
CREATE TABLE `admin_companies` (
  `id` int NOT NULL,
  `adminId` int NOT NULL,
  `companyName` varchar(150) COLLATE utf8mb4_general_ci NOT NULL,
  `isAdminCompany` tinyint NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
  `createdBy` int NOT NULL,
  `updatedBy` int NOT NULL,
  `created` datetime NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
  `modified` datetime NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP ON UPDATE CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4 COLLATE=utf8mb4_general_ci;

--
-- Dumping data for table `admin_companies`
--

INSERT INTO `admin_companies` (`id`, `adminId`, `companyName`, `isAdminCompany`, `createdBy`, `updatedBy`, `created`, `modified`) VALUES
(1, 1, 'GCS', 1, 1, 0, '2023-08-14 03:53:24', '2024-11-21 08:03:10'),
(3, 2, 'Adzip', 1, 2, 0, '2023-08-14 08:14:58', '2023-08-14 08:14:58'),
(7, 3, 'Vision Beyond', 1, 3, 0, '2023-08-15 08:11:07', '2023-08-15 08:11:07'),
(10, 4, 'VBeyond Corporation', 1, 4, 0, '2023-08-16 05:41:05', '2023-08-16 05:41:05'),
(13, 5, 'Artech Infosystems', 1, 5, 0, '2023-08-22 07:25:35', '2023-08-22 07:25:35'),
(14, 12, 'HCL Technologies', 1, 12, 0, '2023-08-23 02:05:32', '2023-08-23 02:05:32'),
(19, 13, 'First Call HR', 1, 13, 0, '2023-08-23 06:58:09', '2023-08-23 06:58:09'),
(21, 14, 'Fialetechnology', 1, 14, 0, '2023-08-24 12:10:10', '2023-08-24 12:10:10'),
(23, 15, 'Adzip', 1, 15, 0, '2023-09-26 03:31:18', '2023-09-26 03:31:18'),
(24, 1, 'Genpact', 0, 0, 0, '2023-10-25 23:46:53', '2023-10-25 23:46:53'),
(25, 1, 'Oracle', 0, 0, 0, '2023-10-27 04:54:37', '2023-10-27 04:54:37'),
(26, 1, 'Accenture', 0, 0, 0, '2023-11-08 02:16:07', '2023-11-08 02:16:07'),
(27, 1, 'GoKloud', 0, 0, 0, '2023-11-08 06:28:00', '2023-11-08 06:28:00'),
(28, 1, 'Yes it labs', 0, 0, 0, '2023-11-09 07:16:06', '2023-11-09 07:16:06'),
(29, 1, 'test', 0, 0, 0, '2023-11-09 11:21:38', '2023-11-09 11:21:38'),
(30, 16, 'GoKloud', 1, 16, 0, '2023-11-09 11:41:14', '2023-11-09 11:41:14'),
(31, 1, 'Google', 0, 0, 0, '2023-11-23 05:50:42', '2023-11-23 05:50:42'),
(32, 17, 'ECS India', 1, 17, 0, '2023-11-23 06:54:40', '2023-11-23 06:54:40'),
(33, 17, 'PHARMACOVIGILANCE', 0, 0, 0, '2023-11-23 16:30:20', '2023-11-23 16:30:20'),
(34, 18, 'Gradient M', 1, 18, 0, '2023-11-24 03:49:46', '2023-11-24 03:49:46'),
(35, 19, 'Gradient M', 1, 19, 0, '2023-11-24 04:05:10', '2023-11-24 04:05:10'),
(36, 20, 'VBeyond Corporation', 1, 20, 0, '2023-11-24 23:59:52', '2023-11-24 23:59:52'),
(37, 21, 'Co-Workers Technologies', 1, 21, 0, '2023-11-25 01:10:23', '2023-11-25 01:10:23'),
(38, 22, 'Gradient M', 1, 22, 0, '2023-12-12 23:04:55', '2023-12-12 23:04:55'),
(39, 33, 'test', 1, 33, 0, '2023-12-13 06:14:18', '2023-12-13 06:14:18'),
(40, 34, 'Milesweb', 1, 34, 0, '2023-12-13 07:02:43', '2023-12-13 07:02:43'),
(41, 18, 'GradientM', 0, 0, 0, '2023-12-14 04:12:23', '2023-12-14 04:12:23'),
(42, 18, 'Merkle', 0, 0, 0, '2024-01-17 10:25:17', '2024-01-17 10:25:17'),
(43, 35, 'Meraqui', 1, 35, 0, '2024-02-09 05:39:32', '2024-02-09 05:39:32'),
(44, 36, 'First Mile', 1, 36, 0, '2024-02-09 06:23:18', '2024-02-09 06:23:18'),
(45, 1, 'Wipro', 0, 0, 0, '2024-02-09 06:37:57', '2024-02-09 06:37:57'),
(46, 37, 'IBS Gurgaon', 1, 37, 0, '2024-02-16 15:11:49', '2024-02-16 15:11:49'),
(47, 38, 'IBS Gurgaon', 1, 38, 0, '2024-02-17 04:33:26', '2024-02-17 04:33:26'),
(48, 39, 'boho baubles', 1, 39, 0, '2024-02-18 10:04:02', '2024-02-18 10:04:02'),
(49, 40, 'IBS Gurgaon', 1, 40, 0, '2024-02-19 12:58:06', '2024-02-19 12:58:06'),
(50, 40, 'Apple', 0, 0, 0, '2024-02-19 13:09:27', '2024-02-19 13:09:27'),
(51, 41, 'UpGrad', 1, 41, 0, '2024-02-22 06:49:18', '2024-02-22 06:49:18'),
(52, 42, 'Shevalues', 1, 42, 0, '2024-02-28 12:27:33', '2024-02-28 12:27:33'),
(53, 43, 'Vega', 1, 43, 0, '2024-03-05 08:58:52', '2024-03-05 08:58:52'),
(54, 44, 'Inmentus Solution', 1, 44, 0, '2024-03-09 06:36:22', '2024-03-09 06:36:22'),
(55, 45, 'Logic Overdrive', 1, 45, 0, '2024-03-18 11:38:57', '2024-03-18 11:38:57'),
(56, 45, 'Logic Overdrive INC', 0, 0, 0, '2024-03-18 13:34:41', '2024-03-18 13:34:41'),
(57, 46, 'ABCDE', 1, 46, 0, '2024-03-19 10:13:42', '2024-03-19 10:13:42'),
(58, 47, 'xyz', 1, 47, 0, '2024-03-20 06:26:25', '2024-03-20 06:26:25'),
(59, 48, 'ABCDE', 1, 48, 0, '2024-03-22 08:35:08', '2024-03-22 08:35:08'),
(60, 49, 'Sunlife', 1, 49, 0, '2024-03-28 02:50:44', '2024-03-28 02:50:44'),
(61, 50, 'Sunlife', 1, 50, 0, '2024-03-28 03:02:14', '2024-03-28 03:02:14'),
(62, 51, 'Noah Healthcare', 1, 51, 0, '2024-03-28 11:53:25', '2024-03-28 11:53:25'),
(63, 52, 'Hyperleap AI', 1, 52, 0, '2024-04-01 11:00:04', '2024-04-01 11:00:04'),
(64, 53, 'Intrvuz', 1, 53, 0, '2024-04-01 15:30:48', '2024-04-01 15:30:48'),
(65, 54, 'Intellinez', 1, 54, 0, '2024-04-03 05:07:15', '2024-04-03 05:07:15'),
(66, 57, 'Cosmospumps', 1, 57, 0, '2024-04-09 10:54:20', '2024-04-09 10:54:20'),
(67, 60, 'Hire Pedia', 1, 60, 0, '2024-04-10 05:24:49', '2024-04-10 05:24:49'),
(68, 62, 'Private', 1, 62, 0, '2024-04-20 04:35:45', '2024-04-20 04:35:45'),
(69, 63, 'Element Technologies', 1, 63, 0, '2024-04-23 06:59:37', '2024-04-23 06:59:37'),
(70, 67, 'Kynthr', 1, 67, 0, '2024-05-06 15:53:01', '2024-05-06 15:53:01'),
(71, 68, 'testing', 1, 68, 0, '2024-05-15 13:38:06', '2024-05-15 13:38:06'),
(72, 69, 'Kingson Tech', 1, 69, 0, '2024-05-23 12:32:32', '2024-05-23 12:32:32'),
(73, 70, 'shree mahadev photoshop', 1, 70, 0, '2024-05-24 20:22:11', '2024-05-24 20:22:11'),
(74, 71, 'TechDilation', 1, 71, 0, '2024-05-25 04:59:36', '2024-05-25 04:59:36'),
(75, 73, 'Royal Enfield', 1, 73, 0, '2024-06-03 10:26:38', '2024-06-03 10:26:38'),
(76, 74, 'Adzip', 1, 74, 0, '2024-07-18 17:32:53', '2024-07-18 17:32:53'),
(77, 75, 'Talent Schools', 1, 75, 0, '2024-07-20 17:21:17', '2024-11-20 16:48:06'),
(78, 76, 'Adzip Technologies', 1, 76, 0, '2024-07-21 02:57:07', '2024-07-21 02:57:07'),
(79, 76, 'LTI Mindtree', 0, 0, 0, '2024-07-21 03:16:45', '2024-07-21 03:16:45'),
(80, 1, 'Lingaya\'s University', 0, 0, 0, '2024-07-22 06:53:10', '2024-07-22 06:53:10'),
(81, 77, 'Sharda University', 1, 77, 0, '2024-07-28 10:45:15', '2024-07-28 10:45:15'),
(82, 77, 'Wipro', 0, 0, 0, '2024-07-28 10:52:38', '2024-07-28 10:52:38'),
(83, 77, 'Tech Mahindra', 0, 0, 0, '2024-07-28 11:13:13', '2024-07-28 11:13:13'),
(84, 77, 'HCL', 0, 0, 0, '2024-07-28 11:15:20', '2024-07-28 11:15:20'),
(85, 77, 'Infosys', 0, 0, 0, '2024-07-28 11:17:23', '2024-07-28 11:17:23'),
(86, 78, 'Levo', 1, 78, 0, '2024-08-05 12:13:18', '2024-08-05 12:13:18'),
(87, 79, 'Tech Jar', 1, 79, 0, '2024-08-23 09:58:13', '2024-08-23 09:58:13'),
(88, 81, 'Magic EdTech', 1, 81, 0, '2024-09-09 05:55:48', '2024-09-09 05:55:48'),
(89, 83, 'Naxnova', 1, 83, 0, '2024-09-12 11:03:46', '2024-09-12 11:03:46'),
(90, 75, 'SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc', 0, 0, 0, '2024-09-18 11:10:59', '2024-09-18 11:10:59'),
(91, 1, 'SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc', 0, 0, 0, '2024-09-20 11:40:55', '2024-09-20 11:40:55'),
(92, 85, 'Adzip Technologies', 1, 85, 0, '2024-10-14 17:05:48', '2024-10-14 17:05:48'),
(93, 86, 'MindSprint', 1, 86, 0, '2024-10-19 03:18:08', '2024-10-19 03:18:08'),
(94, 87, 'MindSprint', 1, 87, 0, '2024-10-21 03:30:10', '2024-10-21 03:30:10'),
(95, 88, 'Tech Jar', 1, 88, 0, '2024-11-07 04:21:24', '2024-11-07 04:21:24'),
(96, 75, 'EY', 0, 0, 0, '2024-11-20 16:34:03', '2024-11-20 16:34:03'),
(97, 75, 'Institute of Product Leadership', 0, 0, 0, '2024-11-20 16:42:44', '2024-11-20 16:42:44'),
(98, 90, 'Adzip Technologies', 1, 90, 0, '2024-12-20 11:18:05', '2024-12-20 11:18:05');

-- --------------------------------------------------------

--
-- Table structure for table `basta_psycho`
--

CREATE TABLE `basta_psycho` (
  `id` int NOT NULL,
  `name` varchar(100) COLLATE utf8mb4_general_ci NOT NULL,
  `screeningId` int NOT NULL,
  `resumeId` int NOT NULL,
  `candidateId` int NOT NULL,
  `isCompleted` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0' COMMENT 'if ful assesments completed ',
  `isVal` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0' COMMENT 'if 1 means can not use other attempt',
  `languageApt` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0' COMMENT 'if 1 means language aptitude completed',
  `abstractApt` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0' COMMENT 'if 1 means abstract reasoning completed',
  `verbalApt` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0' COMMENT 'if 1 means verbal reasoning completed',
  `mechanicalApt` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0' COMMENT 'if 1 means mechanical reasoning completed',
  `numericalApt` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0' COMMENT 'if 1 means numerical Aptitude completed	',
  `spatialApt` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0' COMMENT 'if 1 means spatial completed	',
  `perceptualApt` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0' COMMENT 'if 1 means Perceptual Aptitude completed	',
  `created` datetime DEFAULT NULL
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4 COLLATE=utf8mb4_general_ci;

--
-- Dumping data for table `basta_psycho`
--

INSERT INTO `basta_psycho` (`id`, `name`, `screeningId`, `resumeId`, `candidateId`, `isCompleted`, `isVal`, `languageApt`, `abstractApt`, `verbalApt`, `mechanicalApt`, `numericalApt`, `spatialApt`, `perceptualApt`, `created`) VALUES
(1, 'Swami_134_564_144_2051061017', 144, 564, 134, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, NULL);

-- --------------------------------------------------------

--
-- Table structure for table `bot_interview`
--

CREATE TABLE `bot_interview` (
  `id` int NOT NULL,
  `screeningId` int DEFAULT NULL,
  `candidateId` int NOT NULL,
  `resumeId` int DEFAULT NULL,
  `ref` varchar(100) COLLATE utf8mb4_general_ci DEFAULT NULL,
  `status` enum('START','IN_PROGRESS','END') COLLATE utf8mb4_general_ci DEFAULT 'START',
  `isCron` tinyint(1) DEFAULT NULL,
  `isVal` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT '1',
  `created` datetime NOT NULL,
  `modified` datetime DEFAULT NULL
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4 COLLATE=utf8mb4_general_ci;

--
-- Dumping data for table `bot_interview`
--

INSERT INTO `bot_interview` (`id`, `screeningId`, `candidateId`, `resumeId`, `ref`, `status`, `isCron`, `isVal`, `created`, `modified`) VALUES
(1, 48, 6, 227, 'SID_6_48_20240209_151919', NULL, 1, 1, '2024-02-09 15:19:28', NULL),
(2, 48, 6, 227, 'VID_6_48_20240209_151919', NULL, 1, 1, '2024-02-09 15:19:28', NULL),
(3, 48, 6, 227, 'VIDEO_6_48_20240209_151919', NULL, 1, 1, '2024-02-09 15:19:28', NULL),
(4, 48, 6, 227, 'REPORT_6_48_20240209_151919', NULL, 1, 1, '2024-02-09 15:19:28', NULL),
(6, 57, 11, 256, 'SID_11_57_20240319_121311', NULL, 1, 1, '2024-03-19 12:23:16', NULL),
(8, 59, 7, 265, 'SID_7_59_20240328_034311', NULL, 1, 1, '2024-03-28 03:46:43', NULL),
(9, 60, 4, 259, 'SID_4_60_20240328_034731', NULL, 1, 1, '2024-03-28 03:52:09', NULL),
(10, 61, 15, 266, 'SID_15_61_20240403_120344', NULL, 1, 1, '2024-04-03 12:10:58', NULL),
(11, 61, 15, 266, 'SID_15_61_20240404_075458', NULL, 1, 1, '2024-04-04 07:57:13', NULL),
(12, 61, 15, 266, 'SID_15_61_20240404_075458', NULL, 1, 1, '2024-04-04 07:58:38', NULL),
(13, 61, 15, 266, 'SID_15_61_20240404_075458', NULL, 1, 1, '2024-04-04 07:58:45', NULL),
(18, 71, 12, 304, 'SID_12_71_20240410_071510', 'IN_PROGRESS', 1, 1, '2024-04-10 07:25:55', NULL),
(19, 60, 4, 258, 'SID_4_60_20240410_102043', 'IN_PROGRESS', 1, 1, '2024-04-10 10:21:00', NULL),
(22, 71, 12, 304, 'SID_12_71_20240412_055527', 'IN_PROGRESS', 1, 1, '2024-04-12 06:01:14', NULL),
(23, 60, 4, 258, 'SID_4_60_20240412_072303', 'IN_PROGRESS', 1, 1, '2024-04-12 07:36:05', NULL),
(24, 60, 4, 258, 'SID_4_60_20240412_081316', 'IN_PROGRESS', 1, 1, '2024-04-12 08:21:35', NULL),
(25, 60, 4, 258, 'SID_4_60_20240412_081316', 'IN_PROGRESS', 1, 1, '2024-04-12 08:37:39', NULL),
(26, 71, 12, 304, 'SID_12_71_20240412_113211', 'IN_PROGRESS', 1, 1, '2024-04-12 11:34:27', NULL),
(27, 65, 26, 285, 'SID_26_65_20240414_073142', 'IN_PROGRESS', 1, 1, '2024-04-14 07:55:36', NULL),
(28, 77, 31, 339, 'SID_31_77_20240426_070709', 'IN_PROGRESS', 1, 1, '2024-04-26 07:42:16', NULL),
(29, 79, 4, 341, 'SID_4_79_20240508_040842', 'IN_PROGRESS', 1, 1, '2024-05-08 04:26:04', NULL),
(31, 81, 4, 357, 'SID_4_81_20240526_062354', 'START', 1, 1, '2024-05-26 06:32:22', NULL),
(32, 80, 4, 344, 'SID_4_80_20240526_083102', 'START', 1, 0, '2024-05-26 08:35:16', NULL),
(33, 80, 4, 342, 'SID_4_80_20240606_163951', 'START', 1, 0, '2024-06-06 16:40:33', NULL),
(34, 87, 4, 371, 'SID_4_371_87_20240717_031712', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-17 03:17:12', '2024-07-17 03:25:15'),
(35, 88, 4, 372, 'SID_4_372_88_20240717_054229', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-17 05:42:29', '2024-07-17 05:55:24'),
(36, 80, 4, 342, 'SID_4_342_80_20240717_111340', 'END', 1, 0, '2024-07-17 11:13:40', '2024-07-17 11:23:09'),
(40, 80, 4, 344, 'SID_4_344_80_20240718_041640', 'START', NULL, 0, '2024-07-18 04:16:40', NULL),
(42, 80, 4, 342, 'SID_4_342_80_20240718_073911', 'START', NULL, 0, '2024-07-18 07:39:11', NULL),
(43, 80, 4, 344, 'SID_4_344_80_20240718_113835', 'IN_PROGRESS', NULL, 0, '2024-07-18 11:38:35', '2024-07-18 11:44:43'),
(44, 51, 4, 228, 'SID_4_228_51_20240718_133759', 'START', NULL, 0, '2024-07-18 13:37:59', NULL),
(45, 91, 40, 377, 'SID_40_377_91_20240718_141115', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-18 14:11:15', '2024-07-18 14:26:45'),
(46, 91, 33, 378, 'SID_33_378_91_20240718_142632', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-18 14:26:32', '2024-07-18 15:07:13'),
(47, 90, 35, 374, 'SID_35_374_90_20240718_160642', 'END', 1, 0, '2024-07-18 16:06:42', '2024-07-18 16:37:57'),
(48, 93, 4, 398, 'SID_4_398_93_20240718_173102', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-18 17:31:02', '2024-07-18 17:42:49'),
(49, 94, 4, 401, 'SID_4_401_94_20240718_174531', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-18 17:45:31', '2024-07-18 18:05:35'),
(50, 94, 4, 405, 'SID_4_405_94_20240718_181220', 'IN_PROGRESS', NULL, 1, '2024-07-18 18:12:20', '2024-07-18 18:12:40'),
(51, 94, 4, 404, 'SID_4_404_94_20240718_181736', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-18 18:17:36', '2024-07-18 18:31:39'),
(52, 92, 33, 388, 'SID_33_388_92_20240719_035404', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-19 03:54:04', '2024-07-19 04:26:56'),
(53, 97, 35, 410, 'SID_35_410_97_20240719_045504', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-19 04:55:04', '2024-07-19 05:21:21'),
(55, 89, 34, 373, 'SID_34_373_89_20240719_053514', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-19 05:35:14', '2024-07-19 06:13:22'),
(56, 98, 4, 411, 'SID_4_411_98_20240719_054149', 'END', 1, 0, '2024-07-19 05:41:49', '2024-07-19 06:00:30'),
(57, 98, 4, 411, 'SID_4_411_98_20240719_064136', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-19 06:41:36', '2024-07-19 07:23:20'),
(58, 80, 4, 342, 'SID_4_342_80_20240719_065101', 'END', 1, 0, '2024-07-19 06:51:01', '2024-07-19 06:56:44'),
(59, 80, 4, 342, 'SID_4_342_80_20240719_070106', 'END', 1, 0, '2024-07-19 07:01:06', '2024-07-19 07:02:19'),
(60, 51, 4, 228, 'SID_4_228_51_20240719_085215', 'IN_PROGRESS', NULL, 0, '2024-07-19 08:52:15', '2024-07-19 08:53:55'),
(61, 92, 40, 387, 'SID_40_387_92_20240719_091012', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-19 09:10:12', '2024-07-19 09:38:48'),
(63, 99, 45, 412, 'SID_45_412_99_20240719_105451', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-19 10:54:51', '2024-07-19 11:48:04'),
(64, 51, 4, 228, 'SID_4_228_51_20240719_130518', 'START', NULL, 1, '2024-07-19 13:05:18', NULL),
(65, 96, 44, 409, 'SID_44_409_96_20240719_153137', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-19 15:31:37', '2024-07-19 16:49:22'),
(66, 91, 46, 383, 'SID_46_383_91_20240719_170627', 'END', 1, 0, '2024-07-19 17:06:27', '2024-07-19 17:36:28'),
(67, 91, 42, 375, 'SID_42_375_91_20240719_235726', 'START', NULL, 0, '2024-07-19 23:57:26', NULL),
(68, 91, 42, 375, 'SID_42_375_91_20240720_013142', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-20 01:31:42', '2024-07-20 03:04:08'),
(69, 100, 35, 413, 'SID_35_413_100_20240720_061739', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-20 06:17:39', '2024-07-20 07:18:27'),
(70, 91, 38, 379, 'SID_38_379_91_20240720_100325', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-20 10:03:25', '2024-07-20 10:34:21'),
(71, 101, 38, 414, 'SID_38_414_101_20240720_105009', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-20 10:50:09', '2024-07-20 11:48:47'),
(72, 91, 37, 380, 'SID_37_380_91_20240720_171546', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-20 17:15:46', '2024-07-20 17:40:01'),
(73, 106, 4, 449, 'SID_4_449_106_20240722_071234', 'END', 1, 0, '2024-07-22 07:12:34', '2024-07-22 07:21:50'),
(74, 106, 4, 449, 'SID_4_449_106_20240722_072514', 'IN_PROGRESS', NULL, 1, '2024-07-22 07:25:14', '2024-07-22 07:25:41'),
(75, 91, 46, 383, 'SID_46_383_91_20240722_174928', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-22 17:49:28', '2024-07-22 18:22:44'),
(76, 80, 4, 342, 'SID_4_342_80_20240728_033652', 'IN_PROGRESS', NULL, 1, '2024-07-28 03:36:52', '2024-07-28 03:37:41'),
(78, 113, 54, 462, 'SID_54_462_113_20240729_053612', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-29 05:36:12', '2024-07-29 06:03:35'),
(79, 113, 53, 465, 'SID_53_465_113_20240729_054034', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-29 05:40:34', '2024-07-29 06:14:42'),
(80, 113, 52, 463, 'SID_52_463_113_20240729_054225', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-29 05:42:25', '2024-07-29 05:45:40'),
(81, 113, 55, 466, 'SID_55_466_113_20240729_055310', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-29 05:53:10', '2024-07-29 05:53:50'),
(82, 112, 56, 460, 'SID_56_460_112_20240729_062829', 'START', NULL, 0, '2024-07-29 06:28:29', NULL),
(83, 111, 57, 458, 'SID_57_458_111_20240729_062921', 'IN_PROGRESS', NULL, 0, '2024-07-29 06:29:21', '2024-07-29 06:31:01'),
(84, 112, 56, 460, 'SID_56_460_112_20240729_063530', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-29 06:35:30', '2024-07-29 07:10:16'),
(85, 111, 58, 459, 'SID_58_459_111_20240729_063628', 'START', NULL, 1, '2024-07-29 06:36:28', NULL),
(86, 111, 58, 459, 'SID_58_459_111_20240729_063801', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-29 06:38:01', '2024-07-29 07:03:17'),
(87, 115, 59, 469, 'SID_59_469_115_20240729_063914', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-29 06:39:14', '2024-07-29 07:02:26'),
(88, 111, 57, 458, 'SID_57_458_111_20240729_064750', 'IN_PROGRESS', NULL, 0, '2024-07-29 06:47:50', '2024-07-29 06:48:27'),
(89, 111, 57, 458, 'SID_57_458_111_20240729_064957', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-29 06:49:57', '2024-07-29 06:50:26'),
(90, 91, 39, 382, 'SID_39_382_91_20240729_132232', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-29 13:22:32', '2024-07-29 13:51:43'),
(91, 109, 46, 456, 'SID_46_456_109_20240730_181734', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-07-30 18:17:34', '2024-07-30 19:24:44'),
(102, 116, 41, 470, 'SID_41_470_116_20240804_022957', 'START', NULL, 0, '2024-08-04 02:29:57', NULL),
(105, 116, 41, 470, 'SID_41_470_116_20240804_042649', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-08-04 04:26:49', '2024-08-04 05:33:43'),
(117, 91, 60, 381, 'SID_60_381_91_20240809_131029', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-08-09 13:10:29', '2024-08-09 14:08:04'),
(118, 119, 4, 509, 'SID_4_509_119_20240904_101235', 'START', NULL, 1, '2024-09-04 10:12:35', NULL),
(119, 119, 4, 509, 'SID_4_509_119_20240904_101235', 'START', NULL, 1, '2024-09-04 10:12:35', NULL),
(120, 119, 4, 509, 'SID_4_509_119_20240904_101235', 'START', NULL, 1, '2024-09-04 10:12:35', NULL),
(121, 119, 4, 509, 'SID_4_509_119_20240904_101235', 'START', NULL, 1, '2024-09-04 10:12:35', NULL),
(122, 119, 4, 510, 'SID_4_510_119_20240904_101313', 'IN_PROGRESS', NULL, 1, '2024-09-04 10:13:13', '2024-09-04 10:13:29'),
(123, 122, 4, 517, 'SID_4_517_122_20240907_101826', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-09-07 10:18:26', '2024-09-07 10:37:51'),
(124, 121, 4, 516, 'SID_4_516_121_20240907_104032', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-09-07 10:40:32', '2024-09-07 10:42:00'),
(125, 123, 4, 519, 'SID_4_519_123_20240909_112754', 'START', NULL, 1, '2024-09-09 11:27:54', NULL),
(127, 129, 4, 523, 'SID_4_523_129_20240911_120422', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-09-11 12:04:22', '2024-09-11 12:27:34'),
(128, 125, 4, 521, 'SID_4_521_125_20240911_122905', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-09-11 12:29:05', '2024-09-11 12:32:55'),
(129, 120, 4, 512, 'SID_4_512_120_20240911_123818', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-09-11 12:38:18', '2024-09-11 12:41:36'),
(130, 130, 4, 526, 'SID_4_526_130_20240916_122720', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-09-16 12:27:20', '2024-09-16 12:32:40'),
(131, 132, 4, 529, 'SID_4_529_132_20240918_114921', 'START', NULL, 1, '2024-09-18 11:49:21', NULL),
(132, 122, 4, 518, 'SID_4_518_122_20240918_162257', 'IN_PROGRESS', NULL, 1, '2024-09-18 16:22:57', '2024-09-18 16:23:16'),
(133, 131, 74, 528, 'SID_74_528_131_20240918_200020', 'END', 1, 0, '2024-09-18 20:00:20', '2024-09-18 20:18:13'),
(134, 135, 4, 540, 'SID_4_540_135_20240920_124152', 'START', NULL, 0, '2024-09-20 12:41:52', NULL),
(135, 135, 4, 540, 'SID_4_540_135_20240920_125636', 'START', NULL, 0, '2024-09-20 12:56:36', NULL),
(136, 135, 4, 540, 'SID_4_540_135_20240920_131521', 'START', NULL, 0, '2024-09-20 13:15:21', NULL),
(140, 119, 4, 511, 'SID_4_511_119_20241107_105223', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-11-07 10:52:23', '2024-11-07 11:01:30'),
(152, 135, 4, 540, 'SID_4_540_135_20241112_055107', 'START', NULL, 0, '2024-11-12 05:51:07', NULL),
(153, 143, 131, 562, 'SID_131_562_143_20241112_055349', 'START', NULL, 1, '2024-11-12 05:53:49', NULL),
(154, 143, 131, 562, 'SID_131_562_143_20241112_062711', 'START', NULL, 1, '2024-11-12 06:27:11', NULL),
(155, 143, 131, 562, 'SID_131_562_143_20241112_072800', 'START', NULL, 1, '2024-11-12 07:28:00', NULL),
(156, 80, 4, 344, 'SID_4_344_80_20241112_121829', 'START', NULL, 1, '2024-11-12 12:18:29', NULL),
(157, 135, 4, 540, 'SID_4_540_135_20241120_090355', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-11-20 09:03:55', '2024-11-20 09:10:22'),
(158, 144, 134, 564, 'SID_134_564_144_20241120_171034', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-11-20 17:10:34', '2024-11-20 17:41:50'),
(159, 144, 134, 566, 'SID_134_566_144_20241122_063117', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-11-22 06:31:17', '2024-11-22 06:45:25'),
(160, 136, 4, 541, 'SID_4_541_136_20241202_193049', 'END', 1, 1, '2024-12-02 19:30:49', '2024-12-02 19:36:45');

--
-- Triggers `bot_interview`
--
DELIMITER $$
CREATE TRIGGER `after_update_bot_interview` AFTER UPDATE ON `bot_interview` FOR EACH ROW BEGIN
    
    IF NEW.status = 'END' THEN
        INSERT INTO mailbox (
            adminId, screeningId, resumeId, botInterviewId, candidateId, candidateName, 
            mailType, title, email, whitelabelId, comments, created
        )
        SELECT 
            sc.adminId, 
            NEW.screeningId, 
            NEW.resumeId, 
            NEW.id, 
            NEW.candidateId, 
            rc.name,
            'Techjar_Students', 
            rb.title, 
            rc.email,
            r.whitelabelId,
            'Sends an email to students or candidates associated with the Techjar company after completing an interview conducted by Techjar',
            NOW()
        FROM screening AS sc
        INNER JOIN register AS r
            ON r.id = sc.adminId 
        INNER JOIN register_whitelabel AS rb 
            ON rb.id = r.whitelabelId 
            AND rb.title = 'Techjar'
        INNER JOIN register_candidate AS rc 
            ON rc.id = NEW.candidateId
        WHERE sc.id = NEW.screeningId$$
DELIMITER ;

-- --------------------------------------------------------

--
-- Table structure for table `bot_logs`
--

CREATE TABLE `bot_logs` (
  `id` int NOT NULL,
  `botInterviewId` int NOT NULL,
  `ref` varchar(100) COLLATE utf8mb4_general_ci NOT NULL,
  `questionId` int NOT NULL,
  `interviewType` enum('ONLY_AI','AI_PRE_DEFINED','ONLY_CUSTOM') COLLATE utf8mb4_general_ci NOT NULL,
  `stage` int NOT NULL,
  `datetime` datetime NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4 COLLATE=utf8mb4_general_ci;

--
-- Dumping data for table `bot_logs`
--

INSERT INTO `bot_logs` (`id`, `botInterviewId`, `ref`, `questionId`, `interviewType`, `stage`, `datetime`) VALUES
(1, 124, 'SID_4_516_121_20240907_104032', 1085, 'AI_PRE_DEFINED', 3, '2024-09-07 10:41:50'),
(2, 129, 'SID_4_512_120_20240911_123818', 1155, 'ONLY_CUSTOM', 3, '2024-09-11 12:41:11'),
(3, 129, 'SID_4_512_120_20240911_123818', 1156, 'ONLY_CUSTOM', 4, '2024-09-11 12:41:27');

-- --------------------------------------------------------

--
-- Table structure for table `bot_overall_feedback`
--

CREATE TABLE `bot_overall_feedback` (
  `id` int NOT NULL,
  `botInterviewId` int NOT NULL,
  `candidateId` int DEFAULT NULL,
  `resumeId` int DEFAULT NULL,
  `screeningId` int DEFAULT NULL,
  `feedback` text COLLATE utf8mb4_general_ci,
  `strength` text COLLATE utf8mb4_general_ci,
  `weakness` text COLLATE utf8mb4_general_ci,
  `primarySkills` text COLLATE utf8mb4_general_ci,
  `secondarySkills` text COLLATE utf8mb4_general_ci,
  `created` datetime DEFAULT NULL
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4 COLLATE=utf8mb4_general_ci;

