720_013142', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-20 01:31:42', '2024-07-20 03:04:08'),
(69, 100, 35, 413, 'SID_35_413_100_20240720_061739', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-20 06:17:39', '2024-07-20 07:18:27'),
(70, 91, 38, 379, 'SID_38_379_91_20240720_100325', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-20 10:03:25', '2024-07-20 10:34:21'),
(71, 101, 38, 414, 'SID_38_414_101_20240720_105009', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-20 10:50:09', '2024-07-20 11:48:47'),
(72, 91, 37, 380, 'SID_37_380_91_20240720_171546', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-20 17:15:46', '2024-07-20 17:40:01'),
(73, 106, 4, 449, 'SID_4_449_106_20240722_071234', 'END', 1, 0, '2024-07-22 07:12:34', '2024-07-22 07:21:50'),
(74, 106, 4, 449, 'SID_4_449_106_20240722_072514', 'IN_PROGRESS', NULL, 1, '2024-07-22 07:25:14', '2024-07-22 07:25:41'),
(75, 91, 46, 383, 'SID_46_383_91_20240722_174928', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-22 17:49:28', '2024-07-22 18:22:44'),
(98, 112, 53, 561, 'SID_53_561_112_20240729_061940', 'START', NULL, 1, '2024-07-29 06:19:40', NULL),
(99, 112, 53, 561, 'SID_53_561_112_20240729_061941', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-29 06:19:41', '2024-07-29 06:26:55'),
(100, 112, 53, 561, 'SID_53_561_112_20240729_061941', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-29 06:19:41', '2024-07-29 06:26:55'),
(102, 114, 54, 566, 'SID_54_566_114_20240731_050317', 'START', NULL, 1, '2024-07-31 05:03:17', NULL),
(103, 114, 54, 566, 'SID_54_566_114_20240731_050318', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-31 05:03:18', '2024-07-31 05:11:21'),
(104, 114, 54, 566, 'SID_54_566_114_20240731_103508', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-31 10:35:08', '2024-07-31 10:35:11'),
(112, 114, 4, 565, 'SID_4_565_114_20240808_062620', 'START', NULL, 1, '2024-08-08 06:26:20', NULL),
(113, 114, 4, 565, 'SID_4_565_114_20240808_062621', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-08-08 06:26:21', '2024-08-08 06:33:40'),
(134, 118, 4, 669, 'SID_4_669_118_20240810_105911', 'END', 1, 0, '2024-08-10 10:59:11', '2024-08-10 15:46:49'),
(137, 51, 4, 228, 'SID_4_228_51_20240810_181712', 'START', NULL, 1, '2024-08-10 18:17:12', NULL),
(138, 98, 4, 411, 'SID_4_411_98_20240811_184715', 'START', NULL, 1, '2024-08-11 18:47:15', NULL),
(141, 119, 4, 670, 'SID_4_670_119_20240813_112750', 'IN_PROGRESS', NULL, 1, '2024-08-13 11:27:50', '2024-08-13 11:28:26'),
(142, 124, 4, 785, 'SID_4_785_124_20240813_171108', 'START', NULL, 0, '2024-08-13 17:11:08', NULL),
(143, 126, 4, 893, 'SID_4_893_126_20240814_125639', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-08-14 12:56:39', '2024-08-14 13:23:59'),
(144, 124, 4, 894, 'SID_4_894_124_20240818_122328', 'END', 1, 0, '2024-08-18 12:23:28', '2024-08-18 12:55:33'),
(155, 129, 4, 918, 'SID_4_918_129_20240826_140427', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-08-26 14:04:27', '2024-08-26 14:11:33'),
(159, 133, 4, 920, 'SID_4_920_133_20240827_055610', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-08-27 05:56:10', '2024-08-27 06:21:52'),
(163, 134, 4, 921, 'SID_4_921_134_20240827_113140', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-08-27 11:31:40', '2024-08-27 11:48:35'),
(165, 134, 4, 922, 'SID_4_922_134_20240828_161826', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-08-28 16:18:26', '2024-08-28 16:25:53'),
(167, 133, 4, 923, 'SID_4_923_133_20240830_065520', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-08-30 06:55:20', '2024-08-30 07:20:36'),
(168, 137, 4, 943, 'SID_4_943_137_20240902_090752', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-09-02 09:07:52', '2024-09-02 09:20:27'),
(172, 137, 4, 945, 'SID_4_945_137_20240903_065614', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-09-03 06:56:14', '2024-09-03 07:26:16'),
(173, 124, 4, 785, 'SID_4_785_124_20240903_110649', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-09-03 11:06:49', '2024-09-03 11:19:42'),
(174, 138, 4, 946, 'SID_4_946_138_20240904_033314', 'END', 1, 0, '2024-09-04 03:33:14', '2024-09-04 04:23:22'),
(177, 138, 4, 946, 'SID_4_946_138_20240904_102057', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-09-04 10:20:57', '2024-09-04 10:35:36'),
(179, 139, 4, 951, 'SID_4_951_139_20240905_090024', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-09-05 09:00:24', '2024-09-05 09:11:17'),
(180, 138, 4, 947, 'SID_4_947_138_20240905_093812', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-09-05 09:38:12', '2024-09-05 10:04:14'),
(186, 140, 4, 952, 'SID_4_952_140_20240905_142145', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-09-05 14:21:45', '2024-09-05 14:28:40'),
(187, 138, 4, 948, 'SID_4_948_138_20240906_050201', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-09-06 05:02:01', '2024-09-06 05:26:48'),
(188, 141, 4, 953, 'SID_4_953_141_20240906_054028', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-09-06 05:40:28', '2024-09-06 05:44:20'),
(189, 142, 4, 954, 'SID_4_954_142_20240906_054602', 'END', 1, 0, '2024-09-06 05:46:02', '2024-09-06 05:49:37'),
(191, 142, 4, 954, 'SID_4_954_142_20240910_045119', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-09-10 04:51:19', '2024-09-10 05:01:11'),
(192, 144, 4, 956, 'SID_4_956_144_20240910_091409', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-09-10 09:14:09', '2024-09-10 09:49:05'),
(193, 145, 4, 965, 'SID_4_965_145_20240921_105752', 'END', 1, 0, '2024-09-21 10:57:52', '2024-09-21 11:03:33'),
(194, 138, 4, 949, 'SID_4_949_138_20240921_113855', 'IN_PROGRESS', NULL, 1, '2024-09-21 11:38:55', '2024-09-21 11:39:11'),
(195, 138, 4, 950, 'SID_4_950_138_20240922_153853', 'IN_PROGRESS', NULL, 1, '2024-09-22 15:38:53', '2024-09-22 15:39:36'),
(196, 146, 4, 967, 'SID_4_967_146_20240923_055800', 'END', 1, 0, '2024-09-23 05:58:00', '2024-09-23 05:59:28'),
(197, 146, 4, 967, 'SID_4_967_146_20240923_060925', 'IN_PROGRESS', NULL, 0, '2024-09-23 06:09:25', '2024-09-23 06:11:58'),
(198, 146, 4, 967, 'SID_4_967_146_20240923_061939', 'END', 1, 0, '2024-09-23 06:19:39', '2024-09-23 06:35:00'),
(199, 124, 4, 894, 'SID_4_894_124_20241015_081910', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-10-15 08:19:10', '2024-10-15 08:59:50'),
(200, 146, 4, 967, 'SID_4_967_146_20241017_085741', 'IN_PROGRESS', NULL, 0, '2024-10-17 08:57:41', '2024-10-17 08:59:03'),
(201, 146, 4, 967, 'SID_4_967_146_20241017_090314', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-10-17 09:03:14', '2024-10-17 09:12:25'),
(206, 147, 4, 968, 'SID_4_968_147_20241107_155454', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-11-07 15:54:54', '2024-11-07 16:07:39'),
(207, 145, 4, 965, 'SID_4_965_145_20241112_103820', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-11-12 10:38:20', '2024-11-12 10:43:08'),
(208, 148, 4, 969, 'SID_4_969_148_20241112_121502', 'IN_PROGRESS', NULL, 0, '2024-11-12 12:15:02', '2024-11-12 12:16:03'),
(209, 148, 4, 969, 'SID_4_969_148_20241112_121717', 'IN_PROGRESS', NULL, 0, '2024-11-12 12:17:17', '2024-11-12 12:17:39'),
(210, 148, 4, 969, 'SID_4_969_148_20241112_121816', 'START', NULL, 1, '2024-11-12 12:18:16', NULL),
(211, 148, 4, 969, 'SID_4_969_148_20241112_121826', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-11-12 12:18:26', '2024-11-12 12:21:17'),
(213, 155, 4, 970, 'SID_4_970_155_20241129_101749', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-11-29 10:17:49', '2024-11-29 10:22:02'),
(214, 156, 4, 971, 'SID_4_971_156_20241205_091201', 'END', 1, 0, '2024-12-05 09:12:01', '2024-12-05 09:38:38'),
(215, 161, 4, 982, 'SID_4_982_161_20241212_092612', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-12-12 09:26:12', '2024-12-12 10:05:08'),
(216, 161, 4, 985, 'SID_4_985_161_20241212_110715', 'IN_PROGRESS', NULL, 0, '2024-12-12 11:07:15', '2024-12-12 11:08:39'),
(217, 161, 4, 986, 'SID_4_986_161_20241212_111046', 'IN_PROGRESS', NULL, 0, '2024-12-12 11:10:46', '2024-12-12 11:10:59'),
(218, 161, 4, 987, 'SID_4_987_161_20241212_111218', 'IN_PROGRESS', NULL, 0, '2024-12-12 11:12:18', '2024-12-12 11:12:31'),
(219, 161, 4, 985, 'SID_4_985_161_20241212_112806', 'IN_PROGRESS', NULL, 1, '2024-12-12 11:28:06', '2024-12-12 11:31:06');

-- --------------------------------------------------------

--
-- Table structure for table `bot_logs`
--

CREATE TABLE `bot_logs` (
  `id` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `botInterviewId` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `ref` varchar(100) NOT NULL,
  `questionId` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `interviewType` enum('ONLY_AI','AI_PRE_DEFINED','ONLY_CUSTOM') NOT NULL,
  `stage` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `datetime` datetime NOT NULL DEFAULT current_timestamp()
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4 COLLATE=utf8mb4_general_ci;

--
-- Dumping data for table `bot_logs`
--

INSERT INTO `bot_logs` (`id`, `botInterviewId`, `ref`, `questionId`, `interviewType`, `stage`, `datetime`) VALUES
(1, 135, 'SID_4_670_119_20240810_172551', 1503, 'ONLY_CUSTOM', 3, '2024-08-10 17:28:49'),
(2, 135, 'SID_4_670_119_20240810_172551', 1504, 'ONLY_CUSTOM', 4, '2024-08-10 17:29:08'),
(3, 135, 'SID_4_670_119_20240810_172551', 1505, 'ONLY_CUSTOM', 5, '2024-08-10 17:29:27'),
(4, 135, 'SID_4_670_119_20240810_172551', 1506, 'ONLY_CUSTOM', 6, '2024-08-10 17:29:46'),
(5, 135, 'SID_4_670_119_20240810_172551', 1507, 'ONLY_CUSTOM', 7, '2024-08-10 17:30:04'),
(6, 143, 'SID_4_893_126_20240814_125639', 1550, 'AI_PRE_DEFINED', 3, '2024-08-14 13:06:08'),
(7, 143, 'SID_4_893_126_20240814_125639', 1551, 'AI_PRE_DEFINED', 4, '2024-08-14 13:08:31'),
(8, 143, 'SID_4_893_126_20240814_125639', 1552, 'AI_PRE_DEFINED', 5, '2024-08-14 13:09:44'),
(9, 143, 'SID_4_893_126_20240814_125639', 1553, 'AI_PRE_DEFINED', 6, '2024-08-14 13:11:06'),
(10, 143, 'SID_4_893_126_20240814_125639', 1554, 'AI_PRE_DEFINED', 7, '2024-08-14 13:13:11'),
(11, 143, 'SID_4_893_126_20240814_125639', 1555, 'AI_PRE_DEFINED', 8, '2024-08-14 13:14:52'),
(12, 143, 'SID_4_893_126_20240814_125639', 1556, 'AI_PRE_DEFINED', 9, '2024-08-14 13:16:41'),
(13, 143, 'SID_4_893_126_20240814_125639', 1557, 'AI_PRE_DEFINED', 10, '2024-08-14 13:17:25'),
(14, 143, 'SID_4_893_126_20240814_125639', 1558, 'AI_PRE_DEFINED', 11, '2024-08-14 13:18:22'),
(15, 143, 'SID_4_893_126_20240814_125639', 1559, 'AI_PRE_DEFINED', 12, '2024-08-14 13:19:14'),
(16, 143, 'SID_4_893_126_20240814_125639', 1560, 'AI_PRE_DEFINED', 13, '2024-08-14 13:20:02'),
(17, 143, 'SID_4_893_126_20240814_125639', 1561, 'AI_PRE_DEFINED', 14, '2024-08-14 13:21:11'),
(18, 143, 'SID_4_893_126_20240814_125639', 1562, 'AI_PRE_DEFINED', 15, '2024-08-14 13:22:04'),
(19, 143, 'SID_4_893_126_20240814_125639', 1563, 'AI_PRE_DEFINED', 16, '2024-08-14 13:23:02'),
(20, 144, 'SID_4_894_124_20240818_122328', 1564, 'AI_PRE_DEFINED', 3, '2024-08-18 12:29:33'),
(21, 144, 'SID_4_894_124_20240818_122328', 1565, 'AI_PRE_DEFINED', 4, '2024-08-18 12:31:33'),
(22, 144, 'SID_4_894_124_20240818_122328', 1566, 'AI_PRE_DEFINED', 5, '2024-08-18 12:35:07'),
(23, 144, 'SID_4_894_124_20240818_122328', 1567, 'AI_PRE_DEFINED', 6, '2024-08-18 12:38:01'),
(24, 144, 'SID_4_894_124_20240818_122328', 1568, 'AI_PRE_DEFINED', 7, '2024-08-18 12:41:19'),
(25, 144, 'SID_4_894_124_20240818_122328', 1569, 'AI_PRE_DEFINED', 8, '2024-08-18 12:42:29'),
(26, 144, 'SID_4_894_124_20240818_122328', 1570, 'AI_PRE_DEFINED', 9, '2024-08-18 12:43:36'),
(27, 144, 'SID_4_894_124_20240818_122328', 1571, 'AI_PRE_DEFINED', 10, '2024-08-18 12:44:51'),
(28, 144, 'SID_4_894_124_20240818_122328', 1572, 'AI_PRE_DEFINED', 11, '2024-08-18 12:46:16'),
(29, 144, 'SID_4_894_124_20240818_122328', 1573, 'AI_PRE_DEFINED', 12, '2024-08-18 12:47:24'),
(30, 144, 'SID_4_894_124_20240818_122328', 1574, 'AI_PRE_DEFINED', 13, '2024-08-18 12:48:19'),
(31, 144, 'SID_4_894_124_20240818_122328', 1575, 'AI_PRE_DEFINED', 14, '2024-08-18 12:49:44'),
(32, 144, 'SID_4_894_124_20240818_122328', 1576, 'AI_PRE_DEFINED', 15, '2024-08-18 12:50:46'),
(33, 144, 'SID_4_894_124_20240818_122328', 1577, 'AI_PRE_DEFINED', 16, '2024-08-18 12:53:36'),
(34, 164, 'SID_4_922_134_20240828_160731', 1732, 'ONLY_CUSTOM', 3, '2024-08-28 16:10:15'),
(35, 164, 'SID_4_922_134_20240828_160731', 1733, 'ONLY_CUSTOM', 4, '2024-08-28 16:10:29'),
(36, 165, 'SID_4_922_134_20240828_161826', 1738, 'AI_PRE_DEFINED', 3, '2024-08-28 16:20:44'),
(37, 188, 'SID_4_953_141_20240906_054028', 1976, 'AI_PRE_DEFINED', 3, '2024-09-06 05:43:49'),
(38, 188, 'SID_4_953_141_20240906_054028', 1977, 'AI_PRE_DEFINED', 4, '2024-09-06 05:44:05'),
(39, 189, 'SID_4_954_142_20240906_054602', 1970, 'ONLY_CUSTOM', 3, '2024-09-06 05:49:29'),
(40, 191, 'SID_4_954_142_20240910_045119', 1970, 'ONLY_CUSTOM', 3, '2024-09-10 04:56:11'),
(41, 191, 'SID_4_954_142_20240910_045119', 1971, 'ONLY_CUSTOM', 4, '2024-09-10 04:56:30'),
(42, 191, 'SID_4_954_142_20240910_045119', 1972, 'ONLY_CUSTOM', 5, '2024-09-10 04:57:11'),
(43, 191, 'SID_4_954_142_20240910_045119', 1973, 'ONLY_CUSTOM', 6, '2024-09-10 04:57:53'),
(44, 191, 'SID_4_954_142_20240910_045119', 1974, 'ONLY_CUSTOM', 7, '2024-09-10 04:58:32'),
(45, 191, 'SID_4_954_142_20240910_045119', 1975, 'ONLY_CUSTOM', 8, '2024-09-10 04:59:07');

-- --------------------------------------------------------

--
-- Table structure for table `bot_overall_feedback`
--

CREATE TABLE `bot_overall_feedback` (
  `id` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `botInterviewId` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `candidateId` int(11) DEFAULT NULL,
  `resumeId` int(11) DEFAULT NULL,
  `screeningId` int(11) DEFAULT NULL,
  `feedback` text DEFAULT NULL,
  `strength` text DEFAULT NULL,
  `weakness` text DEFAULT NULL,
  `primarySkills` text DEFAULT NULL,
  `secondarySkills` text DEFAULT NULL,
  `created` datetime DEFAULT NULL
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4 COLLATE=utf8mb4_general_ci;

--
-- Dumping data for table `bot_overall_feedback`
--

INSERT INTO `bot_overall_feedback` (`id`, `botInterviewId`, `candidateId`, `resumeId`, `screeningId`, `feedback`, `strength`, `weakness`, `primarySkills`, `secondarySkills`, `created`) VALUES
(1, 5, 4, 228, 51, 'Sanjay demonstrated a lack of confidence and self-awareness during the interview, which led to an early termination of the process. His inability to provide detailed responses about his experience and skills in relation to the job description suggests a misalignment with the Front-end Engineer role at Freshworks.', '- Sanjay initially expressed enthusiasm for the interview.', '- Sanjay was unable to articulate his experience with UI technologies.\n- He showed a lack of confidence in his abilities for the role.\n- Sanjay terminated the interview prematurely, indicating a potential misfit for the position.', '11. HTML: 2/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Sanjay did not discuss his HTML skills or provide relevant examples.\n\n12. CSS: 2/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Sanjay was unable to elaborate on his CSS experience.\n\n13. JavaScript: 2/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Sanjay did not provide any insight into his JavaScript expertise.\n\n14. MVC architecture: 2/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Sanjay did not mention any experience with MVC architecture.\n\n15. OOP programming style: 2/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Sanjay did not discuss his knowledge of OOP programming style.', '16. SASS: 2/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no mention of SASS experience in Sanjay\'s responses.\n\n17. JQuery: 2/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Sanjay did not provide examples of his work with JQuery.\n\n18. Javascript Frameworks: 2/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Sanjay failed to discuss his experience with any JavaScript frameworks.\n\n19. GIT: 2/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Sanjay did not talk about his proficiency with GIT.\n\n20. Communication skills: 2/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Sanjay\'s communication skills were not up to the mark for the interview process.', '2024-02-19 06:08:14'),
(2, 6, 11, 256, 57, 'Eric demonstrated a foundational understanding of Laravel and its ecosystem, including experience with PHP, Laravel framework, and integration of third-party libraries like PayPal. However, his responses lacked depth and specificity in some areas, which are crucial for the PHP Laravel Developer Lead role.', '- Eric has experience with Laravel and other PHP frameworks, indicating adaptability to different technologies.\n- He has worked on various projects, including e-commerce and betting applications, showcasing his versatility.\n- Eric is familiar with using Composer and handling deprecated libraries, which is important for maintaining a codebase.', '- Responses lacked detail and did not fully convey the depth of his experience or the impact of his work on projects.\n- He could have provided more specific examples of problem-solving and innovation in his past roles.\n- Communication could be more engaging and enthusiastic to better demonstrate his leadership potential.', '11. PHP: 6/10\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Eric has experience with PHP but did not convey a mastery level.\n\n12. CSS: N/A\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: CSS skills were not directly assessed in the interview.\n\n13. Laravel framework: 6/10\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Eric has worked with Laravel but did not demonstrate advanced proficiency.\n\n14. MySQL: N/A\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: MySQL skills were not directly assessed in the interview.\n\n15. Software Development: 6/10\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Eric has experience in software development but did not discuss his strategic or innovative contributions.', '16. Node.js: N/A\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Node.js skills were not directly assessed in the interview.\n\n17. React.js: N/A\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: React.js skills were not directly assessed in the interview.\n\n18. Ajax: N/A\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Ajax skills were not directly assessed in the interview.\n\n19. Jenkins: N/A\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Jenkins skills were not directly assessed in the interview.\n\n20. GitLab: N/A\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: GitLab skills were not directly assessed in the interview.', '2024-03-19 12:25:11'),
(3, 8, 7, 265, 59, 'Shalu\'s performance in the interview was significantly below expectations. The responses lacked depth, relevance, and engagement with the role\'s requirements. Shalu was unable to demonstrate knowledge or experience in key areas critical for the UX/UI Designer position at Google.', '- Shalu expressed comfort with HTML, indicating some familiarity with front-end development technologies.', '- Lack of experience and knowledge in JavaScript and other required technical skills.\n- Inability to articulate a process for conducting user research.\n- Did not demonstrate an understanding of user-centered design processes.\n- Failed to engage with the questions related to design principles, tools, and competitive analysis.\n- Requested to reschedule the interview, indicating a lack of preparedness or engagement.', '11. UX/UI design principles:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shalu did not demonstrate knowledge or experience in UX/UI design principles.\n\n12. user-centered design processes:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shalu did not articulate any understanding of user-centered design processes.\n\n13. design tools (Sketch, Adobe XD, Figma):\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shalu did not mention any experience with design tools like Sketch, Adobe XD, or Figma.\n\n14. front-end development technologies (HTML, CSS, JavaScript):\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shalu expressed comfort with HTML but did not demonstrate knowledge or experience with CSS and JavaScript.\n\n15. user research:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shalu did not describe a process for conducting user research or how findings are incorporated into design.', '16. Wireframing:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no mention of wireframing experience or knowledge.\n\n17. prototyping:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shalu did not discuss any experience with prototyping.\n\n18. visual design:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shalu did not demonstrate knowledge or experience in visual design.\n\n19. usability testing:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no indication of experience with usability testing.\n\n20. industry trends:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shalu did not show awareness of industry trends or best practices in UX/UI design.', '2024-03-28 03:47:44'),
(4, 9, 4, 259, 60, 'Varun\'s interview performance was subpar, with responses that lacked depth and relevance to the questions asked. His communication was unclear and his engagement in the interview process was minimal, indicating a need for significant improvement in interview preparedness and professional communication.', '- Varun expressed a willingness to engage in the interview process.\n- He acknowledged his experience with HTML, which is relevant to the job description.', '- Varun\'s responses were brief and lacked detail, failing to demonstrate a strong understanding of UX/UI design principles and user-centered design processes.\n- He did not provide examples of his work or elaborate on his experience, which was necessary to assess his fit for the role.\n- Varun seemed unprepared for the interview, questioning the interview duration and not engaging with the questions meaningfully.', '11. UX/UI design principles:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate knowledge or experience in UX/UI design principles.\n\n12. user-centered design processes:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide evidence of experience or knowledge in user-centered design processes.\n\n13. design tools (Sketch, Adobe XD, Figma):\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any proficiency in design tools.\n\n14. front-end development technologies (HTML, CSS, JavaScript):\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun acknowledged experience with HTML but did not demonstrate proficiency in CSS or JavaScript.\n\n15. user research:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss any experience with user research.', '16. Wireframing:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any experience with wireframing.\n\n17. prototyping:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide any information on his experience with prototyping.\n\n18. visual design:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not showcase any knowledge or experience in visual design.\n\n19. usability testing:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss any experience with usability testing.\n\n20. mentoring:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide any evidence of mentoring experience.', '2024-03-28 03:53:03'),
(5, 10, 15, 266, 61, 'Ruby\'s responses were concise but lacked the enthusiasm and detail expected for a senior-level position. The responses were repetitive and did not convey a strong interest or preparedness for the interview.', '- Ruby responded affirmatively to the readiness for the interview, indicating a willingness to engage in the conversation.', '- Lack of detail and enthusiasm in responses.\n- Repetitive and informal communication style.\n- Missed opportunity to showcase preparation and interest in the role.', '11. SQL: 8/10:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: SQL knowledge was not assessed in the provided responses.\n\n12. SQL Server: 8/10:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: SQL Server knowledge was not assessed in the provided responses.\n\n13. Database Design and Development: 6/10:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Database design and development knowledge was not assessed in the provided responses.\n\n14. Database Management Systems: 6/10:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Database management systems knowledge was not assessed in the provided responses.\n\n15. Familiarity with database management systems and tools: 6/10:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Familiarity with database management systems and tools was not assessed in the provided responses.', '16. Performance Tuning and Optimization: 4/10:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Performance tuning and optimization knowledge was not assessed in the provided responses.\n\n17. ETL (Extract: 2/10:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: ETL knowledge was not assessed in the provided responses.\n\n18. Transform: 2/10:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Transform knowledge was not assessed in the provided responses.\n\n19. Load) processes: 2/10:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Load processes knowledge was not assessed in the provided responses.\n\n20. Stored Procedures: 8/10:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Stored procedures knowledge was not assessed in the provided responses.', '2024-04-03 12:11:56'),
(6, 21, 4, 228, 51, 'Varun\'s responses throughout the interview demonstrated a strong technical background and relevant experience in front-end development. However, there were areas where his responses could have been more aligned with the job description\'s requirements, particularly in showcasing his expertise in specific skills and frameworks mentioned.', '- Varun has a solid foundation in front-end technologies such as HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.\n- His extensive experience in web development is evident from his resume and the confidence in his responses.', '- Varun\'s responses lacked depth in certain areas such as MVC architecture, SASS, and JavaScript frameworks.\n- He could have provided more specific examples of his work related to the job description to demonstrate his expertise.', '11. HTML: 8/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun demonstrated a strong understanding of HTML.\n\n12. CSS: 8/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun showed a good grasp of CSS.\n\n13. JavaScript: 8/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun\'s knowledge of JavaScript was clear and aligned with his experience.\n\n14. MVC architecture: 6/10:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s understanding of MVC architecture was not thoroughly explored.\n\n15. OOP programming style: 6/10:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s responses did not fully reflect his proficiency in OOP.', '16. SASS: 4/10:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s experience with SASS was not well articulated.\n\n17. JQuery: 6/10:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s knowledge of JQuery was adequate but lacked depth.\n\n18. Javascript Frameworks (Backbone/Angular/EmberJs/NodeJs): 4/10:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate strong expertise in the mentioned JavaScript frameworks.\n\n19. GIT: 6/10:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s experience with GIT could have been highlighted more effectively.\n\n20. Communication skills: 8/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun communicated effectively but could improve by providing more detailed responses.', '2024-04-12 04:52:06'),
(7, 23, 4, 258, 60, 'Varun\'s responses were minimal and lacked the depth and engagement expected for a UX/UI Designer role at Google. He failed to demonstrate the necessary knowledge and experience in key areas relevant to the job description.', '- Varun expressed a positive demeanor at the beginning of the interview.', '- Varun\'s responses were extremely brief and did not showcase his expertise or experience.\n- He did not provide any evidence of his skills or past work relevant to the UX/UI Designer role.\n- There was no mention of his proficiency in design tools or user-centered design processes.\n- Varun did not engage in the conversation beyond the most basic response.', '11. UX/UI design principles:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any UX/UI design principles.\n\n12. user-centered design processes:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss any user-centered design processes.\n\n13. design tools (Sketch, Adobe XD, Figma):\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not reference his proficiency with any design tools.\n\n14. front-end development technologies (HTML, CSS, JavaScript):\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any front-end development technologies.\n\n15. user research:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide any information on his experience with user research.', '16. Wireframing:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his skills in wireframing.\n\n17. prototyping:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any experience with prototyping.\n\n18. visual design:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not showcase any visual design skills.\n\n19. usability testing:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss usability testing.\n\n20. mentoring:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any mentoring experience.', '2024-04-12 07:36:53'),
(8, 28, 31, 339, 77, 'Yashaswee demonstrated a good understanding of BI tools and technologies, with a particular strength in Power BI and data migration projects. He provided detailed responses about his experiences with BI architecture, tool deployment, and report customization. However, Yashaswee\'s responses lacked depth in certain areas such as building universes and self-service reporting. His communication was clear but could have been more structured and focused on the specific questions asked.', '- Yashaswee has strong experience in BI architecture and Power BI.\n- He has practical experience with data migration projects and tool deployment.\n- Yashaswee showed a good understanding of performance optimization and problem-solving in BI contexts.', '- Yashaswee\'s responses could be more detailed in areas like building universes and self-service reporting.\n- He could improve on aligning his responses more closely with the questions asked.\n- Yashaswee could benefit from providing more examples of his work with Spotfire to better demonstrate his expertise in that area.', '11. - BI Architect: 8/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Yashaswee demonstrated strong knowledge and experience as a BI Architect.\n\n12. - Spotfire: 6/10:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Yashaswee could have provided more specific examples of his work with Spotfire to demonstrate his expertise.\n\n13. - PowerBI: 8/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Yashaswee showed strong proficiency with PowerBI through his detailed project examples.\n\n14. - Data Modelling: 8/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Yashaswee\'s experience with data modeling was evident in his discussion of migration projects and architecture design.\n\n15. - Building Universe: 4/10:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Yashaswee did not provide sufficient detail on his experience with building universes.', '16. - Creating Metrics: 6/10:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Yashaswee mentioned creating metrics but did not delve into specifics or examples.\n\n17. - Build Reports and Dashboard: 8/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Yashaswee\'s experience with building reports and dashboards was clear from his project descriptions.\n\n18. - Report Authorization and Access Control: 6/10:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Yashaswee discussed report authorization but could have provided more detail on access control mechanisms.\n\n19. - Self-Service Reporting: 6/10:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Yashaswee\'s response on self-service reporting lacked depth and specific examples.\n\n20. - BI Tool Deployment: 6/10:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Yashaswee mentioned BI tool deployment but did not fully explain his approach or experience in this area.', '2024-04-26 07:44:27'),