--
-- Dumping data for table `bot_overall_feedback`
--

INSERT INTO `bot_overall_feedback` (`id`, `botInterviewId`, `candidateId`, `resumeId`, `screeningId`, `feedback`, `strength`, `weakness`, `primarySkills`, `secondarySkills`, `created`) VALUES
(1, 5, 4, 228, 51, 'Sanjay demonstrated a lack of confidence and self-awareness during the interview, which led to an early termination of the process. His inability to provide detailed responses about his experience and skills in relation to the job description suggests a misalignment with the Front-end Engineer role at Freshworks.', '- Sanjay initially expressed enthusiasm for the interview.', '- Sanjay was unable to articulate his experience with UI technologies.\n- He showed a lack of confidence in his abilities for the role.\n- Sanjay terminated the interview prematurely, indicating a potential misfit for the position.', '11. HTML: 2/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Sanjay did not discuss his HTML skills or provide relevant examples.\n\n12. CSS: 2/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Sanjay was unable to elaborate on his CSS experience.\n\n13. JavaScript: 2/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Sanjay did not provide any insight into his JavaScript expertise.\n\n14. MVC architecture: 2/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Sanjay did not mention any experience with MVC architecture.\n\n15. OOP programming style: 2/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Sanjay did not discuss his knowledge of OOP programming style.', '16. SASS: 2/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no mention of SASS experience in Sanjay\'s responses.\n\n17. JQuery: 2/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Sanjay did not provide examples of his work with JQuery.\n\n18. Javascript Frameworks: 2/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Sanjay failed to discuss his experience with any JavaScript frameworks.\n\n19. GIT: 2/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Sanjay did not talk about his proficiency with GIT.\n\n20. Communication skills: 2/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Sanjay\'s communication skills were not up to the mark for the interview process.', '2024-02-19 06:08:14'),
(2, 6, 11, 256, 57, 'Eric demonstrated a foundational understanding of Laravel and its ecosystem, including experience with PHP, Laravel framework, and integration of third-party libraries like PayPal. However, his responses lacked depth and specificity in some areas, which are crucial for the PHP Laravel Developer Lead role.', '- Eric has experience with Laravel and other PHP frameworks, indicating adaptability to different technologies.\n- He has worked on various projects, including e-commerce and betting applications, showcasing his versatility.\n- Eric is familiar with using Composer and handling deprecated libraries, which is important for maintaining a codebase.', '- Responses lacked detail and did not fully convey the depth of his experience or the impact of his work on projects.\n- He could have provided more specific examples of problem-solving and innovation in his past roles.\n- Communication could be more engaging and enthusiastic to better demonstrate his leadership potential.', '11. PHP: 6/10\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Eric has experience with PHP but did not convey a mastery level.\n\n12. CSS: N/A\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: CSS skills were not directly assessed in the interview.\n\n13. Laravel framework: 6/10\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Eric has worked with Laravel but did not demonstrate advanced proficiency.\n\n14. MySQL: N/A\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: MySQL skills were not directly assessed in the interview.\n\n15. Software Development: 6/10\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Eric has experience in software development but did not discuss his strategic or innovative contributions.', '16. Node.js: N/A\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Node.js skills were not directly assessed in the interview.\n\n17. React.js: N/A\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: React.js skills were not directly assessed in the interview.\n\n18. Ajax: N/A\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Ajax skills were not directly assessed in the interview.\n\n19. Jenkins: N/A\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Jenkins skills were not directly assessed in the interview.\n\n20. GitLab: N/A\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: GitLab skills were not directly assessed in the interview.', '2024-03-19 12:25:11'),
(3, 8, 7, 265, 59, 'Shalu\'s performance in the interview was significantly below expectations. The responses lacked depth, relevance, and engagement with the role\'s requirements. Shalu was unable to demonstrate knowledge or experience in key areas critical for the UX/UI Designer position at Google.', '- Shalu expressed comfort with HTML, indicating some familiarity with front-end development technologies.', '- Lack of experience and knowledge in JavaScript and other required technical skills.\n- Inability to articulate a process for conducting user research.\n- Did not demonstrate an understanding of user-centered design processes.\n- Failed to engage with the questions related to design principles, tools, and competitive analysis.\n- Requested to reschedule the interview, indicating a lack of preparedness or engagement.', '11. UX/UI design principles:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shalu did not demonstrate knowledge or experience in UX/UI design principles.\n\n12. user-centered design processes:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shalu did not articulate any understanding of user-centered design processes.\n\n13. design tools (Sketch, Adobe XD, Figma):\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shalu did not mention any experience with design tools like Sketch, Adobe XD, or Figma.\n\n14. front-end development technologies (HTML, CSS, JavaScript):\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shalu expressed comfort with HTML but did not demonstrate knowledge or experience with CSS and JavaScript.\n\n15. user research:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shalu did not describe a process for conducting user research or how findings are incorporated into design.', '16. Wireframing:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no mention of wireframing experience or knowledge.\n\n17. prototyping:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shalu did not discuss any experience with prototyping.\n\n18. visual design:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shalu did not demonstrate knowledge or experience in visual design.\n\n19. usability testing:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no indication of experience with usability testing.\n\n20. industry trends:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shalu did not show awareness of industry trends or best practices in UX/UI design.', '2024-03-28 03:47:44'),
(4, 9, 4, 259, 60, 'Varun\'s interview performance was subpar, with responses that lacked depth and relevance to the questions asked. His communication was unclear and his engagement in the interview process was minimal, indicating a need for significant improvement in interview preparedness and professional communication.', '- Varun expressed a willingness to engage in the interview process.\n- He acknowledged his experience with HTML, which is relevant to the job description.', '- Varun\'s responses were brief and lacked detail, failing to demonstrate a strong understanding of UX/UI design principles and user-centered design processes.\n- He did not provide examples of his work or elaborate on his experience, which was necessary to assess his fit for the role.\n- Varun seemed unprepared for the interview, questioning the interview duration and not engaging with the questions meaningfully.', '11. UX/UI design principles:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate knowledge or experience in UX/UI design principles.\n\n12. user-centered design processes:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide evidence of experience or knowledge in user-centered design processes.\n\n13. design tools (Sketch, Adobe XD, Figma):\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any proficiency in design tools.\n\n14. front-end development technologies (HTML, CSS, JavaScript):\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun acknowledged experience with HTML but did not demonstrate proficiency in CSS or JavaScript.\n\n15. user research:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss any experience with user research.', '16. Wireframing:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any experience with wireframing.\n\n17. prototyping:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide any information on his experience with prototyping.\n\n18. visual design:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not showcase any knowledge or experience in visual design.\n\n19. usability testing:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss any experience with usability testing.\n\n20. mentoring:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide any evidence of mentoring experience.', '2024-03-28 03:53:03'),
(5, 10, 15, 266, 61, 'Ruby\'s responses were concise but lacked the enthusiasm and detail expected for a senior-level position. The responses were repetitive and did not convey a strong interest or preparedness for the interview.', '- Ruby responded affirmatively to the readiness for the interview, indicating a willingness to engage in the conversation.', '- Lack of detail and enthusiasm in responses.\n- Repetitive and informal communication style.\n- Missed opportunity to showcase preparation and interest in the role.', '11. SQL: 8/10:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: SQL knowledge was not assessed in the provided responses.\n\n12. SQL Server: 8/10:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: SQL Server knowledge was not assessed in the provided responses.\n\n13. Database Design and Development: 6/10:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Database design and development knowledge was not assessed in the provided responses.\n\n14. Database Management Systems: 6/10:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Database management systems knowledge was not assessed in the provided responses.\n\n15. Familiarity with database management systems and tools: 6/10:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Familiarity with database management systems and tools was not assessed in the provided responses.', '16. Performance Tuning and Optimization: 4/10:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Performance tuning and optimization knowledge was not assessed in the provided responses.\n\n17. ETL (Extract: 2/10:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: ETL knowledge was not assessed in the provided responses.\n\n18. Transform: 2/10:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Transform knowledge was not assessed in the provided responses.\n\n19. Load) processes: 2/10:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Load processes knowledge was not assessed in the provided responses.\n\n20. Stored Procedures: 8/10:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Stored procedures knowledge was not assessed in the provided responses.', '2024-04-03 12:11:56'),
(6, 21, 4, 228, 51, 'Varun\'s responses throughout the interview demonstrated a strong technical background and relevant experience in front-end development. However, there were areas where his responses could have been more aligned with the job description\'s requirements, particularly in showcasing his expertise in specific skills and frameworks mentioned.', '- Varun has a solid foundation in front-end technologies such as HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.\n- His extensive experience in web development is evident from his resume and the confidence in his responses.', '- Varun\'s responses lacked depth in certain areas such as MVC architecture, SASS, and JavaScript frameworks.\n- He could have provided more specific examples of his work related to the job description to demonstrate his expertise.', '11. HTML: 8/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun demonstrated a strong understanding of HTML.\n\n12. CSS: 8/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun showed a good grasp of CSS.\n\n13. JavaScript: 8/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun\'s knowledge of JavaScript was clear and aligned with his experience.\n\n14. MVC architecture: 6/10:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s understanding of MVC architecture was not thoroughly explored.\n\n15. OOP programming style: 6/10:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s responses did not fully reflect his proficiency in OOP.', '16. SASS: 4/10:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s experience with SASS was not well articulated.\n\n17. JQuery: 6/10:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s knowledge of JQuery was adequate but lacked depth.\n\n18. Javascript Frameworks (Backbone/Angular/EmberJs/NodeJs): 4/10:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate strong expertise in the mentioned JavaScript frameworks.\n\n19. GIT: 6/10:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s experience with GIT could have been highlighted more effectively.\n\n20. Communication skills: 8/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun communicated effectively but could improve by providing more detailed responses.', '2024-04-12 04:52:06'),
(7, 23, 4, 258, 60, 'Varun\'s responses were minimal and lacked the depth and engagement expected for a UX/UI Designer role at Google. He failed to demonstrate the necessary knowledge and experience in key areas relevant to the job description.', '- Varun expressed a positive demeanor at the beginning of the interview.', '- Varun\'s responses were extremely brief and did not showcase his expertise or experience.\n- He did not provide any evidence of his skills or past work relevant to the UX/UI Designer role.\n- There was no mention of his proficiency in design tools or user-centered design processes.\n- Varun did not engage in the conversation beyond the most basic response.', '11. UX/UI design principles:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any UX/UI design principles.\n\n12. user-centered design processes:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss any user-centered design processes.\n\n13. design tools (Sketch, Adobe XD, Figma):\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not reference his proficiency with any design tools.\n\n14. front-end development technologies (HTML, CSS, JavaScript):\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any front-end development technologies.\n\n15. user research:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide any information on his experience with user research.', '16. Wireframing:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his skills in wireframing.\n\n17. prototyping:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any experience with prototyping.\n\n18. visual design:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not showcase any visual design skills.\n\n19. usability testing:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss usability testing.\n\n20. mentoring:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any mentoring experience.', '2024-04-12 07:36:53'),
(8, 28, 31, 339, 77, 'Yashaswee demonstrated a good understanding of BI tools and technologies, with a particular strength in Power BI and data migration projects. He provided detailed responses about his experiences with BI architecture, tool deployment, and report customization. However, Yashaswee\'s responses lacked depth in certain areas such as building universes and self-service reporting. His communication was clear but could have been more structured and focused on the specific questions asked.', '- Yashaswee has strong experience in BI architecture and Power BI.\n- He has practical experience with data migration projects and tool deployment.\n- Yashaswee showed a good understanding of performance optimization and problem-solving in BI contexts.', '- Yashaswee\'s responses could be more detailed in areas like building universes and self-service reporting.\n- He could improve on aligning his responses more closely with the questions asked.\n- Yashaswee could benefit from providing more examples of his work with Spotfire to better demonstrate his expertise in that area.', '11. - BI Architect: 8/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Yashaswee demonstrated strong knowledge and experience as a BI Architect.\n\n12. - Spotfire: 6/10:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Yashaswee could have provided more specific examples of his work with Spotfire to demonstrate his expertise.\n\n13. - PowerBI: 8/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Yashaswee showed strong proficiency with PowerBI through his detailed project examples.\n\n14. - Data Modelling: 8/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Yashaswee\'s experience with data modeling was evident in his discussion of migration projects and architecture design.\n\n15. - Building Universe: 4/10:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Yashaswee did not provide sufficient detail on his experience with building universes.', '16. - Creating Metrics: 6/10:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Yashaswee mentioned creating metrics but did not delve into specifics or examples.\n\n17. - Build Reports and Dashboard: 8/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Yashaswee\'s experience with building reports and dashboards was clear from his project descriptions.\n\n18. - Report Authorization and Access Control: 6/10:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Yashaswee discussed report authorization but could have provided more detail on access control mechanisms.\n\n19. - Self-Service Reporting: 6/10:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Yashaswee\'s response on self-service reporting lacked depth and specific examples.\n\n20. - BI Tool Deployment: 6/10:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Yashaswee mentioned BI tool deployment but did not fully explain his approach or experience in this area.', '2024-04-26 07:44:27'),
(9, 29, 4, 341, 79, 'Varun demonstrated a good understanding of Agile and Scrum methodologies, relevant experience in business analysis, and strong communication skills. However, there were gaps in his familiarity with certain tools and methodologies, and his responses lacked depth in some areas.', '- Varun showed confidence in his technical skills and experience with Agile and Scrum methodologies.\n- He effectively communicated his role in requirement gathering and collaboration with stakeholders.\n- Varun provided clear examples of managing backlogs and facilitating stakeholder sign-offs using Jira.', '- Varun\'s responses lacked depth in his experience with data analysis and visualization tools.\n- He did not provide detailed examples of problem-solving or process improvement methodologies.\n- Varun could improve his familiarity with the Atlassian Suite beyond Jira and demonstrate a broader understanding of industry trends and their application to his role.', '11. Agile and Scrum methodologies: 8/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun demonstrated applied experience with Agile and Scrum methodologies.\n\n12. Requirements gathering and documentation: 8/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun\'s experience with requirements gathering was evident, aligning with the job description.\n\n13. Analytical and problem-solving skills: 8/10:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun could have provided more detailed examples to showcase his analytical and problem-solving skills.\n\n14. Communication and interpersonal skills: 10/10:\nScore: 9\nQualitative Assessment: Excellent\nDescription: Varun\'s communication and interpersonal skills were a strong point throughout the interview.\n\n15. Cross-functional teamwork: 8/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun showed good experience in working with cross-functional teams.', '16. Familiarity with Atlassian Suite (Jira): 6/10:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun was familiar with Jira but could have discussed other Atlassian Suite tools.\n\n17. Confluence: 4/10:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention his experience with Confluence, indicating a need for improvement.\n\n18. Bitbucket: 2/10:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate familiarity with Bitbucket, which is a gap in his skill set.\n\n19. Data analysis and visualization tools: 4/10:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s use of visualization tools was basic, and he could have provided more examples.\n\n20. Process improvement methodologies: 4/10:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s response did not show a strong understanding of process improvement methodologies.', '2024-05-08 04:27:27'),
(10, 31, 4, 357, 81, 'Varun demonstrated a good understanding of Agile and Scrum methodologies and his past experience as a Business Analyst aligns with the job description. However, his responses lacked depth in some areas and he did not complete the interview, which affects the overall assessment of his fit for the role.', '- Varun has a strong background in Agile and Scrum methodologies, as evidenced by his detailed description of his experience with these practices.\n- He has extensive experience in requirement gathering, documentation, and stakeholder management.\n- Varun\'s communication style is clear and he expresses his ideas effectively.', '- Varun\'s responses lacked specific examples and depth in certain areas, such as data analysis and visualization tools, and familiarity with Atlassian Suite.\n- He did not complete the interview, which raises concerns about his ability to handle stress and adaptability.\n- Varun could improve on providing more detailed examples of problem-solving and process improvement methodologies.', '11. Agile and Scrum methodologies: 8/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun demonstrated a good understanding of Agile and Scrum methodologies.\n\n12. Requirements gathering and documentation: 8/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun has strong experience in requirements gathering and documentation.\n\n13. Analytical and problem-solving skills: 8/10:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun needs to provide more examples of how he has applied his analytical and problem-solving skills.\n\n14. Communication and interpersonal skills: 10/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun communicates well but could improve on maintaining engagement throughout the interview.\n\n15. Cross-functional teamwork: 8/10:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun has experience working with cross-functional teams.', '16. Familiarity with Atlassian Suite (Jira): 6/10:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide enough detail about his experience with Jira.\n\n17. Confluence: 4/10:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any specific experience with Confluence.\n\n18. Bitbucket: 2/10:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate any experience with Bitbucket.\n\n19. Data analysis and visualization tools: 4/10:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s experience with data analysis and visualization tools was not evident in his responses.\n\n20. Process improvement methodologies: 6/10:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun mentioned process improvements but did not provide specific examples or methodologies used.', '2024-05-26 06:33:24'),
(11, 32, 4, 344, 80, 'Varun\'s responses during the interview were non-existent or irrelevant, showing a lack of engagement and understanding of the interview process. His inability to provide coherent answers to the questions asked indicates a significant gap in communication skills and job role comprehension.', '- No strengths were demonstrated based on the interview responses provided.', '- Inability to understand and respond to questions in a relevant manner.\n- Lack of clarity in communication.\n- Did not demonstrate knowledge or experience relevant to the job role.\n- Failed to engage in the interview process.', '11. Functional knowledge: 0/10\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not exhibit any functional knowledge relevant to the job description.\n\n12. Technical knowledge: 0/10\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun failed to demonstrate any technical knowledge during the interview.\n\n13. Consulting experience: 0/10\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no evidence of consulting experience in Varun\'s responses.\n\n14. Analytical ability: 0/10\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not display any analytical abilities in his responses.\n\n15. Business understanding: 0/10\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s responses did not reflect an understanding of business related to the role.', '16. Interpersonal skills: 0/10\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate the interpersonal skills necessary for the role.\n\n17. Industry experience: 0/10\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not show any industry experience relevant to the job description.\n\n18. Presentation skills: 0/10\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not exhibit any presentation skills during the interview.\n\n19. Requirement analysis: 0/10\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no indication of requirement analysis skills in Varun\'s responses.\n\n20. Agile methodology: 0/10\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate any knowledge or experience with agile methodology.', '2024-05-26 08:36:12'),
(12, 33, 4, 342, 80, 'Varun\'s responses in the interview were generally brief and lacked depth, failing to showcase his skills and experience relevant to the Techno-Functional Business Analyst position. His answers did not provide enough evidence of his expertise in the e-commerce domain or his ability to fulfill the roles and responsibilities outlined in the job description.', '- Varun maintained a polite and positive demeanor throughout the interview.', '- Varun\'s responses were not detailed and did not demonstrate a clear understanding of the job requirements.\n- He did not provide specific examples of his work experience related to the e-commerce domain or business analysis.\n- Varun failed to highlight his consulting experience, analytical ability, or business understanding, which are critical for the role.\n- His communication style was too brief and lacked engagement.', '11. Functional knowledge: 0/10\nScore: 0/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate functional knowledge relevant to the role.\n\n12. Technical knowledge: 4/10\nScore: 4/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun mentioned working with Laravel but did not connect his technical knowledge to the job requirements.\n\n13. Consulting experience: 0/10\nScore: 0/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide evidence of consulting experience.\n\n14. Analytical ability: 0/10\nScore: 0/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not showcase his analytical abilities during the interview.\n\n15. Business understanding: 0/10\nScore: 0/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate an understanding of business challenges faced by customers.', '16. Interpersonal skills: 0/10\nScore: 0/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not exhibit strong interpersonal skills required for the role.\n\n17. Industry experience: 0/10\nScore: 0/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any specific industry experience related to e-commerce.\n\n18. Presentation skills: 0/10\nScore: 0/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not display the presentation skills necessary for the role.\n\n19. Requirement analysis: 0/10\nScore: 0/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his experience with requirement analysis.\n\n20. Agile methodology: 0/10\nScore: 0/10\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any experience with Agile methodology.', '2024-06-06 16:41:31'),
(13, 34, 4, 371, 87, 'Asmiya\'s responses during the interview were consistently brief and lacked the depth and detail expected for a candidate with her experience. While she confirmed her readiness and comfort with the interview process, her answers did not provide insight into her skills, experiences, or problem-solving abilities, which are crucial for evaluating her fit for the Developer-Connected Vehicle role.', '- Asmiya confirmed her readiness and comfort with the interview process, indicating a positive attitude towards the opportunity.\n- She consistently responded affirmatively to the questions, showing a willingness to engage.', '- Asmiya\'s responses lacked detail and did not showcase her experience or knowledge in relation to the job description.\n- She did not provide examples or elaborate on her skills and experiences, which is necessary to assess her fit for the role.\n- Her communication style was too concise, missing the opportunity to demonstrate her problem-solving skills and depth of knowledge.', '11. Android Development:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya did not provide any specific details about her Android development experience.\n\n12. Java/Kotlin:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya did not elaborate on her experience with Java or Kotlin, which is crucial for the role.\n\n13. Android Studio:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya did not describe her use of Android Studio or its features in her projects.\n\n14. RESTful APIs/Websocket:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya did not explain how she implemented RESTful APIs or Websocket in her applications.\n\n15. Agile Practices/JIRA/Rally:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya did not provide examples of how she applied Agile practices or used JIRA or Rally.', '16. Android Architecture/AAOS/BSP:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya did not elaborate on her knowledge or experience with Android Architecture, AAOS, or BSP.\n\n17. CAN bus/OBD-II Protocols:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya did not discuss her experience with CAN bus or OBD-II protocols in the context of Android development.\n\n18. GraphQL APIs/Apollo Client:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya did not explain her use of GraphQL APIs and the Apollo Client in her Android applications.\n\n19. Software Documentation/Technical Support:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya did not share how she ensured clear and useful software documentation for her team and technical support purposes.\n\n20. Cross-Functional Collaboration:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya did not provide an example of her collaboration with cross-functional teams to deliver a project successfully.', '2024-07-17 03:26:51'),
(14, 35, 4, 372, 88, 'Asmiya\'s performance in the interview was significantly below expectations. She struggled to provide substantive answers to most questions, often responding with brief or irrelevant statements. Her inability to discuss her experience and skills in depth suggests a lack of preparedness or a mismatch with the job requirements.', '- Asmiya confirmed her availability and willingness to proceed with the interview.\n- She provided a brief overview of her professional experience, mentioning her specialization and eagerness to collaborate on technology.', '- Asmiya failed to provide detailed responses to questions about her specific experiences and skills.\n- She was unable to discuss instances of problem-solving, performance optimization, or collaboration with cross-functional teams.\n- Asmiya did not demonstrate knowledge of security best practices, CI/CD pipelines, or cloud platforms in the context of Android development.\n- She did not engage with questions about leadership, adaptability, or customer advocacy.\n- Asmiya did not ask any questions about the role or the company, showing a lack of engagement with the interview process.', '11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Maintenance:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya mentioned working on Android-based systems but did not elaborate on her experience in development, customization, or maintenance.\n\n12. Android System Services/Frameworks:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya\'s response did not provide evidence of her expertise in Android System Services or Frameworks.\n\n13. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya mentioned using Java and Kotlin but did not discuss her programming skills in detail.\n\n14. User Interface (UI) Design/Development for Android:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya did not provide any information on her experience with UI design or development for Android.\n\n15. Performance Optimization/Profiling/Debugging:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya was unable to discuss any instances of performance optimization, profiling, or debugging.', '16. Collaboration/Communication with Cross-Functional Teams:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya briefly mentioned working with cross-functional teams but did not detail how she ensured effective collaboration.\n\n17. Security Best Practices/Compliance for Android:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya\'s mention of two-factor authentication was too vague to demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of security best practices.\n\n18. Continuous Improvement/Keeping Updated with AOSP/AAOS:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya stated she keeps herself updated but did not provide examples of how this knowledge benefited a project.\n\n19. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya did not provide any examples of implementing CI/CD pipelines, automated testing, or build automation.\n\n20. Cloud Platforms/Containerization (Docker/Kubernetes):\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya admitted to not having used Docker or Kubernetes, showing a gap in her experience with cloud platforms and containerization.', '2024-07-17 05:57:40'),
(15, 36, 4, 342, 80, 'Varun\'s responses were not in line with professional standards expected for the Techno-Functional Business Analyst position. His use of non-English languages and lack of clear communication indicate a need for improvement in professional interaction and language skills.', '- Expressed enthusiasm for the interview process.', '- Responses were not in English, which is the medium of communication for the interview.\n- Did not demonstrate a professional level of communication.\n- Lack of clarity and relevance in responses.', '11. Functional knowledge:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide responses to assess his functional knowledge.\n\n12. Technical knowledge:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s technical knowledge could not be evaluated due to irrelevant responses.\n\n13. Consulting experience:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no evidence of consulting experience in Varun\'s responses.\n\n14. Analytical ability:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate analytical ability in his responses.\n\n15. Business understanding:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not show any business understanding relevant to the role.', '16. Interpersonal skills:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s interpersonal skills were not evident due to the lack of professional communication.\n\n17. Industry experience:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any relevant industry experience.\n\n18. Presentation skills:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not exhibit the presentation skills expected for the role.\n\n19. Requirement analysis:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no discussion of requirement analysis skills.\n\n20. Agile methodology:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide any insight into his experience with agile methodology.', '2024-07-17 11:23:49'),
(16, 37, 33, 378, 91, 'Shailendra demonstrated a solid understanding of Android development, with a focus on platform development and customization. However, his responses lacked depth in certain areas, and there were instances of unclear communication.', '- Shailendra has a strong background in Android application development, as evidenced by his experience with Scania truck navigation applications.\n- He is familiar with the Android build system and has experience customizing AOSP for specific hardware requirements.\n- Shailendra has worked with cross-functional teams, which is crucial for the role in question.', '- Shailendra\'s responses were sometimes vague and lacked the technical depth expected for someone with his experience.\n- Communication clarity was an issue, with some responses being incomplete or not directly addressing the question.\n- There was a lack of specific examples and details in his responses, which made it difficult to assess his problem-solving skills and depth of knowledge in certain areas.', '11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Integration:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shailendra has experience in this area but did not provide detailed examples of his work, making it difficult to assess his proficiency.\n\n12. User Interface Development for Android:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shailendra mentioned UI development but did not elaborate on his approach or the challenges he faced.\n\n13. Performance Optimization for Android Systems:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shailendra discussed performance optimization but did not detail the tools or methodologies he used.\n\n14. Android Security Best Practices/Compliance:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shailendra mentioned security practices but did not provide specific examples of how he implemented them in projects.\n\n15. Cross-Functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: While Shailendra has experience collaborating with teams, his communication skills need improvement to effectively work in a cross-functional environment.', '16. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shailendra mentioned using Java and Kotlin but did not discuss complex coding problems he solved with these languages.\n\n17. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shailendra has experience with CI/CD pipelines but did not clearly explain how he set up a pipeline or the benefits it brought.\n\n18. AOSP/AAOS Experience:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shailendra has worked with AOSP/AAOS but did not provide in-depth examples of his contributions to development or maintenance.\n\n19. Cloud Platforms/Containerization Knowledge:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shailendra mentioned cloud and containerization but did not discuss how these technologies impacted his Android development workflow.\n\n20. Android Development Tools Proficiency (Android Studio/ADB/Gradle):\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shailendra is proficient with development tools but did not share how this proficiency enhanced his development process.', '2024-07-17 15:47:57'),
(17, 39, 4, 228, 51, 'Varun\'s responses were brief and lacked engagement. He did not directly address the questions posed by the interviewer, which suggests a need for improvement in communication and interview etiquette.', '- Varun was polite in his initial greeting.', '- Varun\'s responses did not address the interviewer\'s questions directly.\n- He did not confirm his readiness for the interview or express enthusiasm for the discussion.\n- His answers were not substantive and did not provide any insight into his qualifications or interest in the role.', '11. HTML:\nScore: Not Applicable\nQualitative Assessment: Not Applicable\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his HTML skills.\n\n12. CSS:\nScore: Not Applicable\nQualitative Assessment: Not Applicable\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his CSS skills.\n\n13. JavaScript:\nScore: Not Applicable\nQualitative Assessment: Not Applicable\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his JavaScript skills.\n\n14. MVC architecture:\nScore: Not Applicable\nQualitative Assessment: Not Applicable\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his experience with MVC architecture.\n\n15. OOP programming style:\nScore: Not Applicable\nQualitative Assessment: Not Applicable\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his experience with OOP programming style.', '16. SASS:\nScore: Not Applicable\nQualitative Assessment: Not Applicable\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his experience with SASS.\n\n17. JQuery:\nScore: Not Applicable\nQualitative Assessment: Not Applicable\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his experience with JQuery.\n\n18. Javascript Frameworks (Backbone/Angular/EmberJs/NodeJs):\nScore: Not Applicable\nQualitative Assessment: Not Applicable\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his experience with JavaScript frameworks.\n\n19. GIT:\nScore: Not Applicable\nQualitative Assessment: Not Applicable\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his experience with GIT.\n\n20. Communication skills:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s communication skills need improvement as he did not effectively communicate during the interview.', '2024-07-18 04:16:51'),
(18, 45, 40, 377, 91, 'Gowtham\'s interview responses were inconsistent and at times incoherent, which made it challenging to accurately assess his fit for the HMI Developer role at Royal Enfield. While he mentioned some relevant experience, his answers lacked depth and clarity, making it difficult to gauge his true expertise in Android Platform Development.', '- Mentioned having four plus years of experience in Android development.\n- Discussed working with Java and Kotlin, which are relevant to the job description.\n- Briefly touched on experience with AOSP and adapting Android software for specific hardware requirements.', '- Responses were often unclear, lacking in detail, and at times incoherent (e.g., response to Q4).\n- Failed to provide concrete examples of past projects or challenges faced, which is crucial for demonstrating applied experience.\n- Did not effectively communicate his approach to ensuring compatibility with AOSP or AAOS specifications.\n- Did not showcase a strong understanding of Android Platform Development in the context of the job description.', '11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Integration:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham mentioned some experience with Android development but did not provide sufficient details to demonstrate proficiency.\n\n12. User Interface Development for Android:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no specific mention of experience in User Interface Development for Android, which is a key component of the job description.\n\n13. Performance Optimization for Android Systems:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham did not discuss any experience with performance optimization for Android systems, which is essential for the role.\n\n14. Android Security Best Practices/Compliance:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no evidence of knowledge or experience with Android security best practices or compliance.\n\n15. Cross-Functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: While Gowtham mentioned teamwork, he did not elaborate on his experience with cross-functional collaboration or communication.', '16. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham mentioned working with Java and Kotlin, but did not provide enough detail to assess his proficiency.\n\n17. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no mention of experience with CI/CD pipelines, automated testing, or build automation.\n\n18. AOSP/AAOS Experience:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham briefly touched on experience with AOSP but did not demonstrate a comprehensive understanding or provide examples of work with AAOS.\n\n19. Cloud Platforms/Containerization Knowledge:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham did not mention any experience with cloud platforms or containerization knowledge.\n\n20. Android Development Tools Proficiency (Android Studio/ADB/Gradle):\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no specific mention of proficiency with Android development tools such as Android Studio, ADB, or Gradle.', '2024-07-18 14:28:47');
INSERT INTO `bot_overall_feedback` (`id`, `botInterviewId`, `candidateId`, `resumeId`, `screeningId`, `feedback`, `strength`, `weakness`, `primarySkills`, `secondarySkills`, `created`) VALUES
(19, 47, 35, 374, 90, 'Bhushan demonstrated a good understanding of data engineering concepts and practical experience with data pipelines, cloud platforms, and real-time data processing. His responses indicated hands-on experience with AWS services and a clear direction towards modernizing data pipelines using Kafka and Kubernetes.', '- Bhushan has practical experience with AWS services, particularly Lambda and Kinesis, which he mentioned using for data processing.\n- He is aware of the cost and scalability benefits of Kafka over AWS Kinesis and has plans to transition to Kafka and Apache Beam.\n- Bhushan has experience with Elasticsearch, indicating his involvement with data transformation and storage.\n- He mentioned using Kubernetes for scalability, showing an understanding of modern deployment and scaling techniques.', '- Bhushan\'s responses lacked specific examples and details that would demonstrate a deeper understanding of the technologies mentioned.\n- He could improve the structure of his responses to make them more concise and focused on the question asked.\n- Bhushan could provide more insights into the challenges faced and how he overcame them in his projects to showcase problem-solving skills.', '11. [Data Pipeline Development/Kafka/MQTT/HTTP]:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan has experience with AWS services and plans to use Kafka, indicating knowledge in data pipeline development.\n\n12. [Real-Time Data Processing/Kafka Streams/Kafka Connect]:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan mentioned real-time data processing with AWS Lambda and plans for Kafka, showing relevant experience.\n\n13. [Data Ingestion and Integration/IoT/Database/APIs]:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan discussed data ingestion from APIs and plans for IoT device integration, demonstrating relevant experience.\n\n14. [Data Transformation and Storage/SQL/NoSQL/Data Lakes]:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan\'s experience with Elasticsearch indicates knowledge in data transformation and storage.\n\n15. [Cloud Platforms/Azure/GCP/AWS]:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Excellent\nDescription: Bhushan\'s extensive use of AWS services for data engineering tasks demonstrates strong experience with cloud platforms.', '16. [Software Development Lifecycle/Agile Methodologies]:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan\'s professional experience implies familiarity with the software development lifecycle, but he could discuss specific Agile practices he has used.\n\n17. [Data Engineering/Data Life Cycle Management]:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan has practical data engineering experience but could provide more insights into data life cycle management.\n\n18. [Collaboration and Communication Skills]:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan mentioned collaborating with teams, but he could discuss more about his communication practices within a team setting.\n\n19. [Continuous Improvement/Technology Upgradation]:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan\'s intention to modernize data pipelines shows a commitment to continuous improvement and technology upgradation.\n\n20. [Problem-Solving/Analytical Skills]:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan\'s responses indicate problem-solving skills, but he could provide more examples of analytical approaches to complex issues.', '2024-07-18 16:39:15'),
(20, 46, 33, 378, 91, 'Shailendra demonstrated a strong technical background in Android platform development with a focus on customization and integration, which aligns with the job description. However, his responses often lacked structure and clarity, leading to some repetition and vagueness in his explanations.', '- Extensive experience in Android platform development, particularly in customization and integration for automotive applications.\n- Familiarity with AOSP/AAOS and ensuring compatibility with these specifications.\n- Experience with hardware integration and performance optimization.\n- Demonstrated ability to work with cross-functional teams and third-party libraries.', '- Communication lacked clarity and conciseness, with some repetition and lack of focus on the questions asked.\n- Responses sometimes veered off-topic or did not directly address the interviewer\'s questions.\n- Could improve on providing structured and specific examples to showcase his expertise more effectively.', '11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Integration:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra has applied experience in this area, though he could provide more specific examples of his work.\n\n12. User Interface Development for Android:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra mentioned UI/UX customization, but more details on his experience would strengthen his response.\n\n13. Performance Optimization for Android Systems:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra discussed performance optimization, but could elaborate on specific techniques and results.\n\n14. Android Security Best Practices/Compliance:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra mentioned security concerns, but could provide more insight into how he ensures compliance with best practices.\n\n15. Cross-Functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra\'s experience with cross-functional teams is evident, but he could discuss his communication strategies more.', '16. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra has applied experience with Java and Kotlin, which is essential for the role.\n\n17. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra mentioned CI/CD and automated testing, but could provide more details on his experience with build automation.\n\n18. AOSP/AAOS Experience:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra has applied experience with AOSP/AAOS, which is highly relevant to the role.\n\n19. Cloud Platforms/Containerization Knowledge:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra touched on cloud services, but could expand on his knowledge of containerization.\n\n20. Android Development Tools Proficiency (Android Studio/ADB/Gradle):\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra demonstrated proficiency with Android development tools, which is crucial for the role.', '2024-07-18 16:53:43'),