(9, 29, 4, 341, 79, 'Varun demonstrated a good understanding of Agile and Scrum methodologies, relevant experience in business analysis, and strong communication skills. However, there were gaps in his familiarity with certain tools and methodologies, and his responses lacked depth in some areas.', '- Varun showed confidence in his technical skills and experience with Agile and Scrum methodologies.\n- He effectively communicated his role in requirement gathering and collaboration with stakeholders.\n- Varun provided clear examples of managing backlogs and facilitating stakeholder sign-offs using Jira.', '- Varun\'s responses lacked depth in his experience with data analysis and visualization tools.\n- He did not provide detailed examples of problem-solving or process improvement methodologies.\n- Varun could improve his familiarity with the Atlassian Suite beyond Jira and demonstrate a broader understanding of industry trends and their application to his role.', '11. Agile and Scrum methodologies: 8/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun demonstrated applied experience with Agile and Scrum methodologies.\n\n12. Requirements gathering and documentation: 8/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun\'s experience with requirements gathering was evident, aligning with the job description.\n\n13. Analytical and problem-solving skills: 8/10:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun could have provided more detailed examples to showcase his analytical and problem-solving skills.\n\n14. Communication and interpersonal skills: 10/10:\nScore: 9\nQualitative Assessment: Excellent\nDescription: Varun\'s communication and interpersonal skills were a strong point throughout the interview.\n\n15. Cross-functional teamwork: 8/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun showed good experience in working with cross-functional teams.', '16. Familiarity with Atlassian Suite (Jira): 6/10:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun was familiar with Jira but could have discussed other Atlassian Suite tools.\n\n17. Confluence: 4/10:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention his experience with Confluence, indicating a need for improvement.\n\n18. Bitbucket: 2/10:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate familiarity with Bitbucket, which is a gap in his skill set.\n\n19. Data analysis and visualization tools: 4/10:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s use of visualization tools was basic, and he could have provided more examples.\n\n20. Process improvement methodologies: 4/10:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s response did not show a strong understanding of process improvement methodologies.', '2024-05-08 04:27:27'),
(10, 31, 4, 357, 81, 'Varun demonstrated a good understanding of Agile and Scrum methodologies and his past experience as a Business Analyst aligns with the job description. However, his responses lacked depth in some areas and he did not complete the interview, which affects the overall assessment of his fit for the role.', '- Varun has a strong background in Agile and Scrum methodologies, as evidenced by his detailed description of his experience with these practices.\n- He has extensive experience in requirement gathering, documentation, and stakeholder management.\n- Varun\'s communication style is clear and he expresses his ideas effectively.', '- Varun\'s responses lacked specific examples and depth in certain areas, such as data analysis and visualization tools, and familiarity with Atlassian Suite.\n- He did not complete the interview, which raises concerns about his ability to handle stress and adaptability.\n- Varun could improve on providing more detailed examples of problem-solving and process improvement methodologies.', '11. Agile and Scrum methodologies: 8/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun demonstrated a good understanding of Agile and Scrum methodologies.\n\n12. Requirements gathering and documentation: 8/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun has strong experience in requirements gathering and documentation.\n\n13. Analytical and problem-solving skills: 8/10:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun needs to provide more examples of how he has applied his analytical and problem-solving skills.\n\n14. Communication and interpersonal skills: 10/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun communicates well but could improve on maintaining engagement throughout the interview.\n\n15. Cross-functional teamwork: 8/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun has experience working with cross-functional teams.', '16. Familiarity with Atlassian Suite (Jira): 6/10:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide enough detail about his experience with Jira.\n\n17. Confluence: 4/10:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any specific experience with Confluence.\n\n18. Bitbucket: 2/10:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate any experience with Bitbucket.\n\n19. Data analysis and visualization tools: 4/10:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s experience with data analysis and visualization tools was not evident in his responses.\n\n20. Process improvement methodologies: 6/10:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun mentioned process improvements but did not provide specific examples or methodologies used.', '2024-05-26 06:33:24'),
(11, 32, 4, 344, 80, 'Varun\'s responses during the interview were non-existent or irrelevant, showing a lack of engagement and understanding of the interview process. His inability to provide coherent answers to the questions asked indicates a significant gap in communication skills and job role comprehension.', '- No strengths were demonstrated based on the interview responses provided.', '- Inability to understand and respond to questions in a relevant manner.\n- Lack of clarity in communication.\n- Did not demonstrate knowledge or experience relevant to the job role.\n- Failed to engage in the interview process.', '11. Functional knowledge: 0/10\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not exhibit any functional knowledge relevant to the job description.\n\n12. Technical knowledge: 0/10\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun failed to demonstrate any technical knowledge during the interview.\n\n13. Consulting experience: 0/10\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no evidence of consulting experience in Varun\'s responses.\n\n14. Analytical ability: 0/10\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not display any analytical abilities in his responses.\n\n15. Business understanding: 0/10\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s responses did not reflect an understanding of business related to the role.', '16. Interpersonal skills: 0/10\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate the interpersonal skills necessary for the role.\n\n17. Industry experience: 0/10\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not show any industry experience relevant to the job description.\n\n18. Presentation skills: 0/10\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not exhibit any presentation skills during the interview.\n\n19. Requirement analysis: 0/10\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no indication of requirement analysis skills in Varun\'s responses.\n\n20. Agile methodology: 0/10\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate any knowledge or experience with agile methodology.', '2024-05-26 08:36:12'),
(12, 33, 4, 342, 80, 'Varun\'s responses in the interview were generally brief and lacked depth, failing to showcase his skills and experience relevant to the Techno-Functional Business Analyst position. His answers did not provide enough evidence of his expertise in the e-commerce domain or his ability to fulfill the roles and responsibilities outlined in the job description.', '- Varun maintained a polite and positive demeanor throughout the interview.', '- Varun\'s responses were not detailed and did not demonstrate a clear understanding of the job requirements.\n- He did not provide specific examples of his work experience related to the e-commerce domain or business analysis.\n- Varun failed to highlight his consulting experience, analytical ability, or business understanding, which are critical for the role.\n- His communication style was too brief and lacked engagement.', '11. Functional knowledge: 0/10\nScore: 0/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate functional knowledge relevant to the role.\n\n12. Technical knowledge: 4/10\nScore: 4/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun mentioned working with Laravel but did not connect his technical knowledge to the job requirements.\n\n13. Consulting experience: 0/10\nScore: 0/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide evidence of consulting experience.\n\n14. Analytical ability: 0/10\nScore: 0/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not showcase his analytical abilities during the interview.\n\n15. Business understanding: 0/10\nScore: 0/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate an understanding of business challenges faced by customers.', '16. Interpersonal skills: 0/10\nScore: 0/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not exhibit strong interpersonal skills required for the role.\n\n17. Industry experience: 0/10\nScore: 0/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any specific industry experience related to e-commerce.\n\n18. Presentation skills: 0/10\nScore: 0/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not display the presentation skills necessary for the role.\n\n19. Requirement analysis: 0/10\nScore: 0/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his experience with requirement analysis.\n\n20. Agile methodology: 0/10\nScore: 0/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any experience with Agile methodology.', '2024-06-06 16:41:31'),
(13, 34, 4, 371, 87, 'Asmiya\'s responses during the interview were consistently brief and lacked the depth and detail expected for a candidate with her experience. While she confirmed her readiness and comfort with the interview process, her answers did not provide insight into her skills, experiences, or problem-solving abilities, which are crucial for evaluating her fit for the Developer-Connected Vehicle role.', '- Asmiya confirmed her readiness and comfort with the interview process, indicating a positive attitude towards the opportunity.\n- She consistently responded affirmatively to the questions, showing a willingness to engage.', '- Asmiya\'s responses lacked detail and did not showcase her experience or knowledge in relation to the job description.\n- She did not provide examples or elaborate on her skills and experiences, which is necessary to assess her fit for the role.\n- Her communication style was too concise, missing the opportunity to demonstrate her problem-solving skills and depth of knowledge.', '11. Android Development:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya did not provide any specific details about her Android development experience.\n\n12. Java/Kotlin:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya did not elaborate on her experience with Java or Kotlin, which is crucial for the role.\n\n13. Android Studio:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya did not describe her use of Android Studio or its features in her projects.\n\n14. RESTful APIs/Websocket:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya did not explain how she implemented RESTful APIs or Websocket in her applications.\n\n15. Agile Practices/JIRA/Rally:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya did not provide examples of how she applied Agile practices or used JIRA or Rally.', '16. Android Architecture/AAOS/BSP:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya did not elaborate on her knowledge or experience with Android Architecture, AAOS, or BSP.\n\n17. CAN bus/OBD-II Protocols:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya did not discuss her experience with CAN bus or OBD-II protocols in the context of Android development.\n\n18. GraphQL APIs/Apollo Client:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya did not explain her use of GraphQL APIs and the Apollo Client in her Android applications.\n\n19. Software Documentation/Technical Support:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya did not share how she ensured clear and useful software documentation for her team and technical support purposes.\n\n20. Cross-Functional Collaboration:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya did not provide an example of her collaboration with cross-functional teams to deliver a project successfully.', '2024-07-17 03:26:51'),
(14, 35, 4, 372, 88, 'Asmiya\'s performance in the interview was significantly below expectations. She struggled to provide substantive answers to most questions, often responding with brief or irrelevant statements. Her inability to discuss her experience and skills in depth suggests a lack of preparedness or a mismatch with the job requirements.', '- Asmiya confirmed her availability and willingness to proceed with the interview.\n- She provided a brief overview of her professional experience, mentioning her specialization and eagerness to collaborate on technology.', '- Asmiya failed to provide detailed responses to questions about her specific experiences and skills.\n- She was unable to discuss instances of problem-solving, performance optimization, or collaboration with cross-functional teams.\n- Asmiya did not demonstrate knowledge of security best practices, CI/CD pipelines, or cloud platforms in the context of Android development.\n- She did not engage with questions about leadership, adaptability, or customer advocacy.\n- Asmiya did not ask any questions about the role or the company, showing a lack of engagement with the interview process.', '11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Maintenance:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya mentioned working on Android-based systems but did not elaborate on her experience in development, customization, or maintenance.\n\n12. Android System Services/Frameworks:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya\'s response did not provide evidence of her expertise in Android System Services or Frameworks.\n\n13. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya mentioned using Java and Kotlin but did not discuss her programming skills in detail.\n\n14. User Interface (UI) Design/Development for Android:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya did not provide any information on her experience with UI design or development for Android.\n\n15. Performance Optimization/Profiling/Debugging:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya was unable to discuss any instances of performance optimization, profiling, or debugging.', '16. Collaboration/Communication with Cross-Functional Teams:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya briefly mentioned working with cross-functional teams but did not detail how she ensured effective collaboration.\n\n17. Security Best Practices/Compliance for Android:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya\'s mention of two-factor authentication was too vague to demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of security best practices.\n\n18. Continuous Improvement/Keeping Updated with AOSP/AAOS:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya stated she keeps herself updated but did not provide examples of how this knowledge benefited a project.\n\n19. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya did not provide any examples of implementing CI/CD pipelines, automated testing, or build automation.\n\n20. Cloud Platforms/Containerization (Docker/Kubernetes):\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya admitted to not having used Docker or Kubernetes, showing a gap in her experience with cloud platforms and containerization.', '2024-07-17 05:57:40'),
(15, 36, 4, 342, 80, 'Varun\'s responses were not in line with professional standards expected for the Techno-Functional Business Analyst position. His use of non-English languages and lack of clear communication indicate a need for improvement in professional interaction and language skills.', '- Expressed enthusiasm for the interview process.', '- Responses were not in English, which is the medium of communication for the interview.\n- Did not demonstrate a professional level of communication.\n- Lack of clarity and relevance in responses.', '11. Functional knowledge:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide responses to assess his functional knowledge.\n\n12. Technical knowledge:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s technical knowledge could not be evaluated due to irrelevant responses.\n\n13. Consulting experience:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no evidence of consulting experience in Varun\'s responses.\n\n14. Analytical ability:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate analytical ability in his responses.\n\n15. Business understanding:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not show any business understanding relevant to the role.', '16. Interpersonal skills:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s interpersonal skills were not evident due to the lack of professional communication.\n\n17. Industry experience:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any relevant industry experience.\n\n18. Presentation skills:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not exhibit the presentation skills expected for the role.\n\n19. Requirement analysis:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no discussion of requirement analysis skills.\n\n20. Agile methodology:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide any insight into his experience with agile methodology.', '2024-07-17 11:23:49'),
(16, 37, 33, 378, 91, 'Shailendra demonstrated a solid understanding of Android development, with a focus on platform development and customization. However, his responses lacked depth in certain areas, and there were instances of unclear communication.', '- Shailendra has a strong background in Android application development, as evidenced by his experience with Scania truck navigation applications.\n- He is familiar with the Android build system and has experience customizing AOSP for specific hardware requirements.\n- Shailendra has worked with cross-functional teams, which is crucial for the role in question.', '- Shailendra\'s responses were sometimes vague and lacked the technical depth expected for someone with his experience.\n- Communication clarity was an issue, with some responses being incomplete or not directly addressing the question.\n- There was a lack of specific examples and details in his responses, which made it difficult to assess his problem-solving skills and depth of knowledge in certain areas.', '11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Integration:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shailendra has experience in this area but did not provide detailed examples of his work, making it difficult to assess his proficiency.\n\n12. User Interface Development for Android:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shailendra mentioned UI development but did not elaborate on his approach or the challenges he faced.\n\n13. Performance Optimization for Android Systems:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shailendra discussed performance optimization but did not detail the tools or methodologies he used.\n\n14. Android Security Best Practices/Compliance:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shailendra mentioned security practices but did not provide specific examples of how he implemented them in projects.\n\n15. Cross-Functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: While Shailendra has experience collaborating with teams, his communication skills need improvement to effectively work in a cross-functional environment.', '16. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shailendra mentioned using Java and Kotlin but did not discuss complex coding problems he solved with these languages.\n\n17. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shailendra has experience with CI/CD pipelines but did not clearly explain how he set up a pipeline or the benefits it brought.\n\n18. AOSP/AAOS Experience:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shailendra has worked with AOSP/AAOS but did not provide in-depth examples of his contributions to development or maintenance.\n\n19. Cloud Platforms/Containerization Knowledge:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shailendra mentioned cloud and containerization but did not discuss how these technologies impacted his Android development workflow.\n\n20. Android Development Tools Proficiency (Android Studio/ADB/Gradle):\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shailendra is proficient with development tools but did not share how this proficiency enhanced his development process.', '2024-07-17 15:47:57'),
(17, 39, 4, 228, 51, 'Varun\'s responses were brief and lacked engagement. He did not directly address the questions posed by the interviewer, which suggests a need for improvement in communication and interview etiquette.', '- Varun was polite in his initial greeting.', '- Varun\'s responses did not address the interviewer\'s questions directly.\n- He did not confirm his readiness for the interview or express enthusiasm for the discussion.\n- His answers were not substantive and did not provide any insight into his qualifications or interest in the role.', '11. HTML:\nScore: Not Applicable\nQualitative Assessment: Not Applicable\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his HTML skills.\n\n12. CSS:\nScore: Not Applicable\nQualitative Assessment: Not Applicable\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his CSS skills.\n\n13. JavaScript:\nScore: Not Applicable\nQualitative Assessment: Not Applicable\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his JavaScript skills.\n\n14. MVC architecture:\nScore: Not Applicable\nQualitative Assessment: Not Applicable\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his experience with MVC architecture.\n\n15. OOP programming style:\nScore: Not Applicable\nQualitative Assessment: Not Applicable\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his experience with OOP programming style.', '16. SASS:\nScore: Not Applicable\nQualitative Assessment: Not Applicable\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his experience with SASS.\n\n17. JQuery:\nScore: Not Applicable\nQualitative Assessment: Not Applicable\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his experience with JQuery.\n\n18. Javascript Frameworks (Backbone/Angular/EmberJs/NodeJs):\nScore: Not Applicable\nQualitative Assessment: Not Applicable\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his experience with JavaScript frameworks.\n\n19. GIT:\nScore: Not Applicable\nQualitative Assessment: Not Applicable\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his experience with GIT.\n\n20. Communication skills:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s communication skills need improvement as he did not effectively communicate during the interview.', '2024-07-18 04:16:51'),
(18, 45, 40, 377, 91, 'Gowtham\'s interview responses were inconsistent and at times incoherent, which made it challenging to accurately assess his fit for the HMI Developer role at Royal Enfield. While he mentioned some relevant experience, his answers lacked depth and clarity, making it difficult to gauge his true expertise in Android Platform Development.', '- Mentioned having four plus years of experience in Android development.\n- Discussed working with Java and Kotlin, which are relevant to the job description.\n- Briefly touched on experience with AOSP and adapting Android software for specific hardware requirements.', '- Responses were often unclear, lacking in detail, and at times incoherent (e.g., response to Q4).\n- Failed to provide concrete examples of past projects or challenges faced, which is crucial for demonstrating applied experience.\n- Did not effectively communicate his approach to ensuring compatibility with AOSP or AAOS specifications.\n- Did not showcase a strong understanding of Android Platform Development in the context of the job description.', '11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Integration:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham mentioned some experience with Android development but did not provide sufficient details to demonstrate proficiency.\n\n12. User Interface Development for Android:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no specific mention of experience in User Interface Development for Android, which is a key component of the job description.\n\n13. Performance Optimization for Android Systems:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham did not discuss any experience with performance optimization for Android systems, which is essential for the role.\n\n14. Android Security Best Practices/Compliance:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no evidence of knowledge or experience with Android security best practices or compliance.\n\n15. Cross-Functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: While Gowtham mentioned teamwork, he did not elaborate on his experience with cross-functional collaboration or communication.', '16. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham mentioned working with Java and Kotlin, but did not provide enough detail to assess his proficiency.\n\n17. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no mention of experience with CI/CD pipelines, automated testing, or build automation.\n\n18. AOSP/AAOS Experience:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham briefly touched on experience with AOSP but did not demonstrate a comprehensive understanding or provide examples of work with AAOS.\n\n19. Cloud Platforms/Containerization Knowledge:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham did not mention any experience with cloud platforms or containerization knowledge.\n\n20. Android Development Tools Proficiency (Android Studio/ADB/Gradle):\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no specific mention of proficiency with Android development tools such as Android Studio, ADB, or Gradle.', '2024-07-18 14:28:47');
INSERT INTO `bot_overall_feedback` (`id`, `botInterviewId`, `candidateId`, `resumeId`, `screeningId`, `feedback`, `strength`, `weakness`, `primarySkills`, `secondarySkills`, `created`) VALUES
(19, 47, 35, 374, 90, 'Bhushan demonstrated a good understanding of data engineering concepts and practical experience with data pipelines, cloud platforms, and real-time data processing. His responses indicated hands-on experience with AWS services and a clear direction towards modernizing data pipelines using Kafka and Kubernetes.', '- Bhushan has practical experience with AWS services, particularly Lambda and Kinesis, which he mentioned using for data processing.\n- He is aware of the cost and scalability benefits of Kafka over AWS Kinesis and has plans to transition to Kafka and Apache Beam.\n- Bhushan has experience with Elasticsearch, indicating his involvement with data transformation and storage.\n- He mentioned using Kubernetes for scalability, showing an understanding of modern deployment and scaling techniques.', '- Bhushan\'s responses lacked specific examples and details that would demonstrate a deeper understanding of the technologies mentioned.\n- He could improve the structure of his responses to make them more concise and focused on the question asked.\n- Bhushan could provide more insights into the challenges faced and how he overcame them in his projects to showcase problem-solving skills.', '11. [Data Pipeline Development/Kafka/MQTT/HTTP]:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan has experience with AWS services and plans to use Kafka, indicating knowledge in data pipeline development.\n\n12. [Real-Time Data Processing/Kafka Streams/Kafka Connect]:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan mentioned real-time data processing with AWS Lambda and plans for Kafka, showing relevant experience.\n\n13. [Data Ingestion and Integration/IoT/Database/APIs]:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan discussed data ingestion from APIs and plans for IoT device integration, demonstrating relevant experience.\n\n14. [Data Transformation and Storage/SQL/NoSQL/Data Lakes]:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan\'s experience with Elasticsearch indicates knowledge in data transformation and storage.\n\n15. [Cloud Platforms/Azure/GCP/AWS]:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Excellent\nDescription: Bhushan\'s extensive use of AWS services for data engineering tasks demonstrates strong experience with cloud platforms.', '16. [Software Development Lifecycle/Agile Methodologies]:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan\'s professional experience implies familiarity with the software development lifecycle, but he could discuss specific Agile practices he has used.\n\n17. [Data Engineering/Data Life Cycle Management]:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan has practical data engineering experience but could provide more insights into data life cycle management.\n\n18. [Collaboration and Communication Skills]:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan mentioned collaborating with teams, but he could discuss more about his communication practices within a team setting.\n\n19. [Continuous Improvement/Technology Upgradation]:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan\'s intention to modernize data pipelines shows a commitment to continuous improvement and technology upgradation.\n\n20. [Problem-Solving/Analytical Skills]:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan\'s responses indicate problem-solving skills, but he could provide more examples of analytical approaches to complex issues.', '2024-07-18 16:39:15'),
(20, 46, 33, 378, 91, 'Shailendra demonstrated a strong technical background in Android platform development with a focus on customization and integration, which aligns with the job description. However, his responses often lacked structure and clarity, leading to some repetition and vagueness in his explanations.', '- Extensive experience in Android platform development, particularly in customization and integration for automotive applications.\n- Familiarity with AOSP/AAOS and ensuring compatibility with these specifications.\n- Experience with hardware integration and performance optimization.\n- Demonstrated ability to work with cross-functional teams and third-party libraries.', '- Communication lacked clarity and conciseness, with some repetition and lack of focus on the questions asked.\n- Responses sometimes veered off-topic or did not directly address the interviewer\'s questions.\n- Could improve on providing structured and specific examples to showcase his expertise more effectively.', '11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Integration:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra has applied experience in this area, though he could provide more specific examples of his work.\n\n12. User Interface Development for Android:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra mentioned UI/UX customization, but more details on his experience would strengthen his response.\n\n13. Performance Optimization for Android Systems:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra discussed performance optimization, but could elaborate on specific techniques and results.\n\n14. Android Security Best Practices/Compliance:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra mentioned security concerns, but could provide more insight into how he ensures compliance with best practices.\n\n15. Cross-Functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra\'s experience with cross-functional teams is evident, but he could discuss his communication strategies more.', '16. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra has applied experience with Java and Kotlin, which is essential for the role.\n\n17. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra mentioned CI/CD and automated testing, but could provide more details on his experience with build automation.\n\n18. AOSP/AAOS Experience:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra has applied experience with AOSP/AAOS, which is highly relevant to the role.\n\n19. Cloud Platforms/Containerization Knowledge:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra touched on cloud services, but could expand on his knowledge of containerization.\n\n20. Android Development Tools Proficiency (Android Studio/ADB/Gradle):\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra demonstrated proficiency with Android development tools, which is crucial for the role.', '2024-07-18 16:53:43'),