(21, 48, 4, 398, 93, 'Varun\'s responses were non-existent or irrelevant throughout the interview, providing no substantive information or insight into his qualifications or thought processes. This indicates a lack of engagement and preparedness for the interview.', '- There are no discernible strengths in Varun\'s interview responses as they are either monosyllabic affirmatives or unrelated to the questions asked.', '- Varun failed to provide any relevant or meaningful answers to the interview questions.\n- There was a complete lack of engagement with the interview process.\n- Varun did not demonstrate any knowledge or experience related to the job description.', '11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Integration:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss any relevant experience or knowledge in this area.\n\n12. User Interface Development/Android UI/UX:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide any insights into his experience with UI/UX development.\n\n13. Performance Optimization/Profiling/Debugging:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not describe any situations where he optimized performance or engaged in profiling/debugging.\n\n14. Security Standards/Compliance/Best Practices:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss how he has implemented security standards or best practices.\n\n15. Cross-Functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide examples of effective cross-functional collaboration or communication.', '16. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not describe any complex problems he solved using Java or Kotlin.\n\n17. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not explain how he utilized CI/CD pipelines in his previous role.\n\n18. AOSP/AAOS Development/Customization:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not talk about his experience with AOSP or AAOS development and customization.\n\n19. Cloud Platforms/Containerization/Docker/Kubernetes:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not describe any projects where he used Docker or Kubernetes in the context of Android development.\n\n20. Android Studio/ADB/Gradle Tools:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not give any examples of how he used these tools to solve development problems.', '2024-07-18 17:44:52'),
(22, 49, 4, 401, 94, 'Varun\'s responses during the interview were limited and, in many cases, non-existent. This made it challenging to evaluate his fit for the HMI Developer role at Adzip Technologies. The lack of engagement and detailed answers to the questions posed by the interviewer indicates a need for significant improvement in interview preparedness and communication.', '- Varun expressed willingness to continue with the interview despite having a tough day, which shows a level of commitment.', '- Varun did not provide substantive responses to the majority of the questions.\n- There was a lack of engagement and detail in his answers, which did not allow for a proper assessment of his skills and experience.\n- Varun\'s responses did not demonstrate a clear understanding of the role or how his background aligns with the job requirements.', '11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Integration:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his experience with Android platform development, which is critical for the role.\n\n12. User Interface Development:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide information on his experience with user interface development, a key skill for the position.\n\n13. Performance Optimization:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not describe any scenarios where he optimized Android applications, which is necessary for the role.\n\n14. Security/Compliance:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his experience with implementing security best practices within an Android environment.\n\n15. Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide examples of effective collaboration or communication with cross-functional teams.', '16. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not talk about his programming skills in Java or Kotlin, which are essential for the role.\n\n17. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not describe his experience with CI/CD pipelines, which is important for the role\'s responsibilities.\n\n18. AOSP/AAOS Experience:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not explain any complex problems he solved while working with AOSP, a requirement for the position.\n\n19. Cloud Platforms/Containerization:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not share his experience with integrating cloud platforms or containerization into his workflow.\n\n20. Android Development Tools Proficiency:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate proficiency with Android development tools, which is necessary for the job.\n\nOverall, Varun\'s interview performance requires significant improvement across all parameters. He should aim to provide detailed and relevant responses that showcase his skills, experience, and alignment with the job requirements.', '2024-07-18 18:08:48'),
(23, 51, 4, 404, 94, 'Varun\'s responses during the interview were generally brief and lacked depth. He did not provide detailed examples or insights into his experience and skills, which made it difficult to assess his fit for the role. Varun\'s lack of engagement and inability to answer several questions related to the job description indicates a need for improvement in preparation and communication.', '- Varun confirmed his availability and willingness to proceed with the interview.\n- He expressed his experience in leading teams and working on multimedia application connectivity features.', '- Varun\'s responses were often too brief and lacked the necessary detail to demonstrate his expertise and experience.\n- He did not provide concrete examples of his work or how he addressed challenges, which is crucial for evaluating his problem-solving skills and technical knowledge.\n- Varun did not engage with the interviewer\'s questions about his experiences with CI/CD pipelines, AOSP, cloud platforms, containerization, and Android development tools, which are critical for the role.\n- He did not ask any questions at the end of the interview, missing an opportunity to show interest in the role and the company.', '11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Integration:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide specific examples of his experience with Android platform development, customization, or integration.\n\n12. User Interface Development:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun stated he had no experience with User Interface Development, which is a key requirement for the role.\n\n13. Performance Optimization:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s response to performance optimization was vague and did not demonstrate applied experience.\n\n14. Security/Compliance:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun mentioned general security practices but did not provide concrete examples of implementation in his work.\n\n15. Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s response about collaboration was unclear and did not provide insight into his ability to work with cross-functional teams.', '16. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his experience with Java or Kotlin programming during the interview.\n\n17. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide any response regarding his experience with CI/CD pipelines, automated testing, or build automation.\n\n18. AOSP/AAOS Experience:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide any response regarding his experience with AOSP or AAOS.\n\n19. Cloud Platforms/Containerization:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide any response regarding his experience with cloud platforms or containerization.\n\n20. Android Development Tools Proficiency:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide any response regarding his proficiency with Android development tools.', '2024-07-18 18:35:11'),
(24, 52, 33, 388, 92, 'Shailendra demonstrated a good understanding of Android development and related technologies throughout the interview. He provided detailed responses, showcasing his experience with Android platform development, UI/UX design, and system performance optimization. However, his responses sometimes lacked structure and clarity, which could be improved for better communication.', '- Extensive experience in Android application development and customization.\n- Familiarity with AOSP and AAOS development.\n- Knowledgeable in performance optimization and debugging.\n- Demonstrated understanding of CI/CD pipelines and automated testing.', '- Responses were sometimes unstructured and lacked clarity.\n- Did not always directly address the interviewer\'s questions.\n- Could improve on providing concise and focused answers.', '11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Maintenance:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra demonstrated applied experience in Android platform development and customization.\n\n12. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra showed good knowledge and experience in Java and Kotlin programming.\n\n13. Android System Architecture/Frameworks/Services:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra\'s experience with Android system architecture and frameworks was evident in his responses.\n\n14. UI/UX Design for Android:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra has experience in UI/UX design, although he could improve on aligning design with user needs.\n\n15. Performance Optimization/Profiling/Debugging:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra provided strong insights into performance optimization and debugging practices.', '16. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra\'s experience with CI/CD pipelines and automated testing was clear and relevant.\n\n17. AOSP/AAOS Development:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra showed good knowledge of AOSP/AAOS development, with room for more detailed examples.\n\n18. Security Best Practices/Compliance:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra understands security best practices, as demonstrated in his discussion of SELinux and code obfuscation.\n\n19. Cross-Functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra\'s responses indicated experience with cross-functional collaboration, though he could improve communication clarity.\n\n20. Cloud Platforms/Containerization (Docker/Kubernetes):\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shailendra did not provide specific examples of experience with cloud platforms or containerization, which could be an area for improvement.', '2024-07-19 04:28:39'),
(25, 54, 33, 388, 92, 'Shailendra demonstrated a strong technical foundation and relevant experience in Android development. However, his responses lacked structure and clarity, often veering off-topic or providing excessive detail without addressing the core of the questions. His communication style could benefit from more focus and conciseness to better align with the expectations of the role.', '- Extensive experience in Android application development and customization.\n- Familiarity with AOSP and AAOS development processes.\n- Knowledge of performance optimization techniques for Android applications.\n- Experience with CI/CD pipelines and automated testing.', '- Responses were often verbose and lacked clarity, making it difficult to extract relevant information.\n- Some answers did not directly address the questions, indicating a need for better listening skills and understanding of the interviewer\'s intent.\n- Limited engagement with the interviewer\'s questions, missing opportunities to showcase problem-solving skills and creativity.', '11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Maintenance:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra has experience in Android platform development but needs to articulate his expertise more clearly.\n\n12. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra\'s experience with Java and Kotlin is evident, though his responses could be more concise.\n\n13. Android System Architecture/Frameworks/Services:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra demonstrated knowledge in this area but could improve by providing more structured examples.\n\n14. UI/UX Design for Android:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra has relevant experience in UI/UX design, as seen in his work with Scania\'s navigation app.\n\n15. Performance Optimization/Profiling/Debugging:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra understands performance optimization but needs to communicate his approach more effectively.', '16. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra has experience with CI/CD and automated testing, though his explanation of the implementation process was not clear.\n\n17. AOSP/AAOS Development:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra\'s familiarity with AOSP/AAOS development is apparent, but his responses lacked specificity.\n\n18. Security Best Practices/Compliance:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra mentioned security practices but did not delve deeply into his experience with them.\n\n19. Cross-Functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shailendra has experience collaborating with teams but could improve his communication of these experiences.\n\n20. Cloud Platforms/Containerization (Docker/Kubernetes):\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Shailendra did not provide sufficient detail on his experience with cloud platforms and containerization.', '2024-07-19 05:17:45'),
(26, 53, 35, 410, 97, 'Bhushan demonstrated a strong technical background with significant experience in data pipeline development and cloud services, particularly AWS. He articulated his role and responsibilities well, showing a clear understanding of real-time data processing and streaming with Kafka, as well as data ingestion and storage using Elasticsearch. Bhushan\'s responses indicated a practical approach to problem-solving and an eagerness to learn new technologies.', '- Extensive experience with AWS services and data pipeline development.\n- Practical knowledge of Kafka and its application in real-time data processing.\n- Demonstrated ability to optimize performance and solve complex technical challenges.\n- Good understanding of HTTPS protocol implementation and its use in securing data communication.\n- Expressed willingness to learn and adapt to new technologies, such as Azure.', '- Limited experience with Azure and GCP compared to AWS.\n- Some responses lacked specific examples or details that could have demonstrated a deeper understanding of certain technologies.\n- Could benefit from more structured responses to convey information more effectively.', '11. Kafka:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan displayed applied experience with Kafka, detailing its use in his projects.\n\n12. MQTT/HTTP protocols:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan explained his implementation of HTTPS, but did not provide examples of MQTT usage.\n\n13. Real-time data processing:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan\'s experience with real-time data processing was evident, particularly with Kafka and AWS services.\n\n14. Data pipeline development:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan provided a comprehensive overview of his data pipeline development experience.\n\n15. Azure/GCP cloud services:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Bhushan admitted limited experience with Azure and GCP, indicating a need for further development in these areas.', '16. JIRA/Rally:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan mentioned using JIRA and Rally but did not elaborate on specific experiences.\n\n17. SQL/NoSQL databases:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan\'s use of Elasticsearch suggests a good understanding of NoSQL databases.\n\n18. Data ingestion/integration:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan\'s experience with data ingestion and integration was well articulated, especially with AWS Kinesis and Lambda.\n\n19. IoT device integration:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan did not specifically mention IoT device integration, but his knowledge of related technologies suggests competence.\n\n20. Data transformation/storage:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan\'s responses indicated a strong grasp of data transformation and storage, particularly with Elasticsearch.', '2024-07-19 05:22:11'),
(27, 56, 4, 411, 98, 'Varun\'s responses during the interview were extremely limited, providing only a \"Yes\" to each question. This indicates a lack of engagement and failure to communicate effectively, which is critical for the role in question. Varun did not demonstrate the required knowledge, experience, or communication skills expected for the Developer - Connected Platform position.', '- Unfortunately, based on Varun\'s responses, no strengths can be identified as he did not provide any substantive answers to the interview questions.', '- Varun\'s responses lacked detail and did not address the questions asked.\n- There was no evidence of Varun\'s knowledge or experience related to the job description.\n- Varun failed to communicate effectively, which is crucial for the role.\n- Varun did not showcase any problem-solving skills or adaptability.', '11. Kafka:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide any information on his experience with Kafka.\n\n12. MQTT/HTTP protocols:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his experience with MQTT/HTTP protocols.\n\n13. Real-time data processing:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not share any insights into his real-time data processing experience.\n\n14. Data pipeline development:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not describe any data pipeline development experience.\n\n15. Microsoft Azure/GCP:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any experience with Microsoft Azure or GCP.', '16. SQL/NoSQL databases:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide details on his experience with SQL/NoSQL databases.\n\n17. Data ingestion/integration:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his experience with data ingestion or integration.\n\n18. Kafka Streams/Kafka Connect:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide information on his use of Kafka Streams or Kafka Connect.\n\n19. Data transformation/storage:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not elaborate on his experience with data transformation or storage.\n\n20. Jira/Rally:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss how he has used Jira or Rally in managing projects.', '2024-07-19 06:03:06'),
(28, 55, 34, 373, 89, 'Asmiya Begum demonstrated a good understanding of Android development, with practical experience in Java and Kotlin, as well as familiarity with various tools and libraries. She has a strong background in application development, particularly in retail and logistics. However, there is room for improvement in her responses regarding advanced topics and leadership experience.', '- Asmiya has solid experience in Android application development, particularly with Java and Kotlin.\n- She is proficient in using Android Studio and related tools, which aligns with the job requirements.\n- Asmiya has practical experience with RESTful APIs and has used Agile methodologies effectively in her past projects.', '- Asmiya lacks experience with automotive-specific protocols like CAN bus and OBD-II, which are relevant to the job description.\n- Her responses lacked depth in areas such as Android Architecture, AAOS, BSP, and ISO 26262 Functional Safety.\n- Asmiya could improve her communication of complex technical solutions, as seen in her explanation of MSAL implementation.', '11. Java/Kotlin:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Asmiya has applied experience with Java and Kotlin, which is evident in her work history and responses.\n\n12. Android Studio:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Asmiya demonstrated applied experience with Android Studio and its tools, aligning with her professional background.\n\n13. RESTful APIs/Websocket:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Asmiya has experience with RESTful APIs and Websocket, but her explanation could have been more detailed.\n\n14. Agile Practice/JIRA/Rally:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Asmiya has applied experience with Agile practices and JIRA, which she effectively used in her projects.\n\n15. Android Architecture/AAOS/BSP:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya has basic knowledge of Android Architecture but lacks experience with AAOS and BSP, which are relevant to the role.', '16. GraphQL APIs/Apollo Client:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya mentioned using GraphQL in personal projects but did not demonstrate applied experience in a professional context.\n\n17. Software Development:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Asmiya has a strong background in software development, with experience in various aspects of Android app development.\n\n18. CAN bus/OBD-II Protocols:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya lacks experience with CAN bus and OBD-II protocols, which are important for the role.\n\n19. ISO 26262 Functional Safety:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Asmiya has limited knowledge of ISO 26262 Functional Safety and did not provide examples of ensuring compliance.\n\n20. Performance Optimization/Resource Management:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Asmiya discussed performance optimization and resource management but could provide more in-depth examples of her approach.', '2024-07-19 06:15:15'),
(29, 57, 4, 411, 98, 'Varun\'s responses throughout the interview were generally on topic, but they lacked the depth and specificity expected for the role. While he demonstrated some understanding of the technologies and processes involved, his answers were often vague and did not convey a strong grasp of the subject matter or the ability to articulate complex technical concepts clearly.', '- Varun expressed confidence in his abilities and a willingness to engage with the interview process.\n- He mentioned experience with Kafka, Python, AWS Lambda, and Jira, which are relevant to the job description.\n- Varun showed an understanding of the importance of scalability and customer-centric approaches in software development.', '- Varun\'s responses lacked detail and specificity, often failing to provide concrete examples or in-depth explanations of his experience.\n- He did not demonstrate a strong understanding of data pipeline development, real-time data processing, or the use of specific technologies like MQTT, HTTP, or SQL/NoSQL databases.\n- Varun\'s communication was not always clear or well-structured, which could lead to misunderstandings in a professional setting.', '11. Kafka:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun mentioned Kafka but did not provide detailed experiences or knowledge of implementing Kafka in projects.\n\n12. MQTT/HTTP protocols:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s understanding of MQTT and HTTP protocols in device-to-cloud communication was basic and lacked specific examples.\n\n13. Real-time data processing:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s response did not demonstrate a strong grasp of real-time data processing techniques or optimization strategies.\n\n14. Data pipeline development:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s description of data pipeline development was vague and did not reflect a deep understanding of the process.\n\n15. Microsoft Azure/GCP:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s experience with Azure or GCP was not clearly articulated, and he did not provide examples of overcoming challenges with these platforms.', '16. SQL/NoSQL databases:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s response on optimizing databases for high-velocity data was insufficient and did not reflect applied experience.\n\n17. Data ingestion/integration:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide a clear explanation of his experience with data ingestion or integration processes.\n\n18. Kafka Streams/Kafka Connect:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s knowledge of Kafka Streams or Kafka Connect was not evident from his responses.\n\n19. Data transformation/storage:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of data transformation or storage solutions.\n\n20. Jira/Rally:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun mentioned using Jira for project management but did not elaborate on how it helped maintain project timelines and deliverables effectively.', '2024-07-19 07:25:34'),
(30, 61, 40, 387, 92, 'Gowtham\'s responses throughout the interview were generally brief and lacked depth. While he demonstrated some familiarity with the technical aspects of the role, his answers often fell short in providing comprehensive insights into his experiences and approaches to problem-solving. There was a notable gap between the benchmark responses and his actual responses, indicating areas where Gowtham could improve to align more closely with the expectations for the HMI Developer role at Royal Enfield.', '- Gowtham has experience in Android development and has worked on various projects, which is relevant to the job description.\n- He mentioned working on customization for specific hardware configurations, which is a key aspect of the role.\n- Gowtham is aware of the importance of security best practices in Android development.', '- Responses lacked detail and specific examples that demonstrate his depth of knowledge and problem-solving skills.\n- He did not effectively communicate his experience with cross-functional collaboration, which is critical for the role.\n- Gowtham\'s answers did not showcase his ability to think creatively or adapt to new technologies and changes, as expected for the position.\n- He did not ask questions at the end of the interview, missing an opportunity to learn more about the role and company.', '11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Maintenance:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham mentioned his experience with Android customization but did not provide detailed examples. He could improve by discussing specific projects and their impact.\n\n12. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham has experience with Java and Kotlin but did not elaborate on his proficiency. He could improve by sharing more about his programming projects and challenges.\n\n13. Android System Architecture/Frameworks/Services:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham\'s knowledge in this area was implied but not well articulated. He could improve by providing examples of how he has worked with Android system architecture.\n\n14. UI/UX Design for Android:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham\'s responses did not demonstrate a strong understanding of UI/UX design principles. He could improve by discussing his involvement in designing user interface components.\n\n15. Performance Optimization/Profiling/Debugging:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham briefly mentioned optimization but did not provide a clear example of how he improved system performance. He could improve by detailing his approach to profiling and debugging.', '16. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham acknowledged the use of CI/CD pipelines but did not describe how he implemented them. He could improve by providing a specific example of how CI/CD improved a project\'s lifecycle.\n\n17. AOSP/AAOS Development:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham stated he was not directly involved in AOSP or AAOS development. He could improve by discussing any related experience or knowledge he has in this area.\n\n18. Security Best Practices/Compliance:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham mentioned security practices but did not provide a comprehensive view of how he implements them. He could improve by discussing specific security measures he has taken in his projects.\n\n19. Cross-Functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham did not provide a strong example of cross-functional collaboration. He could improve by sharing experiences where he worked with different teams to achieve project goals.\n\n20. Cloud Platforms/Containerization (Docker/Kubernetes):\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Gowtham mentioned using Docker but not Kubernetes. He could improve by discussing how containerization has enhanced system scalability and reliability in his projects.', '2024-07-19 09:42:47'),
(31, 63, 45, 412, 99, 'John\'s responses throughout the interview were generally aligned with the benchmark responses but lacked depth and specificity in certain areas. He demonstrated a solid understanding of Android development and shared relevant experiences from his previous roles. However, his answers could have been more detailed and structured to better showcase his expertise and problem-solving abilities.', '- John has a strong background in Android development, with specific experiences in security and performance optimization.\n- He showed awareness of the importance of collaboration with cross-functional teams and the need to prioritize user needs.\n- John\'s experience with leading a team and mentoring junior developers is evident and aligns with the job description\'s emphasis on cross-functional collaboration.', '- John\'s responses were sometimes vague and lacked the detail expected from a candidate with his experience. He could have provided more concrete examples and outcomes from his past projects.\n- His communication style could be more engaging and structured to convey his ideas more effectively.\n- John did not ask any questions at the end of the interview, missing an opportunity to learn more about the role and company.', '11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Integration:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: John discussed his experience with Android platform development but could have provided more details on customization and integration aspects.\n\n12. User Interface Development for Android:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: John mentioned his transition from XML to Jetpack Compose, indicating his experience with UI development.\n\n13. Performance Optimization for Android Systems:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: John provided an example of performance optimization but could have elaborated on the specific techniques and tools he used.\n\n14. Android Security Best Practices/Compliance:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: John\'s experience with security in banking apps demonstrates his knowledge in this area, although he could have mentioned compliance aspects.\n\n15. Cross-functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: John\'s response indicated experience with cross-functional collaboration, aligning with the job description.', '16. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: John discussed his experience with Java and Kotlin, showing a solid foundation in these programming languages.\n\n17. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: John mentioned the implementation of CI/CD pipelines at TCS, which improved the development process.\n\n18. AOSP/AAOS Development Experience:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: John did not specifically mention AOSP/AAOS development experience, which is an area he could have highlighted.\n\n19. Cloud Platforms/Containerization Knowledge:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: John did not provide information on his experience with cloud platforms or containerization.\n\n20. Android Development Tools Proficiency (Android Studio/ADB/Gradle):\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: John provided examples of using Android development tools, demonstrating proficiency in this area.', '2024-07-19 12:43:38'),
(32, 65, 44, 409, 96, 'Avinash\'s performance in the interview was mixed. While he demonstrated a solid understanding of Android development and experience in the automotive domain, his responses lacked depth in certain areas and were sometimes off-topic or unclear. His communication style was straightforward, but there were instances where he could have been more articulate and relevant to the questions asked.', '- Avinash has substantial experience in Android framework development and automotive software, aligning with the job requirements.\n- He has worked on performance optimization, which is critical for the role.\n- His experience with Agile practices and JIRA is evident and aligns with the collaborative nature of the role.', '- Avinash\'s responses sometimes lacked relevance and clarity, particularly when discussing Kotlin and GraphQL APIs, which he has limited experience with.\n- He did not demonstrate a strong understanding of Android Architecture, AAOS, or BSP, which are important for the role.\n- His communication style could be more engaging and structured to effectively convey his thoughts.', '11. Java/Kotlin:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Avinash has experience with Java but limited experience with Kotlin, which is relevant to the role.\n\n12. Android Studio:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Avinash demonstrated applied experience with Android Studio, which is crucial for the role.\n\n13. RESTful APIs/Websocket:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Avinash has experience with RESTful APIs at the app level but did not provide in-depth examples relevant to the automotive domain.\n\n14. Agile Practice/JIRA/Rally:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Avinash has good experience with Agile practices and JIRA, aligning with the job requirements.\n\n15. Android Architecture/AAOS/BSP:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Avinash\'s understanding of Android Architecture, AAOS, and BSP was not clearly conveyed and requires improvement.', '16. GraphQL APIs/Apollo Client:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Avinash has very limited experience with GraphQL APIs and Apollo Client, which are relevant to the role.\n\n17. Software Development Lifecycle:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Avinash demonstrated a good understanding of the Software Development Lifecycle and its application in the automotive industry.\n\n18. CAN bus/OBD-II Protocols:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Avinash has practical experience with CAN bus and OBD-II protocols, which is beneficial for the role.\n\n19. ISO 26262 Functional Safety:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Avinash mentioned ISO 26262 but did not provide a strong example of how he incorporated functional safety into his development process.\n\n20. Performance Optimization:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Avinash has experience with performance optimization, which is crucial for the role.', '2024-07-19 17:51:29'),
(33, 68, 42, 375, 91, 'Ajay demonstrated a strong technical background and relevant experience in Android-based Automotive Infotainment systems. His responses indicated a good understanding of the technical aspects of the role, including platform development, integration of third-party libraries, and user interface design. However, there were instances where his responses lacked depth and clarity, particularly when discussing non-technical stakeholder communication and balancing innovation with established processes.', '- Relevant experience in Android-based Automotive Infotainment systems.\n- Familiarity with Android platform development, customization, and integration.\n- Experience with third-party library integration and problem-solving skills.\n- Understanding of performance optimization in Android systems.', '- Communication could be clearer and more structured.\n- Responses sometimes lacked the depth expected for someone with his experience.\n- Could improve on explaining technical concepts to non-technical stakeholders.\n- Approach to balancing established processes with innovation could be more strategic.', '11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Integration:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ajay provided solid examples of his experience in this area, aligning well with the job requirements.\n\n12. User Interface Development for Android:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ajay discussed his approach to UI development, but more detail on his creative process would enhance his response.\n\n13. Performance Optimization for Android Systems:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ajay\'s experience with performance optimization was evident, showcasing his applied experience.\n\n14. Android Security Best Practices/Compliance:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ajay understands the importance of security and compliance but could articulate his experience with best practices more clearly.\n\n15. Cross-Functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ajay has experience with cross-functional teams but could improve how he communicates technical concepts to various stakeholders.', '16. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ajay provided examples of solving complex problems using Java and Kotlin, demonstrating good proficiency.\n\n17. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ajay\'s response showed his contribution to CI/CD practices, though more detail on his role in process improvement would be beneficial.\n\n18. AOSP/AAOS Experience:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ajay shared a relevant experience with AOSP, indicating a good level of applied experience.\n\n19. Cloud Platforms/Containerization Knowledge:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ajay is familiar with cloud platforms and containerization but could provide more concrete examples of leveraging these technologies.\n\n20. Android Development Tools Proficiency (Android Studio/ADB/Gradle):\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ajay demonstrated proficiency with essential Android development tools, aligning with the job requirements.', '2024-07-20 05:12:02');
INSERT INTO `bot_overall_feedback` (`id`, `botInterviewId`, `candidateId`, `resumeId`, `screeningId`, `feedback`, `strength`, `weakness`, `primarySkills`, `secondarySkills`, `created`) VALUES
(34, 70, 38, 379, 91, 'Swapnil demonstrated a good understanding of Android development and relevant experience. However, his responses lacked depth in certain areas and were sometimes unclear or incomplete, which suggests a need for improvement in communication and elaboration on technical expertise.', '- Swapnil has relevant experience in Android development and has worked on multiple projects, which aligns with the job description.\n- He mentioned experience with performance optimization, security practices, and cross-functional collaboration, which are key aspects of the role.\n- Swapnil\'s experience with AOSP and leading a team of developers indicates his capability to handle responsibilities that the job entails.', '- Swapnil\'s responses were sometimes vague and lacked specific examples or detailed explanations.\n- He did not fully articulate his thought process or the impact of his work on the projects he mentioned.\n- There were instances where Swapnil\'s communication was not clear, and he did not address the questions directly, which could be improved with more structured responses.', '11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Integration:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil mentioned relevant experience but did not provide compelling examples of his work in Android platform development.\n\n12. User Interface Development for Android:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Not relevant\nDescription: Swapnil did not provide a response to the question about his experience with User Interface Development on the Android platform.\n\n13. Performance Optimization for Android Systems:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil discussed performance optimization strategies but could have provided more concrete examples and results.\n\n14. Android Security Best Practices/Compliance:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil mentioned several security measures but did not detail specific instances where he ensured compliance with best practices.\n\n15. Cross-Functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil\'s response indicated experience with cross-functional collaboration, but he could have provided clearer examples of successful outcomes.', '16. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil\'s resume suggests proficiency in Java and Kotlin, but his interview responses did not fully demonstrate his programming skills.\n\n17. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Swapnil did not mention his experience with CI/CD pipelines, automated testing, or build automation during the interview.\n\n18. AOSP/AAOS Experience:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil mentioned working on an AOSP project, but he could have elaborated on his specific contributions and the impact of his work.\n\n19. Cloud Platforms/Containerization Knowledge:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Swapnil did not discuss his experience with cloud platforms or containerization, which are mentioned in the job description.\n\n20. Android Development Tools Proficiency (Android Studio/ADB/Gradle):\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil\'s resume indicates proficiency with Android development tools, but he did not elaborate on this during the interview.', '2024-07-20 11:20:28'),
(35, 69, 35, 413, 100, 'Bhushan demonstrated a solid understanding of data engineering concepts and his experience with various technologies relevant to the job description. He provided detailed explanations of his work with Kafka, real-time data processing, and data pipeline development, showcasing his technical expertise. However, there were instances where his responses could have been more structured and aligned with the benchmark responses, which emphasized clarity and relevance to the role at Royal Enfield.', '- Bhushan has hands-on experience with Kafka, real-time data processing, and data pipeline development, which are critical for the role.\n- He has worked on modernizing data pipelines, improving performance, and reducing costs, showing his ability to drive efficiency.\n- Bhushan\'s experience with AWS services, Elasticsearch, and Kubernetes indicates a strong background in cloud technologies and data storage solutions.', '- Bhushan\'s responses occasionally lacked the structured communication and clear articulation seen in the benchmark responses.\n- While he demonstrated technical knowledge, there were opportunities to better tailor his responses to the specific context of the role at Royal Enfield.\n- Bhushan could improve his ability to communicate complex technical concepts to non-technical stakeholders, ensuring complete understanding.', '11. Kafka:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan\'s experience with Kafka was evident, and he provided detailed explanations of its use in data streaming and processing.\n\n12. MQTT/HTTP protocols:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan discussed using HTTP protocols for secure data communication but did not elaborate on MQTT, indicating room for improvement.\n\n13. Real-time data processing:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan provided strong examples of real-time data processing, demonstrating his capability in this area.\n\n14. Data pipeline development:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan\'s experience with developing and modernizing data pipelines aligns well with the role\'s requirements.\n\n15. Microsoft Azure/GCP:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan expressed a preference for GCP over Azure based on his experience, showing an understanding of cloud platforms.', '16. SQL/NoSQL databases:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan shared challenges he faced with NoSQL databases and his solutions, indicating his proficiency with these technologies.\n\n17. Data ingestion/integration:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan\'s use of Kafka Connect for data ingestion and integration showcases his relevant experience.\n\n18. Kafka Streams/Kafka Connect:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan has practical experience with Kafka Streams and Kafka Connect, which he discussed in the context of enhancing data ingestion.\n\n19. Data transformation/storage:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan described tackling data transformation and storage challenges, particularly with Elasticsearch and Kubernetes.\n\n20. Jira/Rally:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Bhushan\'s use of Jira to manage complex projects and ensure task completion was well-articulated.\n\nOverall, Bhushan\'s technical expertise and experience are strong, but he could benefit from refining his communication skills and providing more contextually relevant responses.', '2024-07-20 11:21:28'),
(36, 71, 38, 414, 101, 'Swapnil demonstrated a good understanding of Android development and relevant experience in his responses. He provided detailed examples of his work, particularly in Android platform development, integration of third-party libraries, and user interface design. However, his responses lacked structure and clarity at times, which made it difficult to follow his thought process. Swapnil\'s experience with AOSP and security practices was evident, but he could improve on articulating his approach to problem-solving and optimization.', '- Swapnil has substantial experience in Android development, as evidenced by his work on multiple applications.\n- He has practical knowledge of integrating third-party libraries and customizing Android for specific hardware configurations.\n- Swapnil has experience with AOSP and has tackled challenges related to system services and inter-process communication.\n- His work on user interface components for automotive and consumer applications shows an understanding of usability and accessibility considerations.', '- Swapnil\'s responses could be more structured and concise to effectively communicate his ideas.\n- He could provide clearer examples of problem-solving, particularly in performance optimization and security best practices.\n- Swapnil did not answer question 8, which leaves a gap in understanding his approach to performance optimization.\n- While he mentioned automated testing and CI/CD pipelines, he could elaborate more on the impact these practices had on his projects.', '11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Integration:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil has solid experience in Android platform development and customization, as seen in his work with AOSP and third-party libraries.\n\n12. User Interface Development/Design:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil\'s experience with designing and implementing user interface components for different applications shows his competency in this area.\n\n13. Performance Optimization/Profiling/Debugging:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Swapnil did not answer question 8, which was directly related to performance optimization, leaving an incomplete assessment of his skills in this area.\n\n14. Security Best Practices/Compliance:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil has a good understanding of security best practices, as evidenced by his response to implementing SSL pinning and data encryption.\n\n15. Cross-Functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil mentioned working with cross-functional teams and helping others with challenges, indicating his ability to collaborate effectively.', '16. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil\'s extensive experience with Java and Kotlin programming is evident in his work on various Android applications.\n\n17. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil has experience with CI/CD pipelines and automated testing, but could provide more detail on how these practices impacted his projects.\n\n18. AOSP/AAOS Experience:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil\'s work with AOSP demonstrates his knowledge and experience in this area, although he could improve on explaining his approach to challenges.\n\n19. Cloud Platforms/Containerization Knowledge:\nScore: Not Evaluated\nQualitative Assessment: Not Evaluated\nDescription: There was no specific mention of cloud platforms or containerization knowledge in Swapnil\'s responses.\n\n20. Android Development Tools Proficiency:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Swapnil\'s proficiency with Android development tools is clear from his discussion of using profiling tools, Android Studio, and other relevant software.', '2024-07-20 11:50:16'),