(21, 48, 4, 398, 93, 'Varun\'s responses were non-existent or irrelevant throughout the interview, providing no substantive information or insight into his qualifications or thought processes. This indicates a lack of engagement and preparedness for the interview.', '- There are no discernible strengths in Varun\'s interview responses as they are either monosyllabic affirmatives or unrelated to the questions asked.', '- Varun failed to provide any relevant or meaningful answers to the interview questions.\n- There was a complete lack of engagement with the interview process.\n- Varun did not demonstrate any knowledge or experience related to the job description.', '11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Integration:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss any relevant experience or knowledge in this area.\n\n12. User Interface Development/Android UI/UX:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide any insights into his experience with UI/UX development.\n\n13. Performance Optimization/Profiling/Debugging:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not describe any situations where he optimized performance or engaged in profiling/debugging.\n\n14. Security Standards/Compliance/Best Practices:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss how he has implemented security standards or best practices.\n\n15. Cross-Functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide examples of effective cross-functional collaboration or communication.', '16. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not describe any complex problems he solved using Java or Kotlin.\n\n17. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not explain how he utilized CI/CD pipelines in his previous role.\n\n18. AOSP/AAOS Development/Customization:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not talk about his experience with AOSP or AAOS development and customization.\n\n19. Cloud Platforms/Containerization/Docker/Kubernetes:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not describe any projects where he used Docker or Kubernetes in the context of Android development.\n\n20. Android Studio/ADB/Gradle Tools:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not give any examples of how he used these tools to solve development problems.', '2024-07-18 17:44:52'),
(22, 49, 4, 401, 94, 'Varun\'s responses during the interview were limited and, in many cases, non-existent. This made it challenging to evaluate his fit for the HMI Developer role at Adzip Technologies. The lack of engagement and detailed answers to the questions posed by the interviewer indicates a need for significant improvement in interview preparedness and communication.', '- Varun expressed willingness to continue with the interview despite having a tough day, which shows a level of commitment.', '- Varun did not provide substantive responses to the majority of the questions.\n- There was a lack of engagement and detail in his answers, which did not allow for a proper assessment of his skills and experience.\n- Varun\'s responses did not demonstrate a clear understanding of the role or how his background aligns with the job requirements.', '11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Integration:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his experience with Android platform development, which is critical for the role.\n\n12. User Interface Development:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide information on his experience with user interface development, a key skill for the position.\n\n13. Performance Optimization:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not describe any scenarios where he optimized Android applications, which is necessary for the role.\n\n14. Security/Compliance:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his experience with implementing security best practices within an Android environment.\n\n15. Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide examples of effective collaboration or communication with cross-functional teams.', '16. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not talk about his programming skills in Java or Kotlin, which are essential for the role.\n\n17. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not describe his experience with CI/CD pipelines, which is important for the role\'s responsibilities.\n\n18. AOSP/AAOS Experience:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not explain any complex problems he solved while working with AOSP, a requirement for the position.\n\n19. Cloud Platforms/Containerization:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not share his experience with integrating cloud platforms or containerization into his workflow.\n\n20. Android Development Tools Proficiency:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate proficiency with Android development tools, which is necessary for the job.\n\nOverall, Varun\'s interview performance requires significant improvement across all parameters. He should aim to provide detailed and relevant responses that showcase his skills, experience, and alignment with the job requirements.', '2024-07-18 18:08:48'),
(23, 51, 4, 404, 94, 'Varun\'s responses during the interview were generally brief and lacked depth. He did not provide detailed examples or insights into his experience and skills, which made it difficult to assess his fit for the role. Varun\'s lack of engagement and inability to answer several questions related to the job description indicates a need for improvement in preparation and communication.', '- Varun confirmed his availability and willingness to proceed with the interview.\n- He expressed his experience in leading teams and working on multimedia application connectivity features.', '- Varun\'s responses were often too brief and lacked the necessary detail to demonstrate his expertise and experience.\n- He did not provide concrete examples of his work or how he addressed challenges, which is crucial for evaluating his problem-solving skills and technical knowledge.\n- Varun did not engage with the interviewer\'s questions about his experiences with CI/CD pipelines, AOSP, cloud platforms, containerization, and Android development tools, which are critical for the role.\n- He did not ask any questions at the end of the interview, missing an opportunity to show interest in the role and the company.', '11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Integration:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide specific examples of his experience with Android platform development, customization, or integration.\n\n12. User Interface Development:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun stated he had no experience with User Interface Development, which is a key requirement for the role.\n\n13. Performance Optimization:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s response to performance optimization was vague and did not demonstrate applied experience.\n\n14. Security/Compliance:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun mentioned general security practices but did not provide concrete examples of implementation in his work.\n\n15. Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s response about collaboration was unclear and did not provide insight into his ability to work with cross-functional teams.', '16. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his experience with Java or Kotlin programming during the interview.\n\n17. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide any response regarding his experience with CI/CD pipelines, automated testing, or build automation.\n\n18. AOSP/AAOS Experience:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide any response regarding his experience with AOSP or AAOS.\n\n19. Cloud Platforms/Containerization:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide any response regarding his experience with cloud platforms or containerization.\n\n20. Android Development Tools Proficiency:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide any response regarding his proficiency with Android development tools.', '2024-07-18 18:35:11'),
(24, 52, 33, 388, 92, 'Shailendra demonstrated a good understanding of Android development and related technologies throughout the interview. He provided detailed responses, showcasing his experience with Android platform development, UI/UX design, and system performance optimization. However, his responses sometimes lacked structure and clarity, which could be improved for better communication.', '- Extensive experience in Android application development and customization.\n- Familiarity with AOSP and AAOS development.\n- Knowledgeable in performance optimization and debugging.\n- Demonstrated understanding of CI/CD pipelines and automated testing.', '- Responses were sometimes unstructured and lacked clarity.\n- Did not always directly address the interviewer\'s questions.\n- Could improve on providing concise and focused answers.', '11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Maintenance:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra demonstrated applied experience in Android platform development and customization.\n\n12. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra showed good knowledge and experience in Java and Kotlin programming.\n\n13. Android System Architecture/Frameworks/Services:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra\'s experience with Android system architecture and frameworks was evident in his responses.\n\n14. UI/UX Design for Android:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra has experience in UI/UX design, although he could improve on aligning design with user needs.\n\n15. Performance Optimization/Profiling/Debugging:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra provided strong insights into performance optimization and debugging practices.', '16. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra\'s experience with CI/CD pipelines and automated testing was clear and relevant.\n\n17. AOSP/AAOS Development:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra showed good knowledge of AOSP/AAOS development, with room for more detailed examples.\n\n18. Security Best Practices/Compliance:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra understands security best practices, as demonstrated in his discussion of SELinux and code obfuscation.\n\n19. Cross-Functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra\'s responses indicated experience with cross-functional collaboration, though he could improve communication clarity.\n\n20. Cloud Platforms/Containerization (Docker/Kubernetes):\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shailendra did not provide specific examples of experience with cloud platforms or containerization, which could be an area for improvement.', '2024-07-19 04:28:39'),
(25, 54, 33, 388, 92, 'Shailendra demonstrated a strong technical foundation and relevant experience in Android development. However, his responses lacked structure and clarity, often veering off-topic or providing excessive detail without addressing the core of the questions. His communication style could benefit from more focus and conciseness to better align with the expectations of the role.', '- Extensive experience in Android application development and customization.\n- Familiarity with AOSP and AAOS development processes.\n- Knowledge of performance optimization techniques for Android applications.\n- Experience with CI/CD pipelines and automated testing.', '- Responses were often verbose and lacked clarity, making it difficult to extract relevant information.\n- Some answers did not directly address the questions, indicating a need for better listening skills and understanding of the interviewer\'s intent.\n- Limited engagement with the interviewer\'s questions, missing opportunities to showcase problem-solving skills and creativity.', '11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Maintenance:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra has experience in Android platform development but needs to articulate his expertise more clearly.\n\n12. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra\'s experience with Java and Kotlin is evident, though his responses could be more concise.\n\n13. Android System Architecture/Frameworks/Services:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra demonstrated knowledge in this area but could improve by providing more structured examples.\n\n14. UI/UX Design for Android:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra has relevant experience in UI/UX design, as seen in his work with Scania\'s navigation app.\n\n15. Performance Optimization/Profiling/Debugging:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra understands performance optimization but needs to communicate his approach more effectively.', '16. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra has experience with CI/CD and automated testing, though his explanation of the implementation process was not clear.\n\n17. AOSP/AAOS Development:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra\'s familiarity with AOSP/AAOS development is apparent, but his responses lacked specificity.\n\n18. Security Best Practices/Compliance:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra mentioned security practices but did not delve deeply into his experience with them.\n\n19. Cross-Functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra has experience collaborating with teams but could improve his communication of these experiences.\n\n20. Cloud Platforms/Containerization (Docker/Kubernetes):\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shailendra did not provide sufficient detail on his experience with cloud platforms and containerization.', '2024-07-19 05:17:45'),
(26, 53, 35, 410, 97, 'Bhushan demonstrated a strong technical background with significant experience in data pipeline development and cloud services, particularly AWS. He articulated his role and responsibilities well, showing a clear understanding of real-time data processing and streaming with Kafka, as well as data ingestion and storage using Elasticsearch. Bhushan\'s responses indicated a practical approach to problem-solving and an eagerness to learn new technologies.', '- Extensive experience with AWS services and data pipeline development.\n- Practical knowledge of Kafka and its application in real-time data processing.\n- Demonstrated ability to optimize performance and solve complex technical challenges.\n- Good understanding of HTTPS protocol implementation and its use in securing data communication.\n- Expressed willingness to learn and adapt to new technologies, such as Azure.', '- Limited experience with Azure and GCP compared to AWS.\n- Some responses lacked specific examples or details that could have demonstrated a deeper understanding of certain technologies.\n- Could benefit from more structured responses to convey information more effectively.', '11. Kafka:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan displayed applied experience with Kafka, detailing its use in his projects.\n\n12. MQTT/HTTP protocols:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan explained his implementation of HTTPS, but did not provide examples of MQTT usage.\n\n13. Real-time data processing:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan\'s experience with real-time data processing was evident, particularly with Kafka and AWS services.\n\n14. Data pipeline development:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan provided a comprehensive overview of his data pipeline development experience.\n\n15. Azure/GCP cloud services:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Bhushan admitted limited experience with Azure and GCP, indicating a need for further development in these areas.', '16. JIRA/Rally:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan mentioned using JIRA and Rally but did not elaborate on specific experiences.\n\n17. SQL/NoSQL databases:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan\'s use of Elasticsearch suggests a good understanding of NoSQL databases.\n\n18. Data ingestion/integration:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan\'s experience with data ingestion and integration was well articulated, especially with AWS Kinesis and Lambda.\n\n19. IoT device integration:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan did not specifically mention IoT device integration, but his knowledge of related technologies suggests competence.\n\n20. Data transformation/storage:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan\'s responses indicated a strong grasp of data transformation and storage, particularly with Elasticsearch.', '2024-07-19 05:22:11'),
(27, 56, 4, 411, 98, 'Varun\'s responses during the interview were extremely limited, providing only a \"Yes\" to each question. This indicates a lack of engagement and failure to communicate effectively, which is critical for the role in question. Varun did not demonstrate the required knowledge, experience, or communication skills expected for the Developer - Connected Platform position.', '- Unfortunately, based on Varun\'s responses, no strengths can be identified as he did not provide any substantive answers to the interview questions.', '- Varun\'s responses lacked detail and did not address the questions asked.\n- There was no evidence of Varun\'s knowledge or experience related to the job description.\n- Varun failed to communicate effectively, which is crucial for the role.\n- Varun did not showcase any problem-solving skills or adaptability.', '11. Kafka:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide any information on his experience with Kafka.\n\n12. MQTT/HTTP protocols:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his experience with MQTT/HTTP protocols.\n\n13. Real-time data processing:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not share any insights into his real-time data processing experience.\n\n14. Data pipeline development:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not describe any data pipeline development experience.\n\n15. Microsoft Azure/GCP:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any experience with Microsoft Azure or GCP.', '16. SQL/NoSQL databases:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide details on his experience with SQL/NoSQL databases.\n\n17. Data ingestion/integration:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his experience with data ingestion or integration.\n\n18. Kafka Streams/Kafka Connect:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide information on his use of Kafka Streams or Kafka Connect.\n\n19. Data transformation/storage:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not elaborate on his experience with data transformation or storage.\n\n20. Jira/Rally:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss how he has used Jira or Rally in managing projects.', '2024-07-19 06:03:06'),
(28, 55, 34, 373, 89, 'Asmiya Begum demonstrated a good understanding of Android development, with practical experience in Java and Kotlin, as well as familiarity with various tools and libraries. She has a strong background in application development, particularly in retail and logistics. However, there is room for improvement in her responses regarding advanced topics and leadership experience.', '- Asmiya has solid experience in Android application development, particularly with Java and Kotlin.\n- She is proficient in using Android Studio and related tools, which aligns with the job requirements.\n- Asmiya has practical experience with RESTful APIs and has used Agile methodologies effectively in her past projects.', '- Asmiya lacks experience with automotive-specific protocols like CAN bus and OBD-II, which are relevant to the job description.\n- Her responses lacked depth in areas such as Android Architecture, AAOS, BSP, and ISO 26262 Functional Safety.\n- Asmiya could improve her communication of complex technical solutions, as seen in her explanation of MSAL implementation.', '11. Java/Kotlin:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Asmiya has applied experience with Java and Kotlin, which is evident in her work history and responses.\n\n12. Android Studio:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Asmiya demonstrated applied experience with Android Studio and its tools, aligning with her professional background.\n\n13. RESTful APIs/Websocket:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Asmiya has experience with RESTful APIs and Websocket, but her explanation could have been more detailed.\n\n14. Agile Practice/JIRA/Rally:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Asmiya has applied experience with Agile practices and JIRA, which she effectively used in her projects.\n\n15. Android Architecture/AAOS/BSP:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya has basic knowledge of Android Architecture but lacks experience with AAOS and BSP, which are relevant to the role.', '16. GraphQL APIs/Apollo Client:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya mentioned using GraphQL in personal projects but did not demonstrate applied experience in a professional context.\n\n17. Software Development:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Asmiya has a strong background in software development, with experience in various aspects of Android app development.\n\n18. CAN bus/OBD-II Protocols:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya lacks experience with CAN bus and OBD-II protocols, which are important for the role.\n\n19. ISO 26262 Functional Safety:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya has limited knowledge of ISO 26262 Functional Safety and did not provide examples of ensuring compliance.\n\n20. Performance Optimization/Resource Management:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Asmiya discussed performance optimization and resource management but could provide more in-depth examples of her approach.', '2024-07-19 06:15:15'),
(29, 57, 4, 411, 98, 'Varun\'s responses throughout the interview were generally on topic, but they lacked the depth and specificity expected for the role. While he demonstrated some understanding of the technologies and processes involved, his answers were often vague and did not convey a strong grasp of the subject matter or the ability to articulate complex technical concepts clearly.', '- Varun expressed confidence in his abilities and a willingness to engage with the interview process.\n- He mentioned experience with Kafka, Python, AWS Lambda, and Jira, which are relevant to the job description.\n- Varun showed an understanding of the importance of scalability and customer-centric approaches in software development.', '- Varun\'s responses lacked detail and specificity, often failing to provide concrete examples or in-depth explanations of his experience.\n- He did not demonstrate a strong understanding of data pipeline development, real-time data processing, or the use of specific technologies like MQTT, HTTP, or SQL/NoSQL databases.\n- Varun\'s communication was not always clear or well-structured, which could lead to misunderstandings in a professional setting.', '11. Kafka:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun mentioned Kafka but did not provide detailed experiences or knowledge of implementing Kafka in projects.\n\n12. MQTT/HTTP protocols:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s understanding of MQTT and HTTP protocols in device-to-cloud communication was basic and lacked specific examples.\n\n13. Real-time data processing:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s response did not demonstrate a strong grasp of real-time data processing techniques or optimization strategies.\n\n14. Data pipeline development:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s description of data pipeline development was vague and did not reflect a deep understanding of the process.\n\n15. Microsoft Azure/GCP:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s experience with Azure or GCP was not clearly articulated, and he did not provide examples of overcoming challenges with these platforms.', '16. SQL/NoSQL databases:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s response on optimizing databases for high-velocity data was insufficient and did not reflect applied experience.\n\n17. Data ingestion/integration:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide a clear explanation of his experience with data ingestion or integration processes.\n\n18. Kafka Streams/Kafka Connect:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s knowledge of Kafka Streams or Kafka Connect was not evident from his responses.\n\n19. Data transformation/storage:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of data transformation or storage solutions.\n\n20. Jira/Rally:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun mentioned using Jira for project management but did not elaborate on how it helped maintain project timelines and deliverables effectively.', '2024-07-19 07:25:34'),
(30, 61, 40, 387, 92, 'Gowtham\'s responses throughout the interview were generally brief and lacked depth. While he demonstrated some familiarity with the technical aspects of the role, his answers often fell short in providing comprehensive insights into his experiences and approaches to problem-solving. There was a notable gap between the benchmark responses and his actual responses, indicating areas where Gowtham could improve to align more closely with the expectations for the HMI Developer role at Royal Enfield.', '- Gowtham has experience in Android development and has worked on various projects, which is relevant to the job description.\n- He mentioned working on customization for specific hardware configurations, which is a key aspect of the role.\n- Gowtham is aware of the importance of security best practices in Android development.', '- Responses lacked detail and specific examples that demonstrate his depth of knowledge and problem-solving skills.\n- He did not effectively communicate his experience with cross-functional collaboration, which is critical for the role.\n- Gowtham\'s answers did not showcase his ability to think creatively or adapt to new technologies and changes, as expected for the position.\n- He did not ask questions at the end of the interview, missing an opportunity to learn more about the role and company.', '11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Maintenance:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham mentioned his experience with Android customization but did not provide detailed examples. He could improve by discussing specific projects and their impact.\n\n12. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham has experience with Java and Kotlin but did not elaborate on his proficiency. He could improve by sharing more about his programming projects and challenges.\n\n13. Android System Architecture/Frameworks/Services:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham\'s knowledge in this area was implied but not well articulated. He could improve by providing examples of how he has worked with Android system architecture.\n\n14. UI/UX Design for Android:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham\'s responses did not demonstrate a strong understanding of UI/UX design principles. He could improve by discussing his involvement in designing user interface components.\n\n15. Performance Optimization/Profiling/Debugging:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham briefly mentioned optimization but did not provide a clear example of how he improved system performance. He could improve by detailing his approach to profiling and debugging.', '16. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham acknowledged the use of CI/CD pipelines but did not describe how he implemented them. He could improve by providing a specific example of how CI/CD improved a project\'s lifecycle.\n\n17. AOSP/AAOS Development:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham stated he was not directly involved in AOSP or AAOS development. He could improve by discussing any related experience or knowledge he has in this area.\n\n18. Security Best Practices/Compliance:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham mentioned security practices but did not provide a comprehensive view of how he implements them. He could improve by discussing specific security measures he has taken in his projects.\n\n19. Cross-Functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham did not provide a strong example of cross-functional collaboration. He could improve by sharing experiences where he worked with different teams to achieve project goals.\n\n20. Cloud Platforms/Containerization (Docker/Kubernetes):\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham mentioned using Docker but not Kubernetes. He could improve by discussing how containerization has enhanced system scalability and reliability in his projects.', '2024-07-19 09:42:47'),
(31, 63, 45, 412, 99, 'John\'s responses throughout the interview were generally aligned with the benchmark responses but lacked depth and specificity in certain areas. He demonstrated a solid understanding of Android development and shared relevant experiences from his previous roles. However, his answers could have been more detailed and structured to better showcase his expertise and problem-solving abilities.', '- John has a strong background in Android development, with specific experiences in security and performance optimization.\n- He showed awareness of the importance of collaboration with cross-functional teams and the need to prioritize user needs.\n- John\'s experience with leading a team and mentoring junior developers is evident and aligns with the job description\'s emphasis on cross-functional collaboration.', '- John\'s responses were sometimes vague and lacked the detail expected from a candidate with his experience. He could have provided more concrete examples and outcomes from his past projects.\n- His communication style could be more engaging and structured to convey his ideas more effectively.\n- John did not ask any questions at the end of the interview, missing an opportunity to learn more about the role and company.', '11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Integration:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: John discussed his experience with Android platform development but could have provided more details on customization and integration aspects.\n\n12. User Interface Development for Android:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: John mentioned his transition from XML to Jetpack Compose, indicating his experience with UI development.\n\n13. Performance Optimization for Android Systems:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: John provided an example of performance optimization but could have elaborated on the specific techniques and tools he used.\n\n14. Android Security Best Practices/Compliance:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: John\'s experience with security in banking apps demonstrates his knowledge in this area, although he could have mentioned compliance aspects.\n\n15. Cross-functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: John\'s response indicated experience with cross-functional collaboration, aligning with the job description.', '16. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: John discussed his experience with Java and Kotlin, showing a solid foundation in these programming languages.\n\n17. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: John mentioned the implementation of CI/CD pipelines at TCS, which improved the development process.\n\n18. AOSP/AAOS Development Experience:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: John did not specifically mention AOSP/AAOS development experience, which is an area he could have highlighted.\n\n19. Cloud Platforms/Containerization Knowledge:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: John did not provide information on his experience with cloud platforms or containerization.\n\n20. Android Development Tools Proficiency (Android Studio/ADB/Gradle):\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: John provided examples of using Android development tools, demonstrating proficiency in this area.', '2024-07-19 12:43:38'),