(37, 72, 37, 380, 91, 'Muhammed\'s interview responses indicate a candidate with practical experience in Android development, particularly at the application layer. He shows a willingness to learn and adapt to new challenges, such as platform development, but lacks direct experience in some areas like CI/CD and containerization.', '- Experience with Java and Kotlin in Android development.\n- Practical knowledge of user interface development and system UI customization.\n- Understanding of performance optimization techniques and security best practices.\n- Ability to communicate technical concepts to non-technical stakeholders.', '- Limited experience with Android platform development and customization.\n- Lack of direct involvement in setting up CI/CD pipelines and containerization.\n- Responses sometimes lack depth and specific examples of complex problem-solving.', '11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Integration:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Muhammed has limited experience in this area and could benefit from more direct involvement and learning.\n\n12. User Interface Development for Android:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Muhammed has applied experience in UI development, which aligns well with the job requirements.\n\n13. Performance Optimization for Android Systems:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Muhammed understands performance optimization but could provide more detailed strategies and results.\n\n14. Android Security Best Practices/Compliance:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Muhammed is aware of security best practices but could discuss more comprehensive security strategies.\n\n15. Cross-Functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Muhammed has experience collaborating with cross-functional teams and effectively communicates technical concepts.', '16. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Muhammed has strong experience with Java and Kotlin, which is crucial for the role.\n\n17. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Muhammed lacks direct experience in CI/CD and could benefit from hands-on involvement.\n\n18. AOSP/AAOS Experience:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Muhammed has some exposure to AOSP/AAOS but needs more significant contributions and experience.\n\n19. Cloud Platforms/Containerization Knowledge:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Muhammed has not used containerization in his work and has limited knowledge of cloud platforms.\n\n20. Android Development Tools Proficiency (Android Studio/ADB/Gradle):\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Muhammed demonstrates proficiency with essential Android development tools, which is a key requirement for the role.', '2024-07-20 17:41:43'),
(38, 75, 46, 383, 91, 'Tabassum\'s responses were concise but lacked the depth and enthusiasm expected for a candidate with her experience. She confirmed her availability and readiness but did not engage in a manner that showcased her expertise or interest in the role.', '- Tabassum confirmed her availability and readiness to proceed with the interview.\n- She acknowledged the questions posed by the interviewer without hesitation.', '- Tabassum\'s responses were brief and lacked detail, failing to demonstrate her experience or enthusiasm for the role.\n- She did not take the opportunity to align her experience with the job requirements or express interest in the company.', '11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Integration:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tabassum did not discuss her experience in Android platform development, customization, or integration.\n\n12. User Interface Development for Android:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no mention of her experience in user interface development for Android.\n\n13. Performance Optimization for Android Systems:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tabassum did not provide any insights into her experience with performance optimization for Android systems.\n\n14. Android Security Best Practices/Compliance:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tabassum did not discuss her knowledge or experience with Android security best practices or compliance.\n\n15. Cross-Functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no indication of her experience with cross-functional collaboration or communication.', '16. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tabassum did not elaborate on her programming skills in Java or Kotlin.\n\n17. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tabassum did not mention any experience with CI/CD pipelines, automated testing, or build automation.\n\n18. AOSP/AAOS Experience:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Despite mentioning work on AOSP in her resume, Tabassum did not discuss this experience during the interview.\n\n19. Cloud Platforms/Containerization Knowledge:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no discussion of her knowledge or experience with cloud platforms or containerization.\n\n20. Android Development Tools Proficiency (Android Studio/ADB/Gradle):\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tabassum did not demonstrate her proficiency with Android development tools such as Android Studio, ADB, or Gradle.', '2024-07-22 18:23:35'),
(39, 78, 54, 462, 113, 'Abhi demonstrated a good understanding of technical concepts and practical experience through his internships. He was able to articulate his experiences with Python, web development frameworks, and the software development lifecycle. However, his responses lacked depth in some areas and could benefit from more detailed examples and explanations.', '- Abhi has practical experience with Python and has applied it in automation and web development tasks.\n- He has experience with Object-Oriented Programming in Python, as evidenced by his work on a VGG-19 model.\n- Abhi has worked with web development frameworks and has experience with the full software development lifecycle.\n- He has demonstrated adaptability by learning new technologies quickly, as shown in his hackathon experience.', '- Abhi\'s responses were sometimes brief and lacked the depth and detail that would demonstrate a mastery of the topics discussed.\n- He could improve his communication of complex technical problems to non-technical stakeholders by using more relatable analogies and focusing on the impact.\n- Abhi\'s approach to learning new technologies could be more structured, with a focus on practical application and incremental integration.', '11. Python programming:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Abhi has applied Python in his projects, showing applied experience, but he could have provided more detailed examples.\n\n12. Object-Oriented Programming/OOP:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Abhi has experience with OOP in Python, but he could have given a more thorough explanation of how he has implemented OOP concepts.\n\n13. Web development frameworks (Flask/Django):\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Abhi mentioned using FastAPI, which shows good knowledge, but he could have provided more details about his experience with Flask or Django.\n\n14. Software Development Life Cycle/SDLC:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Abhi described his approach to the SDLC phases, demonstrating applied experience, but his response could have been more structured.\n\n15. Code review and optimization:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Abhi discussed optimizing a React website, but he could have provided more insight into his code review process.', '16. JavaScript:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Abhi has experience with JavaScript in React, but he could have discussed challenges and solutions in more depth.\n\n17. DOM manipulation and event handling:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Abhi\'s response indicated familiarity with DOM manipulation and event handling in React, but more detail on specific challenges would have been beneficial.\n\n18. HTML5:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Abhi\'s response suggested a misunderstanding of HTML5\'s role in web development, and he could have provided examples of using HTML5 for responsive design.\n\n19. Responsive design principles:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Abhi did not provide a clear example of how he has implemented responsive design principles, which is an area for improvement.\n\n20. Version control systems (Git):\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Abhi shared an experience where Git was useful, showing applied experience, but he could have elaborated on how he uses Git in his workflow.', '2024-07-29 06:06:07'),
(40, 79, 53, 465, 113, 'Jyoti demonstrated a basic understanding of the required skills and showed a willingness to learn. However, her responses lacked depth and specificity, and she missed opportunities to showcase her experience in a way that aligns with the job description.', '- Expressed comfort with discussing her experience and skills.\n- Mentioned specific projects and technologies she has worked with, such as React.js and Node.js.\n- Demonstrated a proactive attitude by learning new technologies from scratch.', '- Responses lacked detail and did not fully address the questions.\n- Missed opportunities to connect her past experiences with the job requirements.\n- Limited demonstration of knowledge in key areas such as Python, Flask/Django, and Git.', '11. Python programming:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Jyoti mentioned a project using Python but did not demonstrate a strong understanding of the language.\n\n12. Object-Oriented Programming/OOP:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Jyoti provided a basic explanation of OOP but did not show advanced knowledge or application.\n\n13. Web development frameworks (Flask/Django):\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Jyoti mentioned using Flask briefly but did not demonstrate significant experience with web development frameworks.\n\n14. Software Development Life Cycle/SDLC:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Jyoti\'s description of her role in the SDLC was vague and lacked specifics.\n\n15. Code review and optimization:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Jyoti discussed code optimization but did not provide a clear example of how she has improved code performance.', '16. JavaScript:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Jyoti mentioned using JavaScript but did not provide detailed examples of her work with the language.\n\n17. DOM manipulation and event handling:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Jyoti\'s response on DOM manipulation and event handling was not detailed and did not showcase her skills effectively.\n\n18. HTML5:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Jyoti\'s response indicated some familiarity with HTML5 but did not demonstrate a strong understanding of web standards and accessibility.\n\n19. Responsive design principles:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Jyoti mentioned responsive design but did not explain her approach in a way that aligns with best practices.\n\n20. Version control systems (Git):\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Jyoti acknowledged learning Git recently but did not demonstrate applied experience with version control systems.', '2024-07-29 06:17:48'),
(41, 86, 58, 459, 111, 'Syed Mohammad Moiez demonstrated a good understanding of technical concepts and the ability to communicate effectively. His responses indicated experience with various tools and technologies relevant to the role, but there were areas where more depth or specific examples could have strengthened his answers.', '- Demonstrated familiarity with data analysis tools like Excel and Python libraries such as pandas.\n- Provided examples of machine learning projects using scikit-learn and Flask for backend development.\n- Showed an understanding of version control with Git and the importance of code quality.\n- Expressed a proactive attitude in improving processes and learning new technologies.', '- Some responses lacked specific details or depth that would showcase a mastery of the subject matter.\n- Could improve on providing more structured and concise answers to demonstrate problem-solving skills.\n- Missed opportunities to discuss experiences with statistical modeling and data visualization in greater detail.', '11. Data Analysis/Excel/Tableau:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Mentioned using Excel for data consistency but did not provide specific examples of analysis or use of Tableau.\n\n12. Statistical Modeling/R/SAS:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Discussed using SAS for classification but did not provide a detailed example of statistical modeling.\n\n13. Machine Learning Algorithms/scikit-learn:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Provided an example of using scikit-learn but could have discussed the implementation in more detail.\n\n14. Data Wrangling/pandas/Python:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Mentioned using pandas for data wrangling but lacked a detailed example of overcoming a specific challenge.\n\n15. Data Visualization/Matplotlib/Seaborn:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Syed mentioned using Matplotlib for visualization but did not elaborate on the insights derived from it.', '16. Python/OOP:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Discussed using OOP principles in a project but could have provided a more comprehensive example.\n\n17. Libraries/Frameworks/Flask/NumPy:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shared experience with Flask in a project but did not mention using NumPy or other libraries.\n\n18. Version Control Systems/Git:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Syed discussed using Git for version control but could have described his workflow in more detail.\n\n19. Virtual Environments/venv/conda:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Admitted limited experience with Conda and venv, lacking a detailed explanation of setting up virtual environments.\n\n20. Communication Skills/Problem-Solving Skills:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Communicated effectively but could have provided more examples showcasing problem-solving skills.', '2024-07-29 07:04:47'),
(42, 87, 59, 469, 115, 'Mohit demonstrated a strong foundation in full-stack development and a proactive attitude towards learning. His responses indicated a willingness to adapt and a collaborative spirit, which aligns with the job description\'s emphasis on teamwork and adaptability. However, there were gaps in his knowledge of certain technologies and frameworks mentioned in the job description, such as Python libraries and Flask/Django, which he would need to address to fully meet the role\'s requirements.', '- Demonstrated experience in full-stack development, particularly with Node.js, Express, and MongoDB.\n- Showed a proactive attitude towards learning and adapting to new technologies.\n- Expressed a collaborative approach to problem-solving and teamwork.\n- Exhibited a strong understanding of web development principles, including responsive design and cross-browser compatibility.', '- Limited experience with Python and related libraries (NumPy, pandas), which are essential for the role.\n- Lack of hands-on experience with Flask/Django, despite the job description\'s emphasis on Python frameworks.\n- Responses lacked depth in certain areas, such as SEO principles and web accessibility standards.\n- Could improve communication clarity, particularly when discussing technical challenges and solutions.', '11. Python/NumPy/pandas:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Mohit\'s response indicated limited experience with Python and its libraries, which are essential for the role.\n\n12. Full Stack Development/HTML/CSS/JavaScript/React/Angular:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Mohit demonstrated applied experience in full-stack development, particularly with JavaScript and React.\n\n13. Back-end Development/Python Frameworks/Flask/Django:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Mohit lacks experience with Flask/Django, which is a gap in his skill set for the role.\n\n14. Database Systems/ORM Tools:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Mohit has experience with MongoDB and ORM concepts but could benefit from deeper knowledge in this area.\n\n15. Version Control/Git:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Mohit understands the importance of version control and has practical experience with Git.', '16. HTML5/CSS3:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Mohit has a strong grasp of HTML5 and CSS3, essential for front-end development.\n\n17. Responsive Design/Bootstrap:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Mohit has applied experience with responsive design and Bootstrap, though he acknowledges its limitations.\n\n18. SEO Principles:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Mohit\'s understanding of SEO principles is basic and requires further development.\n\n19. Web Accessibility Standards/WCAG:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Mohit\'s response indicated a basic awareness of web accessibility but lacked depth.\n\n20. Cross-Browser Compatibility Issues:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Mohit is aware of cross-browser compatibility issues but could improve his understanding of how to address them effectively.', '2024-07-29 07:05:02'),
(43, 84, 56, 460, 112, 'Abhinav demonstrated a good understanding of full-stack development, particularly with JavaScript technologies, and showed a proactive attitude towards learning and problem-solving. However, there is room for improvement in his knowledge of Python, Flask, Django, and data manipulation with NumPy and pandas, as these were not as strong in his responses.', '- Strong knowledge and experience in full-stack development with JavaScript technologies.\n- Demonstrated problem-solving skills and adaptability in project work.\n- Good understanding of responsive design and front-end challenges.\n- Experience with version control using Git and addressing merge conflicts.', '- Limited experience with Python and related frameworks like Flask and Django.\n- Less familiarity with data manipulation using NumPy and pandas.\n- Could benefit from deeper knowledge of SEO principles and web accessibility standards.', '11. Python/NumPy/pandas:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Abhinav\'s knowledge in this area was limited and requires further development.\n\n12. Full Stack Development/HTML/CSS/JavaScript/React/Angular:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Abhinav demonstrated strong skills and experience in full-stack development with JavaScript technologies.\n\n13. Backend Development/Python Frameworks/Flask/Django:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Abhinav lacked experience with Flask and Django, which are important for the role.\n\n14. Database Systems/ORM Tools:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Abhinav has good experience with MongoDB and Mongoose but could benefit from more experience with ORM tools like Prisma.\n\n15. Version Control/Git:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Abhinav showed a good understanding of Git for version control and resolving merge conflicts.', '16. HTML5/CSS3:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Abhinav demonstrated proficiency in HTML5 and CSS3, particularly in responsive design.\n\n17. Responsive Design/Bootstrap:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Abhinav has experience with responsive design using Tailwind but could expand his knowledge of Bootstrap.\n\n18. SEO Principles:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Abhinav\'s understanding of SEO principles was basic and could be improved.\n\n19. Web Accessibility Standards/WCAG:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Abhinav showed some awareness of accessibility but needs to deepen his knowledge of WCAG standards.\n\n20. Cross-Browser Compatibility Issues:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Abhinav is aware of cross-browser compatibility issues but has limited experience addressing them.', '2024-07-29 07:12:12'),
(44, 90, 39, 382, 91, 'Suresh Redddy demonstrated a good level of technical knowledge and experience in Android development, particularly with AOSP and HMI development. His responses indicated hands-on experience with platform customization and UI development. However, there was a lack of depth in his responses regarding security practices, automated testing, and cloud technologies. His communication was straightforward but lacked engagement and enthusiasm.', '- Experience with Android platform development and customization.\n- Hands-on experience with user interface development, particularly with third-party UI tools.\n- Understanding of performance optimization in Android systems.\n- Practical experience with AOSP and creating custom services.', '- Limited depth in responses on security best practices and compliance.\n- Lack of experience with automated testing and CI/CD pipelines.\n- Could improve on communication style to be more engaging and articulate.\n- Did not demonstrate a strong understanding of cloud platforms and containerization.', '11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Integration:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Demonstrated applied experience with Android platform development and customization.\n\n12. User Interface Development for Android:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Showed applied experience with UI development, especially with third-party tools.\n\n13. Performance Optimization for Android Systems:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Provided practical examples of performance optimization in Android systems.\n\n14. Android Security Best Practices/Compliance:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Lacked depth in discussing security best practices and compliance.\n\n15. Cross-Functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Suresh mentioned collaboration but did not demonstrate effective cross-functional communication skills.', '16. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Showed applied experience with Java and is currently improving his Kotlin skills.\n\n17. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Limited experience with CI/CD and automated testing.\n\n18. AOSP/AAOS Experience:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Demonstrated good experience with AOSP, including creating custom services.\n\n19. Cloud Platforms/Containerization Knowledge:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Provided a basic understanding of cloud platforms but lacked depth.\n\n20. Android Development Tools Proficiency (Android Studio/ADB/Gradle):\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Showed proficiency with essential Android development tools.', '2024-07-29 13:54:48'),
(45, 89, 57, 458, 111, 'Kritika demonstrated a foundational understanding of the technical skills required for the Software Developer/Engineer position. However, her responses lacked depth and specificity, which could be improved to better align with the job requirements.', '- Kritika showed a basic understanding of machine learning algorithms and the decision-making process behind choosing specific models.\n- She mentioned the use of pandas for data wrangling and Matplotlib/Seaborn for data visualization, indicating familiarity with these tools.', '- Kritika\'s responses were often vague and lacked the detail expected for the technical questions posed.\n- She did not provide concrete examples or outcomes from her experiences, which would have demonstrated a deeper understanding of the skills and knowledge required.\n- Her communication style could be more structured and focused to convey her thoughts effectively.', '11. Data Analysis/Excel/Tableau:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Kritika mentioned using Excel but did not provide a detailed application of her skills.\n\n12. Statistical Modeling/R/SAS:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Kritika did not discuss her experience with R or SAS.\n\n13. Machine Learning Algorithms/scikit-learn:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Kritika mentioned machine learning models but did not discuss her experience with scikit-learn specifically.\n\n14. Data Wrangling/pandas/Python:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Kritika mentioned using pandas but did not provide a clear example of how she overcame data wrangling challenges.\n\n15. Data Visualization/Matplotlib/Seaborn:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Kritika mentioned using Matplotlib/Seaborn but did not provide a detailed explanation of how she used these tools to convey insights.', '16. Python/OOP:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Kritika did not discuss her experience with Python OOP concepts.\n\n17. Libraries/Frameworks/Flask/NumPy:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Kritika did not mention her experience with Flask or NumPy.\n\n18. Version Control Systems/Git:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Kritika did not discuss her experience with version control systems like Git.\n\n19. Virtual Environments/venv/conda:\nScore: N/A\nQualitative Assessment: N/A\nDescription: Kritika did not mention her experience with virtual environments.\n\n20. Communication Skills/Problem-Solving Skills:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Kritika\'s communication and problem-solving skills were not clearly demonstrated. She could improve by providing specific examples of how she has used these skills effectively.', '2024-07-30 07:14:28'),
(46, 91, 46, 456, 109, 'Tabassum demonstrated a good understanding of Android development and relevant technologies, with a focus on practical experience. However, her responses lacked depth in explaining complex technical processes and problem-solving approaches. She could improve by providing more detailed examples and aligning her responses more closely with the job description.', '- Tabassum has practical experience in Android development, particularly in the automotive domain.\n- She is familiar with various technologies and tools such as Kotlin, Java, Retrofit, Room database, and WorkManager.\n- Tabassum has experience with performance optimization and user interface design, which are relevant to the HMI Developer role.', '- Responses were often brief and lacked detailed explanations of her thought process and solutions.\n- She could have provided more specific examples of how she addressed challenges and implemented features.\n- Tabassum\'s communication style could be more engaging and informative to better demonstrate her expertise.', '11. Android Platform Development/Customization:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tabassum has experience but did not provide in-depth examples of how she customized the Android platform for specific hardware configurations.\n\n12. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tabassum mentioned using Java and Kotlin but did not elaborate on complex projects or challenges she overcame using these languages.\n\n13. Android System Architecture/Frameworks:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tabassum\'s response indicated familiarity with Android architecture but lacked details on her contributions to system stability and compatibility.\n\n14. User Interface Design/Development:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tabassum discussed UI design principles but could have provided more specific examples of her design process and outcomes.\n\n15. Performance Optimization/Debugging:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tabassum addressed performance optimization but did not give a strong example of a specific optimization she implemented.', '16. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tabassum has experience with CI/CD pipelines and automated testing but could have detailed her strategy and its impact on the development process.\n\n17. AOSP/AAOS Experience:\nScore: 0\nQualitative Assessment: Not relevant\nDescription: Tabassum did not provide a response to this question, so her experience with AOSP/AAOS could not be assessed.\n\n18. Security Standards/Compliance:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tabassum mentioned security practices but did not convincingly explain how she ensures compliance with security standards.\n\n19. Cross-functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tabassum spoke about collaboration but did not provide a compelling example of how she communicated technical concepts effectively with cross-functional teams.\n\n20. Cloud Platforms/Containerization (Docker/Kubernetes):\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Tabassum mentioned containerization tools but did not elaborate on how she leveraged them to enhance development workflows.', '2024-07-30 19:26:36'),
(47, 105, 41, 470, 116, 'VISHWAS demonstrated a solid understanding of Android development and the necessary skills for the HMI Developer role. His responses indicated hands-on experience with platform customization, UI development, and problem-solving. However, there is room for improvement in communication clarity and depth of knowledge in certain areas.', '- Experience with Android platform development and customization for specific hardware.\n- Practical knowledge of Java/Kotlin programming and Android system architecture.\n- Demonstrated problem-solving skills and adaptability in addressing technical challenges.\n- Experience with CI/CD pipelines and automated testing to improve development processes.', '- Some responses lacked the depth and technical detail expected for a candidate with his experience.\n- Communication could be clearer and more structured to effectively convey complex ideas.\n- Could benefit from providing more concrete examples of innovation and creativity in his work.', '11. Android Platform Development/Customization:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: VISHWAS has experience in platform development and customization, but could provide more specific examples of his work.\n\n12. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Demonstrated practical knowledge of Java/Kotlin programming, though deeper insights into complex project work would enhance his response.\n\n13. Android System Architecture/Frameworks:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Good understanding of Android system architecture, with examples of applying this knowledge in projects.\n\n14. Performance Optimization/Resource Management:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: VISHWAS discussed strategies for performance optimization and resource management, showing applied experience.\n\n15. Security Standards/Best Practices Implementation:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Provided examples of implementing security standards, indicating a good grasp of best practices.', '16. User Interface (UI) Development:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Shared experiences in UI development, reflecting a good understanding of user interface design principles.\n\n17. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: VISHWAS has experience with CI/CD and automated testing, but could discuss more about the impact on development efficiency.\n\n18. AOSP/AAOS Development Experience:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Showed experience with AOSP/AAOS development, but could benefit from sharing more detailed contributions.\n\n19. Cloud Platforms/Containerization Knowledge:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: VISHWAS has worked with cloud platforms like Firebase, but could expand on how this knowledge has impacted his Android development work.\n\n20. Cross-Functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Demonstrated ability to collaborate with cross-functional teams, though could improve in communicating technical concepts to non-technical stakeholders.', '2024-08-04 05:35:41'),
(48, 117, 60, 381, 91, 'Rajat demonstrated a solid understanding of Android development, particularly in the automotive domain. His responses indicated hands-on experience with Android IVI applications, UI development, and performance optimization. However, there were areas where his responses lacked depth, especially regarding CI/CD pipelines, AOSP/AAOS, and cloud technologies. Rajat\'s communication was clear, but he could improve by providing more structured and detailed answers.', '- Rajat has hands-on experience with Android IVI applications and has worked on significant projects like FOTA updates.\n- He has demonstrated problem-solving skills, particularly in UI development and performance optimization.\n- Rajat is familiar with using Android development tools such as Android Studio, ADB, and Gradle to solve complex problems.', '- Rajat\'s knowledge of CI/CD pipelines, AOSP/AAOS, and cloud technologies seems limited based on his responses.\n- He could improve the structure and detail of his responses to showcase a deeper understanding of the topics discussed.\n- Rajat\'s approach to unconventional industry practices appears to be cautious and reliant on client approval, which may limit innovation.', '11. Android Platform Development/Customization/Integration:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Rajat has experience with Android platform development, particularly IVI applications, but his knowledge of platform customization could be deeper.\n\n12. User Interface Development for Android:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Rajat provided strong examples of his experience with UI development, showcasing his ability to solve related challenges.\n\n13. Performance Optimization for Android Systems:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Rajat\'s response indicated applied experience in optimizing Android applications for performance.\n\n14. Android Security Best Practices/Compliance:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Rajat understands the importance of security but could provide more examples of implementing best practices and compliance standards.\n\n15. Cross-Functional Collaboration/Communication:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Rajat has experience collaborating with cross-functional teams but could improve by sharing more about how he navigates diverse perspectives.', '16. Java/Kotlin Programming:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Rajat has a good grasp of Java/Kotlin programming for Android, as evidenced by his experience and the coding guidelines he follows.\n\n17. CI/CD Pipelines/Automated Testing/Build Automation:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Rajat\'s knowledge of CI/CD pipelines is basic, and he could benefit from more hands-on experience in this area.\n\n18. AOSP/AAOS Experience:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Rajat has limited experience with AOSP/AAOS, and his response indicated a need for further development in this skill.\n\n19. Cloud Platforms/Containerization Knowledge:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Rajat lacks experience with cloud platforms and containerization, which is an area for improvement given the role\'s requirements.\n\n20. Android Development Tools Proficiency (Android Studio/ADB/Gradle):\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Rajat demonstrated proficiency with essential Android development tools and provided examples of solving complex issues using them.', '2024-08-09 14:11:52');
INSERT INTO `bot_overall_feedback` (`id`, `botInterviewId`, `candidateId`, `resumeId`, `screeningId`, `feedback`, `strength`, `weakness`, `primarySkills`, `secondarySkills`, `created`) VALUES
(49, 80, 52, 463, 113, 'Ishan demonstrated a good understanding of front-end development, particularly with React and Next.js, and showed a proactive attitude towards learning new technologies. However, his experience with Python, Flask/Django, and OOP principles in Python was limited to academic exposure, and he lacked practical application in these areas.', '- Proficiency in front-end development with React and Next.js.\n- Experience with code migration and performance optimization.\n- Willingness to learn and quickly adapt to new technologies.\n- Good understanding of code review processes and file structure organization.', '- Limited practical experience with Python, Flask/Django, and OOP in Python.\n- Responses lacked depth in certain technical areas relevant to the job description.\n- Could benefit from more examples and details in responses to demonstrate applied knowledge.', '11. Python programming:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Ishan lacked practical experience with Python, which is a key requirement for the role.\n\n12. Object-Oriented Programming/OOP:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Ishan\'s understanding of OOP in Python was theoretical and lacked practical examples.\n\n13. Web development frameworks (Flask/Django):\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Ishan had no experience with Flask or Django, which are important for the role.\n\n14. Software Development Life Cycle/SDLC:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Ishan was involved in the SDLC but could have provided more details on his specific contributions.\n\n15. Code review and optimization:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ishan had experience with code review and provided examples of optimization, which is a strength.', '16. JavaScript:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ishan demonstrated strong knowledge and practical experience with JavaScript.\n\n17. DOM manipulation and event handling:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ishan likely has experience with DOM manipulation and event handling through his work with React and Next.js.\n\n18. HTML5:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ishan\'s front-end development experience suggests a good understanding of HTML5.\n\n19. Responsive design principles:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ishan\'s experience with front-end frameworks implies knowledge of responsive design principles.\n\n20. Version control systems (Git):\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Ishan mentioned using Git, indicating he has experience with version control systems.', '2024-08-11 17:52:16'),
(50, 81, 55, 466, 113, 'Kritika demonstrated a strong understanding of the technical skills required for the Software Developer/Engineer role. She provided detailed examples of her experience with Python, Flask, and Git, showcasing her ability to apply these skills in practical scenarios. However, her responses could benefit from more structured communication and deeper insights into problem-solving and software development methodologies.', '- Kritika has hands-on experience with Python, Flask, and Git, which she discussed in the context of her internships and projects.\n- She has a good understanding of Object-Oriented Programming and its application in Python.\n- Kritika\'s experience with front-end development and responsive design principles is evident from her discussion about using React and CSS techniques.', '- While Kritika\'s responses were relevant, they lacked the structured communication and depth that would demonstrate a mastery level of understanding.\n- Her problem-solving approach could be more systematic, with a clearer explanation of how she identifies and resolves issues.\n- Kritika could improve her explanation of software development methodologies and how she applies them in her work.', '11. Python programming:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Kritika has applied experience with Python, as evidenced by her project examples.\n\n12. Object-Oriented Programming/OOP:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Kritika understands OOP concepts in Python but could provide more complex examples.\n\n13. Web development frameworks (Flask/Django):\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Kritika has good experience with Flask but could discuss more advanced features.\n\n14. Software Development Life Cycle/SDLC:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Kritika\'s understanding of SDLC could be deeper, with more emphasis on each phase.\n\n15. Code review and optimization:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Kritika follows best practices but could discuss more about optimization techniques.', '16. JavaScript:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Kritika has experience with JavaScript but could discuss more complex DOM manipulation.\n\n17. DOM manipulation and event handling:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Kritika\'s response indicates experience but lacks detail on advanced DOM manipulation techniques.\n\n18. HTML5:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Kritika has a good understanding of HTML5 and its semantic elements.\n\n19. Responsive design principles:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Kritika demonstrated knowledge of responsive design but could provide more examples of her work.\n\n20. Version control systems (Git):\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Kritika has practical experience with Git but could improve her explanation of branching and merging strategies.', '2024-08-11 17:54:45'),
(51, 123, 4, 517, 122, 'Varun\'s performance in the interview was significantly below expectations. His responses were often unrelated or too brief, lacking depth and relevance to the questions posed. This pattern persisted throughout the interview, indicating a lack of preparation or understanding of the role he applied for. Despite his extensive experience as outlined in his resume, Varun failed to effectively communicate his qualifications and fit for the IT Director position at Adzip Technologies.', 'It is challenging to highlight specific strengths from Varun\'s interview responses due to the general lack of relevance and detail in his communication. However, his resume suggests a strong background in managing complex IT projects and a deep understanding of Agile methodologies, which are critical for the role.', 'Varun\'s main weakness in the interview was his inability to provide coherent and relevant answers to the questions asked. This could be due to nervousness, lack of preparation, or misunderstanding the interview format. His responses were often one-word or completely unrelated, which prevented any meaningful assessment of his skills and fit for the role. Varun needs to focus on improving his communication skills, specifically his ability to understand and respond to interview questions effectively. Practicing mock interviews and receiving feedback could be beneficial.', '16. Business analysis:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate his business analysis skills during the interview, failing to relate his experiences to the questions asked.\n\n17. Requirement gathering:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no detailed discussion on requirement gathering, which is crucial for the role he applied for.\n\n18. Requirement management:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun failed to discuss how he manages requirements effectively, which is a key skill for the position.\n\n19. User stories:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide any insight into his ability to develop or manage user stories.\n\n20. Project management:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was a lack of evidence regarding Varun\'s project management skills, as he did not discuss any relevant experiences or methodologies.', '21. Data analysis:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not showcase his data analysis skills, which are important for the IT Director role.\n\n22. Process mapping:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: No discussion on process mapping was evident, missing an opportunity to display a critical skill.\n\n23. Risk management:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss how he handles risk management, which is essential for the role.\n\n24. Agile methodologies:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Despite mentioning Agile methodologies in his resume, Varun did not effectively discuss his experience or skills in this area during the interview.\n\nRecommendation:\nBased on the interview evaluation, it is recommended not to proceed with Varun\'s application for the IT Director position. His performance in the interview suggests a significant gap between his documented experiences and his ability to articulate and apply those experiences effectively. Further development in communication and interview skills is advised before reapplying for similar roles.', '2024-09-07 10:39:25'),
(52, 124, 4, 516, 121, 'Varun\'s responses during the interview were notably brief and lacked the depth and engagement expected for a candidate applying for the IT Director position at Adzip Technologies. His answers did not demonstrate the required understanding or enthusiasm for the role, which involves leading strategic IT initiatives and managing a team in the Retail domain. Varun\'s inability to elaborate on his experiences and skills, particularly in areas critical to the role such as business analysis and digital transformation, raises concerns about his suitability for the position.', 'Varun\'s resume suggests a strong background in IT and product management, with extensive experience in agile environments and digital transformation. However, these strengths were not effectively communicated in his interview responses, which were minimal and uninformative.', 'Varun\'s main weakness in the interview was his lack of detailed responses. For a role that requires significant interaction, leadership, and strategic thinking, his one-word answers and failure to engage in the conversation are major red flags. He needs to improve on articulating his experiences, achievements, and understanding of the job role. Practicing detailed responses and engaging more actively in discussions about his qualifications and vision for the role would be beneficial.', '16. Business analysis:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide any insights into his business analysis skills, which are crucial for the IT Director role.\n\n17. Requirement gathering:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: No evidence was provided of Varun\'s skills in requirement gathering, an essential part of the job description.\n\n18. Requirement management:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun failed to discuss any aspect of requirement management during the interview.\n\n19. User stories:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no mention or demonstration of Varun\'s ability to develop user stories, a key skill for the role.\n\n20. Project management:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not elaborate on his project management skills, which are essential for leading IT initiatives.', 'Overall, Varun\'s performance in the interview was underwhelming. He needs to significantly improve his engagement and ability to articulate his skills and experiences relevant to the IT Director position. Based on this interview, it is recommended to consider other candidates who demonstrate a stronger understanding and enthusiasm for the role.', '2024-09-07 10:43:14'),
(53, 127, 4, 523, 129, 'Varun\'s responses during the interview were brief and lacked depth, particularly when compared to the benchmark responses which were detailed and aligned with the expectations for a Product Manager role in the Retail domain. His inability to engage in a more detailed discussion about his qualifications and experiences, especially in relation to the specific responsibilities and skills required for the role, suggests a need for improvement in interview preparedness and communication.', 'Varun\'s strengths were not fully demonstrated in the interview due to the brevity and lack of detail in his responses. However, his resume suggests a strong background in digital commerce and product management, which are relevant to the job role.', 'Varun\'s main weakness in the interview was his lack of detailed responses and failure to effectively communicate his alignment with the job role\'s requirements. His responses were significantly shorter and less informative compared to the benchmark responses, which could indicate a lack of preparedness or inability to effectively articulate his experiences and skills.', '16. Product owner:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his experience as a product owner, missing the opportunity to highlight relevant skills and experiences.\n\n17. User stories:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no mention of his experience with user stories, which are critical in product management.\n\n18. Backlog management:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun failed to mention any specific experiences with backlog management, a key skill for the role.\n\n19. Requirement management:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: The lack of discussion about requirement management suggests a gap in demonstrating this essential skill.\n\n20. Agile methodologies:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: While his resume suggests familiarity with agile methodologies, Varun did not effectively communicate this during the interview.', '21. Market research:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide examples of conducting market research, which is important for understanding customer needs and market trends.\n\n22. Budget management:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no indication that Varun has experience with budget management, an important aspect of the Product Manager role.\n\n23. Risk management:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss any experiences related to risk management, missing the chance to show his capability in this area.\n\n24. User experience design:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: The lack of mention of user experience design in his responses was a missed opportunity to connect his background with the role\'s requirements.\n\n25. Data-driven decision making:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention his experience with data-driven decision making, a crucial skill for making informed product decisions.\n\nRecommendation:\nBased on the evaluation, it is recommended that Varun may not be the best fit for the Product Manager position at this time without further development in interview skills and clearer communication of his relevant experiences and skills. Additional interviews or a more detailed discussion may be required to fully assess his suitability for the role.', '2024-09-11 12:28:52'),
(54, 128, 4, 521, 125, 'Varun\'s responses during the interview were concise but lacked depth and engagement, which are crucial for the role of a Senior Software Engineer specializing in Java at Adzip Technologies. His responses did not fully address the questions posed, missing opportunities to showcase his expertise and alignment with the job requirements. This raises concerns about his suitability for the role that demands strong technical skills and effective communication.', 'Varun\'s resume indicates a strong background in digital commerce and program management, suggesting he might have the technical expertise required for the role. However, his strengths were not adequately reflected in his interview responses, which were brief and lacked specific details.', 'Varun\'s main weakness in the interview was his inability to provide detailed and relevant responses. He did not use the opportunity to highlight his experience or how it relates to the job role, which is essential in demonstrating candidate fit. His responses were shorter than expected and lacked the enthusiasm and detail that might be expected from a candidate with his background. He could improve by elaborating on his experiences, providing examples, and showing more enthusiasm for the role.', '16. - Java:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun did not provide sufficient details to assess his expertise in Java, which is critical for the role. He should discuss specific projects and contributions.\n\n17. - Core Java:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Similar to Java, Varun\'s expertise in Core Java was not adequately showcased. More detailed examples are needed.\n\n18. - REST API design:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any specific experiences with REST API design, which is a key requirement for the role.\n\n19. - Microservice Architecture:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no mention of Varun\'s experience with microservice architecture, despite its relevance to the job description.\n\n20. - Unit Testing / Test Coverage:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide information on his experience with unit testing or test coverage, areas important for the role.', '21. - Amazon Cloud:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his experience with Amazon Cloud, which could be relevant given the job\'s technical requirements.\n\n22. - Database:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: There was limited discussion of Varun\'s database skills, which are necessary for the role.\n\n23. - MongoDB:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any specific knowledge or projects involving MongoDB.\n\n24. - Spring Boot:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no evidence of Varun\'s experience with Spring Boot, despite its relevance to the position.\n\n25. - Docker:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide details on his experience with Docker, which is important for the role.\n\nRecommendation: Based on the evaluation, it is recommended that Varun may not be the best fit for the Senior Software Engineer role at Adzip Technologies without further demonstration of his technical skills and a more engaging communication style. Additional interviews or a technical assessment may be necessary to fully evaluate his suitability for the position.', '2024-09-11 12:34:09'),
(55, 129, 4, 512, 120, 'Varun\'s responses during the interview were notably brief and lacked the depth and engagement expected for a Business Analyst role at Wipro. His answers did not provide the necessary insights into his experience or skills relevant to the job description, which emphasizes Agile and Scrum methodologies, stakeholder collaboration, and detailed business process analysis. This raises concerns about his suitability for the role, as the responses did not demonstrate the required communication and analytical skills.', 'Varun\'s main strength appears to be his extensive experience in the IT and digital commerce sectors, as indicated in his resume. However, this strength was not effectively communicated in the interview, as his responses were minimal and did not showcase his expertise or align with the job requirements.', 'Varun\'s major weakness in this interview was his lack of detailed responses and failure to engage with the questions meaningfully. His answers were too brief and did not include examples or explanations that would demonstrate his knowledge and skills. This is particularly concerning for a role that requires strong communication skills and the ability to articulate complex information clearly and effectively. Varun could improve by providing more comprehensive answers, using specific examples from his past experiences, and demonstrating how his skills align with the job requirements.', '16. Agile/Scrum methodologies:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any specific experiences with Agile/Scrum, which are critical for the role. He should detail his experience with these methodologies to align with the job requirements.\n\n17. Requirements gathering/documentation:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no discussion of Varun\'s skills in requirements gathering or documentation. He should provide examples of how he has effectively performed these tasks in past projects.\n\n18. Analytical/problem-solving skills:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide any examples that demonstrate his analytical or problem-solving skills. He should describe specific instances where he used these skills to address business challenges.\n\n19. Communication/interpersonal skills:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Although Varun\'s responses were polite, they lacked depth and did not effectively showcase his interpersonal skills. He should aim to be more engaging and responsive in his communication.\n\n20. Cross-functional team collaboration:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any experiences related to cross-functional team collaboration. He should discuss how he has successfully worked with diverse teams to achieve business objectives.', '21. Atlassian Suite (Jira/Confluence/Bitbucket):\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no mention of Varun\'s experience with the Atlassian Suite, which is important for the role. He should detail his proficiency with these tools and how he has used them in his work.\n\n22. Data analysis/visualization tools:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss his skills in data analysis or the use of visualization tools. He should provide examples of how he has applied these tools to derive business insights.\n\n23. Process improvement methodologies:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no indication of Varun\'s experience with process improvement methodologies. He should explain how he has implemented these methodologies to enhance business processes.\n\n24. User acceptance testing:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide information on his experience with user acceptance testing. He should describe his role in this area and how he has contributed to successful project outcomes.\n\n25. Training/end-user support:\nScore: 2\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no mention of Varun\'s experience in providing training or end-user support. He should illustrate how he has effectively supported users in adopting new systems or processes.\n\nRecommendation: Based on the evaluation, it is recommended that Varun may not be the best fit for the Business Analyst role at Wipro without further interviews or a more detailed discussion to better understand his capabilities and experiences. He should be given an opportunity to provide more comprehensive responses in a follow-up interview to fully assess his suitability for the position.', '2024-09-11 12:44:33'),
(56, 130, 4, 526, 130, 'Varun\'s responses in the interview were concise but lacked depth in some areas, particularly in demonstrating his understanding of the role\'s responsibilities and his alignment with them. While he confirmed his comfort with the responsibilities, his answers were not expansive enough to showcase his expertise or how his past experiences directly align with the job requirements. This could be due to nervousness or lack of preparation for the interview.', 'Varun\'s strengths lie in his willingness to proceed with the interview despite not feeling energetically optimal, which shows a level of commitment. His brief affirmations to continue the interview and his comfort with the job responsibilities indicate a positive attitude towards taking on challenges.', 'Varun needs to improve on providing detailed responses that align with the job role\'s requirements. His answers were too brief and did not fully leverage his background to demonstrate how his experience makes him a suitable candidate for the role. He could benefit from elaborating on his experiences with specific examples, especially how he has bridged IT solutions with business objectives in the past.', 'Based on the overall assessment, Varun shows potential but would benefit from further development in articulating his experiences and knowledge more effectively related to the job role. It is recommended to consider a second, more detailed interview or a role with training opportunities to better align his skills with the company’s needs.', '', '2024-09-16 12:33:17'),
(57, 133, 74, 528, 131, 'Manoj\'s interview responses reveal a candidate with foundational experience in business analysis and project management, particularly in Agile environments. While he demonstrates a basic understanding of Agile methodologies and tools like Jira, his responses often lack depth and specificity, especially when detailing technical skills or complex project scenarios. His communication style is somewhat unclear and could benefit from more structured and precise language. Manoj shows potential in areas like stakeholder management and event planning, but his technical and strategic articulations need significant enhancement to meet the demands of a Business Analyst role at SS&C Technologies, especially considering the job\'s focus on mutual funds and financial services.', 'Manoj\'s strengths lie in his practical experience with Agile methodologies and his exposure to business analysis through event planning and stakeholder management. His involvement with IIBA and his role in organizing conferences and webinars highlight his capability in managing and executing large-scale projects. His proactive approach to starting an NGO during the COVID-19 pandemic showcases his initiative and ability to lead in crisis situations.', 'Manoj\'s interview responses often lack the depth and technical detail expected for a Business Analyst role in a specialized financial services context. His understanding of SQL and customizing tools like Jira appears limited, which could hinder his ability to perform data-intensive analysis or optimize project management processes. Additionally, his communication skills need improvement for clearer and more effective stakeholder engagement. Manoj would benefit from further training in specific business analysis tools and techniques, particularly those related to financial services, and enhancing his communication clarity and project detailing.', '16. Agile Business Analysis:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Manoj mentioned using Agile tools and methodologies but did not convincingly articulate how he applied Agile business analysis techniques to deliver tangible business improvements.\n\n17. User Stories:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Manoj understands the concept of user stories but needs to improve how he crafts these to ensure they are clear, detailed, and aligned with technical and business requirements.\n\n18. Backlog Creation:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Manoj has experience with backlog management but did not demonstrate advanced skills in prioritizing and refining backlogs to drive project efficiency and effectiveness.\n\n19. Sprint Management:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: While Manoj has managed sprints, his understanding of optimizing sprint activities to enhance team performance and project outcomes could be improved.\n\n20. Product Owner:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Manoj\'s experience as a product owner is limited, and his strategic impact in this role was not clearly demonstrated during the interview.', '21. SQL Database:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Manoj admitted to only basic knowledge of SQL, which is below the proficiency expected for a Business Analyst role involving data-intensive activities.\n\n22. Sprint Planning:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Manoj\'s sprint planning experience is basic, and he could benefit from deeper strategic planning skills to align sprints more closely with business goals.\n\n23. Sprint Demo:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Manoj has conducted sprint demos but needs to enhance his ability to use these sessions to effectively communicate project progress and stakeholder alignment.\n\n24. Agile Jira:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Manoj has used Jira but has not customized or optimized it to meet specific project needs, which is a critical skill for a Business Analyst.\n\n25. Backlog Creation:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Manoj\'s approach to backlog creation is adequate but lacks the strategic depth to ensure it drives project priorities and outcomes effectively.\n\nRecommendation:\nBased on the evaluation, Manoj shows potential but would require additional training and development, particularly in technical skills and strategic project management, to fully meet the demands of the Business Analyst role at SS&C Technologies. It is recommended to consider other candidates who demonstrate a stronger alignment with the job\'s technical and strategic requirements or to offer Manoj a role with a tailored development plan to address these gaps.', '2024-09-18 20:21:38'),
(58, 140, 4, 511, 119, 'Varun\'s interview responses show a mix of strengths and areas for improvement. His initial greeting was friendly and appropriate, but his responses to subsequent questions were either missing or not in English, which raises concerns about his communication skills and readiness for the interview. This inconsistency makes it challenging to fully assess his fit for the Business Analyst role at Adzip Technologies, especially given the importance of clear and effective communication in this position.', 'Varun\'s initial response to the greeting was polite and professional, indicating good interpersonal skills. He expressed a positive disposition and engaged with the interviewer initially, which is crucial for building rapport.', 'Varun\'s major weakness in this interview is his communication, particularly his inability to respond to simple questions in English, which is critical for the role he is applying for. His response to the second question was in a different language, and he failed to provide any response to the third question, which suggests a lack of preparation or understanding of the interview\'s language requirements. This is a significant concern as the job requires excellent communication skills.', 'Based on the overall evaluation, it is recommended that Varun\'s application not be progressed without further assessment, particularly in areas of communication and language proficiency, which are critical for the Business Analyst role at Adzip Technologies.', '', '2024-11-07 11:02:04'),
(59, 148, 4, 541, 136, 'Varun\'s interview responses generally align with the expectations for the Business Analyst role at Adzip Technologies, focusing on mutual funds. He demonstrates a solid understanding of business analysis, stakeholder communication, and strategic planning. However, there are areas where Varun could improve, particularly in demonstrating deeper industry-specific knowledge and technical skills related to mutual funds management and regulatory compliance.', 'Varun\'s strengths lie in his clear communication and strategic thinking, as evidenced by his responses that align well with his resume experiences in business development and strategy. He articulates his thoughts clearly and demonstrates a good grasp of general business analysis concepts.', 'Varun\'s responses lack depth in specialized knowledge areas critical for the role, such as mutual funds management, SEC and FINRA compliance, and advanced data analysis specific to financial markets. To improve, Varun could benefit from further education or training in these specific areas to better align with the job requirements.', '16. - mutual funds:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun needs to demonstrate more in-depth knowledge and experience in mutual funds to fully meet the job requirements.\n\n17. - user stories:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun understands the concept of user stories but could discuss more about how he has specifically used them to drive mutual funds projects.\n\n18. - product owner:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun mentions working with product owners but does not detail his direct experience in this role, which is crucial for the job.\n\n19. - us retirement solution:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun does not mention any specific experience or knowledge related to U.S. retirement solutions, which could be integral to the role.\n\n20. - business analysis:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun shows strong capabilities in business analysis, aligning well with the job\'s requirements, though more specific examples related to mutual funds would enhance his fit.', '21. - agile scrum:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun mentions Agile Scrum methodologies but could benefit from discussing more detailed applications in his past projects, especially in mutual funds.\n\n22. - sprint management:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: While Varun understands sprint management, more detailed examples of his leadership in this area would strengthen his application.\n\n23. - agile scrum methodologies:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun has a good grasp of Agile methodologies but needs to connect this more explicitly to how it can be applied in the mutual funds context.\n\n24. - stakeholder communication:\nScore: 8\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun demonstrates strong stakeholder communication skills, which are essential for the role. He could, however, provide more examples of handling complex communications.\n\n25. - risk management:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun mentions risk management but does not provide enough detail on how he has implemented these strategies specifically in the mutual funds industry.\n\nRecommendation: Consider for a second interview with a focus on technical skills and industry-specific knowledge to better assess suitability for the role.', '2024-11-08 06:43:03'),
(60, 149, 4, 541, 136, 'Varun\'s responses in the interview were generally brief and lacked the depth and detail expected for a Business Analyst role in the mutual funds domain. His answers did not fully demonstrate the required expertise or enthusiasm for the responsibilities and skills outlined in the job description. This suggests a need for improvement in communication and domain-specific knowledge.', 'Varun\'s main strength lies in his willingness to engage in the interview process, as indicated by his affirmative responses to continue the interview and his comfort with the role\'s responsibilities. This shows a basic level of preparedness and openness to the position\'s requirements.', 'Varun\'s responses were significantly lacking in detail and relevance, particularly when discussing his professional experience and alignment with the job\'s demands. He failed to expand on his skills or experiences related to business analysis, mutual funds, or regulatory compliance, which are critical for the role. To improve, Varun could focus on articulating his experiences more clearly, linking them directly to the job requirements, and demonstrating a deeper understanding of the mutual funds industry.', '16. - mutual funds:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not display adequate knowledge or experience in mutual funds, which is critical for the role. He should detail his direct experiences with fund management and compliance to align better with the job expectations.\n\n17. - user stories:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: While Varun mentioned handling user stories in his previous roles, he did not elaborate on how this experience could be applied in the new role. Providing specific examples of how he has used user stories to meet business goals would be beneficial.\n\n18. - product owner:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s experience as a product owner was not evident from his responses. He should discuss specific instances where he has led product development or enhancements, particularly in a financial context.\n\n19. - us retirement solution:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was no mention of experience with U.S. retirement solutions, which could be relevant to the mutual funds domain. Varun should highlight any relevant experience, even if indirectly related, to improve his suitability for the role.\n\n20. - business analysis:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s responses lacked depth in demonstrating his business analysis skills. He should provide detailed examples of his analytical projects, particularly those that had significant business impacts.', '21. - agile scrum:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun mentioned Agile methodologies but did not discuss his practical experience with Scrum practices. Detailing his role in Scrum projects and his contributions to their success would strengthen his response.\n\n22. - sprint management:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was limited evidence of Varun\'s expertise in sprint management. He should describe his approach to planning, monitoring, and leading sprints, especially in complex project environments.\n\n23. - agile scrum methodologies:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: While Varun alluded to knowledge of Agile Scrum methodologies, he did not provide concrete examples of how he has implemented or benefited from these methodologies in his projects. More detailed responses would demonstrate his proficiency.\n\n24. - stakeholder communication:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun needs to better illustrate his stakeholder communication skills. Discussing specific strategies he has used to manage and satisfy stakeholder expectations would be advantageous.\n\n25. - risk management:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not adequately address his skills in risk management, an essential area for the role. He should outline his experience in identifying, assessing, and mitigating risks, particularly in financial settings.', '2024-11-08 07:13:11'),
(61, 148, 4, 541, 136, 'Varun demonstrated a good level of engagement and communication during the interview. His responses, while generally relevant, lacked depth in certain technical areas crucial for the Business Analyst role at Adzip Technologies, particularly in mutual funds and regulatory compliance. His strengths lie in business development and client management, as evidenced by his previous roles. However, for the specific requirements of this job, Varun needs to enhance his knowledge and experience in the mutual funds sector and related regulatory frameworks.', 'Varun\'s strengths include strong communication skills and a proactive approach to business analysis, as seen in his previous job roles where he led teams and exceeded revenue targets. His experience in client relationship management and strategic sales initiatives are commendable and were evident in his responses about past roles and achievements.', 'Varun\'s main weakness in the context of the job role is his limited exposure to the mutual funds industry and the specific regulatory standards such as SEC and FINRA, which are critical for the Business Analyst position at Adzip Technologies. His responses lacked depth in discussing technical strategies and compliance issues related to mutual funds, which are central to the job description.', '16. - mutual funds:\n    Score: 3\n    Qualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\n    Description: Varun needs to significantly enhance his knowledge and practical experience in mutual funds to meet the job\'s requirements.\n\n17. - user stories:\n    Score: 6\n    Qualitative Assessment: Average\n    Description: Varun has some experience with user stories, but he needs to demonstrate how these align specifically with mutual fund projects.\n\n18. - product owner:\n    Score: 5\n    Qualitative Assessment: Average\n    Description: Varun\'s understanding of the product owner role is basic and needs deeper integration with technical and regulatory knowledge in mutual funds.\n\n19. - us retirement solution:\n    Score: 4\n    Qualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\n    Description: Varun did not demonstrate sufficient knowledge or experience in U.S. retirement solutions, which are relevant to the mutual funds sector.\n\n20. - business analysis:\n    Score: 7\n    Qualitative Assessment: Good\n    Description: Varun has a good foundation in business analysis, but applying this specifically to the mutual funds industry requires further development.', '21. - agile scrum:\n    Score: 6\n    Qualitative Assessment: Average\n    Description: While Varun is familiar with Agile Scrum, he needs to better demonstrate how he has applied this methodology in contexts relevant to the financial sector.\n\n22. - sprint management:\n    Score: 5\n    Qualitative Assessment: Average\n    Description: Varun\'s experience with sprint management is adequate but lacks depth in how it can be effectively utilized in mutual fund projects.\n\n23. - agile scrum methodologies:\n    Score: 6\n    Qualitative Assessment: Average\n    Description: Varun understands Agile Scrum methodologies; however, more detailed examples of application in his past projects would strengthen his profile.\n\n24. - stakeholder communication:\n    Score: 8\n    Qualitative Assessment: Good\n    Description: Varun demonstrated strong skills in stakeholder communication, an essential attribute for the business analyst role.\n\n25. - risk management:\n    Score: 4\n    Qualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\n    Description: Varun\'s understanding of risk management in the context of mutual funds is limited and requires significant improvement to meet the demands of the role.', '2024-11-08 07:25:28'),
(62, 150, 4, 541, 136, 'Varun\'s performance in the interview was generally satisfactory, but there were areas where he could have demonstrated stronger alignment with the job requirements. His responses were concise and to the point, which is a positive trait. However, his answers lacked the depth and specificity needed to fully convince of his suitability for the Business Analyst role in the mutual funds domain, particularly in demonstrating knowledge of regulatory compliance and strategic initiative management.', 'Varun\'s strengths include clear communication and a good foundational understanding of business development and client relationship management. His response to the initial greeting was polite and set a positive tone for the interview. His readiness to proceed with the interview also showed good professionalism.', 'Varun\'s responses lacked depth in areas critical to the role, such as regulatory compliance, financial analysis, and strategic planning specific to mutual funds. His answers were somewhat generic and did not fully address the complexities of the role as described in the job description. To improve, Varun could focus on tailoring his responses more closely to the specifics of the job, perhaps by citing more detailed examples of past experiences that align with the responsibilities of the role.', '16. - mutual funds:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate a deep understanding of mutual funds, which is critical for the role. He should include specific examples of his experience in this area.\n\n17. - user stories:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun mentioned his experience with user stories, but did not connect this effectively to how it could be applied in the mutual funds context.\n\n18. - product owner:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun\'s experience as a product owner was not clearly articulated in terms of leading strategic initiatives in mutual funds.\n\n19. - us retirement solution:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not mention any specific knowledge or experience with US retirement solutions, which could be relevant to the role.\n\n20. - business analysis:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: While Varun has a background in business analysis, he did not sufficiently detail how his skills could be applied specifically in the mutual funds domain.', '21. - agile scrum:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun has good knowledge of Agile Scrum methodologies, which is beneficial for the role. However, he could discuss more about how he has applied these in complex financial projects.\n\n22. - sprint management:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun mentioned his experience with sprint management but did not elaborate on how this skill could benefit the mutual funds projects at Adzip Technologies.\n\n23. - agile scrum methodologies:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun understands Agile Scrum methodologies well. He could enhance his response by detailing specific projects where he successfully applied these methodologies.\n\n24. - stakeholder communication:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: While Varun mentioned stakeholder communication, he did not provide examples of how he has effectively managed this in a complex regulatory environment like that of mutual funds.\n\n25. - risk management:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun\'s knowledge of risk management was not specifically tailored to the mutual funds industry, which is essential for the role. He could improve by discussing specific risk management strategies he has implemented in financial settings.\n\nRecommendation:\nBased on the evaluation, Varun shows potential but would benefit from further development in areas critical to the Business Analyst role at Adzip Technologies, particularly in mutual funds-specific knowledge and strategic planning. It is recommended to consider Varun for roles that align more closely with his current expertise while offering him opportunities to grow into the desired role with additional training and exposure.', '2024-11-08 07:29:01');
INSERT INTO `bot_overall_feedback` (`id`, `botInterviewId`, `candidateId`, `resumeId`, `screeningId`, `feedback`, `strength`, `weakness`, `primarySkills`, `secondarySkills`, `created`) VALUES
(63, 151, 4, 541, 136, 'Varun demonstrated a basic level of competence during the interview, but there were notable areas where improvement is needed to fully align with the expectations for a Business Analyst role in the mutual funds domain. His responses lacked depth in specific required skills such as mutual funds knowledge and regulatory compliance. However, he showed good communication skills and a positive attitude towards the interview process.', 'Varun\'s main strengths lie in his communication style and general engagement during the interview. He was polite and expressed his ideas clearly enough, which are crucial traits for any role involving stakeholder communication. His background in business development and strategy also suggests he has a solid foundation in handling client relationships and strategic planning.', 'Varun\'s responses lacked depth in several critical areas required for the Business Analyst role, particularly in mutual funds, regulatory compliance, and advanced data analysis. His experience seems more aligned with sales and marketing rather than the technical and analytical demands of the mutual funds industry. To improve, Varun could benefit from specific training in financial regulations, mutual fund operations, and technical platforms mentioned in the job description like Charles River Development.', '16. - mutual funds:\nScore: 3\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s knowledge of mutual funds was insufficient for the role\'s demands. He should focus on gaining specific industry knowledge and understanding the technical aspects of fund management.\n\n17. - user stories:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun mentioned experience with user stories but did not provide detailed examples of how he has effectively integrated them into business analysis processes.\n\n18. - product owner:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun\'s understanding of the product owner role was basic. He needs to demonstrate how he can translate product owner insights into actionable business analysis.\n\n19. - us retirement solution:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate knowledge specific to US retirement solutions, which could be crucial depending on the projects at Adzip Technologies.\n\n20. - business analysis:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: While Varun has a background in business analysis, his experience seems more aligned with sales strategies rather than the analytical depth required for this role.', '21. - agile scrum:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun mentioned familiarity with Agile Scrum methodologies, but more detailed knowledge and examples of practical application are needed.\n\n22. - sprint management:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun\'s experience with sprint management was not detailed during the interview, suggesting a need for further development in this area.\n\n23. - agile scrum methodologies:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun needs to deepen his understanding and application of Agile Scrum methodologies to align with the job requirements.\n\n24. - stakeholder communication:\nScore: 7\nQualitative Assessment: Good\nDescription: Varun demonstrated good stakeholder communication skills, which are essential for the Business Analyst role.\n\n25. - risk management:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun\'s knowledge of risk management, especially in the context of mutual funds, needs significant enhancement to meet the role\'s demands.', '2024-11-08 07:32:41'),
(64, 157, 4, 540, 135, 'Varun demonstrated a strong foundational understanding of business analysis principles, particularly in areas related to agile methodologies and stakeholder management. His responses were generally clear and relevant, showcasing his experience in business development and strategy. However, there were gaps in technical depth and specific domain knowledge which are critical for the role at Adzip Technologies, especially concerning mutual funds and financial services.', 'Varun\'s strengths lie in his clear communication and practical experience in business analysis. He effectively articulated his past roles and responsibilities, demonstrating a good grasp of agile practices and user story creation. His experience with CRM tools and client management suggests strong interpersonal and stakeholder management skills, which are crucial for the business analyst role.', 'Varun\'s main areas for improvement include a deeper technical understanding of the financial services domain, specifically mutual funds, which is essential for the job role. Additionally, his responses could benefit from more detailed examples and less generic descriptions. Enhancing his technical skills, particularly in SQL databases and advanced agile methodologies, would make him a stronger candidate.', '16. - agile business analysis:\n    Score: 7\n    Qualitative Assessment: Good\n    Description: Varun understands agile business analysis but needs to apply this knowledge more effectively in the context of financial services.\n\n17. - user stories:\n    Score: 8\n    Qualitative Assessment: Good\n    Description: Varun is proficient in creating user stories. He could enhance his skill by integrating more specific acceptance criteria tailored to financial services.\n\n18. - backlog creation:\n    Score: 6\n    Qualitative Assessment: Average\n    Description: Varun has basic knowledge of backlog creation. He should focus on learning more about prioritizing backlogs in line with strategic business objectives.\n\n19. - sprint creation:\n    Score: 6\n    Qualitative Assessment: Average\n    Description: Varun\'s understanding of sprint creation is fundamental. He could benefit from deeper practical experience in managing sprints within agile frameworks.\n\n20. - product owner:\n    Score: 5\n    Qualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\n    Description: Varun needs to develop a stronger understanding of the product owner\'s role, particularly in defining vision and aligning product goals with business objectives.', '21. - sql database:\n    Score: 4\n    Qualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\n    Description: Varun\'s knowledge of SQL databases is limited. Enhancing his skills in SQL query writing and database management would be beneficial.\n\n22. - sprint planning:\n    Score: 6\n    Qualitative Assessment: Average\n    Description: Varun has a basic grasp of sprint planning. He should focus on advanced techniques for effective sprint goal setting and resource allocation.\n\n23. - sprint demo:\n    Score: 6\n    Qualitative Assessment: Average\n    Description: Varun can conduct sprint demos but needs to improve in collecting and integrating feedback into future sprints.\n\n24. - agile jira:\n    Score: 7\n    Qualitative Assessment: Good\n    Description: Varun is competent in using JIRA for agile projects. He could improve by exploring more advanced features and customization options.\n\n25. - requirement gathering:\n    Score: 7\n    Qualitative Assessment: Good\n    Description: Varun is adept at gathering requirements. He could enhance his techniques to ensure more precise and comprehensive requirement documentation.\n\nRecommendation:\nBased on the evaluation, Varun shows potential but would benefit from targeted training in financial services and advanced technical skills. If the role allows for on-the-job training, he could be considered for the position with a recommendation for further development in specific areas.', '2024-11-20 09:11:15'),
(65, 158, 134, 564, 144, 'Swami\'s responses throughout the interview were generally concise and to the point, but they lacked depth and specific examples that would demonstrate a thorough understanding of the role and its requirements. While he showed some familiarity with the concepts discussed, his answers were often generic and did not fully align with the benchmark responses, which were more detailed and tied directly to practical experiences and specific methodologies.', 'Swami\'s strengths lie in his general knowledge of business analysis concepts such as requirement gathering, functional specification, and user acceptance testing. He was able to articulate the basic responsibilities of a business analyst and showed some understanding of Agile methodologies and stakeholder engagement.', 'Swami\'s main weakness is the lack of depth in his responses and the absence of detailed examples that demonstrate his expertise and experience. His answers were often superficial and did not convey a strong grasp of how to apply business analysis techniques effectively in real-world scenarios. Additionally, his communication was sometimes unclear and could benefit from more structured and polished delivery. To improve, Swami could focus on providing more specific examples from his past experiences that relate directly to the tasks and responsibilities of the role he is applying for. He should also work on enhancing his communication skills to convey his thoughts more clearly and professionally.', '16. User Acceptance Testing:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Swami mentioned his involvement in UAT but did not delve into specifics about how he conducts tests or handles feedback. More detailed examples would improve his score.\n\n17. Requirements Gathering:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: While Swami understands the basics of requirements gathering, his approach lacks the thoroughness and detail needed to excel in this area.\n\n18. Functional Specification:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Swami needs to provide clearer examples of how he translates business requirements into functional specifications. More detail on his process and the tools he uses would be beneficial.\n\n19. Product Owner Analysis:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Swami has some understanding of the product owner role but needs to demonstrate a deeper knowledge of managing product backlogs and aligning product features with business goals.\n\n20. Agile Analysis:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Swami\'s familiarity with Agile is apparent, but he could improve by sharing more about his direct experiences using Agile methodologies in project management.', '21. Business Requirement Document:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Swami knows what a BRD should contain but did not convincingly explain how he ensures these documents meet project needs comprehensively.\n\n22. Functional Specification Document:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: More information on his specific contributions to creating functional specifications would help clarify Swami\'s expertise in this area.\n\n23. User Stories:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Swami mentions user stories but does not detail his approach to writing or validating them, which is crucial for understanding user needs.\n\n24. Backlog Management:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Swami\'s approach to backlog management is basic. He could improve by discussing how he prioritizes and refines backlog items to meet strategic goals.\n\n25. Problem Definition:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: While Swami identifies problems, he needs to strengthen his ability to define them clearly and propose effective solutions.\n\nRecommendation:\nBased on the evaluation, Swami shows potential but would benefit from further development in several key areas of business analysis. If the role can accommodate on-the-job training or if a junior position is available, Swami might be considered with the understanding that he would need support to reach his full potential. Otherwise, we might look for a candidate with more demonstrated expertise and a proven track record in similar roles.', '2024-11-20 17:43:42'),
(66, 159, 134, 566, 144, 'Swami\'s responses during the interview demonstrated a basic understanding of the responsibilities and skills required for the Catalyst Business Analyst position. However, there were noticeable gaps in the depth and relevance of his answers compared to the benchmark responses. Swami showed some familiarity with the tools and processes mentioned in the job description but often lacked detailed examples and clarity in his explanations. His communication was generally clear, though there were instances of repetition and lack of engagement with the questions posed.', 'Swami\'s strengths lie in his familiarity with various digital tools and platforms, as evidenced by his mention of using Figma, Google Analytics, and MailChimp. He also demonstrated a basic understanding of Agile methodologies and business analysis through his brief mentions of user stories and business analytics courses. His experience as a social media manager shows he has some practical experience managing tasks and priorities, which are relevant to the role of a business analyst.', 'Swami\'s main weakness is the lack of depth in his responses. He often failed to provide detailed examples that align with the job responsibilities, such as in user acceptance testing and backlog management. His answers were sometimes vague and did not fully address the interviewer\'s questions, indicating a need for improvement in communication and interview preparedness. To improve, Swami could benefit from more hands-on experience in specific business analyst tasks and enhancing his ability to articulate his experiences and knowledge clearly and relevantly during interviews.', '16. User Acceptance Testing:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Swami mentioned his involvement in projects that required testing but did not provide detailed insights into his role in user acceptance testing or the development of test cases. He needs to gain more practical experience in this area and be able to discuss it more competently.\n\n17. Requirements Gathering:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Swami described some activities related to requirements gathering, such as conducting interviews and surveys. However, his explanation lacked depth and did not fully convey his ability to capture and document comprehensive requirements effectively.\n\n18. Functional Specification:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Swami mentioned using Figma for wireframing but did not elaborate on how he translated project requirements into detailed functional specifications. He should focus on gaining more experience in this area and being able to discuss it more thoroughly.\n\n19. Product Owner Analysis:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Swami did not provide any specific examples of his experience with product owner analysis. He needs to develop a better understanding of this role and its responsibilities, particularly in managing product backlogs and roadmap planning.\n\n20. Agile Analysis:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Swami briefly mentioned his exposure to Agile methodologies, but his understanding appears to be superficial. He could benefit from more practical experience in Agile environments and a deeper understanding of Agile analysis techniques.', '21. Business Requirement Document:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Swami did not discuss his experience with creating or maintaining business requirement documents. This is a crucial skill for a business analyst, and Swami should focus on developing his abilities in this area.\n\n22. Functional Specification Document:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: While Swami mentioned using tools like Figma for wireframing, he did not provide detailed insights into how he develops or maintains functional specification documents. More experience and knowledge in this area would be beneficial.\n\n23. User Stories:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Swami mentioned his recent learning about user stories, but he did not provide examples of how he has effectively written or utilized user stories in projects. He should work on applying this knowledge practically to improve his proficiency.\n\n24. Backlog Management:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Swami\'s experience with backlog management was not evident from his responses. He needs to gain practical experience in this area and be able to articulate how he manages and prioritizes a product backlog effectively.\n\n25. Problem Definition:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Swami mentioned using business analytics techniques, which likely involve some level of problem definition. However, he did not provide specific examples of how he defines and addresses problems in his projects. More detailed explanations and examples would help demonstrate his capability in this area.\n\nIn conclusion, while Swami has some foundational skills and knowledge relevant to the Catalyst Business Analyst role, there are significant areas for improvement, particularly in depth of knowledge, problem-solving, and specific business analysis tasks. His communication skills are adequate but could be enhanced with more focus on clarity and engagement. Swami should seek additional practical experience and training in business analysis to better meet the demands of the role and improve his performance in future interviews.', '2024-11-22 06:47:04'),
(67, 160, 4, 541, 136, 'Varun\'s responses during the interview were concise but lacked depth and engagement, which are crucial for the Business Analyst role he applied for. His answers did not fully address the questions posed, particularly in terms of aligning his experience with the job requirements. This suggests a need for improvement in communication and articulation of his skills and experiences relative to the role.', 'Varun demonstrated basic communication skills and was able to maintain a polite and professional demeanor throughout the interview. His brief responses indicate a level of comfort with the interview process.', 'Varun\'s responses were often too brief and lacked the necessary detail to fully convey his suitability for the role. He missed opportunities to align his past experiences with the job requirements, particularly in areas like strategic initiative management and regulatory compliance. Varun could benefit from more thoroughly preparing for interviews by mapping his experiences to the job description and practicing more detailed and targeted responses.', '16. - mutual funds:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not demonstrate a strong understanding of mutual funds, which is critical for the role. He should provide specific examples of his experience in this area.\n\n17. - user stories:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun mentioned user stories in his resume but did not effectively connect this experience to the job requirements during the interview.\n\n18. - product owner:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: There was little to no mention of experience relevant to acting as a product owner, an important aspect of the Business Analyst role.\n\n19. - us retirement solution:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not discuss any relevant experience with US retirement solutions, missing an opportunity to align with the job\'s focus.\n\n20. - business analysis:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: While Varun has a background in business analysis, he did not provide strong examples of his expertise in this area during the interview.', '21. - agile scrum:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun\'s responses lacked depth in discussing his proficiency in Agile Scrum methodologies, which are important for the role.\n\n22. - sprint management:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun did not provide evidence of experience in sprint management, which is crucial for the Business Analyst role in an IT setting.\n\n23. - agile scrum methodologies:\nScore: 5\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: More detailed examples of applying Agile Scrum methodologies in his past roles would help Varun demonstrate his qualifications for this job.\n\n24. - stakeholder communication:\nScore: 6\nQualitative Assessment: Average\nDescription: Varun mentioned stakeholder communication but did not effectively showcase his skills in this area during the interview.\n\n25. - risk management:\nScore: 4\nQualitative Assessment: Needs Improvement\nDescription: Varun needs to better articulate his experience with risk management strategies and their application in business settings, especially related to mutual funds.\n\nRecommendation:\nBased on the evaluation, it is recommended that Varun may not currently be the best fit for the Business Analyst position at GCS, primarily due to the lack of depth in his responses and the limited demonstration of required skills and knowledge. However, with additional preparation and a more detailed presentation of his experiences and skills, he could potentially be reconsidered for future opportunities.', '2024-12-02 19:37:34');