(32, 65, 44, 409, 96, 'Avinash\'s performance in the interview was mixed. While he demonstrated a solid understanding of Android development and experience in the automotive domain, his responses lacked depth in certain areas and were sometimes off-topic or unclear. His communication style was straightforward, but there were instances where he could have been more articulate and relevant to the questions asked.', '- Avinash has substantial experience in Android framework development and automotive software, aligning with the job requirements.\n- He has worked on performance optimization, which is critical for the role.\n- His experience with Agile practices and JIRA is evident and aligns with the collaborative nature of the role.', '- Avinash\'s responses sometimes lacked relevance and clarity, particularly when discussing Kotlin and GraphQL APIs, which he has limited experience with.\n- He did not demonstrate a strong understanding of Android Architecture, AAOS, or BSP, which are important for the role.\n- His communication style could be more engaging and structured to effectively convey his thoughts.', '11. Java/Kotlin:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Avinash has experience with Java but limited experience with Kotlin, which is relevant to the role.\n\n12. Android Studio:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Avinash demonstrated applied experience with Android Studio, which is crucial for the role.\n\n13. RESTful APIs/Websocket:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Avinash has experience with RESTful APIs at the app level but did not provide in-depth examples relevant to the automotive domain.\n\n14. Agile Practice/JIRA/Rally:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Avinash has good experience with Agile practices and JIRA, aligning with the job requirements.\n\n15. Android Architecture/AAOS/BSP:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Avinash\'s understanding of Android Architecture, AAOS, and BSP was not clearly conveyed and requires improvement.', '16. GraphQL APIs/Apollo Client:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Avinash has very limited experience with GraphQL APIs and Apollo Client, which are relevant to the role.\n\n17. Software Development Lifecycle:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Avinash demonstrated a good understanding of the Software Development Lifecycle and its application in the automotive industry.\n\n18. CAN bus/OBD-II Protocols:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Avinash has practical experience with CAN bus and OBD-II protocols, which is beneficial for the role.\n\n19. ISO 26262 Functional Safety:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Avinash mentioned ISO 26262 but did not provide a strong example of how he incorporated functional safety into his development process.\n\n20. Performance Optimization:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Avinash has experience with performance optimization, which is crucial for the role.', '2024-07-19 17:51:29'),
(33, 68, 42, 375, 91, 'Ajay demonstrated a strong technical background and relevant experience in Android-based Automotive Infotainment systems. His responses indicated a good understanding of the technical aspects of the role, including platform development, integration of third-party libraries, and user interface design. However, there were instances where his responses lacked depth and clarity, particularly when discussing non-technical stakeholder communication and balancing innovation with established processes.', '- Relevant experience in Android-based Automotive Infotainment systems.\n- Familiarity with Android platform development, customization, and integration.\n- Experience with third-party library integration and problem-solving skills.\n- Understanding of performance optimization in Android systems.', '- Communication could be clearer and more structured.\n- Responses sometimes lacked the depth expected for someone with his experience.\n- Could improve on explaining technical concepts to non-technical stakeholders.\n- Approach to balancing established processes with innovation could be more strategic.', '11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Integration:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ajay provided solid examples of his experience in this area, aligning well with the job requirements.\n\n12. User Interface Development for Android:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ajay discussed his approach to UI development, but more detail on his creative process would enhance his response.\n\n13. Performance Optimization for Android Systems:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ajay\'s experience with performance optimization was evident, showcasing his applied experience.\n\n14. Android Security Best Practices/Compliance:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ajay understands the importance of security and compliance but could articulate his experience with best practices more clearly.\n\n15. Cross-Functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ajay has experience with cross-functional teams but could improve how he communicates technical concepts to various stakeholders.', '16. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ajay provided examples of solving complex problems using Java and Kotlin, demonstrating good proficiency.\n\n17. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ajay\'s response showed his contribution to CI/CD practices, though more detail on his role in process improvement would be beneficial.\n\n18. AOSP/AAOS Experience:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ajay shared a relevant experience with AOSP, indicating a good level of applied experience.\n\n19. Cloud Platforms/Containerization Knowledge:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ajay is familiar with cloud platforms and containerization but could provide more concrete examples of leveraging these technologies.\n\n20. Android Development Tools Proficiency (Android Studio/ADB/Gradle):\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ajay demonstrated proficiency with essential Android development tools, aligning with the job requirements.', '2024-07-20 05:12:02');
INSERT INTO `bot_overall_feedback` (`id`, `botInterviewId`, `candidateId`, `resumeId`, `screeningId`, `feedback`, `strength`, `weakness`, `primarySkills`, `secondarySkills`, `created`) VALUES
(34, 70, 38, 379, 91, 'Swapnil demonstrated a good understanding of Android development and relevant experience. However, his responses lacked depth in certain areas and were sometimes unclear or incomplete, which suggests a need for improvement in communication and elaboration on technical expertise.', '- Swapnil has relevant experience in Android development and has worked on multiple projects, which aligns with the job description.\n- He mentioned experience with performance optimization, security practices, and cross-functional collaboration, which are key aspects of the role.\n- Swapnil\'s experience with AOSP and leading a team of developers indicates his capability to handle responsibilities that the job entails.', '- Swapnil\'s responses were sometimes vague and lacked specific examples or detailed explanations.\n- He did not fully articulate his thought process or the impact of his work on the projects he mentioned.\n- There were instances where Swapnil\'s communication was not clear, and he did not address the questions directly, which could be improved with more structured responses.', '11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Integration:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil mentioned relevant experience but did not provide compelling examples of his work in Android platform development.\n\n12. User Interface Development for Android:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Not relevant\nDescription: Swapnil did not provide a response to the question about his experience with User Interface Development on the Android platform.\n\n13. Performance Optimization for Android Systems:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil discussed performance optimization strategies but could have provided more concrete examples and results.\n\n14. Android Security Best Practices/Compliance:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil mentioned several security measures but did not detail specific instances where he ensured compliance with best practices.\n\n15. Cross-Functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil\'s response indicated experience with cross-functional collaboration, but he could have provided clearer examples of successful outcomes.', '16. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil\'s resume suggests proficiency in Java and Kotlin, but his interview responses did not fully demonstrate his programming skills.\n\n17. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Swapnil did not mention his experience with CI/CD pipelines, automated testing, or build automation during the interview.\n\n18. AOSP/AAOS Experience:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil mentioned working on an AOSP project, but he could have elaborated on his specific contributions and the impact of his work.\n\n19. Cloud Platforms/Containerization Knowledge:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Swapnil did not discuss his experience with cloud platforms or containerization, which are mentioned in the job description.\n\n20. Android Development Tools Proficiency (Android Studio/ADB/Gradle):\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil\'s resume indicates proficiency with Android development tools, but he did not elaborate on this during the interview.', '2024-07-20 11:20:28'),
(35, 69, 35, 413, 100, 'Bhushan demonstrated a solid understanding of data engineering concepts and his experience with various technologies relevant to the job description. He provided detailed explanations of his work with Kafka, real-time data processing, and data pipeline development, showcasing his technical expertise. However, there were instances where his responses could have been more structured and aligned with the benchmark responses, which emphasized clarity and relevance to the role at Royal Enfield.', '- Bhushan has hands-on experience with Kafka, real-time data processing, and data pipeline development, which are critical for the role.\n- He has worked on modernizing data pipelines, improving performance, and reducing costs, showing his ability to drive efficiency.\n- Bhushan\'s experience with AWS services, Elasticsearch, and Kubernetes indicates a strong background in cloud technologies and data storage solutions.', '- Bhushan\'s responses occasionally lacked the structured communication and clear articulation seen in the benchmark responses.\n- While he demonstrated technical knowledge, there were opportunities to better tailor his responses to the specific context of the role at Royal Enfield.\n- Bhushan could improve his ability to communicate complex technical concepts to non-technical stakeholders, ensuring complete understanding.', '11. Kafka:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan\'s experience with Kafka was evident, and he provided detailed explanations of its use in data streaming and processing.\n\n12. MQTT/HTTP protocols:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan discussed using HTTP protocols for secure data communication but did not elaborate on MQTT, indicating room for improvement.\n\n13. Real-time data processing:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan provided strong examples of real-time data processing, demonstrating his capability in this area.\n\n14. Data pipeline development:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan\'s experience with developing and modernizing data pipelines aligns well with the role\'s requirements.\n\n15. Microsoft Azure/GCP:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan expressed a preference for GCP over Azure based on his experience, showing an understanding of cloud platforms.', '16. SQL/NoSQL databases:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan shared challenges he faced with NoSQL databases and his solutions, indicating his proficiency with these technologies.\n\n17. Data ingestion/integration:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan\'s use of Kafka Connect for data ingestion and integration showcases his relevant experience.\n\n18. Kafka Streams/Kafka Connect:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan has practical experience with Kafka Streams and Kafka Connect, which he discussed in the context of enhancing data ingestion.\n\n19. Data transformation/storage:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan described tackling data transformation and storage challenges, particularly with Elasticsearch and Kubernetes.\n\n20. Jira/Rally:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan\'s use of Jira to manage complex projects and ensure task completion was well-articulated.\n\nOverall, Bhushan\'s technical expertise and experience are strong, but he could benefit from refining his communication skills and providing more contextually relevant responses.', '2024-07-20 11:21:28'),
(36, 71, 38, 414, 101, 'Swapnil demonstrated a good understanding of Android development and relevant experience in his responses. He provided detailed examples of his work, particularly in Android platform development, integration of third-party libraries, and user interface design. However, his responses lacked structure and clarity at times, which made it difficult to follow his thought process. Swapnil\'s experience with AOSP and security practices was evident, but he could improve on articulating his approach to problem-solving and optimization.', '- Swapnil has substantial experience in Android development, as evidenced by his work on multiple applications.\n- He has practical knowledge of integrating third-party libraries and customizing Android for specific hardware configurations.\n- Swapnil has experience with AOSP and has tackled challenges related to system services and inter-process communication.\n- His work on user interface components for automotive and consumer applications shows an understanding of usability and accessibility considerations.', '- Swapnil\'s responses could be more structured and concise to effectively communicate his ideas.\n- He could provide clearer examples of problem-solving, particularly in performance optimization and security best practices.\n- Swapnil did not answer question 8, which leaves a gap in understanding his approach to performance optimization.\n- While he mentioned automated testing and CI/CD pipelines, he could elaborate more on the impact these practices had on his projects.', '11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Integration:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil has solid experience in Android platform development and customization, as seen in his work with AOSP and third-party libraries.\n\n12. User Interface Development/Design:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil\'s experience with designing and implementing user interface components for different applications shows his competency in this area.\n\n13. Performance Optimization/Profiling/Debugging:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Swapnil did not answer question 8, which was directly related to performance optimization, leaving an incomplete assessment of his skills in this area.\n\n14. Security Best Practices/Compliance:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil has a good understanding of security best practices, as evidenced by his response to implementing SSL pinning and data encryption.\n\n15. Cross-Functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil mentioned working with cross-functional teams and helping others with challenges, indicating his ability to collaborate effectively.', '16. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil\'s extensive experience with Java and Kotlin programming is evident in his work on various Android applications.\n\n17. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil has experience with CI/CD pipelines and automated testing, but could provide more detail on how these practices impacted his projects.\n\n18. AOSP/AAOS Experience:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil\'s work with AOSP demonstrates his knowledge and experience in this area, although he could improve on explaining his approach to challenges.\n\n19. Cloud Platforms/Containerization Knowledge:\nScore: Not Evaluated\nQualitative Assessment: Not Evaluated\nDescription: There was no specific mention of cloud platforms or containerization knowledge in Swapnil\'s responses.\n\n20. Android Development Tools Proficiency:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil\'s proficiency with Android development tools is clear from his discussion of using profiling tools, Android Studio, and other relevant software.', '2024-07-20 11:50:16'),
(37, 72, 37, 380, 91, 'Muhammed\'s interview responses indicate a candidate with practical experience in Android development, particularly at the application layer. He shows a willingness to learn and adapt to new challenges, such as platform development, but lacks direct experience in some areas like CI/CD and containerization.', '- Experience with Java and Kotlin in Android development.\n- Practical knowledge of user interface development and system UI customization.\n- Understanding of performance optimization techniques and security best practices.\n- Ability to communicate technical concepts to non-technical stakeholders.', '- Limited experience with Android platform development and customization.\n- Lack of direct involvement in setting up CI/CD pipelines and containerization.\n- Responses sometimes lack depth and specific examples of complex problem-solving.', '11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Integration:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Muhammed has limited experience in this area and could benefit from more direct involvement and learning.\n\n12. User Interface Development for Android:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Muhammed has applied experience in UI development, which aligns well with the job requirements.\n\n13. Performance Optimization for Android Systems:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Muhammed understands performance optimization but could provide more detailed strategies and results.\n\n14. Android Security Best Practices/Compliance:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Muhammed is aware of security best practices but could discuss more comprehensive security strategies.\n\n15. Cross-Functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Muhammed has experience collaborating with cross-functional teams and effectively communicates technical concepts.', '16. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Muhammed has strong experience with Java and Kotlin, which is crucial for the role.\n\n17. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Muhammed lacks direct experience in CI/CD and could benefit from hands-on involvement.\n\n18. AOSP/AAOS Experience:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Muhammed has some exposure to AOSP/AAOS but needs more significant contributions and experience.\n\n19. Cloud Platforms/Containerization Knowledge:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Muhammed has not used containerization in his work and has limited knowledge of cloud platforms.\n\n20. Android Development Tools Proficiency (Android Studio/ADB/Gradle):\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Muhammed demonstrates proficiency with essential Android development tools, which is a key requirement for the role.', '2024-07-20 17:41:43'),
(38, 75, 46, 383, 91, 'Tabassum\'s responses were concise but lacked the depth and enthusiasm expected for a candidate with her experience. She confirmed her availability and readiness but did not engage in a manner that showcased her expertise or interest in the role.', '- Tabassum confirmed her availability and readiness to proceed with the interview.\n- She acknowledged the questions posed by the interviewer without hesitation.', '- Tabassum\'s responses were brief and lacked detail, failing to demonstrate her experience or enthusiasm for the role.\n- She did not take the opportunity to align her experience with the job requirements or express interest in the company.', '11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Integration:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tabassum did not discuss her experience in Android platform development, customization, or integration.\n\n12. User Interface Development for Android:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no mention of her experience in user interface development for Android.\n\n13. Performance Optimization for Android Systems:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tabassum did not provide any insights into her experience with performance optimization for Android systems.\n\n14. Android Security Best Practices/Compliance:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tabassum did not discuss her knowledge or experience with Android security best practices or compliance.\n\n15. Cross-Functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no indication of her experience with cross-functional collaboration or communication.', '16. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tabassum did not elaborate on her programming skills in Java or Kotlin.\n\n17. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tabassum did not mention any experience with CI/CD pipelines, automated testing, or build automation.\n\n18. AOSP/AAOS Experience:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Despite mentioning work on AOSP in her resume, Tabassum did not discuss this experience during the interview.\n\n19. Cloud Platforms/Containerization Knowledge:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no discussion of her knowledge or experience with cloud platforms or containerization.\n\n20. Android Development Tools Proficiency (Android Studio/ADB/Gradle):\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tabassum did not demonstrate her proficiency with Android development tools such as Android Studio, ADB, or Gradle.', '2024-07-22 18:23:35'),
(39, 93, 52, 558, 110, 'Ujjwal\'s responses in the interview were generally aligned with the job description, but there were some inconsistencies and areas for improvement. He demonstrated a good understanding of his professional experience and technical skills, but his responses lacked depth and specificity in certain areas.', '- Ujjwal expressed comfort with the responsibilities and technical skills required for the position.\n- He provided an overview of his professional experience, indicating a background in cloud and DevOps.', '- Ujjwal\'s responses lacked depth and did not provide specific examples of his work or achievements.\n- There were inconsistencies in his introduction, such as mentioning an MCA degree instead of a B.Tech, which could indicate a lack of attention to detail.\n- He did not share anything beyond his CV or LinkedIn profile when prompted.', '11. Cloud platforms (AWS):\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ujjwal mentioned experience with AWS but did not elaborate on specific projects or skills.\n\n12. Azure:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Ujjwal did not mention Azure experience in his responses.\n\n13. Google Cloud Platform:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Ujjwal did not mention Google Cloud Platform experience in his responses.\n\n14. CloudFormation:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Ujjwal did not discuss his experience with CloudFormation.\n\n15. GitLab CI:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ujjwal mentioned implementing CI/CD pipelines but did not specify his experience with GitLab CI.', '16. Cloud services and architecture:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ujjwal\'s experience with cloud services was implied but not detailed.\n\n17. Compute:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ujjwal did not provide specific examples of working with compute resources.\n\n18. Storage:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Ujjwal did not provide specific examples of working with cloud storage solutions.\n\n19. Networking in cloud:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Ujjwal did not provide specific examples of working with cloud networking.\n\n20. Scalable and resilient cloud solution design:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ujjwal mentioned scalable and reliable architectures but did not provide details on his design experience.', '2024-07-28 17:22:33'),
(40, 97, 52, 558, 110, 'Ujjwal\'s responses were brief and lacked the professional tone expected in an interview setting. The candidate\'s engagement was minimal, and responses did not provide substantial information to assess competencies fully.', '- Ujjwal demonstrated a willingness to proceed with the interview, indicating readiness and availability.', '- The responses were too brief and lacked professionalism.\n- Ujjwal did not address the interviewer by the correct name, which could be seen as a lack of attention to detail.\n- The use of a foreign language (Indonesian) in the second response was inappropriate for the context and could indicate a misunderstanding of the communication norms in an interview.', '11. Cloud platforms (AWS:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Ujjwal\'s responses did not provide enough information to assess AWS knowledge.\n\n12. Azure:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Ujjwal\'s responses did not provide enough information to assess Azure knowledge.\n\n13. Google Cloud Platform:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Ujjwal\'s responses did not provide enough information to assess GCP knowledge.\n\n14. CloudFormation:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Ujjwal\'s responses did not provide enough information to assess CloudFormation knowledge.\n\n15. GitLab CI:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Ujjwal\'s responses did not provide enough information to assess GitLab CI knowledge.', '16. Cloud services and architecture:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Ujjwal\'s responses did not provide enough information to assess cloud services and architecture knowledge.\n\n17. Compute:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Ujjwal\'s responses did not provide enough information to assess compute knowledge.\n\n18. Storage:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Ujjwal\'s responses did not provide enough information to assess storage knowledge.\n\n19. Networking in cloud:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Ujjwal\'s responses did not provide enough information to assess networking in cloud knowledge.\n\n20. Scalable and resilient cloud solution design:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Ujjwal\'s responses did not provide enough information to assess scalable and resilient cloud solution design knowledge.', '2024-07-29 02:48:41'),
(41, 103, 54, 566, 114, 'Nimmisha\'s responses during the interview were concise but lacked depth and detail. She confirmed her availability and comfort with the role\'s responsibilities but did not provide substantial information about her professional journey or specific experiences related to business process reengineering and stakeholder analysis.', '- Nimmisha confirmed her readiness and availability for the interview.\n- She expressed comfort with the responsibilities and technical skills required for the position.', '- Nimmisha\'s responses lacked the detail and depth expected for someone with her experience.\n- She did not provide specific examples or insights into her professional journey or relevant experiences.\n- Her communication style was brief and did not engage with the questions in a way that showcased her expertise or enthusiasm for the role.', '11. Business process reengineering; Requirements gathering; Functional requirements documentation; Use case development; Data analytics tools proficiency:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Nimmisha did not provide any specific examples or experiences related to these skills.\n\n16. Stakeholder analysis; Communication and presentation skills; Problem-solving; Analytical thinking; Banking industry knowledge:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Nimmisha mentioned her involvement in stakeholder analysis but did not elaborate on her experience or skills in this area.', '', '2024-07-31 05:12:40'),
(42, 144, 4, 894, 124, 'Varun\'s responses throughout the interview were technically detailed but often strayed from the specific marketing context expected for the role at Adzip Technologies. His answers were more aligned with technical data processing and IT infrastructure, which, while impressive, did not directly address the marketing-focused questions. This indicates a potential misalignment with the job requirements, which emphasize marketing strategy, social media management, and customer engagement within the automotive industry.', 'Varun demonstrated a strong technical grasp of data management systems, particularly around Kafka and AWS, which suggests he has excellent analytical and technical skills. His detailed knowledge in these areas could be beneficial in data-driven marketing analytics if appropriately channeled towards marketing outcomes.', 'Varun\'s responses lacked focus on marketing strategies and were overly technical, missing the opportunity to showcase his ability to translate market research into actionable marketing strategies. He needs to improve on aligning his responses with the job role\'s requirements, focusing more on marketing and less on technical data processing. Training or coaching in strategic marketing and brand management specific to the automotive industry could help Varun align better with such roles.', '11. Social Media Marketing:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not effectively demonstrate knowledge or strategies related to social media marketing, which is crucial for the role.\n\n12. SEO:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s understanding of SEO was not evident from his responses, which did not align with the strategies needed for effective SEO in marketing.\n\n13. SEM:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no clear demonstration of knowledge or experience in SEM, which is essential for the marketing specialist role.\n\n14. Content Marketing:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss any relevant content marketing strategies or experiences, which are critical for the role.\n\n15. Market Research:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun mentioned data processes but did not connect these to market research applications in marketing.', '16. Sales Collaboration:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was little evidence of effective collaboration with sales teams to align marketing strategies, which is key for the role.\n\n17. Lead Generation:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate understanding or strategies for lead generation through marketing efforts.\n\n18. Event Management:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide examples of successful event management that could contribute to brand awareness and marketing goals.\n\n19. Customer Relationship Management:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was a lack of demonstrated experience in using CRM tools to enhance customer relationships effectively.\n\n20. Community Management:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not showcase effective community management strategies to foster engagement and loyalty, which are important for the role.\n\nRecommendation:\nBased on the evaluation, Varun appears to have strong technical skills but lacks the marketing-focused approach needed for the Marketing Specialist role at Adzip Technologies. It is recommended that Varun either undergoes specific training in marketing within the automotive industry or considers roles that align more closely with his technical skill set.', '2024-08-18 12:57:24'),