-- --------------------------------------------------------

--
-- Table structure for table `bot_overall_scores`
--

CREATE TABLE `bot_overall_scores` (
  `id` int NOT NULL,
  `botInterviewId` int NOT NULL,
  `candidateId` int DEFAULT NULL,
  `resumeId` int DEFAULT NULL,
  `screeningId` int DEFAULT NULL,
  `parameter` varchar(100) COLLATE utf8mb4_general_ci DEFAULT NULL,
  `score` varchar(100) COLLATE utf8mb4_general_ci DEFAULT NULL,
  `feedback` text COLLATE utf8mb4_general_ci,
  `created` datetime DEFAULT NULL
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4 COLLATE=utf8mb4_general_ci;

--
-- Dumping data for table `bot_overall_scores`
--

INSERT INTO `bot_overall_scores` (`id`, `botInterviewId`, `candidateId`, `resumeId`, `screeningId`, `parameter`, `score`, `feedback`, `created`) VALUES
(1, 6, 11, 256, 57, 'Clarity of Communication', '6', 'Eric\'s communication was straightforward but lacked detail. He could have provided more comprehensive responses to showcase his expertise.', '2024-03-19 12:25:11'),
(2, 6, 11, 256, 57, 'Relevance of Responses', '6', 'Eric\'s responses were relevant but not detailed enough to fully address the questions.', '2024-03-19 12:25:11'),
(3, 6, 11, 256, 57, 'Depth of Knowledge', '4', 'Eric showed basic knowledge of Laravel but did not delve into the complexities or provide in-depth examples.', '2024-03-19 12:25:11'),
(4, 6, 11, 256, 57, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '4', 'Eric mentioned problem-solving with deprecated libraries but did not elaborate on the process or outcomes.', '2024-03-19 12:25:11'),
(5, 6, 11, 256, 57, 'Communication Style', '6', 'Eric\'s communication style was functional but lacked the enthusiasm and detail expected for a lead role.', '2024-03-19 12:25:11'),
(6, 6, 11, 256, 57, 'Adaptability', '6', 'Eric demonstrated adaptability by working with different PHP frameworks but did not provide examples of adapting to new challenges.', '2024-03-19 12:25:11'),
(7, 6, 11, 256, 57, 'Creativity', '4', 'Eric\'s responses did not highlight any creative solutions or innovative approaches to his work.', '2024-03-19 12:25:11'),
(8, 6, 11, 256, 57, 'Problem Awareness', '6', 'Eric recognized issues with deprecated libraries but did not discuss proactive strategies for problem awareness.', '2024-03-19 12:25:11'),
(9, 8, 7, 265, 59, 'Clarity of Communication', '2', 'Shalu\'s responses were brief and lacked clarity, failing to convey a comprehensive understanding of the topics discussed.', '2024-03-28 03:47:44'),
(10, 8, 7, 265, 59, 'Relevance of Responses', '2', 'Responses did not address the questions directly and lacked relevance to the role\'s responsibilities.', '2024-03-28 03:47:44'),
(11, 8, 7, 265, 59, 'Depth of Knowledge', '2', 'Shalu did not demonstrate the depth of knowledge expected for a candidate with 5-10 years of experience in UX/UI design.', '2024-03-28 03:47:44'),
(12, 8, 7, 265, 59, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '2', 'Shalu did not provide any examples of problem-solving skills or how they have overcome challenges in their work.', '2024-03-28 03:47:44'),
(13, 8, 7, 265, 59, 'Communication Style', '2', 'The communication style was not engaging and failed to convey enthusiasm or confidence.', '2024-03-28 03:47:44'),
(14, 8, 7, 265, 59, 'Adaptability', '2', 'Shalu\'s request to reschedule the interview indicates a lack of adaptability to the interview situation.', '2024-03-28 03:47:44'),
(15, 8, 7, 265, 59, 'Creativity', '0', 'Shalu did not provide any insights into their creative process or how they generate innovative ideas.', '2024-03-28 03:47:44'),
(16, 8, 7, 265, 59, 'Problem Awareness', '2', 'Shalu did not demonstrate awareness of challenges or issues related to UX/UI design.', '2024-03-28 03:47:44'),
(17, 8, 7, 265, 59, 'Empathy', '0', 'There was no mention of empathy or understanding from the user\'s perspective in the design process.', '2024-03-28 03:47:44'),
(18, 8, 7, 265, 59, 'Overall Engagement', '2', 'Shalu\'s overall engagement was low, as evidenced by the request to reschedule and lack of detailed responses.', '2024-03-28 03:47:44'),
(19, 9, 4, 259, 60, 'Clarity of Communication', '2', 'Varun\'s responses were brief and lacked clarity, failing to convey his ideas effectively.', '2024-03-28 03:53:03'),
(20, 9, 4, 259, 60, 'Relevance of Responses', '2', 'Varun\'s answers did not address the interviewer\'s questions in a relevant or detailed manner.', '2024-03-28 03:53:03'),
(21, 9, 4, 259, 60, 'Depth of Knowledge', '2', 'Varun did not demonstrate a strong understanding of the subject matter, providing minimal insight into his knowledge.', '2024-03-28 03:53:03'),
(22, 9, 4, 259, 60, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '2', 'Varun did not provide any examples of problem-solving in his responses.', '2024-03-28 03:53:03'),
(23, 9, 4, 259, 60, 'Communication Style', '2', 'Varun\'s communication style was not engaging and lacked professionalism.', '2024-03-28 03:53:03'),
(24, 9, 4, 259, 60, 'Adaptability', '2', 'Varun showed resistance to a full-length interview, indicating a lack of adaptability.', '2024-03-28 03:53:03'),
(25, 9, 4, 259, 60, 'Creativity', '0', 'Varun did not provide any responses that demonstrated creative thinking.', '2024-03-28 03:53:03'),
(26, 9, 4, 259, 60, 'Problem Awareness', '2', 'Varun did not show an awareness of challenges or issues related to UX/UI design.', '2024-03-28 03:53:03'),
(27, 9, 4, 259, 60, 'Empathy', '2', 'Varun did not display an ability to empathize with users\' perspectives or concerns.', '2024-03-28 03:53:03'),
(28, 9, 4, 259, 60, 'Overall Engagement', '2', 'Varun\'s level of engagement was low, and he did not show enthusiasm during the interview.', '2024-03-28 03:53:03'),
(29, 10, 15, 266, 61, 'Clarity of Communication', '6', 'Ruby\'s responses were clear but lacked detail and formality, which is expected in a professional interview setting.', '2024-04-03 12:11:56'),
(30, 10, 15, 266, 61, 'Relevance of Responses', '6', 'Ruby\'s responses were relevant but did not go beyond a basic acknowledgment, missing the chance to connect with the interviewer.', '2024-04-03 12:11:56'),
(31, 21, 4, 228, 51, 'Clarity of Communication', '8', 'Varun communicated his thoughts clearly but could have elaborated more on his experiences to provide a better understanding of his capabilities.', '2024-04-12 04:52:06'),
(32, 21, 4, 228, 51, 'Relevance of Responses', '8', 'Varun\'s responses were relevant, but he could have tied them more closely to the job description\'s requirements.', '2024-04-12 04:52:06'),
(33, 21, 4, 228, 51, 'Depth of Knowledge', '6', 'Varun showed a good understanding of front-end development but did not delve deeply into some of the skills listed in the job description.', '2024-04-12 04:52:06'),
(34, 21, 4, 228, 51, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '6', 'Varun\'s problem-solving abilities were not fully showcased during the interview.', '2024-04-12 04:52:06'),
(35, 21, 4, 228, 51, 'Communication Style', '8', 'Varun maintained a professional and clear communication style throughout the interview.', '2024-04-12 04:52:06'),
(36, 21, 4, 228, 51, 'Adaptability', '6', 'Varun\'s adaptability was not explicitly demonstrated in his responses.', '2024-04-12 04:52:06'),
(37, 21, 4, 228, 51, 'Creativity', '6', 'Varun\'s creativity in solving problems or approaching tasks was not evident from his responses.', '2024-04-12 04:52:06'),
(38, 21, 4, 228, 51, 'Problem Awareness', '6', 'There was limited discussion of Varun\'s awareness of potential challenges in front-end development.', '2024-04-12 04:52:06'),
(39, 21, 4, 228, 51, 'Empathy', '6', 'Varun\'s ability to empathize with user needs or team dynamics was not clearly conveyed.', '2024-04-12 04:52:06'),
(40, 21, 4, 228, 51, 'Overall Engagement', '8', 'Varun seemed engaged, but he could have shown more enthusiasm about the role and the company.', '2024-04-12 04:52:06'),
(41, 23, 4, 258, 60, 'Clarity of Communication', '2', 'Varun\'s communication was clear but too brief, lacking elaboration on his skills or experiences.', '2024-04-12 07:36:53'),
(42, 23, 4, 258, 60, 'Relevance of Responses', '0', 'Varun\'s response did not address the interviewer\'s greeting in the context of a professional setting.', '2024-04-12 07:36:53'),
(43, 23, 4, 258, 60, 'Depth of Knowledge', '0', 'Varun did not demonstrate any knowledge relevant to the UX/UI Designer role.', '2024-04-12 07:36:53'),
(44, 23, 4, 258, 60, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '0', 'Varun did not provide any insight into his problem-solving abilities.', '2024-04-12 07:36:53'),
(45, 23, 4, 258, 60, 'Communication Style', '2', 'Varun\'s communication style was too informal and lacked professional engagement.', '2024-04-12 07:36:53'),
(46, 23, 4, 258, 60, 'Adaptability', '0', 'Varun did not show adaptability in his response to the interviewer\'s greeting.', '2024-04-12 07:36:53'),
(47, 23, 4, 258, 60, 'Creativity', '0', 'There was no indication of creativity in Varun\'s response.', '2024-04-12 07:36:53'),
(48, 23, 4, 258, 60, 'Problem Awareness', '0', 'Varun did not acknowledge any problems or challenges.', '2024-04-12 07:36:53'),
(49, 23, 4, 258, 60, 'Empathy', '0', 'Varun did not demonstrate empathy or understanding of the interviewer\'s perspective.', '2024-04-12 07:36:53'),
(50, 23, 4, 258, 60, 'Overall Engagement', '0', 'Varun\'s engagement was minimal and did not reflect enthusiasm for the role.', '2024-04-12 07:36:53'),
(51, 28, 31, 339, 77, 'Clarity of Communication', '7', 'Yashaswee communicated his ideas clearly but could have structured his responses more effectively to directly address the questions.', '2024-04-26 07:44:27'),
(52, 28, 31, 339, 77, 'Relevance of Responses', '6', 'Some responses were relevant, but Yashaswee occasionally veered off-topic or did not fully address the question.', '2024-04-26 07:44:27'),
(53, 28, 31, 339, 77, 'Depth of Knowledge', '7', 'Yashaswee showed good knowledge in BI architecture and Power BI but lacked depth in other areas like building universes.', '2024-04-26 07:44:27'),
(54, 28, 31, 339, 77, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '7', 'Yashaswee demonstrated problem-solving skills, particularly in optimizing report performance and integrating comments with PowerApps.', '2024-04-26 07:44:27'),
(55, 28, 31, 339, 77, 'Communication Style', '7', 'Yashaswee\'s communication style was clear and professional, although at times he could have been more concise.', '2024-04-26 07:44:27'),
(56, 28, 31, 339, 77, 'Adaptability', '6', 'Yashaswee adapted to the questions but could have been more agile in providing relevant examples from his experience.', '2024-04-26 07:44:27'),
(57, 28, 31, 339, 77, 'Creativity', '6', 'Yashaswee showed creativity in solving BI issues but did not fully demonstrate innovative thinking in his responses.', '2024-04-26 07:44:27'),
(58, 28, 31, 339, 77, 'Problem Awareness', '7', 'Yashaswee was aware of common BI problems and provided solutions, but could have elaborated more on potential challenges.', '2024-04-26 07:44:27'),
(59, 28, 31, 339, 77, 'Empathy', '7', 'Yashaswee expressed understanding of team dynamics and the importance of empathy in work culture.', '2024-04-26 07:44:27'),
(60, 28, 31, 339, 77, 'Overall Engagement', '7', 'Yashaswee was engaged throughout the interview but could have shown more enthusiasm for the role and company.', '2024-04-26 07:44:27'),
(61, 29, 4, 341, 79, 'Clarity of Communication', '8', 'Varun communicated his ideas clearly but could have provided more detailed examples to support his responses.', '2024-05-08 04:27:27'),
(62, 29, 4, 341, 79, 'Relevance of Responses', '7', 'Responses were relevant but sometimes lacked the depth expected from a candidate with his experience.', '2024-05-08 04:27:27'),
(63, 29, 4, 341, 79, 'Depth of Knowledge', '6', 'Varun showed knowledge of Agile and Scrum but could have demonstrated a deeper understanding of data analysis tools and process improvement.', '2024-05-08 04:27:27'),
(64, 29, 4, 341, 79, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '6', 'Varun discussed troubleshooting but did not provide a strong example of his problem-solving process.', '2024-05-08 04:27:27'),
(65, 29, 4, 341, 79, 'Communication Style', '8', 'Varun maintained a professional tone and was articulate, though he could engage more with the interviewer\'s queries.', '2024-05-08 04:27:27'),
(66, 29, 4, 341, 79, 'Adaptability', '7', 'Varun showed adaptability in his approach to Agile methodologies but could have elaborated on adapting to industry trends.', '2024-05-08 04:27:27'),
(67, 29, 4, 341, 79, 'Creativity', '6', 'Varun\'s use of visualization tools indicated some creativity, but he could have provided more innovative examples.', '2024-05-08 04:27:27'),
(68, 29, 4, 341, 79, 'Problem Awareness', '6', 'Varun recognized problems but did not convey a strong awareness of challenges or issues related to the role.', '2024-05-08 04:27:27'),
(69, 29, 4, 341, 79, 'Empathy', '8', 'Varun expressed the importance of empathy in the workplace, aligning with the company\'s values.', '2024-05-08 04:27:27'),
(70, 29, 4, 341, 79, 'Overall Engagement', '7', 'Varun was engaged but could have shown more enthusiasm and interest in the company and role.', '2024-05-08 04:27:27'),
(71, 31, 4, 357, 81, 'Clarity of Communication', '8', 'Varun communicated his ideas clearly, but there were instances where he could have provided more detailed responses.', '2024-05-26 06:33:24'),
(72, 31, 4, 357, 81, 'Relevance of Responses', '6', 'Varun\'s responses were relevant but lacked the depth expected for someone with his experience.', '2024-05-26 06:33:24'),
(73, 31, 4, 357, 81, 'Depth of Knowledge', '6', 'Varun showed knowledge of Agile and Scrum but did not demonstrate depth in other areas of the job description.', '2024-05-26 06:33:24'),
(74, 31, 4, 357, 81, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '6', 'Varun mentioned troubleshooting an issue but did not elaborate on the steps taken to resolve it.', '2024-05-26 06:33:24'),
(75, 31, 4, 357, 81, 'Communication Style', '8', 'Varun\'s communication style is clear and professional, but he could improve on engagement and enthusiasm.', '2024-05-26 06:33:24'),
(76, 31, 4, 357, 81, 'Adaptability', '4', 'Varun\'s early termination of the interview raises concerns about his adaptability.', '2024-05-26 06:33:24'),
(77, 31, 4, 357, 81, 'Creativity', '6', 'Varun did not provide examples that showcased his creativity in problem-solving.', '2024-05-26 06:33:24'),
(78, 31, 4, 357, 81, 'Problem Awareness', '6', 'Varun identified a problem during a sprint review but did not provide a comprehensive solution.', '2024-05-26 06:33:24'),
(79, 31, 4, 357, 81, 'Empathy', '8', 'Varun showed empathy by understanding stakeholders\' expectations but could improve on managing evolving expectations.', '2024-05-26 06:33:24'),
(80, 31, 4, 357, 81, 'Overall Engagement', '6', 'Varun\'s engagement was good at the start but dropped significantly when he asked to end the interview early.', '2024-05-26 06:33:24'),
(81, 32, 4, 344, 80, 'Clarity of Communication', '0', 'Varun failed to communicate effectively, providing responses that were either non-existent or irrelevant.', '2024-05-26 08:36:12'),
(82, 32, 4, 344, 80, 'Relevance of Responses', '0', 'Varun\'s responses did not address the interviewer\'s questions, indicating a lack of relevance.', '2024-05-26 08:36:12'),
(83, 32, 4, 344, 80, 'Depth of Knowledge', '0', 'Varun did not demonstrate any depth of knowledge in his responses.', '2024-05-26 08:36:12'),
(84, 32, 4, 344, 80, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '0', 'There was no evidence of problem-solving skills in Varun\'s responses.', '2024-05-26 08:36:12'),
(85, 32, 4, 344, 80, 'Communication Style', '0', 'Varun\'s communication style was non-responsive and did not adhere to the context of the interview.', '2024-05-26 08:36:12'),
(86, 32, 4, 344, 80, 'Adaptability', '0', 'Varun did not show adaptability in responding to the interviewer\'s prompts for clarification.', '2024-05-26 08:36:12'),
(87, 32, 4, 344, 80, 'Creativity', '0', 'No creativity was demonstrated in Varun\'s responses.', '2024-05-26 08:36:12'),
(88, 32, 4, 344, 80, 'Problem Awareness', '0', 'Varun did not show any awareness of the job role\'s challenges or issues.', '2024-05-26 08:36:12'),
(89, 32, 4, 344, 80, 'Empathy', '0', 'There was no demonstration of empathy or understanding of others\' perspectives.', '2024-05-26 08:36:12'),
(90, 32, 4, 344, 80, 'Overall Engagement', '0', 'Varun did not engage with the interview process.', '2024-05-26 08:36:12'),
(91, 33, 4, 342, 80, 'Clarity of Communication', '4/10', 'Varun\'s responses were understandable but lacked detail and depth.', '2024-06-06 16:41:31'),
(92, 33, 4, 342, 80, 'Relevance of Responses', '2/10', 'Varun\'s responses did not address the specifics of the job description or the interviewer\'s questions.', '2024-06-06 16:41:31'),
(93, 33, 4, 342, 80, 'Depth of Knowledge', '2/10', 'Varun did not demonstrate a deep understanding of the e-commerce domain or business analysis.', '2024-06-06 16:41:31'),
(94, 33, 4, 342, 80, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '2/10', 'Varun did not provide any examples showcasing his problem-solving skills.', '2024-06-06 16:41:31'),
(95, 33, 4, 342, 80, 'Communication Style', '4/10', 'Varun\'s communication was polite but lacked engagement and enthusiasm.', '2024-06-06 16:41:31'),
(96, 33, 4, 342, 80, 'Adaptability', '2/10', 'Varun did not show adaptability in his responses.', '2024-06-06 16:41:31'),
(97, 33, 4, 342, 80, 'Creativity', '2/10', 'Varun did not demonstrate creativity in his responses.', '2024-06-06 16:41:31'),
(98, 33, 4, 342, 80, 'Problem Awareness', '2/10', 'Varun did not show awareness of challenges or issues related to the role.', '2024-06-06 16:41:31'),
(99, 33, 4, 342, 80, 'Empathy', '4/10', 'Varun\'s responses did not showcase empathy towards customer perspectives or concerns.', '2024-06-06 16:41:31'),
(100, 33, 4, 342, 80, 'Overall Engagement', '4/10', 'Varun\'s overall engagement in the interview was low.', '2024-06-06 16:41:31'),
(101, 34, 4, 371, 87, 'Clarity of Communication', '2', 'Asmiya\'s responses were clear but too brief, lacking the necessary detail to effectively communicate her qualifications and experiences.', '2024-07-17 03:26:51'),
(102, 34, 4, 371, 87, 'Relevance of Responses', '2', 'Asmiya\'s responses were relevant in that she agreed to answer the questions, but she did not provide substantive answers that addressed the interviewer\'s questions.', '2024-07-17 03:26:51'),
(103, 34, 4, 371, 87, 'Depth of Knowledge', '2', 'Asmiya did not demonstrate depth of knowledge as her responses did not include any details or examples of her work experience.', '2024-07-17 03:26:51'),
(104, 34, 4, 371, 87, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '2', 'Asmiya did not showcase her problem-solving skills due to the lack of detailed responses to the questions posed.', '2024-07-17 03:26:51'),
(105, 34, 4, 371, 87, 'Communication Style', '2', 'Asmiya\'s communication style was too concise, which did not allow for an assessment of her communication effectiveness.', '2024-07-17 03:26:51'),
(106, 34, 4, 371, 87, 'Adaptability', '2', 'Asmiya\'s brief affirmations did not provide evidence of her adaptability to new information or unexpected questions.', '2024-07-17 03:26:51'),
(107, 34, 4, 371, 87, 'Creativity', '2', 'Asmiya did not demonstrate creativity in her responses, as she did not provide any innovative or detailed answers.', '2024-07-17 03:26:51'),
(108, 34, 4, 371, 87, 'Problem Awareness', '2', 'Asmiya did not exhibit awareness of challenges or issues related to the topics discussed due to the lack of detail in her responses.', '2024-07-17 03:26:51'),
(109, 34, 4, 371, 87, 'Empathy', '2', 'Asmiya\'s responses did not convey empathy or an understanding of others\' perspectives or concerns.', '2024-07-17 03:26:51'),
(110, 34, 4, 371, 87, 'Overall Engagement', '2', 'Asmiya\'s engagement level was difficult to assess due to the brevity of her responses.', '2024-07-17 03:26:51'),
(111, 35, 4, 372, 88, 'Clarity of Communication', '2', 'Asmiya\'s responses were brief and lacked clarity, failing to convey her experience effectively.', '2024-07-17 05:57:40'),
(112, 35, 4, 372, 88, 'Relevance of Responses', '2', 'Asmiya\'s responses often did not address the interviewer\'s questions directly or provide relevant information.', '2024-07-17 05:57:40'),
(113, 35, 4, 372, 88, 'Depth of Knowledge', '2', 'Asmiya did not demonstrate a deep understanding of the topics discussed, providing minimal insight into her expertise.', '2024-07-17 05:57:40'),
(114, 35, 4, 372, 88, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '0', 'Asmiya was unable to provide examples of her problem-solving skills, which is crucial for the role.', '2024-07-17 05:57:40'),
(115, 35, 4, 372, 88, 'Communication Style', '2', 'Asmiya\'s communication style was not engaging and did not convey enthusiasm or professionalism.', '2024-07-17 05:57:40'),
(116, 35, 4, 372, 88, 'Adaptability', '0', 'Asmiya did not provide examples of adaptability in her responses, which is important for the role.', '2024-07-17 05:57:40'),
(117, 35, 4, 372, 88, 'Creativity', '0', 'Asmiya did not showcase any creative thinking or innovative approaches in her responses.', '2024-07-17 05:57:40'),
(118, 35, 4, 372, 88, 'Problem Awareness', '0', 'Asmiya did not demonstrate awareness of challenges or issues related to Android development.', '2024-07-17 05:57:40'),
(119, 35, 4, 372, 88, 'Empathy', '0', 'Asmiya did not exhibit empathy or understanding of user-centric approaches in her responses.', '2024-07-17 05:57:40'),
(120, 35, 4, 372, 88, 'Overall Engagement', '2', 'Asmiya\'s overall engagement was low, as evidenced by her lack of questions and brief responses.', '2024-07-17 05:57:40'),
(121, 36, 4, 342, 80, 'Clarity of Communication', '2', 'Varun\'s responses were not in English, which made it difficult to understand his intent.', '2024-07-17 11:23:49'),
(122, 36, 4, 342, 80, 'Relevance of Responses', '0', 'Varun\'s responses did not address the interviewer\'s questions appropriately.', '2024-07-17 11:23:49'),
(123, 36, 4, 342, 80, 'Depth of Knowledge', '0', 'Varun did not provide any information to assess his knowledge depth.', '2024-07-17 11:23:49'),
(124, 36, 4, 342, 80, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '0', 'Varun did not display problem-solving skills in his communication.', '2024-07-17 11:23:49'),
(125, 36, 4, 342, 80, 'Communication Style', '2', 'Varun\'s communication style was informal and not suited for a professional interview.', '2024-07-17 11:23:49'),
(126, 36, 4, 342, 80, 'Adaptability', '0', 'Varun did not adapt his responses to the interview context.', '2024-07-17 11:23:49'),
(127, 36, 4, 342, 80, 'Creativity', '0', 'There was no demonstration of creativity in Varun\'s responses.', '2024-07-17 11:23:49'),
(128, 36, 4, 342, 80, 'Problem Awareness', '0', 'Varun did not show awareness of the interview process or the job requirements.', '2024-07-17 11:23:49'),
(129, 36, 4, 342, 80, 'Empathy', '0', 'Varun did not exhibit empathy or understanding of the interviewer\'s role.', '2024-07-17 11:23:49'),
(130, 36, 4, 342, 80, 'Overall Engagement', '2', 'Varun showed initial enthusiasm but failed to engage meaningfully.', '2024-07-17 11:23:49'),
(131, 37, 33, 378, 91, 'Clarity of Communication', '4', 'Shailendra\'s responses were not always clear or well-structured, which made it difficult to fully understand his experience and thought process.', '2024-07-17 15:47:57'),
(132, 37, 33, 378, 91, 'Relevance of Responses', '6', 'While Shailendra addressed the questions, his responses often lacked the specificity and relevance expected for the role.', '2024-07-17 15:47:57'),
(133, 37, 33, 378, 91, 'Depth of Knowledge', '6', 'Shailendra showed some understanding of Android development, but his responses did not consistently demonstrate the depth of knowledge required for the role.', '2024-07-17 15:47:57'),
(134, 37, 33, 378, 91, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '4', 'Shailendra\'s problem-solving approach was not clearly articulated, and he did not provide compelling examples of how he addressed complex issues.', '2024-07-17 15:47:57'),
(135, 37, 33, 378, 91, 'Communication Style', '4', 'Shailendra\'s communication style was not engaging, and he struggled to convey his ideas effectively.', '2024-07-17 15:47:57'),
(136, 37, 33, 378, 91, 'Adaptability', '6', 'Shailendra\'s responses did not provide enough evidence of his adaptability, particularly in addressing unexpected questions or scenarios.', '2024-07-17 15:47:57'),
(137, 37, 33, 378, 91, 'Creativity', '4', 'Shailendra did not provide examples that showcased his ability to think creatively or generate innovative solutions.', '2024-07-17 15:47:57'),
(138, 37, 33, 378, 91, 'Problem Awareness', '6', 'Shailendra\'s awareness of challenges or issues was not clearly demonstrated through his responses.', '2024-07-17 15:47:57'),
(139, 37, 33, 378, 91, 'Empathy', '6', 'Shailendra\'s ability to empathize with non-technical stakeholders was not convincingly conveyed in his responses.', '2024-07-17 15:47:57'),
(140, 37, 33, 378, 91, 'Overall Engagement', '4', 'Shailendra\'s level of engagement and enthusiasm during the interview was not evident, which could impact his fit for the role.', '2024-07-17 15:47:57'),
(141, 39, 4, 228, 51, 'Clarity of Communication', '2', 'Varun\'s responses were unclear and did not directly answer the interviewer\'s questions.', '2024-07-18 04:16:51'),
(142, 39, 4, 228, 51, 'Relevance of Responses', '0', 'Varun\'s responses did not address the questions asked, indicating a lack of relevance.', '2024-07-18 04:16:51'),
(143, 39, 4, 228, 51, 'Depth of Knowledge', 'Not Applicable', 'Varun did not provide any responses that demonstrated his knowledge.', '2024-07-18 04:16:51'),
(144, 39, 4, 228, 51, 'Problem-Solving Skills', 'Not Applicable', 'Varun did not provide any information related to problem-solving skills.', '2024-07-18 04:16:51'),
(145, 39, 4, 228, 51, 'Communication Style', '2', 'Varun\'s communication style was not engaging and did not convey enthusiasm or professionalism.', '2024-07-18 04:16:51'),
(146, 39, 4, 228, 51, 'Adaptability', 'Not Applicable', 'Varun did not demonstrate adaptability as he did not engage with the questions asked.', '2024-07-18 04:16:51'),
(147, 39, 4, 228, 51, 'Creativity', 'Not Applicable', 'Varun did not provide responses that could be evaluated for creativity.', '2024-07-18 04:16:51'),
(148, 39, 4, 228, 51, 'Problem Awareness', 'Not Applicable', 'Varun did not discuss any problems or challenges, so this could not be assessed.', '2024-07-18 04:16:51'),
(149, 39, 4, 228, 51, 'Empathy', 'Not Applicable', 'Varun did not exhibit empathy or understanding of the interviewer\'s role.', '2024-07-18 04:16:51'),
(150, 39, 4, 228, 51, 'Overall Engagement', '0', 'Varun did not engage with the interview process, indicating a lack of interest or preparation.', '2024-07-18 04:16:51'),
(151, 45, 40, 377, 91, 'Clarity of Communication', '2', 'Gowtham\'s responses were unclear and lacked coherence, making it difficult to understand his professional experience and expertise.', '2024-07-18 14:28:47'),
(152, 45, 40, 377, 91, 'Relevance of Responses', '2', 'Responses were often not directly relevant to the questions asked, and Gowtham failed to provide detailed examples that would demonstrate his skills and experience.', '2024-07-18 14:28:47'),
(153, 45, 40, 377, 91, 'Depth of Knowledge', '2', 'Gowtham did not demonstrate a deep understanding of Android Platform Development, which is essential for the HMI Developer role.', '2024-07-18 14:28:47'),
(154, 45, 40, 377, 91, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '2', 'Gowtham did not provide examples of problem-solving in his past projects, which is critical for assessing his ability to tackle challenges.', '2024-07-18 14:28:47'),
(155, 45, 40, 377, 91, 'Communication Style', '2', 'The communication style was not effective, with responses that were difficult to follow and did not convey information clearly.', '2024-07-18 14:28:47'),
(156, 45, 40, 377, 91, 'Adaptability', '2', 'Gowtham did not demonstrate adaptability in his responses, failing to adjust his answers to provide the information requested by the interviewer.', '2024-07-18 14:28:47'),
(157, 45, 40, 377, 91, 'Creativity', '2', 'There was no evidence of creative thinking in Gowtham\'s responses, which is important for developing innovative solutions in Android Platform Development.', '2024-07-18 14:28:47'),
(158, 45, 40, 377, 91, 'Problem Awareness', '2', 'Gowtham did not showcase an awareness of challenges or issues related to Android Platform Development, which is crucial for the role.', '2024-07-18 14:28:47'),
(159, 45, 40, 377, 91, 'Empathy', '2', 'Gowtham\'s responses did not reflect an ability to empathize with users\' perspectives or concerns, which is important for user-centric development.', '2024-07-18 14:28:47'),
(160, 45, 40, 377, 91, 'Overall Engagement', '2', 'Gowtham\'s level of engagement was low, as evidenced by his brief and unclear responses throughout the interview.', '2024-07-18 14:28:47'),
(161, 47, 35, 374, 90, 'Clarity of Communication', '6', 'Bhushan communicated his ideas reasonably well but could improve by structuring his responses more clearly and concisely.', '2024-07-18 16:39:15'),
(162, 47, 35, 374, 90, 'Relevance of Responses', '6', 'Bhushan\'s responses were relevant to the questions asked, but he could enhance them by providing more specific examples related to the job description.', '2024-07-18 16:39:15'),
(163, 47, 35, 374, 90, 'Depth of Knowledge', '6', 'Bhushan showed a good understanding of data engineering concepts but could demonstrate deeper knowledge by discussing specific challenges and solutions.', '2024-07-18 16:39:15'),
(164, 47, 35, 374, 90, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '6', 'Bhushan mentioned transitioning to Kafka for scalability, which indicates problem-solving skills, but he could elaborate on specific problems and solutions.', '2024-07-18 16:39:15'),
(165, 47, 35, 374, 90, 'Communication Style', '6', 'Bhushan\'s communication style was clear, but he could improve by being more concise and engaging.', '2024-07-18 16:39:15'),
(166, 47, 35, 374, 90, 'Adaptability', '6', 'Bhushan\'s plans to modernize data pipelines show adaptability, but he could discuss how he adapts to unexpected changes or issues.', '2024-07-18 16:39:15'),
(167, 47, 35, 374, 90, 'Creativity', '4', 'Bhushan could demonstrate creativity by discussing innovative solutions he has implemented or proposed in his projects.', '2024-07-18 16:39:15'),
(168, 47, 35, 374, 90, 'Problem Awareness', '6', 'Bhushan is aware of scalability and cost issues with AWS Kinesis and plans to address them with Kafka, showing problem awareness.', '2024-07-18 16:39:15'),
(169, 47, 35, 374, 90, 'Empathy', '4', 'Empathy was not directly assessed in the interview, but Bhushan could improve by showing understanding of end-user or team needs.', '2024-07-18 16:39:15'),
(170, 47, 35, 374, 90, 'Overall Engagement', '6', 'Bhushan was engaged in the conversation but could show more enthusiasm and interest in the role and company.', '2024-07-18 16:39:15'),
(171, 46, 33, 378, 91, 'Clarity of Communication', '4', 'Shailendra\'s responses were often repetitive and lacked clarity. He could improve by organizing his thoughts and providing more concise answers.', '2024-07-18 16:53:43'),
(172, 46, 33, 378, 91, 'Relevance of Responses', '4', 'Shailendra\'s responses sometimes did not directly address the questions asked. He could improve by ensuring his answers are relevant to the interviewer\'s queries.', '2024-07-18 16:53:43'),
(173, 46, 33, 378, 91, 'Depth of Knowledge', '6', 'Shailendra demonstrated a good understanding of Android platform development, but his explanations could be more detailed and structured.', '2024-07-18 16:53:43'),
(174, 46, 33, 378, 91, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '6', 'Shailendra showed problem-solving abilities, particularly in addressing compatibility and performance issues, but could provide clearer examples of his approach.', '2024-07-18 16:53:43'),
(175, 46, 33, 378, 91, 'Communication Style', '3', 'Shailendra\'s communication style was not always effective. He could benefit from being more articulate and engaging in his responses.', '2024-07-18 16:53:43'),
(176, 46, 33, 378, 91, 'Adaptability', '6', 'Shailendra showed adaptability in discussing various aspects of Android development, but could be more responsive to the specific questions asked.', '2024-07-18 16:53:43'),
(177, 46, 33, 378, 91, 'Creativity', '6', 'Shailendra\'s experience with customization suggests creativity, but he could better highlight innovative solutions he has implemented.', '2024-07-18 16:53:43'),
(178, 46, 33, 378, 91, 'Problem Awareness', '6', 'Shailendra is aware of challenges in Android development, such as hardware compatibility and performance optimization.', '2024-07-18 16:53:43'),
(179, 46, 33, 378, 91, 'Empathy', '6', 'Shailendra did not explicitly demonstrate empathy, but his focus on user experience suggests an understanding of end-user needs.', '2024-07-18 16:53:43'),
(180, 46, 33, 378, 91, 'Overall Engagement', '4', 'Shailendra\'s engagement could be improved by showing more enthusiasm and actively addressing the interviewer\'s questions.', '2024-07-18 16:53:43'),
(181, 48, 4, 398, 93, 'Clarity of Communication', '0', 'Varun did not communicate any clear or relevant information during the interview.', '2024-07-18 17:44:52'),
(182, 48, 4, 398, 93, 'Relevance of Responses', '0', 'Varun\'s responses did not address any of the interviewer\'s questions.', '2024-07-18 17:44:52'),
(183, 48, 4, 398, 93, 'Depth of Knowledge', '0', 'Varun did not demonstrate any depth of knowledge in his responses.', '2024-07-18 17:44:52'),
(184, 48, 4, 398, 93, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '0', 'Varun did not provide any examples or insights into his problem-solving abilities.', '2024-07-18 17:44:52'),
(185, 48, 4, 398, 93, 'Communication Style', '0', 'Varun\'s communication style was non-responsive and did not convey any substantive information.', '2024-07-18 17:44:52'),
(186, 48, 4, 398, 93, 'Adaptability', '0', 'Varun did not show adaptability as he did not engage with the questions or the interview process.', '2024-07-18 17:44:52'),
(187, 48, 4, 398, 93, 'Creativity', '0', 'There was no evidence of creativity in Varun\'s responses.', '2024-07-18 17:44:52'),
(188, 48, 4, 398, 93, 'Problem Awareness', '0', 'Varun did not demonstrate awareness of any problems or challenges related to the role.', '2024-07-18 17:44:52'),
(189, 48, 4, 398, 93, 'Empathy', '0', 'Varun did not display empathy or understanding of the interviewer\'s role or the interview context.', '2024-07-18 17:44:52'),
(190, 48, 4, 398, 93, 'Overall Engagement', '0', 'Varun was not engaged in the interview process.', '2024-07-18 17:44:52'),
(191, 49, 4, 401, 94, 'Clarity of Communication', '0', 'Varun\'s communication was unclear due to the absence of responses to most questions. He needs to provide detailed and relevant answers to demonstrate his communication skills effectively.', '2024-07-18 18:08:48'),
(192, 49, 4, 401, 94, 'Relevance of Responses', '0', 'Varun\'s responses were not relevant to the questions asked. He should aim to provide answers that directly address the interviewer\'s queries.', '2024-07-18 18:08:48'),
(193, 49, 4, 401, 94, 'Depth of Knowledge', '0', 'Varun did not showcase his knowledge due to the lack of responses. He should provide examples from his experience that highlight his expertise in the field.', '2024-07-18 18:08:48'),
(194, 49, 4, 401, 94, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '0', 'Varun did not demonstrate problem-solving skills as he did not answer questions related to overcoming challenges or technical issues.', '2024-07-18 18:08:48'),
(195, 49, 4, 401, 94, 'Communication Style', '0', 'Varun\'s communication style could not be assessed due to insufficient responses. Engaging with the interviewer and providing comprehensive answers would help evaluate this parameter.', '2024-07-18 18:08:48'),
(196, 49, 4, 401, 94, 'Adaptability', '0', 'Varun did not provide examples of adaptability, which is crucial for the role. He should discuss instances where he adapted to changes or new technologies.', '2024-07-18 18:08:48'),
(197, 49, 4, 401, 94, 'Creativity', '0', 'Varun did not exhibit creativity in his responses. Sharing innovative solutions or creative approaches to problems would be beneficial.', '2024-07-18 18:08:48'),
(198, 49, 4, 401, 94, 'Problem Awareness', '0', 'Varun did not address problem awareness, an important aspect of the role. Discussing challenges faced and how they were addressed would improve this score.', '2024-07-18 18:08:48'),
(199, 49, 4, 401, 94, 'Empathy', '0', 'There was no demonstration of empathy in Varun\'s responses. Understanding and addressing user needs or team concerns is essential for the role.', '2024-07-18 18:08:48'),
(200, 49, 4, 401, 94, 'Overall Engagement', '0', 'Varun\'s overall engagement was lacking. Active participation and enthusiasm during the interview are key to a successful evaluation.', '2024-07-18 18:08:48'),
(201, 51, 4, 404, 94, 'Clarity of Communication', '2', 'Varun\'s responses were clear but lacked the necessary detail to fully convey his experience and skills.', '2024-07-18 18:35:11'),
(202, 51, 4, 404, 94, 'Relevance of Responses', '2', 'Varun\'s responses did not fully address the interviewer\'s questions, and he failed to provide relevant examples from his experience.', '2024-07-18 18:35:11'),
(203, 51, 4, 404, 94, 'Depth of Knowledge', '2', 'Varun did not demonstrate a deep understanding of the subject matter, as he did not provide detailed responses or examples.', '2024-07-18 18:35:11'),
(204, 51, 4, 404, 94, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '2', 'Varun\'s responses did not showcase his problem-solving skills, as he did not describe specific instances where he addressed challenges.', '2024-07-18 18:35:11'),
(205, 51, 4, 404, 94, 'Communication Style', '4', 'While Varun communicated in a straightforward manner, his style lacked engagement and did not convey enthusiasm for the role.', '2024-07-18 18:35:11'),
(206, 51, 4, 404, 94, 'Adaptability', '2', 'Varun did not provide examples of how he adapted to new information or unexpected questions during the interview.', '2024-07-18 18:35:11'),
(207, 51, 4, 404, 94, 'Creativity', '2', 'Varun did not demonstrate creativity in his responses, as he did not provide innovative solutions or approaches to technical problems.', '2024-07-18 18:35:11'),
(208, 51, 4, 404, 94, 'Problem Awareness', '2', 'Varun did not show awareness of challenges or issues related to the topics discussed, as he did not provide examples of how he overcame them.', '2024-07-18 18:35:11'),
(209, 51, 4, 404, 94, 'Empathy', '4', 'Varun did not exhibit empathy in his responses, as he did not ask questions or show interest in the interviewer\'s perspective.', '2024-07-18 18:35:11'),
(210, 51, 4, 404, 94, 'Overall Engagement', '2', 'Varun\'s overall engagement was low, as evidenced by his brief responses and lack of questions at the end of the interview.', '2024-07-18 18:35:11'),
(211, 52, 33, 388, 92, 'Clarity of Communication', '6', 'Shailendra\'s responses were detailed but sometimes lacked clarity and structure. He could benefit from organizing his thoughts and presenting them more coherently.', '2024-07-19 04:28:39'),
(212, 52, 33, 388, 92, 'Relevance of Responses', '6', 'While Shailendra\'s responses contained relevant information, they occasionally diverged from the specific questions asked. He could improve by directly addressing the questions.', '2024-07-19 04:28:39'),
(213, 52, 33, 388, 92, 'Depth of Knowledge', '8', 'Shailendra displayed a good depth of knowledge in Android development, particularly in system architecture and performance optimization.', '2024-07-19 04:28:39'),
(214, 52, 33, 388, 92, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '7', 'Shailendra provided examples of problem-solving in his work, such as optimizing system performance and debugging app crashes.', '2024-07-19 04:28:39'),
(215, 52, 33, 388, 92, 'Communication Style', '6', 'Shailendra\'s communication style could be more structured and concise to effectively convey his expertise.', '2024-07-19 04:28:39'),
(216, 52, 33, 388, 92, 'Adaptability', '7', 'Shailendra showed adaptability by discussing various aspects of Android development and addressing different scenarios.', '2024-07-19 04:28:39'),
(217, 52, 33, 388, 92, 'Creativity', '7', 'Shailendra\'s approach to UI/UX design and problem-solving demonstrated creativity in his work.', '2024-07-19 04:28:39'),
(218, 52, 33, 388, 92, 'Problem Awareness', '7', 'Shailendra was aware of common issues in Android development and provided solutions to address them.', '2024-07-19 04:28:39'),
(219, 52, 33, 388, 92, 'Empathy', '6', 'Shailendra could improve on empathizing with user needs, particularly in UI/UX design for truck drivers.', '2024-07-19 04:28:39'),
(220, 52, 33, 388, 92, 'Overall Engagement', '7', 'Shailendra was engaged throughout the interview, showing enthusiasm for the role and his work.', '2024-07-19 04:28:39'),
(221, 54, 33, 388, 92, 'Clarity of Communication', '4', 'Shailendra\'s responses were often long-winded and lacked focus, making it difficult to follow his train of thought. He could improve by structuring his answers more coherently and directly addressing the questions.', '2024-07-19 05:17:45'),
(222, 54, 33, 388, 92, 'Relevance of Responses', '4', 'While Shailendra provided detailed technical information, his responses frequently diverged from the core questions, indicating a need to stay more on-topic.', '2024-07-19 05:17:45'),
(223, 54, 33, 388, 92, 'Depth of Knowledge', '6', 'Shailendra demonstrated good technical knowledge in Android development, but his explanations were sometimes convoluted, which detracted from showcasing his expertise effectively.', '2024-07-19 05:17:45'),
(224, 54, 33, 388, 92, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '4', 'Shailendra\'s problem-solving approach was not clearly articulated, and he missed opportunities to demonstrate critical thinking in his responses.', '2024-07-19 05:17:45'),
(225, 54, 33, 388, 92, 'Communication Style', '4', 'Shailendra\'s communication style was verbose and lacked precision. He could benefit from a more concise and structured approach to his responses.', '2024-07-19 05:17:45'),
(226, 54, 33, 388, 92, 'Adaptability', '4', 'Shailendra\'s ability to adapt to the questions and provide focused answers was limited, as seen in his tangential responses.', '2024-07-19 05:17:45'),
(227, 54, 33, 388, 92, 'Creativity', '4', 'Shailendra\'s responses did not showcase a high level of creativity or innovative thinking in addressing the questions posed.', '2024-07-19 05:17:45'),
(228, 54, 33, 388, 92, 'Problem Awareness', '6', 'Shailendra showed awareness of common issues in Android development but could improve by providing more targeted solutions.', '2024-07-19 05:17:45'),
(229, 54, 33, 388, 92, 'Empathy', '6', 'Shailendra\'s responses indicated an understanding of user needs, particularly in the context of UI/UX design for truck drivers.', '2024-07-19 05:17:45'),
(230, 54, 33, 388, 92, 'Overall Engagement', '4', 'Shailendra\'s engagement level was inconsistent, with some responses showing enthusiasm and others lacking direct engagement with the questions.', '2024-07-19 05:17:45'),
(231, 53, 35, 410, 97, 'Clarity of Communication', '7', 'Bhushan communicated his ideas effectively but could improve by structuring his responses more coherently.', '2024-07-19 05:22:11'),
(232, 53, 35, 410, 97, 'Relevance of Responses', '8', 'Bhushan\'s responses were relevant to the questions, showcasing his experience and knowledge.', '2024-07-19 05:22:11'),
(233, 53, 35, 410, 97, 'Depth of Knowledge', '7', 'Bhushan showed a good understanding of the subject matter, particularly AWS and Kafka.', '2024-07-19 05:22:11'),
(234, 53, 35, 410, 97, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '8', 'Bhushan provided a detailed account of how he addressed performance optimization, demonstrating strong problem-solving skills.', '2024-07-19 05:22:11'),
(235, 53, 35, 410, 97, 'Communication Style', '7', 'Bhushan\'s communication style was clear and informative, though at times he could be more concise.', '2024-07-19 05:22:11'),
(236, 53, 35, 410, 97, 'Adaptability', '7', 'Bhushan expressed a willingness to learn and adapt, particularly regarding new cloud services.', '2024-07-19 05:22:11'),
(237, 53, 35, 410, 97, 'Creativity', '6', 'Bhushan\'s approach to problem-solving showed creativity, especially in optimizing data pipeline performance.', '2024-07-19 05:22:11'),
(238, 53, 35, 410, 97, 'Problem Awareness', '7', 'Bhushan demonstrated awareness of challenges in data pipeline development and addressed them effectively.', '2024-07-19 05:22:11'),
(239, 53, 35, 410, 97, 'Empathy', '6', 'While not directly applicable to the technical questions, Bhushan\'s responses showed an understanding of user needs in API development.', '2024-07-19 05:22:11'),
(240, 53, 35, 410, 97, 'Overall Engagement', '7', 'Bhushan was engaged throughout the interview, showing enthusiasm for his work and eagerness to discuss his experience.', '2024-07-19 05:22:11'),
(241, 56, 4, 411, 98, 'Clarity of Communication', '0', 'Varun\'s responses lacked clarity and substance, failing to communicate any relevant information.', '2024-07-19 06:03:06'),
(242, 56, 4, 411, 98, 'Relevance of Responses', '0', 'Varun\'s responses did not address the questions asked, showing a lack of relevance.', '2024-07-19 06:03:06'),
(243, 56, 4, 411, 98, 'Depth of Knowledge', '0', 'Varun did not demonstrate any depth of knowledge as he did not provide any detailed responses.', '2024-07-19 06:03:06'),
(244, 56, 4, 411, 98, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '0', 'Varun did not showcase any problem-solving skills due to the lack of substantive responses.', '2024-07-19 06:03:06'),
(245, 56, 4, 411, 98, 'Communication Style', '0', 'Varun\'s communication style was ineffective as he only provided one-word answers.', '2024-07-19 06:03:06'),
(246, 56, 4, 411, 98, 'Adaptability', '0', 'Varun did not demonstrate adaptability in responding to the interview questions.', '2024-07-19 06:03:06'),
(247, 56, 4, 411, 98, 'Creativity', '0', 'There was no evidence of creativity in Varun\'s responses.', '2024-07-19 06:03:06'),
(248, 56, 4, 411, 98, 'Problem Awareness', '0', 'Varun did not exhibit awareness of problems or challenges related to the role.', '2024-07-19 06:03:06'),
(249, 56, 4, 411, 98, 'Empathy', '0', 'Varun did not display empathy or understanding of the interviewer\'s questions.', '2024-07-19 06:03:06'),
(250, 56, 4, 411, 98, 'Overall Engagement', '0', 'Varun\'s engagement level was extremely low, providing only \"Yes\" as an answer to all questions.', '2024-07-19 06:03:06'),
(251, 55, 34, 373, 89, 'Clarity of Communication', '6', 'Asmiya communicated her experiences and knowledge adequately but could improve the clarity and detail in her technical explanations.', '2024-07-19 06:15:15'),
(252, 55, 34, 373, 89, 'Relevance of Responses', '6', 'Asmiya\'s responses were relevant to the questions but sometimes lacked the depth expected for the role\'s requirements.', '2024-07-19 06:15:15'),
(253, 55, 34, 373, 89, 'Depth of Knowledge', '6', 'Asmiya showed a good understanding of Android development but lacked depth in certain areas, such as Android Architecture and automotive protocols.', '2024-07-19 06:15:15'),
(254, 55, 34, 373, 89, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '6', 'Asmiya provided examples of problem-solving, such as fixing a memory leak, but her responses could have been more detailed.', '2024-07-19 06:15:15'),
(255, 55, 34, 373, 89, 'Communication Style', '6', 'Asmiya\'s communication style was professional, but she could enhance her ability to articulate complex technical concepts.', '2024-07-19 06:15:15'),
(256, 55, 34, 373, 89, 'Adaptability', '6', 'Asmiya demonstrated adaptability in learning new technologies but did not provide specific examples of adapting to unexpected challenges.', '2024-07-19 06:15:15'),
(257, 55, 34, 373, 89, 'Creativity', '4', 'Asmiya\'s responses did not showcase much creativity. She could have provided examples of innovative solutions she implemented.', '2024-07-19 06:15:15'),
(258, 55, 34, 373, 89, 'Problem Awareness', '6', 'Asmiya showed awareness of technical issues and their impact on projects but could expand on how she anticipates and addresses potential problems.', '2024-07-19 06:15:15'),
(259, 55, 34, 373, 89, 'Empathy', '6', 'Asmiya\'s responses did not specifically address empathy, but her willingness to mentor junior developers indicates an understanding of others\' perspectives.', '2024-07-19 06:15:15'),
(260, 55, 34, 373, 89, 'Overall Engagement', '6', 'Asmiya was engaged throughout the interview but could show more enthusiasm and initiative in her responses.', '2024-07-19 06:15:15'),
(261, 57, 4, 411, 98, 'Clarity of Communication', '4', 'Varun\'s responses were understandable but lacked the clarity and detail necessary to convey a strong understanding of the topics discussed.', '2024-07-19 07:25:34'),
(262, 57, 4, 411, 98, 'Relevance of Responses', '4', 'While Varun\'s responses were related to the questions, they often did not directly address the interviewer\'s queries with the required depth.', '2024-07-19 07:25:34'),
(263, 57, 4, 411, 98, 'Depth of Knowledge', '4', 'Varun\'s knowledge of the subject matter appears basic, as he did not provide in-depth explanations or examples that demonstrate advanced understanding.', '2024-07-19 07:25:34'),
(264, 57, 4, 411, 98, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '4', 'Varun\'s approach to problem-solving was mentioned but not elaborated upon, leaving doubts about his problem-solving capabilities.', '2024-07-19 07:25:34'),
(265, 57, 4, 411, 98, 'Communication Style', '4', 'Varun\'s communication style was casual, and at times it lacked the professionalism expected in a technical interview.', '2024-07-19 07:25:34'),
(266, 57, 4, 411, 98, 'Adaptability', '4', 'Varun mentioned adapting to changes but did not convincingly describe how he managed transitions or the impact on projects.', '2024-07-19 07:25:34'),
(267, 57, 4, 411, 98, 'Creativity', '4', 'Varun\'s creativity was hinted at in his approach to caching but was not showcased effectively in his responses.', '2024-07-19 07:25:34'),
(268, 57, 4, 411, 98, 'Problem Awareness', '4', 'Varun\'s awareness of issues like data pipeline lag was mentioned, but he did not demonstrate a comprehensive strategy for addressing such problems.', '2024-07-19 07:25:34'),
(269, 57, 4, 411, 98, 'Empathy', '4', 'While Varun mentioned customer-centric approaches, he did not show a deep understanding of empathizing with user needs or balancing them with technical constraints.', '2024-07-19 07:25:34'),
(270, 57, 4, 411, 98, 'Overall Engagement', '4', 'Varun engaged with the interview but did not convey enthusiasm or a proactive interest in the role or company.', '2024-07-19 07:25:34'),
(271, 61, 40, 387, 92, 'Clarity of Communication', '4', 'Gowtham\'s responses were understandable but lacked the detail and clarity expected for the role. He could improve by providing more structured answers and elaborating on his experiences.', '2024-07-19 09:42:47');
INSERT INTO `bot_overall_scores` (`id`, `botInterviewId`, `candidateId`, `resumeId`, `screeningId`, `parameter`, `score`, `feedback`, `created`) VALUES
(272, 61, 40, 387, 92, 'Relevance of Responses', '4', 'While Gowtham\'s responses were related to the questions, they were not as detailed or specific as the benchmark responses. He could enhance relevance by aligning his answers more closely with the job requirements.', '2024-07-19 09:42:47'),
(273, 61, 40, 387, 92, 'Depth of Knowledge', '4', 'Gowtham\'s knowledge of Android development was evident, but his responses did not delve into the depth required for the role. He could improve by sharing more about his experiences with Android system architecture and frameworks.', '2024-07-19 09:42:47'),
(274, 61, 40, 387, 92, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '4', 'Gowtham\'s problem-solving skills were not clearly demonstrated in his responses. He could improve by providing specific examples of challenges he faced and how he overcame them.', '2024-07-19 09:42:47'),
(275, 61, 40, 387, 92, 'Communication Style', '4', 'Gowtham\'s communication style was direct but lacked engagement and enthusiasm. He could improve by showing more interest in the role and the company.', '2024-07-19 09:42:47'),
(276, 61, 40, 387, 92, 'Adaptability', '4', 'Gowtham mentioned adapting to changes but did not provide a clear example of how he managed a significant transition. He could improve by detailing his approach to learning and integrating new technologies.', '2024-07-19 09:42:47'),
(277, 61, 40, 387, 92, 'Creativity', '4', 'Gowtham\'s responses did not showcase his creativity. He could improve by describing situations where he had to think outside the box to solve problems.', '2024-07-19 09:42:47'),
(278, 61, 40, 387, 92, 'Problem Awareness', '4', 'Gowtham\'s awareness of challenges was not clearly articulated. He could improve by discussing specific issues he has encountered and how he addressed them.', '2024-07-19 09:42:47'),
(279, 61, 40, 387, 92, 'Empathy', '4', 'Gowtham did not demonstrate empathy in his responses. He could improve by showing an understanding of user needs and how they influence his development work.', '2024-07-19 09:42:47'),
(280, 61, 40, 387, 92, 'Overall Engagement', '4', 'Gowtham\'s level of engagement was low throughout the interview. He could improve by expressing more enthusiasm for the role and the company.', '2024-07-19 09:42:47'),
(281, 63, 45, 412, 99, 'Clarity of Communication', '6', 'John\'s communication was generally clear but lacked the detail and structure that would make his responses more compelling.', '2024-07-19 12:43:38'),
(282, 63, 45, 412, 99, 'Relevance of Responses', '7', 'John\'s responses were relevant to the questions asked but could have been more focused and specific to better demonstrate his suitability for the role.', '2024-07-19 12:43:38'),
(283, 63, 45, 412, 99, 'Depth of Knowledge', '6', 'While John showed a good understanding of Android development, he could have provided more in-depth insights into his technical expertise and problem-solving strategies.', '2024-07-19 12:43:38'),
(284, 63, 45, 412, 99, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '6', 'John mentioned problem-solving scenarios but did not elaborate on his thought process or the specific steps he took to resolve the issues.', '2024-07-19 12:43:38'),
(285, 63, 45, 412, 99, 'Communication Style', '6', 'John\'s communication style was straightforward but could benefit from more enthusiasm and engagement to better connect with the interviewer.', '2024-07-19 12:43:38'),
(286, 63, 45, 412, 99, 'Adaptability', '7', 'John demonstrated adaptability by discussing how he kept up with new technologies and frameworks, although he could have provided more examples of how he applied this adaptability in practice.', '2024-07-19 12:43:38'),
(287, 63, 45, 412, 99, 'Creativity', '6', 'John did not provide clear examples of creative problem-solving, which is an area he could develop further.', '2024-07-19 12:43:38'),
(288, 63, 45, 412, 99, 'Problem Awareness', '7', 'John showed awareness of potential issues in Android development, such as performance bottlenecks and security risks.', '2024-07-19 12:43:38'),
(289, 63, 45, 412, 99, 'Empathy', '6', 'While John mentioned user needs, he could have shown more empathy by discussing how he actively sought user feedback and incorporated it into his development process.', '2024-07-19 12:43:38'),
(290, 63, 45, 412, 99, 'Overall Engagement', '6', 'John\'s engagement level was adequate but could be improved with more energy and proactive communication.', '2024-07-19 12:43:38'),
(291, 65, 44, 409, 96, 'Clarity of Communication', '6', 'Avinash could have been more articulate and structured in his responses, ensuring they were clear and directly addressed the questions.', '2024-07-19 17:51:29'),
(292, 65, 44, 409, 96, 'Relevance of Responses', '4', 'Avinash\'s responses were sometimes off-topic or unclear, particularly when discussing Kotlin and GraphQL APIs, which are relevant to the role.', '2024-07-19 17:51:29'),
(293, 65, 44, 409, 96, 'Depth of Knowledge', '6', 'Avinash showed a good understanding of Android development but lacked depth in areas like Android Architecture and new technologies like GraphQL APIs.', '2024-07-19 17:51:29'),
(294, 65, 44, 409, 96, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '6', 'Avinash demonstrated problem-solving skills, but his approach to unconventional problems and performance optimization could have been more innovative.', '2024-07-19 17:51:29'),
(295, 65, 44, 409, 96, 'Communication Style', '6', 'Avinash\'s communication was straightforward but lacked the engagement and enthusiasm that would make his responses more compelling.', '2024-07-19 17:51:29'),
(296, 65, 44, 409, 96, 'Adaptability', '6', 'Avinash showed some adaptability in his work but did not provide strong examples of adapting to new technologies or methodologies.', '2024-07-19 17:51:29'),
(297, 65, 44, 409, 96, 'Creativity', '4', 'Avinash did not provide strong examples of creative thinking or innovation in his responses.', '2024-07-19 17:51:29'),
(298, 65, 44, 409, 96, 'Problem Awareness', '6', 'Avinash was aware of problems and challenges but could have demonstrated a more proactive approach to identifying and addressing them.', '2024-07-19 17:51:29'),
(299, 65, 44, 409, 96, 'Empathy', '6', 'Avinash did not provide clear examples of empathizing with users\' perspectives or concerns.', '2024-07-19 17:51:29'),
(300, 65, 44, 409, 96, 'Overall Engagement', '6', 'Avinash\'s engagement level was adequate but lacked the enthusiasm and interest that would make him a standout candidate.', '2024-07-19 17:51:29'),
(301, 68, 42, 375, 91, 'Clarity of Communication', '6', 'Ajay communicated his ideas with a reasonable level of clarity but could benefit from more structured responses.', '2024-07-20 05:12:02'),
(302, 68, 42, 375, 91, 'Relevance of Responses', '7', 'Ajay\'s responses were relevant to the questions, but he could have provided more specific examples to illustrate his points.', '2024-07-20 05:12:02'),
(303, 68, 42, 375, 91, 'Depth of Knowledge', '6', 'Ajay showed a good understanding of the subject matter but could delve deeper into certain topics for a more comprehensive response.', '2024-07-20 05:12:02'),
(304, 68, 42, 375, 91, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '7', 'Ajay demonstrated problem-solving skills, particularly when discussing performance optimization and integration challenges.', '2024-07-20 05:12:02'),
(305, 68, 42, 375, 91, 'Communication Style', '6', 'Ajay\'s communication style was generally effective, though he could work on making his explanations more accessible to non-technical audiences.', '2024-07-20 05:12:02'),
(306, 68, 42, 375, 91, 'Adaptability', '6', 'Ajay showed adaptability in his approach to problem-solving but could further illustrate his ability to handle unexpected questions or scenarios.', '2024-07-20 05:12:02'),
(307, 68, 42, 375, 91, 'Creativity', '5', 'Ajay\'s responses indicated some creativity, but he could provide clearer examples of innovative thinking in his work.', '2024-07-20 05:12:02'),
(308, 68, 42, 375, 91, 'Problem Awareness', '7', 'Ajay demonstrated awareness of potential challenges and issues related to Android development.', '2024-07-20 05:12:02'),
(309, 68, 42, 375, 91, 'Empathy', '5', 'Ajay could improve on showing empathy, particularly when discussing communication with non-technical stakeholders.', '2024-07-20 05:12:02'),
(310, 68, 42, 375, 91, 'Overall Engagement', '6', 'Ajay was engaged throughout the interview but could express more enthusiasm for the role and company.', '2024-07-20 05:12:02'),
(311, 70, 38, 379, 91, 'Clarity of Communication', '4', 'Swapnil\'s responses were understandable but lacked clarity and conciseness, which made it difficult to grasp the full extent of his expertise.', '2024-07-20 11:20:28'),
(312, 70, 38, 379, 91, 'Relevance of Responses', '6', 'Swapnil\'s responses were relevant to the questions but could have been more focused and detailed to demonstrate his fit for the role.', '2024-07-20 11:20:28'),
(313, 70, 38, 379, 91, 'Depth of Knowledge', '6', 'Swapnil showed a good understanding of Android development but did not provide in-depth insights or examples to showcase his expertise.', '2024-07-20 11:20:28'),
(314, 70, 38, 379, 91, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '4', 'Swapnil mentioned challenges and solutions but did not elaborate on his problem-solving approach or the outcomes of his actions.', '2024-07-20 11:20:28'),
(315, 70, 38, 379, 91, 'Communication Style', '4', 'Swapnil\'s communication style was informal and at times disjointed, which affected the delivery of his responses.', '2024-07-20 11:20:28'),
(316, 70, 38, 379, 91, 'Adaptability', '6', 'Swapnil\'s experience with various Android versions and projects suggests adaptability, but he could have provided clearer examples of adapting to new challenges.', '2024-07-20 11:20:28'),
(317, 70, 38, 379, 91, 'Creativity', '4', 'Swapnil did not provide clear examples of creative solutions or innovative approaches in his work.', '2024-07-20 11:20:28'),
(318, 70, 38, 379, 91, 'Problem Awareness', '6', 'Swapnil demonstrated awareness of potential issues in Android development, such as performance and security, but could have been more specific about how he addressed them.', '2024-07-20 11:20:28'),
(319, 70, 38, 379, 91, 'Empathy', '6', 'Swapnil\'s consideration of user experience and team collaboration indicates empathy, but he could have provided examples of how he incorporated feedback or supported team members.', '2024-07-20 11:20:28'),
(320, 70, 38, 379, 91, 'Overall Engagement', '6', 'Swapnil engaged with the questions and seemed interested in the role, but his engagement could be enhanced with more enthusiasm and detailed responses.', '2024-07-20 11:20:28'),
(321, 69, 35, 413, 100, 'Clarity of Communication', '6', 'Bhushan communicated his ideas with a reasonable level of clarity but could benefit from more structured responses and avoiding technical jargon when not necessary.', '2024-07-20 11:21:28'),
(322, 69, 35, 413, 100, 'Relevance of Responses', '6', 'Bhushan\'s responses were relevant to the questions asked, but he could improve by aligning his answers more closely with the job description and role requirements.', '2024-07-20 11:21:28'),
(323, 69, 35, 413, 100, 'Depth of Knowledge', '8', 'Bhushan demonstrated a good depth of knowledge in his field, particularly in areas related to Kafka, data pipelines, and AWS services.', '2024-07-20 11:21:28'),
(324, 69, 35, 413, 100, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '7', 'Bhushan provided examples of problem-solving, such as optimizing data processing and addressing message loss in Kafka streams, showcasing his critical thinking abilities.', '2024-07-20 11:21:28'),
(325, 69, 35, 413, 100, 'Communication Style', '6', 'Bhushan\'s communication style was generally effective, though he could enhance his ability to convey technical concepts in a more accessible manner for all audience types.', '2024-07-20 11:21:28'),
(326, 69, 35, 413, 100, 'Adaptability', '7', 'Bhushan showed adaptability by discussing how he managed transitions due to changing project requirements, indicating his flexibility.', '2024-07-20 11:21:28'),
(327, 69, 35, 413, 100, 'Creativity', '6', 'Bhushan\'s approach to unconventional thinking in solving performance issues reflects his creativity, but he could provide more examples of innovative solutions.', '2024-07-20 11:21:28'),
(328, 69, 35, 413, 100, 'Problem Awareness', '7', 'Bhushan displayed awareness of potential issues, such as message loss in Kafka streams, and offered methods for diagnosing and resolving them.', '2024-07-20 11:21:28'),
(329, 69, 35, 413, 100, 'Empathy', '6', 'While Bhushan did not explicitly mention empathy, his willingness to advocate for customer needs suggests an understanding of different perspectives.', '2024-07-20 11:21:28'),
(330, 69, 35, 413, 100, 'Overall Engagement', '7', 'Bhushan engaged well with the interviewer\'s questions, showing enthusiasm for the role and his work.', '2024-07-20 11:21:28'),
(331, 71, 38, 414, 101, 'Clarity of Communication', '4', 'Swapnil\'s responses were somewhat disorganized and lacked clarity, making it difficult to follow his thought process. He could improve by structuring his responses more logically and focusing on key points.', '2024-07-20 11:50:16'),
(332, 71, 38, 414, 101, 'Relevance of Responses', '6', 'Swapnil\'s responses were relevant to the questions asked, but he could improve by providing more specific examples and focusing on the most pertinent information.', '2024-07-20 11:50:16'),
(333, 71, 38, 414, 101, 'Depth of Knowledge', '7', 'Swapnil demonstrated a good depth of knowledge in Android development, particularly in his experience with AOSP and user interface design.', '2024-07-20 11:50:16'),
(334, 71, 38, 414, 101, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '4', 'Swapnil mentioned solving complex coding problems but did not clearly articulate his problem-solving process. He could improve by detailing the steps he took to address challenges.', '2024-07-20 11:50:16'),
(335, 71, 38, 414, 101, 'Communication Style', '4', 'Swapnil\'s communication style was informal and lacked precision. He could benefit from using a more professional tone and clearer language.', '2024-07-20 11:50:16'),
(336, 71, 38, 414, 101, 'Adaptability', '6', 'Swapnil showed adaptability in his work, particularly in migrating projects between Android versions and integrating new technologies.', '2024-07-20 11:50:16'),
(337, 71, 38, 414, 101, 'Creativity', '6', 'Swapnil\'s work on custom UI components and solving unique challenges in his projects indicates a level of creativity.', '2024-07-20 11:50:16'),
(338, 71, 38, 414, 101, 'Problem Awareness', '6', 'Swapnil demonstrated awareness of potential issues, such as compatibility and security challenges, and addressed them in his projects.', '2024-07-20 11:50:16'),
(339, 71, 38, 414, 101, 'Empathy', '6', 'Swapnil\'s consideration of user accessibility and experience in UI design shows empathy towards users\' needs.', '2024-07-20 11:50:16'),
(340, 71, 38, 414, 101, 'Overall Engagement', '6', 'Swapnil engaged with the interview questions and provided detailed responses, indicating a good level of engagement.', '2024-07-20 11:50:16'),
(341, 72, 37, 380, 91, 'Clarity of Communication', '6', 'Muhammed communicates his ideas with reasonable clarity but could provide more detailed explanations and examples.', '2024-07-20 17:41:43'),
(342, 72, 37, 380, 91, 'Relevance of Responses', '6', 'Muhammed\'s responses are relevant but sometimes lack depth. He could improve by tying his answers more closely to the job description.', '2024-07-20 17:41:43'),
(343, 72, 37, 380, 91, 'Depth of Knowledge', '6', 'Muhammed demonstrates a good understanding of Android development but lacks depth in areas like platform development and CI/CD.', '2024-07-20 17:41:43'),
(344, 72, 37, 380, 91, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '6', 'Muhammed mentions problem-solving scenarios but could elaborate more on his approach and the outcomes.', '2024-07-20 17:41:43'),
(345, 72, 37, 380, 91, 'Communication Style', '7', 'Muhammed has a friendly and respectful communication style, which is a strength.', '2024-07-20 17:41:43'),
(346, 72, 37, 380, 91, 'Adaptability', '6', 'Muhammed shows adaptability in learning new technologies but could provide examples of how he has adapted in past roles.', '2024-07-20 17:41:43'),
(347, 72, 37, 380, 91, 'Creativity', '5', 'Muhammed could improve by offering more innovative solutions or creative approaches to problems.', '2024-07-20 17:41:43'),
(348, 72, 37, 380, 91, 'Problem Awareness', '6', 'Muhammed is aware of challenges but could be more proactive in identifying and addressing them.', '2024-07-20 17:41:43'),
(349, 72, 37, 380, 91, 'Empathy', '6', 'Muhammed demonstrates an understanding of different perspectives, particularly when communicating with non-technical stakeholders.', '2024-07-20 17:41:43'),
(350, 72, 37, 380, 91, 'Overall Engagement', '7', 'Muhammed is engaged and expresses interest in the role, but could show more enthusiasm and initiative.', '2024-07-20 17:41:43'),
(351, 75, 46, 383, 91, 'Clarity of Communication', '6', 'Tabassum communicated her availability clearly but did not elaborate on her thoughts or experiences.', '2024-07-22 18:23:35'),
(352, 75, 46, 383, 91, 'Relevance of Responses', '4', 'Responses were relevant to the questions asked but lacked depth and did not provide insight into her qualifications or interest in the role.', '2024-07-22 18:23:35'),
(353, 75, 46, 383, 91, 'Depth of Knowledge', '2', 'Tabassum did not convey her knowledge or experience, which is critical for the role of HMI Developer.', '2024-07-22 18:23:35'),
(354, 75, 46, 383, 91, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '2', 'Tabassum did not provide any examples of her problem-solving skills, which are essential for the position.', '2024-07-22 18:23:35'),
(355, 75, 46, 383, 91, 'Communication Style', '4', 'While Tabassum\'s responses were polite, they were too brief and lacked the enthusiasm expected for a job interview.', '2024-07-22 18:23:35'),
(356, 75, 46, 383, 91, 'Adaptability', '4', 'Tabassum did not demonstrate adaptability as she did not adjust her responses to the context of the role or company.', '2024-07-22 18:23:35'),
(357, 75, 46, 383, 91, 'Creativity', '2', 'There was no evidence of creativity in Tabassum\'s responses.', '2024-07-22 18:23:35'),
(358, 75, 46, 383, 91, 'Problem Awareness', '2', 'Tabassum did not acknowledge or discuss any challenges related to the role or industry.', '2024-07-22 18:23:35'),
(359, 75, 46, 383, 91, 'Empathy', '4', 'Tabassum did not exhibit empathy or understanding of the company\'s needs or the interviewer\'s role.', '2024-07-22 18:23:35'),
(360, 75, 46, 383, 91, 'Overall Engagement', '4', 'Tabassum\'s level of engagement was minimal, with no enthusiasm or proactive communication.', '2024-07-22 18:23:35'),
(361, 78, 54, 462, 113, 'Clarity of Communication', '6', 'Abhi communicated his ideas reasonably well but could have provided more detailed responses to demonstrate a deeper understanding of the topics.', '2024-07-29 06:06:07'),
(362, 78, 54, 462, 113, 'Relevance of Responses', '6', 'Abhi\'s responses were relevant but sometimes lacked the specificity and detail that would show a strong alignment with the job requirements.', '2024-07-29 06:06:07'),
(363, 78, 54, 462, 113, 'Depth of Knowledge', '6', 'Abhi showed a good understanding of the concepts discussed but could have provided more comprehensive examples to demonstrate depth of knowledge.', '2024-07-29 06:06:07'),
(364, 78, 54, 462, 113, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '6', 'Abhi discussed his problem-solving approach, but his responses could have been more detailed to showcase his critical thinking skills.', '2024-07-29 06:06:07'),
(365, 78, 54, 462, 113, 'Communication Style', '6', 'Abhi\'s communication style was straightforward, but he could improve by being more engaging and providing richer explanations.', '2024-07-29 06:06:07'),
(366, 78, 54, 462, 113, 'Adaptability', '8', 'Abhi demonstrated adaptability, particularly in learning new technologies and adjusting to changes in project requirements.', '2024-07-29 06:06:07'),
(367, 78, 54, 462, 113, 'Creativity', '6', 'Abhi\'s responses indicated some creativity in his approach to projects, but he could have provided examples that showcased innovative problem-solving.', '2024-07-29 06:06:07'),
(368, 78, 54, 462, 113, 'Problem Awareness', '6', 'Abhi showed awareness of problems in his projects, but he could have elaborated on how he identified and addressed these issues.', '2024-07-29 06:06:07'),
(369, 78, 54, 462, 113, 'Empathy', '6', 'Abhi\'s responses suggested an understanding of team dynamics, but he could have provided more examples of how he empathizes with team members and stakeholders.', '2024-07-29 06:06:07'),
(370, 78, 54, 462, 113, 'Overall Engagement', '6', 'Abhi was engaged during the interview, but he could have shown more enthusiasm and interest in the role and company.', '2024-07-29 06:06:07'),
(371, 79, 53, 465, 113, 'Clarity of Communication', '4', 'Jyoti\'s responses were generally clear but lacked detail. She could improve by providing more specific examples and explanations of her experience.', '2024-07-29 06:17:48'),
(372, 79, 53, 465, 113, 'Relevance of Responses', '4', 'Jyoti\'s responses were relevant but did not fully address the questions. She could have connected her experience more directly to the job requirements.', '2024-07-29 06:17:48'),
(373, 79, 53, 465, 113, 'Depth of Knowledge', '4', 'Jyoti showed basic knowledge but did not demonstrate a deep understanding of the technologies mentioned in the job description.', '2024-07-29 06:17:48'),
(374, 79, 53, 465, 113, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '4', 'Jyoti mentioned problem-solving in her projects but did not provide compelling examples of her skills in action.', '2024-07-29 06:17:48'),
(375, 79, 53, 465, 113, 'Communication Style', '4', 'Jyoti communicated in a straightforward manner but could enhance her style by being more engaging and enthusiastic.', '2024-07-29 06:17:48'),
(376, 79, 53, 465, 113, 'Adaptability', '4', 'Jyoti mentioned adapting to new technologies but did not elaborate on how she managed these transitions effectively.', '2024-07-29 06:17:48'),
(377, 79, 53, 465, 113, 'Creativity', '4', 'Jyoti did not provide clear examples of creativity in her responses.', '2024-07-29 06:17:48'),
(378, 79, 53, 465, 113, 'Problem Awareness', '4', 'Jyoti\'s responses indicated some awareness of problems but lacked insight into how she identified and addressed them.', '2024-07-29 06:17:48'),
(379, 79, 53, 465, 113, 'Empathy', '4', 'Jyoti did not demonstrate empathy in her responses, which is important for understanding user needs and team dynamics.', '2024-07-29 06:17:48'),
(380, 79, 53, 465, 113, 'Overall Engagement', '4', 'Jyoti\'s engagement level was adequate but could be improved with more enthusiasm and interest in the role.', '2024-07-29 06:17:48'),
(381, 86, 58, 459, 111, 'Clarity of Communication', '7', 'Syed communicated his ideas effectively, but could have provided more structured responses.', '2024-07-29 07:04:47'),
(382, 86, 58, 459, 111, 'Relevance of Responses', '7', 'Responses were relevant but occasionally lacked depth, missing opportunities to fully align with the job requirements.', '2024-07-29 07:04:47'),
(383, 86, 58, 459, 111, 'Depth of Knowledge', '6', 'Demonstrated knowledge, but responses could have been more detailed, especially regarding statistical modeling and data visualization.', '2024-07-29 07:04:47'),
(384, 86, 58, 459, 111, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '6', 'Showed problem-solving abilities but could have provided more comprehensive examples of how he approached and resolved specific technical challenges.', '2024-07-29 07:04:47'),
(385, 86, 58, 459, 111, 'Communication Style', '8', 'Syed\'s communication style was clear and professional, with a friendly tone.', '2024-07-29 07:04:47'),
(386, 86, 58, 459, 111, 'Adaptability', '7', 'Showed adaptability in learning Flask for backend development, but could have shared more experiences demonstrating this skill.', '2024-07-29 07:04:47'),
(387, 86, 58, 459, 111, 'Creativity', '6', 'Responses indicated some creativity, but more examples of innovative problem-solving would have been beneficial.', '2024-07-29 07:04:47'),
(388, 86, 58, 459, 111, 'Problem Awareness', '6', 'Syed showed awareness of issues like data inconsistencies, but could have elaborated on how he identifies and addresses such problems.', '2024-07-29 07:04:47'),
(389, 86, 58, 459, 111, 'Empathy', '8', 'Demonstrated empathy by effectively communicating technical concepts to non-technical audiences.', '2024-07-29 07:04:47'),
(390, 86, 58, 459, 111, 'Overall Engagement', '7', 'Syed was engaged throughout the interview, but could have shown more enthusiasm for the role and company.', '2024-07-29 07:04:47'),
(391, 87, 59, 469, 115, 'Clarity of Communication', '6', 'Mohit communicated his ideas with a degree of clarity but occasionally lacked precision in his technical explanations.', '2024-07-29 07:05:02'),
(392, 87, 59, 469, 115, 'Relevance of Responses', '6', 'Mohit\'s responses were relevant but sometimes lacked the depth and specificity expected for the role.', '2024-07-29 07:05:02'),
(393, 87, 59, 469, 115, 'Depth of Knowledge', '4', 'Mohit showed foundational knowledge but lacked depth in areas critical to the role, such as Python and ORM tools.', '2024-07-29 07:05:02'),
(394, 87, 59, 469, 115, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '6', 'Mohit demonstrated problem-solving skills, particularly in full-stack development, but could benefit from more comprehensive solutions.', '2024-07-29 07:05:02'),
(395, 87, 59, 469, 115, 'Communication Style', '6', 'Mohit\'s communication style was generally effective, but he could work on articulating his thoughts more cohesively.', '2024-07-29 07:05:02'),
(396, 87, 59, 469, 115, 'Adaptability', '6', 'Mohit showed adaptability in learning new technologies and adjusting to project changes.', '2024-07-29 07:05:02'),
(397, 87, 59, 469, 115, 'Creativity', '6', 'Mohit displayed creativity in his approach to web development, particularly in responsive design.', '2024-07-29 07:05:02'),
(398, 87, 59, 469, 115, 'Problem Awareness', '6', 'Mohit was aware of common development problems, such as CORS issues, but could improve his awareness of Python-related challenges.', '2024-07-29 07:05:02'),
(399, 87, 59, 469, 115, 'Empathy', '6', 'Mohit\'s responses indicated an understanding of user-centric design, but he could further develop empathy towards diverse user needs.', '2024-07-29 07:05:02'),
(400, 87, 59, 469, 115, 'Overall Engagement', '6', 'Mohit was engaged throughout the interview but could show more enthusiasm for the role and its responsibilities.', '2024-07-29 07:05:02'),
(401, 84, 56, 460, 112, 'Clarity of Communication', '8', 'Abhinav communicated his ideas clearly, though he could have provided more structured and detailed responses.', '2024-07-29 07:12:12'),
(402, 84, 56, 460, 112, 'Relevance of Responses', '6', 'Abhinav\'s responses were relevant but lacked depth in certain areas, such as his experience with Python, Flask, and Django.', '2024-07-29 07:12:12'),
(403, 84, 56, 460, 112, 'Depth of Knowledge', '6', 'Abhinav showed depth in JavaScript and full-stack development but needs to improve his knowledge of Python and data manipulation libraries.', '2024-07-29 07:12:12'),
(404, 84, 56, 460, 112, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '8', 'Abhinav demonstrated good problem-solving skills, especially in his project work and handling of version control issues.', '2024-07-29 07:12:12'),
(405, 84, 56, 460, 112, 'Communication Style', '8', 'Abhinav\'s communication style was approachable and enthusiastic, which is beneficial for teamwork.', '2024-07-29 07:12:12'),
(406, 84, 56, 460, 112, 'Adaptability', '8', 'Abhinav showed adaptability in his project work and willingness to learn new technologies.', '2024-07-29 07:12:12'),
(407, 84, 56, 460, 112, 'Creativity', '7', 'Abhinav displayed creativity in his approach to project challenges, particularly in front-end design.', '2024-07-29 07:12:12'),
(408, 84, 56, 460, 112, 'Problem Awareness', '7', 'Abhinav was aware of potential problems, such as cross-browser compatibility and scalability issues.', '2024-07-29 07:12:12'),
(409, 84, 56, 460, 112, 'Empathy', '7', 'Abhinav showed an understanding of user experience and accessibility, although he could expand on WCAG standards.', '2024-07-29 07:12:12'),
(410, 84, 56, 460, 112, 'Overall Engagement', '8', 'Abhinav was engaged and enthusiastic throughout the interview, showing a keen interest in the role.', '2024-07-29 07:12:12'),
(411, 90, 39, 382, 91, 'Clarity of Communication', '6', 'Suresh communicated his points but could have been more articulate and structured in his responses.', '2024-07-29 13:54:48'),
(412, 90, 39, 382, 91, 'Relevance of Responses', '6', 'Responses were relevant but lacked the depth and detail expected for someone with his experience.', '2024-07-29 13:54:48'),
(413, 90, 39, 382, 91, 'Depth of Knowledge', '6', 'Demonstrated practical knowledge but did not show a deep understanding of some areas like security and cloud technologies.', '2024-07-29 13:54:48'),
(414, 90, 39, 382, 91, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '6', 'Suresh provided examples of problem-solving but did not articulate his approach and thought process clearly.', '2024-07-29 13:54:48'),
(415, 90, 39, 382, 91, 'Communication Style', '6', 'His communication was direct but lacked engagement, which is crucial for collaboration and leadership roles.', '2024-07-29 13:54:48'),
(416, 90, 39, 382, 91, 'Adaptability', '6', 'Showed adaptability in learning new technologies but did not provide strong examples of adapting to unexpected questions or scenarios.', '2024-07-29 13:54:48'),
(417, 90, 39, 382, 91, 'Creativity', '6', 'Suresh showed some creativity in his approach to UI development but did not provide strong examples of creative problem-solving.', '2024-07-29 13:54:48'),
(418, 90, 39, 382, 91, 'Problem Awareness', '6', 'Recognized problems in development but did not demonstrate a proactive approach to identifying and addressing potential issues.', '2024-07-29 13:54:48'),
(419, 90, 39, 382, 91, 'Empathy', '6', 'Did not provide strong examples of empathizing with users or team members\' perspectives.', '2024-07-29 13:54:48'),
(420, 90, 39, 382, 91, 'Overall Engagement', '6', 'Suresh\'s engagement level was low, which could affect team dynamics and project enthusiasm.', '2024-07-29 13:54:48'),
(421, 89, 57, 458, 111, 'Clarity of Communication', '4', 'Kritika\'s responses were somewhat unclear and lacked detail. She could improve by structuring her answers more coherently and providing specific examples.', '2024-07-30 07:14:28'),
(422, 89, 57, 458, 111, 'Relevance of Responses', '4', 'Kritika\'s responses were relevant but lacked depth. She could enhance her answers by directly addressing the questions with detailed examples.', '2024-07-30 07:14:28'),
(423, 89, 57, 458, 111, 'Depth of Knowledge', '4', 'Kritika\'s knowledge appears basic. She could demonstrate a deeper understanding by discussing her experiences and the impact of her work.', '2024-07-30 07:14:28'),
(424, 89, 57, 458, 111, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '4', 'Kritika mentioned problem-solving in the context of machine learning but did not elaborate on her approach or results.', '2024-07-30 07:14:28'),
(425, 89, 57, 458, 111, 'Communication Style', '4', 'Kritika\'s communication was informal and lacked professionalism. She could benefit from a more polished and structured communication style.', '2024-07-30 07:14:28'),
(426, 89, 57, 458, 111, 'Adaptability', '4', 'Kritika did not provide examples of adaptability. She could improve by sharing experiences where she adapted to new challenges.', '2024-07-30 07:14:28'),
(427, 89, 57, 458, 111, 'Creativity', '4', 'Kritika\'s responses did not showcase creativity. She could highlight innovative solutions she has implemented in past projects.', '2024-07-30 07:14:28'),
(428, 89, 57, 458, 111, 'Problem Awareness', '4', 'Kritika did not demonstrate awareness of specific problems or challenges. She could improve by discussing obstacles she has faced and how she addressed them.', '2024-07-30 07:14:28'),
(429, 89, 57, 458, 111, 'Empathy', '4', 'Kritika did not exhibit empathy in her responses. She could improve by showing understanding of user needs or team dynamics.', '2024-07-30 07:14:28'),
(430, 89, 57, 458, 111, 'Overall Engagement', '4', 'Kritika\'s engagement level was moderate. She could show more enthusiasm and interest in the role and company.', '2024-07-30 07:14:28'),
(431, 91, 46, 456, 109, 'Clarity of Communication', '6', 'Tabassum\'s responses were understandable but lacked detail. She could improve by elaborating on her answers and providing clearer examples.', '2024-07-30 19:26:36'),
(432, 91, 46, 456, 109, 'Relevance of Responses', '6', 'While Tabassum\'s responses were relevant, they often did not fully address the questions. She could enhance her answers by directly linking her experience to the job requirements.', '2024-07-30 19:26:36'),
(433, 91, 46, 456, 109, 'Depth of Knowledge', '6', 'Tabassum showed a basic understanding of the required skills but did not delve deeply into technical details or processes.', '2024-07-30 19:26:36'),
(434, 91, 46, 456, 109, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '6', 'Tabassum mentioned problem-solving but did not provide a strong narrative on her approach to overcoming challenges.', '2024-07-30 19:26:36'),
(435, 91, 46, 456, 109, 'Communication Style', '6', 'Tabassum\'s communication was straightforward but lacked engagement. She could improve by being more expressive and using technical language effectively.', '2024-07-30 19:26:36'),
(436, 91, 46, 456, 109, 'Adaptability', '6', 'Tabassum did not demonstrate adaptability in her responses. She could have shown flexibility by discussing how she handles unexpected issues or changes in requirements.', '2024-07-30 19:26:36'),
(437, 91, 46, 456, 109, 'Creativity', '6', 'While Tabassum mentioned using new tools, she did not provide strong examples of creative problem-solving.', '2024-07-30 19:26:36'),
(438, 91, 46, 456, 109, 'Problem Awareness', '6', 'Tabassum recognized problems such as performance issues but could have better articulated her awareness of potential challenges in her role.', '2024-07-30 19:26:36'),
(439, 91, 46, 456, 109, 'Empathy', '6', 'Tabassum\'s responses did not strongly convey empathy towards users or team members. She could improve by discussing how she considers different perspectives in her work.', '2024-07-30 19:26:36'),
(440, 91, 46, 456, 109, 'Overall Engagement', '6', 'Tabassum\'s engagement level was adequate but could be more enthusiastic and interactive to convey genuine interest in the role.', '2024-07-30 19:26:36'),
(441, 105, 41, 470, 116, 'Clarity of Communication', '6', 'VISHWAS communicated his ideas with a good level of clarity, but at times, his responses could be more structured to enhance understanding.', '2024-08-04 05:35:41'),
(442, 105, 41, 470, 116, 'Relevance of Responses', '7', 'Responses were relevant to the questions, but occasionally lacked the depth expected from his resume.', '2024-08-04 05:35:41'),
(443, 105, 41, 470, 116, 'Depth of Knowledge', '6', 'VISHWAS showed a good understanding of Android development, but some answers could be more detailed, reflecting a deeper level of expertise.', '2024-08-04 05:35:41'),
(444, 105, 41, 470, 116, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '7', 'Demonstrated problem-solving abilities through examples of overcoming challenges in projects.', '2024-08-04 05:35:41'),
(445, 105, 41, 470, 116, 'Communication Style', '6', 'VISHWAS has a friendly communication style but could improve in articulating technical concepts more succinctly.', '2024-08-04 05:35:41'),
(446, 105, 41, 470, 116, 'Adaptability', '7', 'Showed adaptability in addressing technical challenges and changing project requirements.', '2024-08-04 05:35:41'),
(447, 105, 41, 470, 116, 'Creativity', '5', 'VISHWAS provided examples of innovative solutions, but could benefit from sharing more instances of creative thinking.', '2024-08-04 05:35:41'),
(448, 105, 41, 470, 116, 'Problem Awareness', '6', 'Aware of potential issues in Android development and took steps to address them, though more proactive strategies could be discussed.', '2024-08-04 05:35:41'),
(449, 105, 41, 470, 116, 'Empathy', '6', 'VISHWAS showed an understanding of user needs in UI development but could further demonstrate empathy in user-centric design.', '2024-08-04 05:35:41'),
(450, 105, 41, 470, 116, 'Overall Engagement', '7', 'Engaged throughout the interview, showing enthusiasm for the role and the company.', '2024-08-04 05:35:41'),
(451, 117, 60, 381, 91, 'Clarity of Communication', '6', 'Rajat communicated his ideas clearly but could improve by organizing his thoughts more coherently and providing more concise responses.', '2024-08-09 14:11:52'),
(452, 117, 60, 381, 91, 'Relevance of Responses', '6', 'Rajat\'s responses were relevant to the questions asked but occasionally lacked the depth and detail expected for someone with his experience.', '2024-08-09 14:11:52'),
(453, 117, 60, 381, 91, 'Depth of Knowledge', '6', 'Rajat showed a good understanding of Android development, but his responses indicated a need for deeper knowledge in areas like CI/CD pipelines and cloud technologies.', '2024-08-09 14:11:52'),
(454, 117, 60, 381, 91, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '7', 'Rajat provided examples of problem-solving, particularly in UI development, showing his ability to tackle challenges effectively.', '2024-08-09 14:11:52'),
(455, 117, 60, 381, 91, 'Communication Style', '6', 'Rajat\'s communication style was generally clear, but he could enhance his responses by being more concise and structured.', '2024-08-09 14:11:52'),
(456, 117, 60, 381, 91, 'Adaptability', '6', 'Rajat\'s responses showed adaptability, especially when dealing with UI challenges, but he could demonstrate more flexibility in his approach to unconventional practices.', '2024-08-09 14:11:52'),
(457, 117, 60, 381, 91, 'Creativity', '5', 'Rajat\'s responses lacked examples of creative problem-solving, particularly when discussing the integration of new technologies.', '2024-08-09 14:11:52'),
(458, 117, 60, 381, 91, 'Problem Awareness', '6', 'Rajat is aware of potential issues in Android development and has strategies to address them, but he could provide more insights into anticipating problems.', '2024-08-09 14:11:52'),
(459, 117, 60, 381, 91, 'Empathy', '6', 'Rajat showed empathy by considering team morale and client needs, but he could articulate more on understanding user perspectives.', '2024-08-09 14:11:52'),
(460, 117, 60, 381, 91, 'Overall Engagement', '6', 'Rajat was engaged in the conversation but could show more enthusiasm and proactive interest in the role and company.', '2024-08-09 14:11:52'),
(461, 80, 52, 463, 113, 'Clarity of Communication', '7', 'Ishan communicated his ideas clearly but could have provided more detailed responses to showcase his understanding better.', '2024-08-11 17:52:16'),
(462, 80, 52, 463, 113, 'Relevance of Responses', '6', 'Ishan\'s responses were relevant but lacked depth in areas like Python and Flask/Django, which are important for the role.', '2024-08-11 17:52:16'),