(43, 155, 4, 918, 129, 'Varun\'s responses during the interview were generally unresponsive and unengaging, which significantly detracts from his suitability for the Marketing Specialist role at Adzip Technologies. Despite his extensive background as indicated on his resume, his actual responses in the interview did not demonstrate the depth of knowledge or enthusiasm expected for a candidate at his level. His inability to provide detailed examples or engage in meaningful discussion about his skills and experiences raises concerns about his fit for the role that demands active engagement and expertise in digital marketing and AI.', 'Varun\'s resume suggests a strong background in digital commerce and strategy consulting, which aligns with the job requirements. However, these strengths were not evident in his interview responses, as he failed to articulate his experiences or discuss his qualifications in a meaningful way.', 'Varun\'s main weakness in the interview was his lack of relevant and engaging responses. He did not provide any substantial answers to the questions posed, which is critical in assessing his suitability for the role. His communication was also lacking clarity and engagement, which are crucial for a marketing role that involves strategy and client interaction. Varun needs to improve on articulating his experiences and skills relevant to the job description and engage more dynamically in discussions about his professional journey and expertise.', 'Given the overall assessment, it is recommended that Varun is not selected for the role of Marketing Specialist at Adzip Technologies based on his performance in this interview. His responses did not meet the expectations set by his resume or the needs of the role as described in the job description.', '', '2024-08-26 14:13:02'),
(44, 159, 4, 920, 133, 'Varun demonstrated a strong foundational understanding of business analysis and Agile methodologies, which aligns well with the job requirements. However, his responses occasionally lacked depth in specific technical aspects such as Scrum methodologies and detailed project management strategies. Varun\'s experience in e-commerce and digital transformation is a significant asset, and he showcased a methodical approach to problem-solving and stakeholder management. Despite some gaps in recalling specific methodologies, his strategic thinking and ability to handle complex requirements are evident, making him a potentially valuable addition to the team, albeit with some areas for improvement.', 'Varun\'s strengths lie in his extensive experience with Agile methodologies and his strategic approach to business analysis, particularly in e-commerce. He effectively described how he breaks down project visions into actionable items and manages documentation and requirements gathering using tools like Jira. His methodical approach to stakeholder management and requirements workshops indicates strong interpersonal skills and the ability to foster collaborative environments.', 'Varun showed uncertainty in recalling and applying Scrum methodologies, which is crucial for the role. His responses sometimes lacked the technical depth expected for someone with his experience, particularly in describing his direct involvement in Scrum events and detailed project management processes. To improve, Varun could benefit from refreshing his knowledge of Scrum practices and enhancing his ability to articulate complex project management strategies in a more structured manner.', '11. - Agile:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun demonstrates a solid understanding of Agile methodologies, using them effectively in his projects. However, more detailed examples of applying these principles could enhance his response.\n\n12. - Scrum:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun admits to not being up-to-date with Scrum methodologies, which is a critical gap for the role. Refreshing his knowledge and providing specific examples would improve his proficiency.\n\n13. - Requirements Gathering:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun excels in requirements gathering, showcasing detailed processes and tools he uses, such as Jira. His systematic approach is a strong asset.\n\n14. - Agile and Scrum methodologies:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: While Varun is strong in Agile principles, his grasp of Scrum is less confident. Balancing his expertise in both areas would provide a more rounded skill set.\n\n15. - Requirements gathering and documentation:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun\'s ability to gather and document requirements effectively, especially using Agile methodologies, is evident. His strategic use of tools like Jira enhances his capabilities in this area.', '16. - Atlassian Suite (Jira):\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun demonstrates proficient use of Jira for documentation and project management, which aligns well with the job requirements.\n\n17. - Confluence:\nScore: Not specifically mentioned\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not specifically mention using Confluence. Familiarity with this tool could be beneficial, given its common use in conjunction with Jira for project documentation.\n\n18. - Bitbucket:\nScore: Not specifically mentioned\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Similar to Confluence, Varun does not mention Bitbucket. Knowledge of this tool, particularly for source code management, would complement his technical skills.\n\n19. - Atlassian Suite (Jira, Confluence, Bitbucket):\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: While Varun shows strong use of Jira, his familiarity with Confluence and Bitbucket is not demonstrated. Enhancing his knowledge of the entire Atlassian Suite would be advantageous.\n\n20. - Data analysis and visualization tools:\nScore: Not specifically mentioned\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun does not discuss his experience with data analysis and visualization tools, which are crucial for the Business Analyst role. Expanding his skill set in this area could improve his job performance.\n\nIn conclusion, Varun has shown considerable strengths in areas critical to the Business Analyst role, particularly in Agile methodologies and stakeholder management. However, there are gaps in his knowledge and application of Scrum and certain technical tools, which he could address to better meet the job requirements. His strategic thinking and problem-solving abilities are commendable, making him a potentially valuable asset to the team with some areas for further development.', '2024-08-27 06:23:54'),
(45, 163, 4, 921, 134, 'Varun\'s responses throughout the interview indicate a strong foundation in business analysis and product management, particularly in the context of digital transformation and e-commerce. His experience with large enterprises and Agile methodologies aligns well with the job requirements. However, his initial reluctance to proceed with the interview and some deviations from the benchmark responses suggest areas for improvement in interview preparedness and engagement.', 'Varun demonstrates a robust understanding of Agile methodologies and has significant experience managing complex IT projects across various industries. His approach to handling ambiguous business requirements is methodical and structured, which is crucial for the Business Analyst role. He also shows a good grasp of stakeholder engagement techniques to clarify project requirements.', 'Varun\'s initial hesitation to proceed with the interview and some inconsistencies in addressing the interviewer by the correct name (e.g., \"Abhi\" instead of \"Avi\") could indicate a need for better focus and engagement during professional interactions. Additionally, his responses could be more aligned with the benchmark by explicitly connecting his past experiences with the potential contributions to the new role.', 'Based on the evaluation, Varun possesses the core competencies required for the Business Analyst role but should focus on enhancing his interview engagement and communication precision. His technical skills and experience are strong, making him a potentially valuable addition to the team with some areas for improvement in professional interactions.', '', '2024-08-27 11:49:55'),
(46, 164, 4, 922, 134, 'Varun\'s responses during the interview were notably brief and lacked the depth and engagement expected for a Business Analyst role at Adzip Technologies. His answers did not demonstrate the required analytical depth, problem-solving skills, or communication effectiveness that the role demands. While his resume suggests significant experience, this was not adequately reflected in his interview performance, which was minimalistic and underwhelming.', 'Varun\'s strength lies in his extensive experience in digital commerce and strategy consulting, as indicated in his resume. However, this strength was not effectively communicated or demonstrated during the interview, as his responses were overly concise and lacked elaboration.', 'Varun\'s main weakness in the interview was his inability to provide detailed and relevant responses. His communication was not effective in conveying his expertise or enthusiasm for the role. He needs to improve on articulating his experiences and how they relate to the job requirements. Engaging more thoroughly with the questions and offering detailed insights into his skills and experiences would make his responses more compelling.', 'Given the overall assessment, it is recommended that Varun may not be the best fit for the Business Analyst position at this time without further interviews or a more detailed discussion that better showcases his abilities and alignment with the role\'s requirements.', '', '2024-08-28 16:11:52'),
(47, 165, 4, 922, 134, 'Varun\'s responses during the interview were notably brief and lacked the depth and engagement expected for a Business Analyst role at Wipro. His concise answers failed to demonstrate a thorough understanding of the responsibilities or to highlight his relevant skills and experiences effectively. This shortfall in communication and engagement raises concerns about his suitability for a role that demands extensive interaction with stakeholders and cross-functional teams.', 'Varun\'s resume suggests a strong background in digital commerce and strategy consulting, which aligns with the job requirements. However, his strengths were not effectively communicated in the interview responses, making it difficult to assess his true potential and fit for the role based solely on the interview.', 'Varun\'s main weakness in the interview was his lack of detailed responses and engagement with the questions posed. His answers were often too brief and did not provide the necessary insights into his capabilities or thought processes. For improvement, Varun could benefit from more actively elaborating on his experiences and how they relate to the job requirements. Practicing detailed and contextually rich responses would better showcase his qualifications and readiness for the role.', 'Given the overall assessment, it is recommended that Varun may not be the best fit for the Business Analyst position at Wipro without further interviews or evidence of his capabilities that align more closely with the job requirements.', '', '2024-08-28 16:26:45'),
(48, 167, 4, 923, 133, 'Varun\'s responses throughout the interview demonstrated a strong foundation in Agile methodologies and significant experience with project management and stakeholder engagement. However, there were instances where his answers lacked the depth and specificity expected for a Business Analyst role at this level. Varun showed familiarity with tools like JIRA and methodologies like Agile and Scrum but struggled to provide detailed examples of process improvements and conflict resolution. His communication was clear but occasionally misaligned with the interviewer\'s queries, suggesting a need for more focused and relevant responses.', 'Varun\'s strengths lie in his extensive experience with Agile and Scrum methodologies, as evidenced by his ability to discuss backlog management and sprint planning. He also demonstrated a good understanding of using JIRA for project management. His experience across various geographies and with diverse teams is a significant asset, providing him with a broad perspective on handling complex project environments.', 'Varun\'s responses sometimes lacked the specificity and detail necessary to fully satisfy the requirements of the role. He struggled with recalling past experiences and providing concrete examples of his analytical capabilities and how he managed documentation and stakeholder conflicts. This could be improved by preparing more detailed case studies and examples that highlight his analytical skills and problem-solving abilities.', 'Based on this evaluation, Varun shows potential but may need further development in certain areas, particularly in providing more detailed and specific responses to demonstrate his expertise fully.', '', '2024-08-30 07:23:12'),
(49, 168, 4, 943, 137, 'Varun\'s performance in the interview was notably below expectations. His responses often lacked depth and relevance to the questions posed, reflecting a significant gap between the benchmark responses and his actual answers. This gap was particularly evident in his inability to provide detailed examples of his work, especially concerning Magento and digital transformation strategies. His communication was often unclear and at times, he failed to answer the questions directly, which raises concerns about his suitability for the role of IT Director, which demands strong leadership and clear communication skills.', 'Varun\'s resume suggests a strong background in e-commerce and digital transformations, which aligns with the job requirements. His experience in leading teams and managing large-scale projects could be beneficial. However, these strengths were not effectively conveyed in his interview responses, which lacked the necessary detail and specificity to fully showcase his capabilities.', 'Varun demonstrated significant weaknesses in communication clarity and relevance of responses. He often responded with \"I don\'t know\" or requested repetition of questions, indicating either a lack of preparation or understanding. His inability to provide concrete examples of past projects or articulate a clear strategy for addressing common e-commerce challenges, such as cart abandonment, was a critical shortfall. Improving his communication skills and ability to articulate his experience and strategies clearly would be necessary for success in a director-level role.', '', '', '2024-09-02 09:22:07'),
(50, 169, 4, 945, 137, 'Varun demonstrates a robust background in IT and e-commerce, particularly in leadership roles that align well with the IT Director position at Adzip Technologies. His responses reflect a strong understanding of e-commerce platforms like Magento and significant experience in managing large-scale projects. However, his responses occasionally lacked the depth and specificity expected for a candidate at this level, particularly in articulating challenges and solutions in past projects.', 'Varun\'s strengths lie in his extensive experience with e-commerce platforms, particularly Magento, and his leadership in managing large teams and projects. His response about integrating Magento with other systems shows a good grasp of technical requirements and project execution. He also demonstrates a strong strategic orientation, as seen in his roles at Wipro and Ogilvy, which aligns with the strategic responsibilities of the IT Director role.', 'Varun could improve in articulating specific challenges and the strategic impact of his solutions in past roles. His responses were sometimes general and did not fully convey the complexity and scope of his experience. For instance, when discussing challenges in Magento integrations, he could have detailed specific problem-solving strategies or innovations he implemented. Enhancing this area would better demonstrate his capability to handle the strategic and technical complexities of the IT Director role.', '16. Retail and e-commerce:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun\'s background in e-commerce is strong, but linking this experience more directly to retail-specific strategies would align better with the job requirements.\n\n17. Magento (e-commerce platform):\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun demonstrates solid experience with Magento; however, deeper insights into strategic use and customization would be beneficial.\n\n18. Ecommerce:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun has a robust understanding of e-commerce, evidenced by his career focus and achievements in this area.\n\nRecommendation:\nBased on the evaluation, Varun is a strong candidate for the IT Director position, with relevant experience and skills. However, to fully meet the strategic demands of the role, he should provide deeper insights into his problem-solving strategies and innovation capabilities in future discussions or presentations.', '', '2024-09-03 04:59:52'),
(51, 171, 4, 945, 137, 'Varun\'s interview responses demonstrate a strong background in e-commerce and digital transformation, aligning well with the IT Director role at Adzip Technologies. His extensive experience in leading e-commerce strategies and integrating technologies like Magento is evident. However, his responses occasionally lacked depth in technical specifics and strategic alignment with business objectives, which are crucial for the IT Director role. His communication was clear but sometimes drifted off-topic, suggesting a need for more focused and concise answers.', 'Varun excels in discussing his experience with e-commerce platforms, particularly Magento, and his role in digital transformations. His strategic involvement in enhancing customer experience and operational efficiency through technology integration is a strong asset. Varun\'s leadership in managing teams and driving significant e-commerce projects aligns well with the responsibilities of an IT Director.', 'Varun\'s responses sometimes veered off-topic and lacked the necessary technical depth expected of an IT Director, who should be capable of discussing strategic IT frameworks in detail. His answers could be more concise and focused on the specific questions asked, reflecting a need for improvement in communication during high-stake discussions. Additionally, Varun could benefit from demonstrating a clearer understanding of aligning IT strategies with broader business objectives.', '16. 1. retail and e-commerce:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun has a strong background in retail and e-commerce, which is directly relevant to the job. He effectively discusses his experience in this area, although more specific examples of strategic impact would be beneficial.\n\n17. 2. magento (e-commerce platform):\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun\'s experience with Magento is evident and aligns with the job requirements. He discusses various implementations and customizations but could delve deeper into strategic uses of Magento in retail.\n\n18. 3. ecommerce:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun\'s expertise in e-commerce is clear and pertinent to the role. He provides solid examples of his work, though additional details on overcoming specific e-commerce challenges would be advantageous.\n\n19. null:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: N/A\n\n20. null:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: N/A', '21. 1. customer experience:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun understands the importance of customer experience in e-commerce. He mentions several initiatives to enhance customer engagement but could provide more detailed strategies that align with business objectives.\n\n22. 2. retail and e-commerce:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun\'s responses demonstrate a robust understanding of retail and e-commerce. He could enhance his responses by discussing more about strategic planning and execution in this domain.\n\n23. 3. magento (e-commerce platform):\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun\'s knowledge of Magento is comprehensive, making him well-suited for the role. He could further impress by detailing more complex technical challenges and solutions in Magento implementations.\n\n24. 4. ecommerce:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun\'s e-commerce expertise is strong. He discusses various aspects effectively but could benefit from sharing more about integrating e-commerce strategies with overall business strategies.\n\n25. null:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: N/A\n\nRecommendation:\nBased on the evaluation, Varun shows potential for the IT Director role, especially with his strong background in e-commerce and Magento. However, he should work on aligning his IT strategies more closely with business objectives and improving the conciseness and strategic focus of his responses. With some guidance and focused development on strategic IT management, Varun could be a valuable asset to Adzip Technologies.', '2024-09-03 06:39:51');
INSERT INTO `bot_overall_feedback` (`id`, `botInterviewId`, `candidateId`, `resumeId`, `screeningId`, `feedback`, `strength`, `weakness`, `primarySkills`, `secondarySkills`, `created`) VALUES
(52, 172, 4, 945, 137, 'Varun\'s responses during the interview were generally brief and lacked the depth and detail expected for a candidate applying for the IT Director position at Adzip Technologies. His answers did not fully demonstrate the comprehensive understanding and expertise required for a role that demands strategic oversight and technical proficiency in the retail and e-commerce sector. There were moments where Varun failed to provide specific examples or elaborate on his experiences, which could raise concerns about his suitability for the role that requires high-level strategic thinking and effective communication skills.', 'Varun\'s resume indicates a strong background in digital commerce and strategic consulting, which aligns with the job requirements. His experience with Magento and leading IT strategies in various industries could be beneficial for Adzip Technologies. However, these strengths were not effectively communicated in his interview responses, which were often too concise and lacked the necessary details to fully convey his capabilities.', 'Varun\'s primary weakness in the interview was his inability to provide detailed and contextually rich answers. For a role as critical as IT Director, it is crucial to articulate thoughts clearly and provide specific examples that demonstrate expertise and strategic thinking. Varun could improve by practicing how to elaborate on his experiences, relate them to the job role, and engage more dynamically with the interviewer. Enhancing his communication to include more detailed explanations and examples would better showcase his qualifications and alignment with the job\'s demands.', '16. Retail and e-commerce:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s responses lacked depth in discussing his retail and e-commerce experience. He should provide specific examples and achievements in this area to better align with the job requirements.\n\n17. Magento (e-commerce platform):\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: While Varun mentioned Magento, he did not delve into detailed experiences or projects. Expanding on his technical and project management skills with Magento would provide a clearer picture of his capabilities.\n\n18. Ecommerce:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun needs to better articulate his strategic and operational roles in e-commerce to align with the expectations of the IT Director position. Providing more detailed insights into his accomplishments and challenges in e-commerce would be beneficial.\n\n16. Retail and sales analysis:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s responses lacked depth in discussing his retail and e-commerce experience. He should provide specific examples and achievements in this area to better align with the job requirements.\n\n17. IT management within the retail industry:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: While Varun mentioned Magento, he did not delve into detailed experiences or projects. Expanding on his technical and project management skills with Magento would provide a clearer picture of his capabilities.\n', '16. Customer experience:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s responses lacked depth in discussing his retail and e-commerce experience. He should provide specific examples and achievements in this area to better align with the job requirements.\n\n17. Inventory management strategies:\nScore: 1\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: While Varun mentioned Magento, he did not delve into detailed experiences or projects. Expanding on his technical and project management skills with Magento would provide a clearer picture of his capabilities.\n\n18. Supply chain optimization	:\nScore: 1\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun needs to better articulate his strategic and operational roles in e-commerce to align with the expectations of the IT Director position. Providing more detailed insights into his accomplishments and challenges in e-commerce would be beneficial.\n\n16. Retail compliance:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s responses lacked depth in discussing his retail and e-commerce experience. He should provide specific examples and achievements in this area to better align with the job requirements.\n\n17. Store operations:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: While Varun mentioned Magento, he did not delve into detailed experiences or projects. Expanding on his technical and project management skills with Magento would provide a clearer picture of his capabilities.\n', '2024-09-03 07:28:07'),
(53, 173, 4, 785, 124, 'Varun demonstrated a strong background in marketing and sales enablement, with extensive experience in digital marketing, media planning, and campaign management. His responses were articulate and showcased his depth of knowledge in the marketing domain. However, there were areas where his responses could align more closely with the specific requirements of the job role, particularly in demonstrating applied experience in automotive industry marketing strategies and brand management.', 'Varun\'s strengths lie in his comprehensive experience in digital marketing and sales enablement, as evidenced by his detailed responses about past projects and roles. His communication was clear and professional, reflecting his seniority and experience in the field. Varun also showed a strong ability to articulate complex marketing strategies and demonstrated a good understanding of market research and digital marketing tools.', 'While Varun has a robust background, his responses lacked specific examples and insights into the automotive industry, which is crucial for the Marketing Specialist role at Adzip Technologies. To improve, Varun could focus on relating his extensive marketing experience more directly to automotive industry challenges and strategies. Additionally, providing more specific examples of past successes in brand campaigns within the automotive sector would strengthen his fit for the role.', '16. Social Media Marketing:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun demonstrated strong knowledge in social media marketing, referencing specific tools and strategies he has used. More examples of successful social media campaigns in the automotive sector would enhance his application.\n\n17. SEO:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun understands SEO principles well. He could further align his SEO knowledge with automotive industry specifics to better meet the job\'s demands.\n\n18. SEM:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun has a good grasp of SEM tactics. Integrating more detailed examples of SEM campaigns in the automotive industry would make his expertise more applicable.\n\n19. Content Marketing:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun has experience in content marketing, but focusing on content strategies specifically tailored to the automotive industry would be beneficial.\n\n20. Market Research:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun showed a solid foundation in market research techniques. More insights into automotive market research would be advantageous.', '21. Sales Collaboration:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun has collaborated effectively in sales roles. Highlighting specific collaborative projects within the automotive sector could strengthen his application.\n\n22. Lead Generation:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun understands lead generation strategies. Applying these strategies in the context of the automotive industry would be ideal.\n\n23. Event Management:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: While Varun mentioned event management, providing examples of automotive-related events he has managed would improve his relevancy.\n\n24. Customer Relationship Management:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun has good CRM skills. Tailoring these skills to address the unique needs of automotive industry clients would be beneficial.\n\n25. Community Management:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun has experience in community management. More details on managing communities specifically related to automotive enthusiasts or customers would enhance his profile.\n\nRecommendation:\nBased on the overall assessment, Varun shows a strong foundation in marketing with extensive experience that could benefit Adzip Technologies. However, for a role specifically tailored to the automotive industry, Varun would benefit from further aligning his experience with industry-specific examples and strategies. If he can bridge this gap, he would be a stronger candidate for the Marketing Specialist position.', '2024-09-03 11:21:15'),
(54, 174, 4, 946, 138, 'Varun\'s interview responses reveal a candidate with extensive experience in product management, particularly in e-commerce and digital transformation. However, his responses often veered off-topic or lacked the depth and specificity expected for a Product Manager role in the life sciences sector at Adzip Technologies. While he demonstrated a broad understanding of various technical aspects and methodologies, his responses sometimes lacked alignment with the specific requirements of the role, such as direct experience in the life sciences industry and the strategic management of product life cycles in this domain.', 'Varun\'s strengths lie in his extensive background in e-commerce and digital commerce strategy consulting, as evidenced by his detailed descriptions of past projects and roles. His experience with Agile methodologies and cross-functional team leadership are also notable, aligning well with the job requirements. His technical knowledge, particularly in Android system architecture and secure application development, though not directly relevant to the job role, showcases his technical proficiency.', 'Varun\'s responses often lacked relevance to the life sciences sector, which is crucial for the role he applied for. His examples were frequently more aligned with IT and generic product management rather than the specialized field of life sciences. Additionally, his communication was sometimes unclear and included irrelevant technical details, which could hinder effective stakeholder communication in a role that demands clear, focused, and strategic discussions. Improving his ability to tailor his experience and responses to the specific industry and role he is applying for would be beneficial.', '16. Product Management:\n    Score: 6\n    Qualitative Assessment: Average\n    Description: Varun has a strong background in product management but needs to better demonstrate how his skills and experiences can be directly applied to the life sciences sector.\n\n17. Business Analysis:\n    Score: 7\n    Qualitative Assessment: Good\n    Description: He shows good analytical skills, although the application to life sciences-specific scenarios could be enhanced.\n\n18. Market Research:\n    Score: 5\n    Qualitative Assessment: Average\n    Description: Varun understands the importance of market research but did not provide strong examples of how market research directly influenced product strategies in life sciences.\n\n19. Agile Methodologies:\n    Score: 7\n    Qualitative Assessment: Good\n    Description: Varun is proficient in using Agile methodologies, which is beneficial for the role. However, demonstrating how these methodologies were adapted for life sciences projects would be advantageous.\n\n20. User Experience Design Principles:\n    Score: 5\n    Qualitative Assessment: Average\n    Description: While he mentions user experience design, the depth and relevance of his experience to the life sciences field could be further detailed.', '21. Requirement Management:\n    Score: 6\n    Qualitative Assessment: Average\n    Description: Varun has experience in requirement management, but examples specific to regulatory and compliance requirements in life sciences were lacking.\n\n22. Requirements Gathering:\n    Score: 6\n    Qualitative Assessment: Average\n    Description: He understands the importance of requirements gathering; however, detailing this process in the context of life sciences would provide a clearer picture of his suitability for the role.\n\n23. Market Research Methodologies:\n    Score: 5\n    Qualitative Assessment: Average\n    Description: Varun needs to better articulate how his market research methodologies are adapted to the specific needs and challenges of the life sciences sector.\n\n24. SEO and SEM Strategies:\n    Score: 6\n    Qualitative Assessment: Average\n    Description: He has a basic understanding of SEO and SEM but did not effectively connect these strategies to their impact on life sciences products.\n\n25. Prototyping and Wireframing Tools:\n    Score: 6\n    Qualitative Assessment: Average\n    Description: Varun mentions using prototyping and wireframing tools, but more detailed examples of how these tools facilitated communication and development in life sciences would be beneficial.\n\nRecommendation:\nBased on the evaluation, Varun shows potential but also areas needing improvement, particularly in aligning his skills and experiences with the specific demands of the life sciences sector. A recommendation for a second, more focused interview or a role with a broader IT focus rather than one strictly in life sciences might be appropriate. Further assessment or training could also be considered to bridge any gaps in industry-specific knowledge and skills.', '2024-09-04 04:25:47'),
(55, 176, 4, 946, 138, 'Varun\'s interview responses indicate a lack of clarity and relevance to the questions posed. His initial greeting was not in English, which is critical for clear communication in this context. Furthermore, Varun did not respond to a direct question about the timing of the interview, which raises concerns about his attentiveness and engagement during the interview process. These issues are significant given the demands of the Product Manager role, which requires excellent communication and engagement with team members and stakeholders.', 'Unfortunately, based on the provided responses, it is challenging to identify specific strengths relevant to the job role. The interview does not showcase Varun’s ability to communicate effectively or engage meaningfully with the interview content.', 'Varun\'s primary areas of weakness in this interview are his clarity of communication and engagement. His initial response was not in English, which is necessary for the role in question. Additionally, his lack of response to a direct question about the interview\'s timing is concerning. Varun needs to improve his communication skills, particularly in English, and ensure he is fully responsive and engaged in professional settings. Practicing English language skills and participating in mock interviews could help address these issues.', '16. - Product Management:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Varun did not provide any information related to product management skills in his responses.\n\n17. - Business Analysis:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Business analysis skills could not be assessed due to the lack of relevant responses.\n\n18. - Market Research:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: No demonstration of market research skills was evident in the interview responses.\n\n19. - Agile Methodologies:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Varun did not mention or demonstrate knowledge of agile methodologies in his responses.\n\n20. - User Experience Design Principles:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: There was no content in the responses that could be used to assess knowledge of user experience design principles.', '21. - Requirement Management:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Requirement management skills were not demonstrated in the interview.\n\n22. - Requirements Gathering:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Varun did not provide responses that could showcase his skills in requirements gathering.\n\n23. - Market Research Methodologies:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: The responses did not include any demonstration of knowledge in market research methodologies.\n\n24. - SEO and SEM Strategies:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: SEO and SEM strategies were not discussed or demonstrated in Varun\'s responses.\n\n25. - Prototyping and Wireframing Tools:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: There was no mention or demonstration of skills in prototyping and wireframing tools in the responses provided.\n\nRecommendation: Based on the evaluation, it is recommended that Varun may not be suitable for the Product Manager position at this time due to significant gaps in communication and engagement. Further development in professional communication skills, particularly in English, and more preparation for engaging effectively in interviews are recommended before reapplying for similar roles.', '2024-09-04 09:55:47'),
(56, 177, 4, 946, 138, 'Varun\'s performance in the interview was significantly below expectations, particularly in his responsiveness and engagement with the role\'s requirements. His responses were brief and lacked the depth and enthusiasm expected for a candidate applying for a Product Manager position at Adzip Technologies. The interview was cut short due to his request to reschedule because of illness, which prevented a full evaluation of his capabilities.', 'Varun\'s primary strength in this interview was his polite interaction with the interviewer, acknowledging the greetings and expressing gratitude. However, this does not compensate for the lack of substantive responses related to the job role.', 'Varun demonstrated a significant weakness in engagement and relevance of responses. He did not address the specific questions related to the job responsibilities and requirements. His request to reschedule the interview due to illness, while reasonable, came abruptly without attempting to address the interview questions meaningfully. This raises concerns about his interest and seriousness towards the role. Improvement can be made by preparing more thoroughly for the interview, ensuring understanding and alignment with the job\'s demands, and demonstrating enthusiasm and readiness to discuss his qualifications and fit for the role.', '16. - Product Management:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss any aspect of his product management skills or experiences.\n\n17. - Business Analysis:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no discussion or demonstration of business analysis skills.\n\n18. - Market Research:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Market research skills were not assessed due to lack of relevant discussion.\n\n19. - Agile Methodologies:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention or demonstrate knowledge of agile methodologies.\n\n20. - User Experience Design Principles:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: No discussion on user experience design principles took place.', '21. - Requirement Management:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Requirement management skills were not evaluated.\n\n22. - Requirements Gathering:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no opportunity to assess Varun\'s skills in requirements gathering.\n\n23. - Market Research Methodologies:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Market research methodologies were not discussed.\n\n24. - SEO and SEM Strategies:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: SEO and SEM strategies were not covered in the interview.\n\n25. - Prototyping and Wireframing Tools:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no mention or demonstration of proficiency with prototyping and wireframing tools.\n\nRecommendation: Based on the interview, it is recommended not to proceed with Varun\'s candidacy without a further, more in-depth interview to properly assess his fit for the role, provided he can demonstrate greater engagement and relevance in his responses.', '2024-09-04 10:36:56'),
(57, 179, 4, 951, 139, 'Varun demonstrated a solid understanding of the requirements for the Full-stack Developer position at Adzip Technologies. His responses were generally aligned with the job\'s demands, particularly highlighting his comfort with the skills and responsibilities due to his project and internship experiences. However, there were areas where his responses could have been more detailed or explicitly tied his past experiences to the job role, which would have showcased a deeper understanding and enthusiasm for the position.', 'Varun\'s strengths lie in his clear comfort with the technical skills required for the role, as evidenced by his affirmative responses about his familiarity with Python, JavaScript, and full-stack development frameworks. His educational background and hands-on project experience, such as his work on tECH-inder, reinforce his capability in handling both front-end and back-end components, which are crucial for the Full-stack Developer role.', 'Varun\'s responses sometimes lacked depth and specificity. For instance, when discussing how his past experiences align with the job role, he could have elaborated on specific projects or aspects of his internships that directly relate to the job responsibilities. Providing more detailed examples would make his responses more compelling and demonstrate a proactive understanding of the role\'s requirements.', '16. Python:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun mentioned his comfort with Python, aligning with the job requirements. More specific examples of using Python in projects would provide a stronger case for his proficiency.\n\n17. Full Stack Developer:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun\'s background in projects like tECH-inder supports his capability as a Full Stack Developer. He could strengthen his response by detailing specific front-end and back-end tasks he has handled.\n\n18. HTML:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun\'s resume suggests familiarity with HTML, but discussing specific uses in projects would illustrate his practical skills better.\n\n19. SQL:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun\'s knowledge of SQL is implied in his background, but specific examples of database work would enhance his response.\n\n20. Restful APIs:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: While Varun is comfortable with APIs, incorporating details about how he has used them in past projects would demonstrate applied knowledge.', '21. Flask or Django:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun mentioned using Flask in a project. More depth about his experience with these frameworks would be beneficial.\n\n22. React or Angular:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun needs to provide more details about his experience with these frameworks to fully align with job expectations.\n\n23. Node.js:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun\'s experience with Node.js was not detailed in the interview. Discussing specific projects or tasks would help demonstrate his competency.\n\n24. Git:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun\'s familiarity with version control is clear from his resume. He could discuss how he has used Git in collaborative settings to strengthen his response.\n\nOverall, Varun shows promise for the Full-stack Developer role but should aim to provide more detailed and specific examples in his responses to fully convey his qualifications and enthusiasm for the position.', '2024-09-05 09:12:45'),
(59, 180, 4, 947, 138, 'Varun demonstrated a strong background in digital commerce and strategic consulting, with extensive experience in product management across various domains. However, his responses often lacked specificity regarding the life sciences sector and the integration of advanced data analytics, which are crucial for the role at Adzip Technologies. While he showcased a broad understanding of product management principles and methodologies, his examples were not always directly aligned with the life sciences industry, which could be a concern given the specialized nature of the position.', 'Varun\'s strengths lie in his comprehensive experience with digital transformations and managing complex product lifecycles, particularly in the e-commerce domain. He is comfortable with Agile methodologies and has a proven track record of leading cross-functional teams. His strategic approach to market research and user experience design indicates a strong capability to enhance product usability and customer satisfaction.', 'Varun\'s responses lacked depth in areas specifically related to the life sciences sector. His examples often did not directly address the integration of advanced data analytics for decision-making, which is critical for the role. Additionally, there were instances where he could not provide detailed responses to questions about handling negative feedback and gathering complex requirements in the life sciences context. Improving his knowledge of the specific challenges and regulatory requirements of the life sciences industry would be beneficial.', '16. Product Management:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun has a strong background in product management, although more examples specific to life sciences would enhance his fit for the role.\n\n17. Business Analysis:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: He demonstrated solid business analysis skills, which are essential for understanding market and customer requirements.\n\n18. Market Research:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun understands market research but did not fully convey how he would apply these skills specifically in the life sciences sector.\n\n19. Agile Methodologies:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: He is comfortable with Agile methodologies, which is beneficial for the iterative development process in product management.\n\n20. User Experience Design Principles:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: While Varun mentioned user experience design, more detailed examples of how he has applied UX principles in life sciences would be helpful.', '21. Requirement Management:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun discussed requirement management in general terms but did not provide detailed insights into handling complex requirements in life sciences.\n\n22. Requirements Gathering:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: He needs to demonstrate a more structured approach to gathering and prioritizing requirements, especially in a regulated industry like life sciences.\n\n23. Market Research Methodologies:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun\'s understanding of market research methodologies is adequate, but application to the life sciences sector was not clearly articulated.\n\n24. SEO and SEM Strategies:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: His knowledge of SEO and SEM is basic, and he could benefit from deeper understanding and integration of these strategies in digital marketing efforts.\n\n25. Prototyping and Wireframing Tools:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun mentioned using prototyping and wireframing tools, but more specific examples of how these tools were used to refine life sciences products would be beneficial.\n\nRecommendation:\nBased on the evaluation, Varun shows potential but would benefit from further development in areas specifically related to the life sciences sector. His strong background in digital commerce and product management is a solid foundation. However, for a role that heavily involves life sciences, he should enhance his understanding and experience in this area. A role that allows him to bridge his existing skills while growing into the life sciences aspect could be ideal, provided there is support for his professional development in this industry.', '2024-09-05 13:04:21'),
(60, 182, 4, 952, 140, 'Varun demonstrated a reasonable understanding of the job role and expressed comfort with the responsibilities and skills required for the IT Architect position at Adzip Technologies. His responses, while somewhat brief and lacking in detail compared to the ideal benchmark responses, still conveyed a general readiness and suitability for the role. However, there is room for improvement in terms of providing more comprehensive and engaging responses to fully showcase his expertise and enthusiasm for the position.', 'Varun\'s strengths lie in his familiarity with the required technologies such as Python, JavaScript, and MySQL, as indicated in the job description. His concise responses suggest a level of confidence in handling the responsibilities associated with the IT Architect role. His readiness to engage in the interview at the proposed time also reflects good professionalism.', 'Varun\'s responses were shorter and less detailed compared to the benchmark responses. This could be seen as a lack of ability to fully articulate his experiences and skills in a manner that would convincingly demonstrate his suitability for the role. To improve, Varun could focus on elaborating his answers to include specific examples of past projects and how his contributions align with the strategic goals of Adzip Technologies. Additionally, enhancing his communication to be more engaging and interactive would likely leave a stronger impression on the interviewers.', '16. - Python:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun mentioned his experience with Python, aligning with the job requirements. He could further impress by discussing specific Python projects and their impact on his previous roles.\n\n17. - JavaScript:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun has a good foundation in JavaScript, essential for the IT Architect position. More details on his use of JavaScript in project scenarios would be beneficial.\n\n18. - MySQL:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun is comfortable with MySQL, but discussing his experience with database design and query optimization specifically could provide a clearer understanding of his expertise.\n\n19. - Data analysis libraries:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: While Varun has used data analysis libraries, he did not elaborate on this during the interview. Providing examples of how he has used these libraries in real-world applications would demonstrate a deeper knowledge.\n\n20. - Web frameworks:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun has experience with web frameworks, which is promising. He could enhance his response by detailing specific frameworks he has worked with and the projects involved.', '21. - Generative AI:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun\'s experience with generative AI was not clearly articulated. Discussing specific projects or achievements in this area would help in demonstrating his capability.\n\n22. - Machine learning libraries:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun mentioned machine learning briefly but did not provide depth in his response. More detailed discussion on his practical use of machine learning libraries would be beneficial.\n\n23. - API development:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun has a solid grasp of API development. Expanding on how he has designed and used APIs in past projects would strengthen his response.\n\n24. - Database design:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun understands database design principles. More comprehensive examples of his work in this area would provide better insights into his capabilities.\n\n25. - Neural networks:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun\'s knowledge of neural networks appears basic. He could improve by detailing specific projects where he applied neural network technology.\n\nRecommendation:\nBased on the evaluation, Varun shows potential for the IT Architect role but would benefit from more detailed and engaging responses to fully demonstrate his suitability. If he can provide more comprehensive insights into his experiences and skills relevant to the role, he would likely be a stronger candidate. Further consideration may be warranted if he can address these areas in a follow-up interview or through additional documentation of his work.', '2024-09-05 14:03:36'),
(61, 186, 4, 952, 140, 'Varun\'s responses during the interview were concise but lacked the enthusiasm and detail expected for the IT Architect role at Adzip Technologies. While he demonstrated basic communication skills, his responses were not expansive or engaging enough to fully assess his fit for the role. His technical background seems strong, but the interview did not provide enough evidence of his ability to handle the comprehensive responsibilities of an IT Architect.', 'Varun\'s resume indicates a solid background in IT, with extensive experience in software development and project management. His technical proficiency in Python, JavaScript, and other technologies is a strong asset. During the interview, he communicated clearly and was polite, showcasing his professionalism.', 'Varun\'s responses were brief and lacked depth, which did not allow a full display of his knowledge or thinking process. He could improve by providing more detailed answers and examples from his experience to demonstrate his expertise and problem-solving skills. Engaging more with the interviewer by asking questions or elaborating on topics could also enhance his candidacy.', '16. - Python:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun\'s experience with Python is strong, but he could demonstrate more advanced applications relevant to the IT Architect role.\n\n17. - JavaScript:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun has a good grasp of JavaScript, although more detailed examples of his work could have been discussed.\n\n18. - MySQL:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun understands MySQL well; however, discussing his experience with complex database tasks would provide a better insight into his capabilities.\n\n19. - Data analysis libraries:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun mentioned using data analysis libraries but did not detail how he has applied them in projects, which is crucial for the role.\n\n20. - Web frameworks:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: While Varun has experience with web frameworks, more specific examples of his work would help assess his expertise better.', '21. - Generative AI:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun\'s knowledge of generative AI could be expanded, particularly in discussing applications in real-world projects.\n\n22. - Machine learning libraries:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun has basic knowledge of machine learning libraries but needs to demonstrate how he has used these tools to solve complex problems.\n\n23. - API development:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun has good experience with API development, though more detailed discussion on his projects would be beneficial.\n\n24. - Database design:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun\'s database design skills are adequate, but he could improve by sharing more about his strategic approach to complex database issues.\n\n25. - Neural networks:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: More depth in discussing his practical experience with neural networks would help in evaluating his fit for the role more effectively.', '2024-09-05 14:29:47'),
(62, 187, 4, 948, 138, 'Varun demonstrated a strong background in product management and digital transformation, particularly in complex and regulated environments like the life sciences sector. His responses highlighted extensive experience with Agile methodologies, user experience design, and strategic project execution. However, there were instances where his responses deviated from the expected detail and relevance, particularly in addressing specific methodologies and project outcomes. His communication was generally clear, though some answers lacked depth and specificity expected for a senior product management role.', 'Varun\'s strengths lie in his extensive experience with Agile methodologies and his ability to lead digital transformation projects across various industries. He articulated well how he applied Agile practices in a regulated environment, showing a good understanding of iterative development and stakeholder engagement. His experience in user experience design and his strategic approach to product management are also commendable, aligning well with the job requirements.', 'Varun occasionally provided responses that were either too generic or somewhat irrelevant to the questions posed, which could indicate a need for improvement in communication specificity and relevance. For instance, his response to a hypothetical scenario about launching a product in a regulated market was not adequately detailed and missed the opportunity to showcase his strategic thinking and planning skills. Improving on providing more targeted and detailed responses would enhance his fit for the role.', '16. Product Management:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun has a strong background in product management, especially in Agile environments. His experience aligns well with the responsibilities of the role, though incorporating more specific examples related to the life sciences sector would be beneficial.\n\n17. Business Analysis:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun\'s experience in business analysis is evident, but he could enhance his responses by detailing more specific analytical techniques and outcomes from his past projects.\n\n18. Market Research:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: While Varun understands the importance of market research, his responses lacked detailed examples of how he has conducted and applied research in a way that directly impacts product strategy and development.\n\n19. Agile Methodologies:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun demonstrated a solid understanding and application of Agile methodologies, which is crucial for the role. Further emphasis on how he has tailored these methodologies to fit specific project needs in the life sciences sector would be advantageous.\n\n20. User Experience Design Principles:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun\'s knowledge of UX design is apparent, but more detailed case studies or examples of how he has implemented UX principles to enhance product outcomes would provide a clearer understanding of his expertise.', '21. Requirement Management:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun has good experience in requirement management, essential for the product manager role. More specifics on how he prioritizes and aligns requirements with business objectives would be helpful.\n\n22. Requirements Gathering:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun understands the importance of requirements gathering, but his responses could be strengthened by discussing specific techniques and tools he uses to ensure comprehensive and precise requirements documentation.\n\n23. Market Research Methodologies:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun mentioned the role of market research in his projects, but did not provide detailed insights into the methodologies he employs or how the findings directly influence product strategy.\n\n24. SEO and SEM Strategies:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s knowledge of SEO and SEM is not strongly evident from his responses. As these skills were mentioned in the job description, providing specific examples of successful SEO/SEM campaigns or strategies he has implemented would be beneficial.\n\n25. Prototyping and Wireframing Tools:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun is proficient with prototyping and wireframing tools, which are crucial for product development. More detailed examples of how these tools have been used to refine product designs and enhance user satisfaction would enrich his responses.\n\nOverall, Varun shows good potential for the Product Manager position with his background in Agile methodologies and product management. However, enhancing the specificity and depth of his responses, particularly in areas directly related to the life sciences sector, would strengthen his candidacy. His communication skills are solid, but more dynamic engagement and tailored responses could further align with the expectations of a senior role.', '2024-09-06 05:29:04'),
(63, 188, 4, 953, 141, 'Varun\'s responses during the interview were notably brief and lacked the depth and engagement expected for a Product Manager role, especially within the life sciences domain at Adzip Technologies. His answers did not demonstrate the required enthusiasm, insight, or detailed understanding of the role and responsibilities. This was evident in his minimalistic responses to questions about his comfort with the role, his experience, and his ability to elaborate on specific projects or methodologies.', 'Varun\'s resume suggests a strong background in product management, particularly in Agile methodologies and SaaS/IoT product development, which aligns with the job requirements. However, these strengths were not effectively communicated in his interview responses, which were too concise to convey his expertise or enthusiasm for the role.', 'Varun\'s main weakness in this interview was his failure to provide substantive answers that demonstrate his qualifications and experiences relevant to the job role. His responses lacked detail and did not engage with the specifics of the questions asked, which is crucial for a role that requires strong communication and stakeholder management skills. To improve, Varun could focus on elaborating his answers, providing specific examples from his past roles, and showing a clear understanding of how his experience aligns with the responsibilities of the Product Manager position at Adzip Technologies.', '16. Product management:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Despite his extensive background, Varun did not effectively convey his product management skills during the interview.\n\n17. Business analysis:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun did not provide specific examples to demonstrate his expertise in business analysis, which is crucial for the role.\n\n18. Market research:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no mention or evidence of market research skills in Varun\'s responses, which is a key area for a Product Manager.\n\n19. Agile methodologies:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun mentioned his familiarity with Agile methodologies but did not discuss how he has applied these in his projects.\n\n20. User experience design principles:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun failed to discuss any specific instances where he applied user experience design principles, missing the opportunity to align with the job requirements.', '21. Requirement management:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: There was no detailed discussion about his skills in requirement management, which would be vital for the Product Manager role.\n\n22. SQL:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: SQL skills were not mentioned or demonstrated in Varun\'s responses.\n\n23. ERP systems:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any experience with ERP systems, which could be important for the role depending on the company\'s technology stack.\n\nRecommendation:\nBased on the evaluation, it is recommended that Varun may not be the best fit for the Product Manager position at Adzip Technologies without further interviews or evidence of his capabilities and enthusiasm for the role. Additional interviews focusing on detailed responses and examples of his work could provide a better assessment of his suitability.', '2024-09-06 05:45:58'),