(463, 80, 52, 463, 113, 'Depth of Knowledge', '5', 'Ishan showed depth in front-end development but lacked practical experience in Python and OOP, which are key for the role.', '2024-08-11 17:52:16'),
(464, 80, 52, 463, 113, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '7', 'Ishan demonstrated problem-solving skills during his internships, particularly in code migration and optimization.', '2024-08-11 17:52:16'),
(465, 80, 52, 463, 113, 'Communication Style', '8', 'Ishan\'s communication style was clear and professional, with a willingness to learn and adapt.', '2024-08-11 17:52:16'),
(466, 80, 52, 463, 113, 'Adaptability', '7', 'Ishan showed adaptability by learning new technologies quickly during his internships.', '2024-08-11 17:52:16'),
(467, 80, 52, 463, 113, 'Creativity', '6', 'Ishan could have provided more creative solutions or examples of innovative thinking during the interview.', '2024-08-11 17:52:16'),
(468, 80, 52, 463, 113, 'Problem Awareness', '7', 'Ishan was aware of the challenges in his projects and took steps to address them, such as suggesting alternatives during code reviews.', '2024-08-11 17:52:16'),
(469, 80, 52, 463, 113, 'Empathy', '6', 'Ishan could have shown more empathy by considering the perspectives of other developers during code reviews.', '2024-08-11 17:52:16'),
(470, 80, 52, 463, 113, 'Overall Engagement', '7', 'Ishan was engaged during the interview but could have shown more enthusiasm for the role and the company.', '2024-08-11 17:52:16'),
(471, 81, 55, 466, 113, 'Clarity of Communication', '6', 'Kritika communicated her ideas but could improve the structure and clarity of her responses.', '2024-08-11 17:54:45'),
(472, 81, 55, 466, 113, 'Relevance of Responses', '7', 'Responses were relevant but lacked depth in certain areas, such as SDLC and problem-solving.', '2024-08-11 17:54:45'),
(473, 81, 55, 466, 113, 'Depth of Knowledge', '6', 'Kritika showed good knowledge of technical skills but could provide more detailed insights.', '2024-08-11 17:54:45'),
(474, 81, 55, 466, 113, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '5', 'Kritika\'s problem-solving approach needs to be more systematic and analytical.', '2024-08-11 17:54:45'),
(475, 81, 55, 466, 113, 'Communication Style', '6', 'Kritika\'s communication was generally good, but she could work on making her responses more concise and impactful.', '2024-08-11 17:54:45'),
(476, 81, 55, 466, 113, 'Adaptability', '6', 'Kritika adapted to questions but could improve by providing more examples of how she handles unexpected challenges.', '2024-08-11 17:54:45'),
(477, 81, 55, 466, 113, 'Creativity', '5', 'Kritika\'s responses lacked creative problem-solving examples.', '2024-08-11 17:54:45'),
(478, 81, 55, 466, 113, 'Problem Awareness', '6', 'Kritika showed awareness of problems but could elaborate on how she anticipates and addresses them.', '2024-08-11 17:54:45'),
(479, 81, 55, 466, 113, 'Empathy', '6', 'Kritika\'s responses did not specifically address empathy, but her collaborative approach suggests an understanding of team dynamics.', '2024-08-11 17:54:45'),
(480, 81, 55, 466, 113, 'Overall Engagement', '7', 'Kritika was engaged throughout the interview but could demonstrate more enthusiasm for the role.', '2024-08-11 17:54:45'),
(481, 123, 4, 517, 122, 'Clarity of Communication', '2', 'Varun\'s responses were unclear and often unrelated to the questions, indicating a significant area for improvement. He needs to practice articulating his thoughts more clearly and relevantly.', '2024-09-07 10:39:25'),
(482, 123, 4, 517, 122, 'Relevance of Responses', '1', 'Varun\'s answers were mostly irrelevant, demonstrating a lack of understanding or preparation for the interview. He should focus on aligning his responses with the questions to better showcase his qualifications.', '2024-09-07 10:39:25'),
(483, 123, 4, 517, 122, 'Depth of Knowledge', '2', 'Varun failed to demonstrate his knowledge adequately due to irrelevant responses. Engaging in detailed discussions relevant to the job role could have better highlighted his expertise.', '2024-09-07 10:39:25'),
(484, 123, 4, 517, 122, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '2', 'There was no evidence of Varun\'s problem-solving skills as his responses did not address the scenarios presented in the questions.', '2024-09-07 10:39:25'),
(485, 123, 4, 517, 122, 'Communication Style', '2', 'Varun\'s communication style was ineffective for the interview context. He needs to work on delivering more structured and engaging responses.', '2024-09-07 10:39:25'),
(486, 123, 4, 517, 122, 'Articulation', '2', 'Varun\'s articulation was poor, with responses often being too brief or off-topic. Practicing clear and precise speech would be beneficial.', '2024-09-07 10:39:25'),
(487, 123, 4, 517, 122, 'Grammar', '4', 'While Varun\'s grammar was not explicitly incorrect, the lack of complete sentences and coherent thoughts made it difficult to fully evaluate.', '2024-09-07 10:39:25'),
(488, 123, 4, 517, 122, 'Filler words', '6', 'Varun did not frequently use filler words, which is a positive aspect of his speech under the circumstances.', '2024-09-07 10:39:25'),
(489, 123, 4, 517, 122, 'Word repetition', '6', 'There was no significant repetition of words, which indicates some control over his vocabulary despite other communication issues.', '2024-09-07 10:39:25'),
(490, 123, 4, 517, 122, 'Intonation', '3', 'Varun\'s intonation was flat, lacking the necessary variation to effectively convey messages and engage the listener.', '2024-09-07 10:39:25'),
(491, 124, 4, 516, 121, 'Clarity of Communication', '2', 'Varun\'s responses were clear but extremely brief, lacking the detail and clarity needed to convey his suitability for the role. He should aim to provide more comprehensive answers that reflect his understanding and capabilities.', '2024-09-07 10:43:14'),
(492, 124, 4, 516, 121, 'Relevance of Responses', '2', 'Varun\'s responses were relevant but overly concise, not fully addressing the questions posed. Expanding on his answers to show how his experience aligns with the job requirements would improve his relevance.', '2024-09-07 10:43:14'),
(493, 124, 4, 516, 121, 'Depth of Knowledge', '2', 'Varun failed to demonstrate depth in his knowledge, particularly in relation to the specific responsibilities of the IT Director role. Providing examples from past roles would better showcase his expertise.', '2024-09-07 10:43:14'),
(494, 124, 4, 516, 121, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '2', 'There was no evidence of problem-solving skills as Varun did not provide any substantive responses to questions about handling specific scenarios or challenges.', '2024-09-07 10:43:14'),
(495, 124, 4, 516, 121, 'Communication Style', '2', 'Varun\'s communication style was underwhelming for a leadership role, characterized by minimal engagement. Enhancing the expressiveness and detail in his communication would be crucial.', '2024-09-07 10:43:14'),
(496, 124, 4, 516, 121, 'Articulation', '4', 'While Varun articulated his words clearly, the lack of content in his responses made it difficult to fully assess his articulation skills in a professional setting.', '2024-09-07 10:43:14'),
(497, 124, 4, 516, 121, 'Grammar', '6', 'Varun\'s grammar was correct in the limited responses provided, but the lack of extended dialogue did not fully test his ability to maintain grammatical standards in more complex discussions.', '2024-09-07 10:43:14'),
(498, 124, 4, 516, 121, 'Filler words', '8', 'Varun did not use filler words, which is positive, but this may also be attributed to the brevity of his responses.', '2024-09-07 10:43:14'),
(499, 124, 4, 516, 121, 'Word repetition', '8', 'There was no noticeable repetition in Varun\'s responses; however, the brevity of his answers contributed to this assessment.', '2024-09-07 10:43:14'),
(500, 124, 4, 516, 121, 'Intonation', '2', 'Varun\'s intonation was flat, lacking the variation needed to convey enthusiasm or confidence, which is important for a leadership role.', '2024-09-07 10:43:14'),
(501, 127, 4, 523, 129, 'Clarity of Communication', '6', 'Varun\'s responses were clear but overly concise, lacking the elaboration needed to fully convey his suitability for the role. A more detailed explanation of his experiences and how they relate to the job responsibilities would have been beneficial.', '2024-09-11 12:28:52'),
(502, 127, 4, 523, 129, 'Relevance of Responses', '4', 'Varun\'s responses did not fully address the questions posed, particularly in demonstrating how his background aligns with the specific responsibilities of the Product Manager role. He could improve by relating his past experiences directly to the job requirements.', '2024-09-11 12:28:52'),
(503, 127, 4, 523, 129, 'Depth of Knowledge', '5', 'Varun\'s brief responses provided little insight into his depth of knowledge. Expanding on his experiences with specific examples of challenges faced and solutions implemented would enhance his responses.', '2024-09-11 12:28:52'),
(504, 127, 4, 523, 129, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '4', 'Varun did not provide examples of problem-solving, which is crucial for the Product Manager role. Discussing specific instances where he applied his problem-solving skills would strengthen his candidacy.', '2024-09-11 12:28:52'),
(505, 127, 4, 523, 129, 'Communication Style', '6', 'While polite, Varun\'s communication style was too reserved and lacked the assertiveness and engagement expected in a leadership role. More dynamic communication would better demonstrate his leadership capabilities.', '2024-09-11 12:28:52'),
(506, 127, 4, 523, 129, 'Articulation', '7', 'Varun articulated his words clearly without any noticeable issues in pronunciation or clarity.', '2024-09-11 12:28:52'),
(507, 127, 4, 523, 129, 'Grammar', '8', 'Varun\'s use of grammar was correct and appropriate for a professional setting.', '2024-09-11 12:28:52'),
(508, 127, 4, 523, 129, 'Filler words', '7', 'Varun used minimal filler words, indicating a polished speech pattern.', '2024-09-11 12:28:52'),
(509, 127, 4, 523, 129, 'Word repetition', '7', 'There was no excessive repetition of words, suggesting a good command of vocabulary.', '2024-09-11 12:28:52'),
(510, 127, 4, 523, 129, 'Intonation', '5', 'Varun\'s intonation was somewhat monotone. Using varied pitch and tone would make his speech more engaging and expressive.', '2024-09-11 12:28:52'),
(511, 128, 4, 521, 125, 'Clarity of Communication', '6', 'Varun communicated in clear, understandable language, but his responses were too brief and lacked the elaboration needed to fully convey his suitability for the role.', '2024-09-11 12:34:09'),
(512, 128, 4, 521, 125, 'Relevance of Responses', '4', 'Varun\'s responses did not fully address the questions. For instance, when asked about his comfort with the technical requirements, a simple \"Okay\" does not demonstrate understanding or enthusiasm.', '2024-09-11 12:34:09');
INSERT INTO `bot_overall_scores` (`id`, `botInterviewId`, `candidateId`, `resumeId`, `screeningId`, `parameter`, `score`, `feedback`, `created`) VALUES
(513, 128, 4, 521, 125, 'Depth of Knowledge', '5', 'Varun did not provide enough information to assess his depth of knowledge adequately. His responses lacked the detail necessary to showcase his expertise in Java and related technologies.', '2024-09-11 12:34:09'),
(514, 128, 4, 521, 125, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '4', 'Varun did not provide examples of problem-solving, which is critical for the role. He should discuss specific instances where he applied his technical skills to solve complex issues.', '2024-09-11 12:34:09'),
(515, 128, 4, 521, 125, 'Communication Style', '6', 'Varun\'s communication style was polite but lacked the engagement and enthusiasm expected for a senior-level position.', '2024-09-11 12:34:09'),
(516, 128, 4, 521, 125, 'Articulation', '7', 'Varun articulated his words clearly without any slurring or mumbling, which made him easily understandable.', '2024-09-11 12:34:09'),
(517, 128, 4, 521, 125, 'Grammar', '8', 'Varun used correct grammar throughout the interview, which helped in maintaining the professionalism of his responses.', '2024-09-11 12:34:09'),
(518, 128, 4, 521, 125, 'Filler words', '7', 'Varun used minimal filler words, which indicates a level of preparedness and confidence in his speech.', '2024-09-11 12:34:09'),
(519, 128, 4, 521, 125, 'Word repetition', '6', 'There was some repetition in Varun\'s speech, which could be improved by expanding his vocabulary and varying his sentence structure.', '2024-09-11 12:34:09'),
(520, 128, 4, 521, 125, 'Intonation', '5', 'Varun\'s intonation was somewhat monotonous, lacking the variations that would help emphasize key points and convey enthusiasm.', '2024-09-11 12:34:09'),
(521, 129, 4, 512, 120, 'Clarity of Communication', '3', 'Varun\'s responses were clear but extremely brief, lacking the detail needed to effectively communicate his qualifications and experiences relevant to the role. He could improve by elaborating on his answers and providing specific examples.', '2024-09-11 12:44:33'),
(522, 129, 4, 512, 120, 'Relevance of Responses', '2', 'Varun\'s responses did not address the questions in a manner that showcased his suitability for the role. He needs to align his answers more closely with the job requirements and provide relevant examples.', '2024-09-11 12:44:33'),
(523, 129, 4, 512, 120, 'Depth of Knowledge', '2', 'Varun did not demonstrate a depth of knowledge expected for a Business Analyst role. His answers were too brief to assess his understanding thoroughly. He should include more detailed explanations of his skills and experiences.', '2024-09-11 12:44:33'),
(524, 129, 4, 512, 120, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '2', 'Varun did not provide any insight into his problem-solving skills, as he did not answer questions related to specific challenges or scenarios. He should discuss past experiences where he successfully addressed complex problems.', '2024-09-11 12:44:33'),
(525, 129, 4, 512, 120, 'Communication Style', '3', 'While Varun\'s responses were polite, they were too concise and did not engage with the interviewer effectively. He should aim to be more expressive and interactive in his communication.', '2024-09-11 12:44:33'),
(526, 129, 4, 512, 120, 'Articulation', '4', 'Varun articulated his words clearly but failed to use this skill to provide substantive answers. More detailed and articulated responses would better demonstrate his communication skills.', '2024-09-11 12:44:33'),
(527, 129, 4, 512, 120, 'Grammar', '5', 'Varun\'s grammar was adequate, with no significant errors noted in his brief responses. However, more complex and detailed sentences would better showcase his grasp of professional English.', '2024-09-11 12:44:33'),
(528, 129, 4, 512, 120, 'Filler words', '8', 'Varun did not use noticeable filler words, which suggests good control over his speech. However, the brevity of his responses might have contributed to this.', '2024-09-11 12:44:33'),
(529, 129, 4, 512, 120, 'Word repetition', '7', 'There was no significant word repetition in Varun\'s responses, indicating a decent vocabulary range. However, longer responses might reveal more about his verbal skills.', '2024-09-11 12:44:33'),
(530, 129, 4, 512, 120, 'Intonation', '3', 'Due to the minimal interaction, it was challenging to assess Varun\'s use of intonation effectively. More expressive answers would help evaluate this better.', '2024-09-11 12:44:33'),
(531, 130, 4, 526, 130, 'Clarity of Communication', '6', 'Varun communicated clearly but his responses were too brief and lacked the necessary details that could have provided a clearer picture of his capabilities and understanding of the role.', '2024-09-16 12:33:17'),
(532, 130, 4, 526, 130, 'Relevance of Responses', '5', 'Varun’s responses were relevant but lacked depth. For instance, when discussing his comfort with the job responsibilities, he could have elaborated on specific projects or tasks that align with the role\'s demands.', '2024-09-16 12:33:17'),
(533, 130, 4, 526, 130, 'Depth of Knowledge', '4', 'Varun did not demonstrate a strong depth of knowledge in his responses. He should have discussed specific instances where he conducted detailed requirements analysis or led system evaluations.', '2024-09-16 12:33:17'),
(534, 130, 4, 526, 130, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '5', 'Varun did not provide enough information to assess his problem-solving skills effectively. Future responses should include examples of challenges faced and how he addressed them.', '2024-09-16 12:33:17'),
(535, 130, 4, 526, 130, 'Communication Style', '7', 'Varun was polite and cooperative during the interview, maintaining a professional demeanor despite not feeling well.', '2024-09-16 12:33:17'),
(536, 130, 4, 526, 130, 'Articulation', '6', 'Varun articulated his words clearly but could improve by providing more structured and detailed responses.', '2024-09-16 12:33:17'),
(537, 130, 4, 526, 130, 'Grammar', '8', 'Varun used correct grammar throughout the interview, which helped in maintaining the professionalism of the conversation.', '2024-09-16 12:33:17'),
(538, 130, 4, 526, 130, 'Filler words', '7', 'Varun used minimal filler words, which indicates a level of preparedness and confidence, although the content could be improved.', '2024-09-16 12:33:17'),
(539, 130, 4, 526, 130, 'Word repetition', '7', 'Varun did not excessively repeat words, which helped in keeping the communication clear and direct.', '2024-09-16 12:33:17'),
(540, 130, 4, 526, 130, 'Intonation', '6', 'Varun’s intonation was somewhat monotonous. Using varied intonation could help better convey enthusiasm and clarity.', '2024-09-16 12:33:17'),
(541, 133, 74, 528, 131, 'Clarity of Communication', '4', 'Manoj\'s responses were often vague and lacked the precision necessary for clear communication. For instance, his explanation of using Agile methodologies was not articulated clearly enough to demonstrate a thorough understanding or effective communication.', '2024-09-18 20:21:38'),
(542, 133, 74, 528, 131, 'Relevance of Responses', '5', 'Manoj\'s responses sometimes addressed the questions but often missed providing detailed examples or relevant specifics that align with the job\'s requirements. For example, his discussion on Agile methodologies lacked specific examples of how these were applied to drive business results.', '2024-09-18 20:21:38'),
(543, 133, 74, 528, 131, 'Depth of Knowledge', '4', 'Manoj showed basic understanding of his previous roles and tasks but did not demonstrate deep knowledge expected of a Business Analyst, especially in technical areas like SQL database management and advanced Agile practices.', '2024-09-18 20:21:38'),
(544, 133, 74, 528, 131, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '5', 'Manoj provided general descriptions of how he addressed challenges, such as managing dependencies in sprints, but did not detail specific problem-solving strategies or outcomes that would illustrate strong analytical or critical thinking skills.', '2024-09-18 20:21:38'),
(545, 133, 74, 528, 131, 'Communication Style', '5', 'Manoj\'s communication was polite but often lacked the assertiveness and clarity needed in a business analysis role. His responses were sometimes convoluted, making it hard to follow his line of reasoning.', '2024-09-18 20:21:38'),
(546, 133, 74, 528, 131, 'Articulation', '4', 'Manoj\'s articulation was not always clear, with some responses being too general or poorly structured, which could lead to misunderstandings or inefficiencies in a business context.', '2024-09-18 20:21:38'),
(547, 133, 74, 528, 131, 'Grammar', '6', 'While Manoj did not make significant grammatical errors, his sentence structure and word choice sometimes affected the clarity and professionalism of his communication.', '2024-09-18 20:21:38'),
(548, 133, 74, 528, 131, 'Filler words', '6', 'Manoj\'s use of filler words was noticeable but not excessive. Reducing these would help in making his communication more professional and polished.', '2024-09-18 20:21:38'),
(549, 133, 74, 528, 131, 'Word repetition', '7', 'Manoj managed to avoid excessive repetition of words, which helped in keeping his responses relatively engaging.', '2024-09-18 20:21:38'),
(550, 133, 74, 528, 131, 'Intonation', '5', 'Manoj\'s intonation lacked variation, which could sometimes make his responses seem monotonous and less engaging.', '2024-09-18 20:21:38'),
(551, 140, 4, 511, 119, 'Clarity of Communication', '2', 'Varun\'s initial response was clear, but subsequent responses were either in a different language or missing. This inconsistency indicates a need for significant improvement in communication clarity.', '2024-11-07 11:02:04'),
(552, 140, 4, 511, 119, 'Relevance of Responses', '1', 'Varun\'s responses were not relevant to the questions asked, particularly his response in a different language and no answer to a direct question about readiness to proceed.', '2024-11-07 11:02:04'),
(553, 140, 4, 511, 119, 'Depth of Knowledge', 'N/A', 'It was not possible to assess Varun\'s knowledge depth due to the lack of relevant responses to the interview questions.', '2024-11-07 11:02:04'),
(554, 140, 4, 511, 119, 'Problem-Solving Skills', 'N/A', 'Varun did not provide any information that could demonstrate his problem-solving skills.', '2024-11-07 11:02:04'),
(555, 140, 4, 511, 119, 'Communication Style', '2', 'Varun\'s communication style is inconsistent. While he started well, his inability to respond appropriately to straightforward questions is a major concern.', '2024-11-07 11:02:04'),
(556, 140, 4, 511, 119, 'Articulation', '2', 'Varun\'s articulation was poor due to the use of a different language and lack of responses, which does not meet the job\'s communication standards.', '2024-11-07 11:02:04'),
(557, 140, 4, 511, 119, 'Grammar', 'N/A', 'Grammar assessment is not applicable as there were no sufficient English responses to evaluate.', '2024-11-07 11:02:04'),
(558, 140, 4, 511, 119, 'Filler words', 'N/A', 'Not applicable due to insufficient content for evaluation.', '2024-11-07 11:02:04'),
(559, 140, 4, 511, 119, 'Word repetition', 'N/A', 'Not applicable as Varun did not provide enough content to assess word repetition.', '2024-11-07 11:02:04'),
(560, 140, 4, 511, 119, 'Intonation', 'N/A', 'Not applicable due to the lack of verbal responses for evaluation.', '2024-11-07 11:02:04'),
(561, 148, 4, 541, 136, 'Clarity of Communication', '8', 'Varun communicates clearly, making his points concisely and effectively. However, he could enhance his communication by incorporating more specific examples from his past roles that relate directly to the job role.', '2024-11-08 06:43:03'),
(562, 148, 4, 541, 136, 'Relevance of Responses', '7', 'Varun\'s responses generally address the questions asked, but he could improve by tying his answers more directly to the mutual funds industry and the specific responsibilities mentioned in the job description.', '2024-11-08 06:43:03'),
(563, 148, 4, 541, 136, 'Depth of Knowledge', '6', 'While Varun shows a good understanding of business analysis, his responses lack depth in areas specific to mutual funds, which is crucial for the role. He could improve by discussing specific strategies or models used in fund management.', '2024-11-08 06:43:03'),
(564, 148, 4, 541, 136, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '7', 'Varun demonstrates competent problem-solving skills, but examples provided were not directly related to the mutual funds industry. More relevant examples would strengthen his responses.', '2024-11-08 06:43:03'),
(565, 148, 4, 541, 136, 'Communication Style', '8', 'Varun\'s polite and professional demeanor is evident, making him a potentially good fit for a role involving stakeholder communication. However, incorporating more enthusiasm about the industry could enhance his engagement.', '2024-11-08 06:43:03'),
(566, 148, 4, 541, 136, 'Articulation', '8', 'Varun articulates his thoughts well without any noticeable slurring or mumbling. His speech is clear, contributing to effective communication.', '2024-11-08 06:43:03'),
(567, 148, 4, 541, 136, 'Grammar', '9', 'Varun uses correct grammar throughout the interview, which aids in presenting his ideas clearly and professionally.', '2024-11-08 06:43:03'),
(568, 148, 4, 541, 136, 'Filler words', '7', 'Varun occasionally uses filler words, but not excessively. Reducing these would polish his speech further.', '2024-11-08 06:43:03'),
(569, 148, 4, 541, 136, 'Word repetition', '8', 'Varun occasionally repeats words but generally uses a varied vocabulary that keeps the conversation engaging.', '2024-11-08 06:43:03'),
(570, 148, 4, 541, 136, 'Intonation', '7', 'Varun uses intonation effectively to emphasize points, though at times his delivery could use more variation to convey enthusiasm.', '2024-11-08 06:43:03'),
(571, 149, 4, 541, 136, 'Clarity of Communication', '4', 'Varun\'s responses were brief and lacked clarity in conveying his suitability for the role. He should aim to provide more structured and detailed answers, clearly articulating how his background aligns with the job requirements.', '2024-11-08 07:13:11'),
(572, 149, 4, 541, 136, 'Relevance of Responses', '3', 'Varun\'s answers did not adequately address the questions posed, missing opportunities to showcase his qualifications and understanding of the role. He could improve by directly linking his experiences to the specific duties and expectations mentioned in the job description.', '2024-11-08 07:13:11'),
(573, 149, 4, 541, 136, 'Depth of Knowledge', '3', 'Varun did not demonstrate a strong grasp of the mutual funds domain or the specific analytical skills required. He should provide examples of his work in fund performance analysis and regulatory compliance to better align with the role\'s demands.', '2024-11-08 07:13:11'),
(574, 149, 4, 541, 136, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '4', 'There was little evidence of Varun\'s problem-solving skills during the interview. He could enhance his responses by discussing specific challenges he has faced in his career and how he addressed them, particularly in a business analysis context.', '2024-11-08 07:13:11'),
(575, 149, 4, 541, 136, 'Communication Style', '5', 'While Varun was polite, his communication style was too concise and lacked the enthusiasm and professionalism expected for a senior role. He should aim to be more expressive and engaging in his interactions.', '2024-11-08 07:13:11'),
(576, 149, 4, 541, 136, 'Articulation', '5', 'Varun articulated his words clearly but failed to use this clarity to deliver substantial information about his capabilities. He should use his articulation skills to provide more comprehensive and relevant responses.', '2024-11-08 07:13:11'),
(577, 149, 4, 541, 136, 'Grammar', '6', 'Varun\'s grammar was generally correct, but the simplicity of his responses did not allow for a thorough evaluation of his ability to use complex structures effectively. More elaborate responses would provide a better insight into his grammatical skills.', '2024-11-08 07:13:11'),
(578, 149, 4, 541, 136, 'Filler words', '7', 'Varun used minimal filler words, which indicates a level of preparedness and confidence. However, he needs to complement this with more substantial content in his speech.', '2024-11-08 07:13:11'),
(579, 149, 4, 541, 136, 'Word repetition', '6', 'Varun did not show excessive word repetition, but the limited content of his responses makes this metric less relevant. Expanding on his answers would better showcase his vocabulary range.', '2024-11-08 07:13:11'),
(580, 149, 4, 541, 136, 'Intonation', '5', 'Varun\'s intonation was flat, lacking the variation needed to emphasize key points and engage the listener. He could improve by varying his pitch to highlight important details and show enthusiasm for the role.', '2024-11-08 07:13:11'),
(581, 148, 4, 541, 136, 'Clarity of Communication', '8', 'Varun communicated his ideas clearly throughout the interview, maintaining a structured and understandable flow in his responses.', '2024-11-08 07:25:28'),
(582, 148, 4, 541, 136, 'Relevance of Responses', '6', 'While Varun\'s responses were generally on topic, they lacked specific insights into the mutual funds industry, which is crucial for the role he applied for. He could improve by aligning his responses more closely with the job requirements.', '2024-11-08 07:25:28'),
(583, 148, 4, 541, 136, 'Depth of Knowledge', '4', 'Varun\'s responses were surface-level regarding mutual funds and regulatory standards. He should deepen his understanding of financial regulations and mutual fund operations to meet the job\'s demands.', '2024-11-08 07:25:28'),
(584, 148, 4, 541, 136, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '7', 'Varun demonstrated good problem-solving skills, particularly in his approach to business development and client management. However, examples specific to financial challenges or compliance issues were missing.', '2024-11-08 07:25:28'),
(585, 148, 4, 541, 136, 'Communication Style', '8', 'Varun\'s polite and professional demeanor was consistent throughout the interview, which is essential for effective stakeholder communication.', '2024-11-08 07:25:28'),
(586, 148, 4, 541, 136, 'Articulation', '8', 'Varun articulated his thoughts clearly without any noticeable slurring or mumbling, making his responses easy to understand.', '2024-11-08 07:25:28'),
(587, 148, 4, 541, 136, 'Grammar', '7', 'Varun used correct grammar for the most part, contributing to the clarity and professionalism of his communication.', '2024-11-08 07:25:28'),
(588, 148, 4, 541, 136, 'Filler words', '9', 'Varun used very few filler words, which helped maintain the flow and professionalism of his responses.', '2024-11-08 07:25:28'),
(589, 148, 4, 541, 136, 'Word repetition', '8', 'Varun showed a good variety in vocabulary, avoiding excessive repetition of words or phrases.', '2024-11-08 07:25:28'),
(590, 148, 4, 541, 136, 'Intonation', '7', 'Varun used varied intonation to keep the conversation engaging, although there is room for more dynamic expression to convey enthusiasm and confidence.', '2024-11-08 07:25:28'),
(591, 150, 4, 541, 136, 'Clarity of Communication', '8', 'Varun communicated his points clearly. His responses were straightforward and easy to understand, which is crucial for effective communication in business settings.', '2024-11-08 07:29:01'),
(592, 150, 4, 541, 136, 'Relevance of Responses', '6', 'While Varun responded to the questions, he could have aligned his answers more closely with the job requirements. For instance, he did not specifically address his experience with SEC and FINRA regulations, which are critical for the role.', '2024-11-08 07:29:01'),
(593, 150, 4, 541, 136, 'Depth of Knowledge', '5', 'Varun showed a basic understanding of business analysis but did not delve into specifics about mutual funds, which is essential for the role. He could have mentioned specific strategies or models he has worked with in the past.', '2024-11-08 07:29:01'),
(594, 150, 4, 541, 136, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '6', 'Varun did not provide specific examples of problem-solving within the context of mutual funds, which would have been relevant to the role. He could improve by detailing particular challenges he has faced and how he addressed them.', '2024-11-08 07:29:01'),
(595, 150, 4, 541, 136, 'Communication Style', '7', 'Varun\'s communication style was polite and professional, which is suitable for a business analyst role involving stakeholder interaction.', '2024-11-08 07:29:01'),
(596, 150, 4, 541, 136, 'Articulation', '8', 'Varun articulated his thoughts clearly without unnecessary repetition or filler words, which facilitated a smooth conversation flow.', '2024-11-08 07:29:01'),
(597, 150, 4, 541, 136, 'Grammar', '7', 'Varun used correct grammar throughout the interview, which helped in presenting his ideas effectively.', '2024-11-08 07:29:01'),
(598, 150, 4, 541, 136, 'Filler words', '8', 'Varun used minimal filler words, which indicates a confident speaking style.', '2024-11-08 07:29:01'),
(599, 150, 4, 541, 136, 'Word repetition', '7', 'Varun managed to avoid excessive repetition of words, which helped maintain the clarity and effectiveness of his communication.', '2024-11-08 07:29:01'),
(600, 150, 4, 541, 136, 'Intonation', '6', 'Varun\'s intonation was mostly flat, lacking variation to emphasize key points. He could improve by using tone to add emphasis and show enthusiasm for the role.', '2024-11-08 07:29:01'),
(601, 151, 4, 541, 136, 'Clarity of Communication', '7', 'Varun communicated his points clearly. However, to enhance clarity, he could structure his responses more effectively by directly addressing the interviewer\'s questions and providing more detailed examples from his past experience.', '2024-11-08 07:32:41'),
(602, 151, 4, 541, 136, 'Relevance of Responses', '5', 'Some of Varun\'s responses were relevant, but he often failed to directly tie his experience to the specific demands of the Business Analyst role, particularly in mutual funds. He could improve by studying the job description more thoroughly and aligning his experience with the role\'s requirements.', '2024-11-08 07:32:41'),
(603, 151, 4, 541, 136, 'Depth of Knowledge', '4', 'Varun\'s responses lacked the depth expected for someone applying for a senior Business Analyst role. He should enhance his understanding of mutual funds, market trend analysis, and regulatory frameworks to better meet the job criteria.', '2024-11-08 07:32:41'),
(604, 151, 4, 541, 136, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '6', 'Varun showed some ability to address problems, particularly in a sales context. However, he did not demonstrate complex problem-solving skills required for analyzing fund performance or regulatory compliance issues.', '2024-11-08 07:32:41'),
(605, 151, 4, 541, 136, 'Communication Style', '8', 'Varun was polite and maintained a professional demeanor throughout the interview. His friendly tone and respectful manner are suitable for a role involving significant stakeholder interaction.', '2024-11-08 07:32:41'),
(606, 151, 4, 541, 136, 'Articulation', '7', 'Varun articulated his thoughts clearly without much use of filler words or jargon, which made his communication effective.', '2024-11-08 07:32:41'),
(607, 151, 4, 541, 136, 'Grammar', '8', 'Varun used correct grammar during the interview, which helped in presenting his ideas clearly and professionally.', '2024-11-08 07:32:41'),
(608, 151, 4, 541, 136, 'Filler words', '7', 'Varun used minimal filler words, which indicates a confident speaking style.', '2024-11-08 07:32:41'),
(609, 151, 4, 541, 136, 'Word repetition', '6', 'Varun occasionally repeated words, which could be improved by expanding his vocabulary and preparing more thoroughly for the interview.', '2024-11-08 07:32:41'),
(610, 151, 4, 541, 136, 'Intonation', '6', 'Varun\'s intonation was generally good, but he could use more variation to emphasize key points and keep the listener engaged.', '2024-11-08 07:32:41'),
(611, 157, 4, 540, 135, 'Clarity of Communication', '8', 'Varun communicated his points clearly, maintaining a structured flow in his responses. However, he could enhance his clarity by avoiding jargon and explaining his points more succinctly.', '2024-11-20 09:11:15'),
(612, 157, 4, 540, 135, 'Relevance of Responses', '7', 'Varun\'s responses were relevant to the questions asked, aligning well with the job requirements. He could improve by tailoring his responses more closely to the specific needs of Adzip Technologies.', '2024-11-20 09:11:15'),
(613, 157, 4, 540, 135, 'Depth of Knowledge', '6', 'While Varun showed a good understanding of general business analysis, his responses lacked depth in the financial services domain. He could benefit from further education or experience in this area.', '2024-11-20 09:11:15'),
(614, 157, 4, 540, 135, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '7', 'Varun demonstrated problem-solving skills through examples of past challenges. However, providing more specific scenarios relevant to the financial services industry would have strengthened his responses.', '2024-11-20 09:11:15'),
(615, 157, 4, 540, 135, 'Communication Style', '8', 'Varun maintained a polite and professional tone throughout the interview. He could improve by varying his intonation to keep the listener engaged.', '2024-11-20 09:11:15'),
(616, 157, 4, 540, 135, 'Articulation', '8', 'Varun articulated his thoughts well, with minimal use of filler words. He could enhance his articulation by using more varied vocabulary.', '2024-11-20 09:11:15'),
(617, 157, 4, 540, 135, 'Grammar', '9', 'Varun used correct grammar throughout the interview, which helped in conveying his ideas effectively.', '2024-11-20 09:11:15'),
(618, 157, 4, 540, 135, 'Filler words', '8', 'Varun used few filler words, indicating preparedness and confidence. Continued practice in speaking clearly will further reduce filler words.', '2024-11-20 09:11:15'),
(619, 157, 4, 540, 135, 'Word repetition', '7', 'Varun occasionally repeated words, which can detract from the impact of his responses. Conscious effort to use synonyms could improve his verbal expression.', '2024-11-20 09:11:15'),
(620, 157, 4, 540, 135, 'Intonation', '7', 'Varun\'s intonation was mostly flat, with little variation to emphasize key points. Practicing intonation variations could make his speech more engaging.', '2024-11-20 09:11:15'),
(621, 158, 134, 564, 144, 'Clarity of Communication', '6', 'Swami\'s communication was understandable but lacked the clarity and professionalism expected at this level. He could improve by structuring his responses more logically and focusing on clear articulation.', '2024-11-20 17:43:42'),
(622, 158, 134, 564, 144, 'Relevance of Responses', '5', 'Swami\'s responses addressed the questions but often missed the depth and specificity required to fully satisfy the inquiry. He should aim to align his answers more closely with the job requirements by citing specific experiences and methodologies.', '2024-11-20 17:43:42'),
(623, 158, 134, 564, 144, 'Depth of Knowledge', '4', 'Swami demonstrated basic understanding but did not show the depth of knowledge expected for a business analyst role. He could enhance his responses by studying current best practices in business analysis and incorporating these into his answers.', '2024-11-20 17:43:42'),
(624, 158, 134, 564, 144, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '5', 'Swami mentioned problem-solving in various contexts but did not provide compelling examples of his problem-solving in action. He should provide clear instances where he successfully identified and resolved issues.', '2024-11-20 17:43:42'),
(625, 158, 134, 564, 144, 'Communication Style', '6', 'Swami\'s style was informal and somewhat disjointed, which could be improved by practicing more formal and structured communication, particularly in a professional interview setting.', '2024-11-20 17:43:42'),
(626, 158, 134, 564, 144, 'Articulation', '6', 'Swami\'s articulation was adequate but could be enhanced by focusing on clearer pronunciation and avoiding filler words that detract from the professionalism of his speech.', '2024-11-20 17:43:42'),
(627, 158, 134, 564, 144, 'Grammar', '7', 'Swami\'s grammar was generally correct, though there were occasional lapses in sentence structure that could be refined for better clarity and impact.', '2024-11-20 17:43:42'),
(628, 158, 134, 564, 144, 'Filler words', '7', 'Swami used some filler words, but they were not overly distracting. Continued awareness and practice could help in reducing these further.', '2024-11-20 17:43:42'),
(629, 158, 134, 564, 144, 'Word repetition', '6', 'Swami occasionally repeated words unnecessarily. He could benefit from expanding his vocabulary and varying his language to avoid repetition.', '2024-11-20 17:43:42'),
(630, 158, 134, 564, 144, 'Intonation', '6', 'Swami\'s intonation was somewhat monotonous. Varying his pitch and tone could help make his communication more engaging and dynamic.', '2024-11-20 17:43:42'),
(631, 159, 134, 566, 144, 'Clarity of Communication', '6', 'Swami was able to communicate without significant issues, but his responses sometimes lacked the precision and clarity expected for the role. He could improve by structuring his thoughts more coherently and focusing on providing concise and relevant information.', '2024-11-22 06:47:04'),
(632, 159, 134, 566, 144, 'Relevance of Responses', '4', 'Swami\'s responses often did not directly address the questions or fully align with the job requirements. He should focus on understanding the question thoroughly and tailoring his answers to demonstrate how his experience and skills directly relate to the role.', '2024-11-22 06:47:04'),
(633, 159, 134, 566, 144, 'Depth of Knowledge', '5', 'Swami showed a basic understanding of some tools and methodologies relevant to the business analyst role. However, he needs to deepen his knowledge, particularly in areas directly related to business analysis tasks such as developing functional specifications and conducting user acceptance testing.', '2024-11-22 06:47:04'),
(634, 159, 134, 566, 144, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '5', 'Swami mentioned using business analytic techniques in a project, but did not provide detailed examples of how he applied these skills to solve specific problems. He could improve by outlining clear instances where he used his problem-solving skills to achieve project objectives.', '2024-11-22 06:47:04'),
(635, 159, 134, 566, 144, 'Communication Style', '6', 'Swami\'s communication style was polite and he was responsive during the interview. However, he could enhance his engagement by showing more enthusiasm and interest in the discussion, which would help in making a positive impression in professional settings.', '2024-11-22 06:47:04'),
(636, 159, 134, 566, 144, 'Articulation', '6', 'Swami articulated his words clearly most of the time but occasionally used filler words and had slight issues with word repetition. Practicing speaking clearly and confidently would benefit his overall articulation.', '2024-11-22 06:47:04'),
(637, 159, 134, 566, 144, 'Grammar', '7', 'Swami\'s use of grammar was generally good, with minor errors. Continued attention to grammatical precision in professional communication would be beneficial.', '2024-11-22 06:47:04'),
(638, 159, 134, 566, 144, 'Filler words', '7', 'Swami used some filler words during his responses, which could be reduced to enhance the professionalism of his communication.', '2024-11-22 06:47:04'),
(639, 159, 134, 566, 144, 'Word repetition', '6', 'There was noticeable repetition in Swami\'s speech, which could be distracting and indicated a limited vocabulary. Expanding his vocabulary and practicing varied word use could help improve this aspect.', '2024-11-22 06:47:04'),
(640, 159, 134, 566, 144, 'Intonation', '6', 'Swami\'s intonation was somewhat monotonous at times, which could affect the listener\'s engagement. Working on varying pitch and tone to emphasize key points could make his communication more effective.', '2024-11-22 06:47:04'),
(641, 160, 4, 541, 136, 'Clarity of Communication', '6', 'Varun communicated in a clear and understandable manner, but his responses were too brief and lacked the elaboration needed to fully convey his thoughts and qualifications for the role.', '2024-12-02 19:37:34'),
(642, 160, 4, 541, 136, 'Relevance of Responses', '4', 'Varun\'s answers did not fully address the questions or the specifics of the role. He could improve by providing more detailed examples that relate directly to the job responsibilities and requirements.', '2024-12-02 19:37:34'),
(643, 160, 4, 541, 136, 'Depth of Knowledge', '5', 'Varun\'s responses suggest a basic understanding of the required knowledge areas but lack depth. He should aim to demonstrate a stronger grasp of business analysis and mutual funds domain knowledge.', '2024-12-02 19:37:34'),
(644, 160, 4, 541, 136, 'Problem-Solving Skills', '5', 'Varun did not provide enough information to assess his problem-solving skills effectively. Future responses should include specific examples of how he has addressed challenges in past roles.', '2024-12-02 19:37:34'),
(645, 160, 4, 541, 136, 'Communication Style', '6', 'While polite and professional, Varun\'s communication style was somewhat passive. He could benefit from being more engaging and dynamic in his interactions.', '2024-12-02 19:37:34'),
(646, 160, 4, 541, 136, 'Articulation', '6', 'Varun spoke clearly but could improve the effectiveness of his communication by being more descriptive and less terse in his responses.', '2024-12-02 19:37:34'),
(647, 160, 4, 541, 136, 'Grammar', '8', 'Varun used correct grammar throughout the interview, which helped maintain the professionalism of his responses.', '2024-12-02 19:37:34'),
(648, 160, 4, 541, 136, 'Filler words', '7', 'Varun used minimal filler words, which contributed to the clarity of his communication.', '2024-12-02 19:37:34'),
(649, 160, 4, 541, 136, 'Word repetition', '7', 'Varun did not excessively repeat words, which helped keep his responses concise and to the point.', '2024-12-02 19:37:34'),
(650, 160, 4, 541, 136, 'Intonation', '5', 'Varun\'s intonation was somewhat flat, lacking the variation needed to fully engage the interviewer and express enthusiasm for the role.', '2024-12-02 19:37:34');

-- --------------------------------------------------------

--