(64, 189, 4, 954, 142, 'Varun\'s responses during the interview were succinct but lacked depth and detail, which is crucial for a role as complex as a Product Manager in the life sciences domain. His brief affirmations did not showcase his expertise or align closely with the job requirements that emphasize strategic role execution, cross-functional team leadership, and deep industry knowledge.', 'Varun\'s resume indicates a strong background in managing SAAS and IOT products, which aligns with the job requirements. His experience with Agile methodologies and product lifecycle management is a significant strength. His professional history suggests capability in handling complex projects and leading diverse teams, which is crucial for the Product Manager role at Adzip Technologies.', 'Varun\'s responses were overly concise and did not provide insights into his strategic thinking, problem-solving skills, or depth of knowledge in the life sciences domain. His communication style in the interview was too brief, which might raise concerns about his ability to engage stakeholders effectively. Varun could improve by elaborating on his experiences, providing specific examples, and demonstrating how his background aligns with the strategic objectives of the role.', '16. - product management:\n    Score: 6\n    Qualitative Assessment: Average\n    Description: While Varun\'s resume suggests experience in product management, his interview responses did not effectively showcase this expertise.\n\n17. - business analysis:\n    Score: 5\n    Qualitative Assessment: Average\n    Description: Varun\'s analytical skills were not demonstrated during the interview, which is critical for understanding and executing business analysis effectively.\n\n18. - market research:\n    Score: 5\n    Qualitative Assessment: Average\n    Description: There was no mention or demonstration of market research skills in Varun\'s responses.\n\n19. - agile methodologies:\n    Score: 6\n    Qualitative Assessment: Average\n    Description: Varun mentioned his experience with Agile methodologies, but did not discuss how he has applied these in his past roles.\n\n20. - user experience design principles:\n    Score: 4\n    Qualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\n    Description: Varun did not discuss any relevant experience or knowledge related to user experience design principles during the interview.', '21. - requirement management:\n    Score: 5\n    Qualitative Assessment: Average\n    Description: The interview lacked depth in discussing Varun\'s skills in requirement management.\n\n22. - requirements gathering:\n    Score: 5\n    Qualitative Assessment: Average\n    Description: Varun did not provide insights into his capabilities in requirements gathering during the interview.\n\n23. - market research methodologies:\n    Score: 4\n    Qualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\n    Description: There was no evidence of Varun\'s knowledge or experience with market research methodologies during the interview.\n\n24. - sql:\n    Score: 5\n    Qualitative Assessment: Average\n    Description: SQL skills were not discussed, which is a missed opportunity to showcase his technical competencies.\n\n25. - erp systems:\n    Score: 5\n    Qualitative Assessment: Average\n    Description: Varun did not mention any specific experiences with ERP systems, which could be crucial for the role.\n\nRecommendation: Varun may not be the best fit for the Product Manager position at Adzip Technologies without further demonstration of his strategic thinking, problem-solving abilities, and deeper knowledge of the life sciences domain. Additional interviews or a more detailed discussion might be necessary to fully assess his suitability for the role.', '2024-09-06 05:50:55');
INSERT INTO `bot_overall_feedback` (`id`, `botInterviewId`, `candidateId`, `resumeId`, `screeningId`, `feedback`, `strength`, `weakness`, `primarySkills`, `secondarySkills`, `created`) VALUES
(65, 191, 4, 954, 142, 'Varun\'s interview responses indicate a lack of clarity and relevance to the questions posed, often deviating from the specific context of the job role at Adzip Technologies. His responses were frequently misaligned with the company\'s focus, referencing incorrect company names and unrelated technical skills. This misalignment raises concerns about his understanding of the role and attention to detail.', 'Varun demonstrated enthusiasm and a willingness to engage in the interview process. He expressed a readiness to discuss his skills and experiences, which suggests a positive attitude towards new opportunities.', 'Varun\'s responses often lacked specificity and relevance to the questions asked. He repeatedly mentioned incorrect company names and discussed skills not pertinent to the role, such as Java and Kotlin, which were not listed in the job requirements. His answers were also sometimes vague and did not convincingly tie his past experiences to the responsibilities of the Product Manager role at Adzip Technologies. Additionally, his communication was unclear at times, using jargon and incomplete explanations that could lead to misunderstandings in a professional setting.', '16. Product management:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun mentioned his background in product management but failed to effectively link his experience with the specific needs of the role at Adzip Technologies, particularly in the life sciences domain. He should focus on detailing relevant experiences that directly relate to the job description.\n\n17. Business analysis:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun discussed aspects of business analysis; however, his explanations lacked depth and did not fully convey his expertise in the field. Enhancing his descriptions with specific examples and outcomes from his past roles would provide a clearer picture of his capabilities.\n\n18. Market research:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: While Varun mentioned market research, he did not provide detailed insights into his methods or how his research has impacted previous projects. Expanding on how he conducts market research and uses this information to drive product decisions would improve his response.\n\n19. Agile methodologies:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun claimed experience with Agile methodologies but did not effectively describe how he has implemented these practices in a way that aligns with the strategic goals of his projects. Providing more detailed examples of his Agile practices could clarify his proficiency.\n\n20. User experience design principles:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s understanding of user experience design principles was not evident in his responses. He could improve by discussing specific UX strategies he has employed and how these have enhanced product usability and customer satisfaction.', '21. Requirement management:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun touched on aspects of requirement management but did not delve into how he ensures these requirements align with business goals and user needs. More detailed discussion on his approach to requirement management would be beneficial.\n\n22. Requirements gathering:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s approach to requirements gathering was unclear and lacked detailed methodologies. He could enhance his response by outlining specific techniques he uses to gather and prioritize requirements effectively.\n\n23. Market research methodologies:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun needs to better articulate his knowledge of market research methodologies and how he applies this knowledge to real-world scenarios. Providing examples of how he has used market research to influence product strategies would be helpful.\n\n24. SQL:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun did not specifically mention SQL during the interview, making it difficult to assess his proficiency. Discussing how he uses SQL in data analysis and decision-making would provide a clearer understanding of his skills.\n\n25. ERP systems:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s familiarity with ERP systems was not demonstrated in his responses. He could improve by detailing his experience with specific ERP systems and how he has leveraged these tools in his projects.\n\nOverall, Varun\'s performance in the interview was below expectations for a candidate applying for a senior Product Manager role at Adzip Technologies. His responses often lacked the depth, clarity, and relevance needed to effectively convey his suitability for the role. To improve, Varun should focus on aligning his responses more closely with the job requirements, enhancing the clarity of his communication, and providing specific examples that demonstrate his expertise and achievements in relevant areas.', '2024-09-10 05:04:21'),
(66, 192, 4, 956, 144, 'Varun demonstrated a strong background in e-commerce and IT consulting, aligning well with the IT Director role at Adzip Technologies. His experience with Magento and strategic IT implementations is notable. However, his responses sometimes lacked depth and specificity expected at a directorial level, and there were moments where he seemed unprepared or requested simplifications of standard industry-related questions. His strategic insights were strong, but operational details and tactical execution specifics were sometimes vague.', 'Varun\'s strengths lie in his extensive experience with Magento implementations and his strategic approach to e-commerce. He has a solid understanding of integrating customer feedback into platform enhancements and has successfully led digital transformations. His ability to manage cross-functional teams and drive significant business outcomes through IT consulting aligns well with the job requirements.', 'Varun occasionally struggled with detailed technical specifics and complex project descriptions. His communication could be more polished, as seen in his requests for question simplifications and less structured responses. To improve, Varun could benefit from focusing on articulating clear, detailed examples of past projects, emphasizing his direct involvement and the specific outcomes.', '16. - retail and e-commerce:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun\'s background in retail and e-commerce is strong, aligning well with the job requirements. Further emphasis on recent trends and innovations would enhance his profile.\n\n17. - magento (e-commerce platform):\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: He has a robust understanding of Magento, crucial for the role. Continuing to stay updated with the latest Magento developments will be beneficial.\n\n18. - customer experience:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun understands the importance of customer experience. More detailed examples of how he has measurably improved customer experiences would strengthen his responses.\n\n19. - e-commerce strategy development:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: His strategic development skills are evident, but more specifics on the execution and measurement of these strategies would provide a clearer picture of his capabilities.\n\n20. - magento platform management:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun is proficient in managing Magento platforms, a key skill for the role. Demonstrating continuous improvement in this area will keep him competitive.', '21. - it consulting:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun\'s IT consulting experience is solid. He could, however, benefit from showcasing more case studies and specific outcomes from his consulting projects.\n\n22. - omnichannel strategy implementation:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: He has good experience with omnichannel strategies. More details on the integration challenges and solutions would enhance his responses.\n\n23. - it policy and procedure management:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: While Varun mentioned IT policies, more depth into his direct involvement with policy development and management would clarify his expertise.\n\n24. - customer experience optimization:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun\'s focus on optimizing customer experience is evident. Quantifying the impact of his optimizations would provide more credibility to his claims.\n\n25. - digital marketing (seo, ppc):\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: He understands digital marketing fundamentals. Expanding on how he integrates SEO and PPC with broader marketing strategies would show a more holistic approach.\n\nRecommendation:\nVarun is recommended for further consideration for the IT Director role, with suggestions for development in communication clarity and strategic detailing. His strong background in e-commerce and IT strategy aligns with the organizational goals, making him a potentially valuable addition to Adzip Technologies.', '2024-09-10 10:42:06'),
(67, 192, 4, 956, 144, 'Varun demonstrated a strong background in IT and e-commerce, with extensive experience in Magento implementations and digital commerce strategy. His responses highlighted his strategic approach to leveraging technology for business growth, particularly in optimizing e-commerce platforms and integrating customer feedback. However, there were instances where his responses could have been more aligned with the question\'s intent, and he occasionally needed clarification on the questions posed.', 'Varun\'s strengths lie in his deep understanding of e-commerce systems, particularly Magento, and his ability to drive significant business outcomes through strategic IT implementations. His experience with large-scale projects and his role in leading teams to achieve business goals are commendable. His approach to integrating customer feedback to enhance user experience and his strategic use of digital marketing to boost e-commerce traffic and sales are particularly noteworthy.', 'Varun occasionally struggled with direct responses to the questions, sometimes asking for clarifications where the questions were straightforward. This could indicate a need for improvement in communication and understanding requirements quickly in high-stake discussions. Additionally, his responses sometimes veered off from the core question, suggesting a need for more focused communication.', '16. - retail and e-commerce:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun shows strong expertise in retail and e-commerce, backed by years of experience and successful project outcomes.\n\n17. - magento (e-commerce platform):\nScore: 9\nQualitative Assessment: Excellent\nDescription: His depth of knowledge and practical experience with Magento are evident and align well with the job requirements.\n\n18. - customer experience:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun understands the importance of customer experience and uses strategic IT implementations to enhance it.\n\n19. - e-commerce strategy development:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: He has a solid approach to e-commerce strategy development, using data-driven insights and market analysis to inform decisions.\n\n20. - magento platform management:\nScore: 9\nQualitative Assessment: Excellent\nDescription: Varun\'s management of Magento platforms is detailed and strategic, showing a high level of proficiency.', '21. - it consulting:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: His experience in IT consulting allows him to provide valuable insights and recommendations for technology solutions.\n\n22. - omnichannel strategy implementation:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun demonstrates a good understanding of omnichannel strategies and their implementation to streamline customer experiences across platforms.\n\n23. - it policy and procedure management:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: He is knowledgeable about IT policies and procedures, although more detailed examples of his direct involvement in policy development could strengthen his response.\n\n24. - customer experience optimization:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun effectively uses technology to optimize customer experiences, particularly through personalization and user interface improvements.\n\n25. - digital marketing (seo, ppc):\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: His strategic use of SEO and PPC to drive e-commerce traffic and sales demonstrates his capability in digital marketing.\n\nRecommendation:\nBased on the evaluation, Varun appears to be a strong candidate for the IT Director position at Adzip Technologies, given his extensive experience and strategic understanding of e-commerce and IT management. His technical expertise, particularly with Magento, aligns well with the job requirements. However, improving directness in responses and enhancing engagement with specific questions could make him an even stronger candidate. His strategic approach to integrating technology with business objectives would likely contribute positively to the company\'s goals.', '2024-09-10 10:44:50'),
(68, 192, 4, 956, 144, 'Varun demonstrated a strong background in e-commerce and IT consulting, with significant experience in Magento implementations and digital transformations. His responses highlighted his strategic thinking and problem-solving skills, particularly in complex project scenarios. However, there were instances where his responses lacked the depth expected for an IT Director role, particularly in aligning his answers with strategic business outcomes. His communication was generally clear, though at times he could benefit from more concise and focused responses to directly address the interview questions.', 'Varun\'s major strengths lie in his extensive experience with Magento and his ability to drive e-commerce strategies that enhance business operations and customer experience. He has a proven track record of handling complex, multi-geographical e-commerce projects, which is crucial for the IT Director role. His strategic approach to integrating customer feedback and optimizing customer engagement through Magento’s capabilities demonstrates his customer-centric approach and his ability to leverage technology to meet business needs.', 'Varun occasionally struggled with directly addressing the interview questions, particularly when asked about specific challenges or strategies. This was evident when he asked for clarifications on questions where details were already sufficient. Improving his ability to deliver precise answers that align closely with the strategic goals of the role would enhance his effectiveness in executive discussions and decision-making. Additionally, his responses could be more structured to succinctly convey how his actions have directly influenced key business metrics.', '16. - retail and e-commerce:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun shows a strong understanding of retail and e-commerce, backed by his extensive experience in this area.\n\n17. - magento (e-commerce platform):\nScore: 9\nQualitative Assessment: Excellent\nDescription: His expertise with Magento is evident and aligns well with the job requirements, showcasing his ability to leverage this platform to achieve business goals.\n\n18. - customer experience:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun recognizes the importance of customer experience and demonstrates methods to enhance it through technological solutions.\n\n19. - e-commerce strategy development:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: He has a solid approach to e-commerce strategy, although he could sometimes link his strategies more explicitly to business outcomes.\n\n20. - magento platform management:\nScore: 9\nQualitative Assessment: Excellent\nDescription: Varun’s management of Magento platforms is a strong point, showing deep knowledge and strategic application.', '21. - it consulting:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: His background in IT consulting is robust, providing him with a strong foundation to lead strategic IT initiatives.\n\n22. - omnichannel strategy implementation:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: He understands the importance of omnichannel strategies and has applied this in past roles, though more detailed outcomes of these implementations would enhance his responses.\n\n23. - it policy and procedure management:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun is capable of managing IT policies and procedures, essential for the IT Director role, but could detail more about his strategic approach to policy development.\n\n24. - customer experience optimization:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: He focuses effectively on optimizing customer experience, crucial for driving customer satisfaction and business growth.\n\n25. - digital marketing (seo, ppc):\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun has a good grasp of digital marketing strategies necessary for enhancing e-commerce traffic and sales, though more specific examples and outcomes would strengthen his profile.\n\nRecommendation:\nBased on the evaluation, Varun is a strong candidate with relevant experience and skills for the IT Director role at Adzip Technologies. His expertise in Magento and digital transformation, along with his strategic approach to e-commerce, makes him a valuable asset. However, he should work on aligning his responses more closely with strategic business outcomes and enhancing his communication to be more concise and focused. With some improvements, Varun could effectively lead the IT department and contribute significantly to the company’s objectives.', '2024-09-10 10:45:28'),
(69, 193, 4, 965, 145, 'Varun demonstrated a strong background in eCommerce and digital transformation, which aligns well with the IT Director role at Adzip Technologies. His responses showcased a deep understanding of strategic IT planning and the ability to manage cross-functional teams effectively. However, there were instances where his communication could have been more concise and directly aligned with the questions posed. His experience with Magento and customer engagement strategies are notable strengths, but he could improve in articulating his thoughts more clearly and avoiding unnecessary details in his responses.', 'Varun\'s strengths lie in his extensive experience with eCommerce platforms, particularly Magento, and his strategic approach to digital transformation. His role as a leader in previous positions has equipped him with the skills necessary to manage large teams and projects, which is crucial for the IT Director role. His familiarity with omnichannel strategies and customer engagement techniques are particularly beneficial for driving business in the dynamic online retail environment of Adzip Technologies.', 'While Varun has a strong technical and strategic background, his communication style could be more polished. He tends to include unnecessary details in his responses, which could potentially lead to miscommunication or inefficiency in a high-stakes role like IT Director. Improving his clarity and conciseness in communication would help him better align with the leadership expectations at Adzip Technologies. Additionally, focusing on more direct responses and aligning closely with the questions asked during interviews will enhance his effectiveness in stakeholder interactions.', '16. Retail and E-commerce:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun has a robust background in retail and e-commerce, which is directly relevant to the job role.\n\n17. Magento (e-commerce platform):\nScore: 9\nQualitative Assessment: Excellent\nDescription: Varun\'s expertise with Magento is evident and highly relevant to the role, considering the platform\'s use in the company.\n\n18. Customer Experience:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun understands the importance of customer experience, crucial for the IT Director role in enhancing customer engagement.\n\n19. E-commerce Strategy Development:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun\'s strategic approach to e-commerce aligns well with the strategic responsibilities of the IT Director position.\n\n20. Magento Platform Expertise:\nScore: 9\nQualitative Assessment: Excellent\nDescription: His detailed knowledge and practical experience with Magento are significant assets.', '21. IT Consulting:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun\'s experience in IT consulting provides a solid foundation for strategic planning and implementation.\n\n22. Omnichannel Retail Management:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: His understanding of omnichannel strategies is beneficial for managing comprehensive e-commerce operations.\n\n23. SEO and Digital Marketing:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun has a good grasp of SEO and digital marketing, important for driving online visibility in e-commerce.\n\n24. Customer Journey Mapping:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: He appreciates the importance of customer journey mapping in enhancing user experience.\n\n25. IT Project Management:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun\'s project management skills are evident, aligning well with the leadership and organizational needs of the role.\n\nRecommendation:\nBased on the evaluation, Varun is a strong candidate for the IT Director position at Adzip Technologies. His technical expertise, particularly in Magento and strategic e-commerce development, are significant strengths. Improvements in communication clarity and engagement would make him an even more valuable asset to the team. I recommend proceeding with further consideration or a second interview focused on addressing the communication concerns noted.', '2024-09-21 11:04:46'),
(70, 196, 4, 967, 146, 'Varun demonstrated a strong alignment with the job requirements for the IT Director role at Adzip Technologies. His responses were articulate and showcased a deep understanding of the retail and e-commerce sectors, particularly in digital commerce and customer experience management. His extensive experience in leading digital transformations and managing large-scale projects was evident. However, there were areas where Varun could improve, particularly in adapting to unexpected questions and in the creative aspects of problem-solving.', 'Varun\'s strengths lie in his profound knowledge of e-commerce platforms, especially Magento, and his experience in managing large-scale IT projects. His responses indicated a strong grasp of strategic IT implementation in the retail industry, which aligns well with the job description. Varun\'s communication was clear and professional, reflecting his seniority and experience in the field.', 'While Varun showed great technical and managerial skills, his responses lacked in areas of creativity and adaptability. In scenarios requiring innovative thinking or swift adaptation to new information, his responses were somewhat standard. Encouraging Varun to engage in continuous learning and to participate in creative problem-solving workshops could help enhance these skills.', '16. Retail and e-commerce:\nScore: 9\nQualitative Assessment: Excellent\nDescription: Varun\'s expertise in retail and e-commerce was evident, aligning well with the job\'s requirements.\n\n17. Magento (e-commerce platform):\nScore: 9\nQualitative Assessment: Excellent\nDescription: Varun showed comprehensive knowledge of Magento, crucial for the role.\n\n18. Ecommerce:\nScore: 9\nQualitative Assessment: Excellent\nDescription: His expertise in e-commerce platforms and strategies was clear and aligns with the job needs.\n\n19. Retail and e-commerce strategy:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun understands strategic elements in retail and e-commerce, although more innovative strategies could be explored.\n\n20. Magento platform expertise:\nScore: 9\nQualitative Assessment: Excellent\nDescription: Varun\'s detailed knowledge of Magento supports his fit for the role.', '21. Customer experience:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: He has a strong grasp of customer experience strategies but could benefit from more innovative approaches.\n\n22. Customer experience management:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun\'s management of customer experience is proficient; however, incorporating more personalized strategies could improve his approach.\n\n23. Omnichannel retail integration:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun understands omnichannel strategies well, though more detailed examples would enhance his responses.\n\n24. Crisis management in IT:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun has experience in crisis management, but more detailed strategies and examples would strengthen his profile.\n\n25. IT compliance and security:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: He is knowledgeable about IT compliance and security, crucial for the IT Director role, though continuous updates on latest security practices could be beneficial.\n\nRecommendation: Based on the overall evaluation, Varun is recommended for the IT Director position at Adzip Technologies. His extensive experience and knowledge in relevant fields align well with the job requirements. However, it is suggested that he works on enhancing his creativity and adaptability to excel in this role.', '2024-09-23 06:01:07'),
(71, 198, 4, 967, 146, 'Varun\'s responses during the interview were non-responsive and unrelated to the questions posed by the interviewer. Despite repeated attempts to clarify and redirect the conversation towards the specifics of the IT Director role at Adzip Technologies, Varun failed to provide relevant or coherent answers. This raises concerns about his communication skills and suitability for the role, which requires clear and effective interaction, especially in a leadership capacity.', 'It is challenging to identify specific strengths from Varun\'s responses in this interview as they did not align with the questions asked. His resume suggests a strong background in eCommerce and digital transformation, but this was not demonstrated in his interview performance.', 'Varun\'s main weakness in this interview was his inability to provide relevant and coherent responses. This is critical for the role of IT Director, which requires excellent communication skills. Varun could benefit from focusing on clear and direct answers to interview questions and perhaps additional preparation to handle interview settings more effectively.', '16. - retail and e-commerce:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate knowledge or experience in retail and e-commerce during the interview.\n\n17. - magento (e-commerce platform):\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no mention or demonstration of Magento expertise.\n\n18. - ecommerce:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun failed to discuss any relevant e-commerce experience.\n\n19. - retail and e-commerce strategy:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: No strategy related to retail and e-commerce was discussed.\n\n20. - magento platform expertise:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not showcase any Magento platform expertise.', '21. - customer experience:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no discussion about customer experience strategies or implementations.\n\n22. - customer experience management:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any relevant experience in customer experience management.\n\n23. - omnichannel retail integration:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: No knowledge or experience in omnichannel retail integration was evident.\n\n24. - crisis management in it:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss any aspects of crisis management.\n\n25. - it compliance and security:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no mention of IT compliance and security practices or knowledge.\n\nRecommendation: Based on the interview performance, it is recommended not to proceed with Varun\'s candidacy for the IT Director position at Adzip Technologies. Further development in communication skills and interview preparedness is suggested before reapplying for similar roles.', '2024-09-23 06:36:26'),
(72, 199, 4, 894, 124, 'Varun\'s responses in the interview were significantly lacking in clarity and relevance to the questions posed by the interviewer, Avi. His initial responses were not in English, which directly impacted the flow of the interview and his ability to effectively communicate his qualifications and experiences relevant to the Marketing Specialist role. Despite his extensive background as outlined in his resume, Varun failed to articulate this experience during the interview, missing the opportunity to align his skills with the job requirements.', 'Based on the interview, it\'s challenging to highlight specific strengths in Varun\'s responses due to the lack of relevant and comprehensible answers. However, his resume suggests a strong background in marketing and sales enablement, which could be beneficial for the Marketing Specialist role if communicated effectively.', 'Varun\'s main weakness in this interview was his inability to communicate clearly in English, as evidenced by his initial responses. This fundamental issue prevented him from effectively discussing his qualifications and how they relate to the role. Additionally, his responses did not address the questions directly, which could be improved with specific preparation focused on aligning his extensive experience with the job\'s requirements. Practicing clear, relevant responses and improving language proficiency would be crucial for Varun to succeed in future interviews.', '16. Social Media Marketing:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his specific experiences with social media marketing during the interview, which is crucial for the role. He should highlight relevant experiences and strategies he has employed in past roles.\n\n17. SEO:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no mention of SEO in his responses. Varun should discuss his experience with SEO tactics and how he has successfully implemented them in past projects.\n\n18. SEM:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: SEM expertise was not discussed. Varun needs to provide examples of his SEM campaign experiences and their outcomes.\n\n19. Content Marketing:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Content marketing skills were not evident in Varun\'s responses. He should detail his approach to content marketing and how it has driven results in his previous roles.\n\n20. Market Research:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide insights into his market research skills. Discussing specific methodologies and outcomes from his research could improve his responses.', '21. Sales Collaboration:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: While Varun\'s resume suggests experience in sales collaboration, he did not discuss this during the interview. He should share specific examples of how he has effectively collaborated with sales teams.\n\n22. Lead Generation:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no discussion of lead generation strategies or successes. Varun should explain how he has developed and executed lead generation campaigns.\n\n23. Event Management:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any experience with event management. He should describe his role in planning and executing marketing events.\n\n24. Customer Relationship Management:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: CRM practices were not covered in his responses. Varun should detail how he has managed customer relationships to improve satisfaction and retention.\n\n25. Community Management:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Community management was not addressed. Varun should illustrate how he has built and maintained active community engagement in his previous positions.\n\nRecommendation:\nBased on the evaluation, it is recommended that Varun not be selected for the Marketing Specialist role at this time. His inability to communicate effectively in the interview setting, particularly in English, suggests that he may struggle in a role that requires strong communication skills. However, if language skills can be improved, his extensive experience might be reconsidered for future opportunities.', '2024-10-15 09:01:15'),
(73, 201, 4, 967, 146, 'Varun demonstrated a strong understanding of digital commerce and IT strategy, aligning well with the job requirements for an IT Director at Adzip Technologies. His responses indicated a deep knowledge of eCommerce platforms, particularly Magento, and a robust experience in customer experience management. However, there were areas where Varun could improve, particularly in communication nuances and adaptability to unexpected questions.', 'Varun\'s strengths lie in his extensive experience with major eCommerce platforms and his strategic approach to digital transformation, as evidenced by his detailed discussion of past projects and roles. His technical proficiency and leadership in managing large teams and projects align well with the job\'s demands. His proactive approach to eCommerce strategy and optimization showcases his capability to drive business growth.', 'While Varun\'s technical and strategic knowledge is strong, his communication style could be more polished. The use of filler words and occasional lack of clarity in responses suggest a need for improvement in verbal communication. Additionally, his responses to unexpected questions could show more adaptability and creativity, which are crucial for leadership roles in dynamic industries like retail and IT.', '16. - retail and e-commerce:\nScore: 9\nQualitative Assessment: Excellent\nDescription: Varun shows a strong grasp of retail and e-commerce, aligning well with job requirements.\n\n17. - magento (e-commerce platform):\nScore: 9\nQualitative Assessment: Excellent\nDescription: Excellent understanding and experience with Magento, crucial for the role.\n\n18. - ecommerce:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Strong, with room for showcasing more innovative strategies.\n\n19. - retail and e-commerce strategy:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Well-aligned with strategic needs, though more innovative approaches could be discussed.\n\n20. - magento platform expertise:\nScore: 9\nQualitative Assessment: Excellent\nDescription: Varun\'s expertise in Magento is evident and highly relevant to the role.', '21. - customer experience:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Strong focus on customer experience, a key aspect of the role.\n\n22. - customer experience management:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Demonstrates good knowledge and strategies for managing customer experience.\n\n23. - omnichannel retail integration:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Good understanding, with potential for deeper integration strategies.\n\n24. - crisis management in it:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shows capability in crisis management with scope for more detailed strategic insights.\n\n25. - it compliance and security:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Adequate focus on compliance and security, crucial for the IT director role.\n\nRecommendation: Recommend for hire, with suggestions for development in communication skills and adaptability.', '2024-10-17 09:13:46'),
(74, 205, 4, 968, 147, 'Varun demonstrated a solid understanding of the IT and e-commerce sectors, particularly in digital transformation and strategy development. His responses, although brief, indicated a comfort with the responsibilities of the IT Director role. However, his answers lacked depth and specificity in several areas crucial for the role, such as his experience with Magento and strategic leadership. This suggests a need for more detailed communication to fully convey his suitability for the role.', 'Varun\'s major strength lies in his extensive experience in digital commerce and strategy consulting, as highlighted in his resume. His brief responses hinted at a familiarity with the responsibilities associated with the IT Director position, suggesting that he understands the role\'s requirements. His readiness to engage in the interview and his concise communication style are also positive traits.', 'Varun\'s responses were often too brief and lacked the detailed insights and examples that would demonstrate a deep understanding of and experience in the required technical skills and leadership capabilities. For instance, when discussing his experience with Magento, a critical skill for the role, he failed to provide any specific examples or elaborate on his expertise. This lack of detail could be addressed by preparing more comprehensive responses and using specific examples to illustrate his skills and experiences.', '16. Retail and e-commerce:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun mentioned his experience in the e-commerce sector but did not delve into specifics about retail, which is crucial for the role.\n\n17. Magento (e-commerce platform):\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun needed to provide detailed examples of his work with Magento to demonstrate his expertise.\n\n18. Customer experience:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: While Varun briefly mentioned customer experience, he did not provide depth in his strategies or achievements in this area.\n\n19. E-commerce strategy development:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun\'s responses lacked detailed discussion on his strategic roles and contributions in e-commerce.\n\n20. Magento platform expertise:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: More detailed responses regarding his specific skills and projects related to Magento were needed.', '21. IT consulting:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun\'s background in IT consulting was apparent, but more examples of his consulting projects would have been beneficial.\n\n22. Omnichannel retailing:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun mentioned omnichannel strategies but did not provide insight into how he has implemented or improved such strategies in past roles.\n\n23. Supply chain optimization:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no mention of Varun\'s experience with supply chain optimization, which is crucial for the IT Director role in an e-commerce setting.\n\n24. Digital marketing (SEO, PPC):\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun\'s experience in digital marketing was noted, but specifics on his SEO and PPC strategies were missing.\n\n25. Project management (PMP, Agile):\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun\'s project management skills were implied in his leadership roles, but explicit examples of managing projects using PMP or Agile methodologies were lacking.\n\nRecommendation:\nBased on the evaluation, Varun shows potential but would benefit from further development in specific areas crucial for the IT Director role. It is recommended that Varun be considered for a role with less responsibility initially, or that he undergoes specific training and mentoring to prepare him for this senior position.', '2024-11-07 12:40:56'),
(75, 206, 4, 968, 147, 'Varun\'s performance in the interview was notably below expectations for a candidate applying for the IT Director role at Adzip Technologies. His responses were often brief, lacking depth, and did not demonstrate the required expertise or enthusiasm for the position. Varun frequently admitted to not remembering or having insufficient experience in key areas crucial for the role, such as Magento expertise, data analytics, and strategic IT planning. This raises concerns about his suitability for a leadership role that demands both technical proficiency and strategic acumen.', 'Varun\'s resume suggests a strong background in e-commerce and digital transformation, which aligns with the job\'s requirements. However, these strengths were not effectively conveyed in his interview responses, which lacked detailed examples and insights into his capabilities and achievements.', 'Varun showed significant gaps in areas critical to the IT Director role, including detailed knowledge of Magento, data analytics, and strategic IT planning. His responses were often vague or indicated a lack of relevant experience. To improve, Varun could benefit from engaging in continuous professional development, particularly in areas of emerging e-commerce technologies and strategic planning. Additionally, practicing for interviews to better articulate his experiences and how they relate to the job requirements would be beneficial.', '16. - retail and e-commerce:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Despite his background in e-commerce, Varun failed to effectively link his experience with the strategic needs of the role during the interview.\n\n17. - magento (e-commerce platform):\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun admitted to having minimal experience with Magento, which is concerning given its importance to the role.\n\n18. - customer experience:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun provided limited insights into how he has improved customer experience through technological innovations, missing a key aspect of the role.\n\n19. - e-commerce strategy development:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate a strong understanding or experience in developing e-commerce strategies, which is critical for this position.\n\n20. - magento platform expertise:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s lack of experience with Magento is a significant gap, considering the job\'s requirements.', '21. - it consulting:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s responses lacked depth in IT consulting, an area crucial for the strategic component of the IT Director role.\n\n22. - omnichannel retailing:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide any substantive experience or strategies related to omnichannel retailing, which is essential for the role.\n\n23. - supply chain optimization:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun was unable to recall any specific projects or strategies related to supply chain optimization, a key skill for this role.\n\n24. - digital marketing (seo, ppc):\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate sufficient knowledge or experience in digital marketing, which is important for driving e-commerce growth.\n\n25. - project management (pmp, agile):\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s lack of detailed examples in using project management methodologies like Agile suggests a gap in a crucial skill area for this role.\n\nRecommendation:\nBased on the evaluation, it is recommended that Varun is not selected for the IT Director position at Adzip Technologies. His interview responses suggest that he may not yet possess the depth of expertise, strategic thinking, and leadership skills required for this senior role. Further development in e-commerce technologies, strategic IT planning, and leadership capabilities would be beneficial for Varun before pursuing similar positions.', '2024-11-07 16:09:42'),
(76, 207, 4, 965, 145, '**\nVarun demonstrated a solid understanding of the IT and digital commerce space, aligning well with the IT Director role at Adzip Technologies. His responses, although concise, reflected confidence and comfort with the responsibilities described. However, Varun could improve on elaborating his answers to showcase his depth of experience and strategic thinking more vividly, which is crucial for a leadership role.', '**\nVarun\'s strengths lie in his evident comfort and familiarity with the responsibilities of an IT Director, especially in the e-commerce sector. His brief affirmations, such as his comfort with the role\'s demands, suggest a readiness to handle the job\'s requirements. His extensive experience in digital commerce strategy and leadership in implementing Adobe Commerce solutions, as mentioned in his resume, supports his capability for the role.', '**\nVarun\'s responses were often too brief and lacked the depth expected from a candidate for a directorial position. He missed opportunities to elaborate on his strategic contributions, innovations, or specific achievements that could have strengthened his candidacy. For improvement, Varun could focus on providing more detailed examples of past projects, leadership experiences, and how he has driven change or achieved results in previous roles.', '15. **Overall Engagement:**\n    - **Score:** 6\n    - **Qualitative Assessment:** Average\n    - **Description:** Varun\'s engagement during the interview was adequate but lacked the vigor expected for a leadership role. More enthusiasm and proactive elaboration on his experiences and visions could improve engagement.\n\n**Recommendation on Selection:**\nVarun shows potential for the IT Director role but should be considered with reservations. A second, more detailed interview focusing on strategic insights and leadership examples is recommended to better assess his suitability for the role.', '', '2024-11-12 10:44:46');
INSERT INTO `bot_overall_feedback` (`id`, `botInterviewId`, `candidateId`, `resumeId`, `screeningId`, `feedback`, `strength`, `weakness`, `primarySkills`, `secondarySkills`, `created`) VALUES
(77, 211, 4, 969, 148, 'Varun demonstrated a strong understanding of the IT Director role at Adzip Technologies, particularly in areas related to digital commerce and strategy consulting. His responses were concise and aligned well with the job requirements, showcasing his experience in leading significant e-commerce transformations and strategic IT planning. However, there were minor discrepancies in addressing the interviewer\'s name and some areas where further elaboration could strengthen his responses.', 'Varun\'s strengths lie in his extensive experience in digital commerce and strategic IT roles, as evident from his responses and resume. He confidently affirmed his comfort with the responsibilities of the IT Director position, indicating a strong alignment with his past roles. His background in managing large-scale e-commerce platforms and cross-functional teams is a significant asset, aligning well with the job\'s demands.', 'Varun\'s initial response to the greeting misaddressed the interviewer, which could be seen as a minor oversight but points to a need for attention to detail. Additionally, while his responses were generally on point, there were opportunities for more detailed examples and explanations of how his past experiences directly relate to the strategic goals of Adzip Technologies. Enhancing his responses with specific achievements or metrics could provide clearer evidence of his capabilities.', '16. - retail and e-commerce:\nScore: 9\nQualitative Assessment: Excellent\nDescription: Varun\'s extensive background in retail and e-commerce was evident and aligns perfectly with the job requirements.\n\n17. - magento (e-commerce platform):\nScore: 9\nQualitative Assessment: Excellent\nDescription: Varun has significant experience with Magento, which is highly relevant to the role and was well articulated.\n\n18. - customer experience:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun understands the importance of customer experience in e-commerce, though more detailed strategies or examples could enhance his response.\n\n19. - e-commerce strategy development:\nScore: 9\nQualitative Assessment: Excellent\nDescription: Varun\'s experience in e-commerce strategy development is robust and directly applicable to the strategic responsibilities of the IT Director role.\n\n20. - magento platform management:\nScore: 9\nQualitative Assessment: Excellent\nDescription: Varun\'s specific experience with Magento platform management is a strong match for the job\'s technical requirements.', '21. - it consulting:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun has a solid background in IT consulting, crucial for the strategic aspect of the IT Director role.\n\n22. - omnichannel retail management:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun\'s experience with omnichannel strategies is relevant, though more specific examples would provide a clearer picture of his capabilities.\n\n23. - seo and digital marketing:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun has a good grasp of SEO and digital marketing, important for driving e-commerce success.\n\n24. - project management:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun\'s project management skills are evident, aligning well with the leadership and organizational aspects of the role.\n\n25. - cloud computing solutions:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: While Varun mentioned cloud solutions, elaborating on his direct experience with cloud technologies specific to e-commerce could strengthen his response.\n\nRecommendation:\nBased on the evaluation, I recommend Varun for the IT Director position at Adzip Technologies. His extensive experience and strategic understanding of digital commerce and IT align well with the job requirements. Minor improvements in communication and providing more detailed examples would make his candidacy even stronger.', '2024-11-12 12:22:53'),
(78, 213, 4, 970, 155, 'Varun\'s responses during the interview were brief and lacked depth, particularly when compared to the benchmark responses. While he confirmed his alignment with the job role and expressed readiness to proceed with the interview, his answers were not expansive or detailed enough to fully showcase his expertise or enthusiasm for the role. This could be due to nervousness or lack of preparation. However, his resume indicates a strong background that might still be valuable for the role at Adzip Technologies.', 'Varun\'s main strength lies in his extensive experience in eCommerce and digital transformations, as highlighted in his resume. His brief affirmations during the interview suggest a confidence in his alignment with the job\'s requirements. His readiness to proceed and handle the interview\'s technical aspects (like understanding potential lags due to the AI interviewer) also shows adaptability.', 'Varun\'s responses were significantly shorter and less informative than the ideal benchmark responses. He did not use the opportunity to elaborate on his skills or experiences, which could have helped in portraying his suitability for the role more vividly. His initial response in a non-English language and minimalistic answers could be seen as a lack of communicative initiative or thoroughness, which are crucial for a leadership role involving complex project management and strategic initiatives.', '16. - retail and e-commerce:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun\'s background in eCommerce is strong, but he did not effectively convey this during the interview, missing the chance to link his experience with the job requirements.\n\n17. - digital commerce:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Similar to retail and e-commerce, Varun\'s expertise is implied in his resume but was not effectively communicated during the interview.\n\n18. - data analytics and visualization tools:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: There was no mention or demonstration of Varun\'s proficiency in data analytics and visualization tools during the interview.\n\n19. - crm software proficiency:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his experience with CRM software, which is crucial for the role he applied for.\n\n20. - agile and scrum methodologies:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun\'s responses lacked any specific mention or evidence of his expertise in Agile and Scrum methodologies.', '21. - supply chain management:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: There was no detailed discussion about his experience or skills in supply chain management during the interview.\n\n22. - inventory management systems:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun did not provide insights into his experience with inventory management systems, missing a key aspect relevant to the job role.\n\n23. - regulatory compliance (gdpr, ccpa):\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Compliance is critical for the role, but Varun did not mention any specific knowledge or experience with GDPR or CCPA.\n\n24. - cybersecurity fundamentals:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: There was no mention of cybersecurity during the interview, which is a significant oversight given the role\'s requirements.\n\n25. null:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: This parameter is not applicable as it seems to be a placeholder.\n\nRecommendation:\nBased on the overall evaluation, Varun shows potential due to his extensive background in relevant fields. However, his performance in the interview was underwhelming. It is recommended that Varun be given another opportunity to interview, possibly with different preparation or format, to better assess his suitability for the role. Further evaluation or a more interactive interview format might help in gaining a clearer understanding of his capabilities and fit for the position.', '2024-11-29 10:23:51'),
(79, 214, 4, 971, 156, 'Varun\'s interview showcased a mix of strengths and areas for improvement. His extensive experience in AI, analytics, and leadership within the retail and CPG sectors is evident and aligns well with the job requirements. However, his responses occasionally lacked depth and specificity, particularly in technical aspects and strategic alignment with business goals. His communication was clear but sometimes drifted from the core question, suggesting a need for more focused and structured responses.', 'Varun demonstrated a strong understanding of AI applications in business, particularly in generating AI-driven solutions for the retail sector. His experience in leading teams and initiating AI-powered projects is a significant asset. Varun\'s strategic approach to problem-solving, as seen in his discussion of predictive analytics and customer segmentation, aligns well with the role\'s requirements for a strategic thinker who can drive AI adoption in retail.', 'Varun\'s responses sometimes lacked technical depth, and he struggled to articulate specific strategies or technical processes clearly. This was evident when discussing cloud platforms and predictive modeling, where he deferred technical details. Improving his ability to communicate complex technical strategies in a more accessible manner would be beneficial. Additionally, enhancing his skills in aligning IT strategies with explicit business objectives could improve his effectiveness in the role.', '16. AI and Machine Learning Technologies:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: While Varun discusses using AI and ML, the depth of his technical knowledge in these areas could be stronger, particularly in explaining specific algorithms or models.\n\n17. Business Strategy Development:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: He understands strategic development but could improve by more clearly connecting IT strategies with overarching business goals.\n\n18. Analytics and Big Data:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun has a good grasp of analytics and big data usage in retail, though more specific examples of data-driven decision-making would enhance his responses.\n\n19. CPG and Retail Industry Knowledge:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: His industry knowledge is a strong point, aligning well with the job\'s requirements.\n\n20. Client Relationship Management:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun demonstrates an understanding of client management, though more detailed strategies for maintaining and growing client relationships could be discussed.', '21. Thought Leadership:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: He shows potential as a thought leader but could be more proactive in sharing insights and innovations in external forums to truly embody this role.\n\n22. Proof of Concept Development:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun discusses his role in proof of concept development but lacks detail in the execution and outcome measurement, areas critical for demonstrating effectiveness.\n\n23. Public Speaking and Presentation:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: His ability to communicate clearly suggests competence in public speaking, though direct examples of presentations or talks would provide stronger evidence.\n\n24. Cloud Platforms (AWS, GCP, Azure):\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun mentions using cloud platforms but does not provide enough detail about his experience to fully assess his proficiency.\n\n25. Talent Management and Team Leadership:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: His experience in leading teams is evident, and he discusses how he develops team capabilities, aligning well with leadership expectations in the role.\n\nRecommendation:\nBased on the evaluation, Varun shows potential for the role but would benefit from further development in technical communication and strategic alignment. A conditional recommendation for hiring could be considered, with the suggestion of targeted training in these areas to fully meet the job\'s demands.', '2024-12-05 09:41:06'),
(80, 215, 4, 982, 161, 'Varun\'s performance in the interview reflects a basic understanding of the required skills but lacks depth and specificity in responses. His communication was often unclear, and he struggled to provide relevant examples or detailed explanations for his experiences. Varun\'s responses were frequently off-topic, indicating a need for improvement in aligning his answers with the questions asked. His technical knowledge, particularly in Python and JavaScript, was not effectively demonstrated. Overall, Varun needs to enhance his articulation and provide more concrete examples to support his claims.', 'Varun demonstrated a willingness to engage with the interviewer and showed a basic understanding of problem-solving skills. His response to the initial questions indicated a positive attitude and openness to discussion. Varun expressed confidence in his problem-solving abilities, which is a valuable trait for the role.', 'Varun\'s responses lacked clarity and relevance, often deviating from the questions asked. He struggled to provide specific examples of his technical skills, particularly in Python, JavaScript, and RESTful API development. His communication style was unclear, with frequent use of filler words and repetition. Varun needs to improve his ability to articulate his thoughts and provide detailed, relevant examples to demonstrate his technical knowledge and experience.', '16. - **python**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not effectively demonstrate his knowledge of Python, providing vague and unclear responses. He should provide more specific examples of his experience with Python.\n\n17. - **javascript**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s knowledge of JavaScript was not effectively demonstrated, with responses lacking depth and specificity. He should provide more detailed examples of his experience with JavaScript.\n\n18. - **python programming**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide clear examples of his Python programming skills, often giving vague responses. He should provide more specific examples of his experience with Python programming.\n\n19. - **restful api development**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s responses on RESTful API development were vague and lacked specificity. He should provide more detailed examples of his experience with RESTful API development.\n\n20. - **javascript development**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not effectively demonstrate his knowledge of JavaScript development, providing vague and unclear responses. He should provide more specific examples of his experience with JavaScript development.', '21. - **html**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide clear examples of his HTML skills, often giving vague responses. He should provide more specific examples of his experience with HTML.\n\n22. - **css**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s knowledge of CSS was not effectively demonstrated, with responses lacking depth and specificity. He should provide more detailed examples of his experience with CSS.\n\n23. - **frontend frameworks (react.js/angular)**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not effectively demonstrate his knowledge of frontend frameworks, providing vague and unclear responses. He should provide more specific examples of his experience with React.js or Angular.\n\n24. - **cloud integration (aws lambda/azure functions)**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s responses on cloud integration were vague and lacked specificity. He should provide more detailed examples of his experience with AWS Lambda or Azure Functions.\n\n25. - **database integration (sqlalchemy/postgresql/mysql)**:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not effectively demonstrate his knowledge of database integration, providing vague and unclear responses. He should provide more specific examples of his experience with MySQL or other databases.', '2024-12-12 10:07:01');

-- --------------------------------------------------------

--
